{ "kind": "framework", "value": "scenario-analysis", "collectionKey": "slides:framework:scenario-analysis:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 159, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 7, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-41de656a4417", "docSlug": "a13515c298f3fbf2", "documentTitle": "ALTAGAMMA 2018 WORLDWIDE LUXURY MARKET MONITOR", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "Bain", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "scenario_analysis", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a bar chart to show market size evolution and a text-based matrix to detail regional impacts under two scenarios.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 2, "evidence": "The slide explicitly compares 'Better' and 'Realistic' scenarios for market growth. · Two named scenarios 'Better' and 'Realistic' with assumption matrix.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-41de656a4417/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-41de656a4417", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-41de656a4417#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 4, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b310-cb334407de8e", "evidence": "p7 explicitly forks Better vs Realistic 2023; p8 contrasts crises; p9 projects 2030.", "position": 2, "objective": "Project personal luxury through 2023 scenarios into 2030", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 78, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e5-47ac081726a9", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Global luxury sizing, recovery vs 2019, scenarios to 2030.", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 9, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e5-5a02795721a6", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Market sizing and recovery facts laid out.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-ed07d758b8cd", "docSlug": "3f41fcbc714f036c", "documentTitle": "Reinforcing the New South Wales Southern Shared Network (HumeLink) PADR – EY Market Modelling", "authorId": "EY", "authorName": "EY", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.779, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "scenario_analysis", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The table uses AEMO ISP 2019-20 as the primary data source for scenario modeling.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 2, "evidence": "Four AEMO scenarios (Fast/Central/Step/Slow) compared across input drivers. · The slide explicitly compares four distinct future scenarios based on varying input parameters.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-ed07d758b8cd/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-ed07d758b8cd", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-ed07d758b8cd#slide-5", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 4, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019de8bb-2d2d-77ac-986a-a1c8f30cb230", "evidence": "Slides decompose the model into methodology, scenarios, supply, renewable, demand, transmission, and Snowy 2.0 — distinct, additive coverage.", "position": 1, "objective": "Build up the market model component by component", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 75, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 4, "beatId": "019de8bb-2c1a-764d-8cba-accec92df303", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology, scenario assumptions, supply/demand/transmission/Snowy inputs frame the model.", "position": 1, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 10, "from": 4, "beatId": "019de8bb-2cc7-75af-be23-eefbaf007ff2", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology and input data slides establish the 'what'.", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 166, "slideType": "scenario_analysis", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a scenario-based comparison framework to evaluate operational scaling options.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide presents seven distinct scenarios with varying operational parameters and costs.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/166", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-166", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 183, "from": 164, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-40d41af340bf", "evidence": "20 small-multiples 'Skaleringsoversigt' pages showing 5-7 scenarios per capacity (Thetis, EH101, IKK, Leopard, Absalon, etc.).", "position": 24, "objective": "Show up/down scenarios for each of the 15 operative capacities", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 90, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 167, "slideType": "scenario_analysis", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide compares SAR (Search and Rescue) and TTT (Tactical Troop Transport) capabilities across five scenarios.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly compares five distinct operational scenarios for helicopter deployment.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/167", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-167", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 183, "from": 164, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-40d41af340bf", "evidence": "20 small-multiples 'Skaleringsoversigt' pages showing 5-7 scenarios per capacity (Thetis, EH101, IKK, Leopard, Absalon, etc.).", "position": 24, "objective": "Show up/down scenarios for each of the 15 operative capacities", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 90, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 169, "slideType": "scenario_analysis", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a scenario-based comparison framework to evaluate readiness levels (7, 30, 180, 360 days) against cost and operational constraints.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly compares four distinct scenarios (1-4) based on readiness levels and their associated operational and financial impacts.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/169", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-169", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 183, "from": 164, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-40d41af340bf", "evidence": "20 small-multiples 'Skaleringsoversigt' pages showing 5-7 scenarios per capacity (Thetis, EH101, IKK, Leopard, Absalon, etc.).", "position": 24, "objective": "Show up/down scenarios for each of the 15 operative capacities", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 90, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 171, "slideType": "scenario_analysis", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a table to compare four distinct operational scenarios for the Absalon-class ships, focusing on deployment days, crew requirements, and costs.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly compares four different operational scenarios for the Absalon-class ships.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/171", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-171", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 183, "from": 164, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-40d41af340bf", "evidence": "20 small-multiples 'Skaleringsoversigt' pages showing 5-7 scenarios per capacity (Thetis, EH101, IKK, Leopard, Absalon, etc.).", "position": 24, "objective": "Show up/down scenarios for each of the 15 operative capacities", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 90, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 175, "slideType": "scenario_analysis", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide compares four readiness scenarios (1-4) based on deployment notice periods (7, 30, 180, 360 days) and their associated cost and operational impacts.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly compares four distinct readiness scenarios (1-4) with varying parameters.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/175", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-175", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 183, "from": 164, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-40d41af340bf", "evidence": "20 small-multiples 'Skaleringsoversigt' pages showing 5-7 scenarios per capacity (Thetis, EH101, IKK, Leopard, Absalon, etc.).", "position": 24, "objective": "Show up/down scenarios for each of the 15 operative capacities", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 90, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 176, "slideType": "scenario_analysis", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The table compares 6 scenarios based on operational days, crew size, and hull count, with associated financial and temporal implications.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Table comparing 6 distinct operational scenarios with varying inputs and outcomes.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/176", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-176", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 183, "from": 164, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-40d41af340bf", "evidence": "20 small-multiples 'Skaleringsoversigt' pages showing 5-7 scenarios per capacity (Thetis, EH101, IKK, Leopard, Absalon, etc.).", "position": 24, "objective": "Show up/down scenarios for each of the 15 operative capacities", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 90, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 177, "slideType": "scenario_analysis", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide compares three scenarios for vessel deployment, showing trade-offs between operational days, crew/hull requirements, and costs.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly compares three distinct operational scenarios with different inputs and outcomes.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/177", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-177", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 183, "from": 164, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-40d41af340bf", "evidence": "20 small-multiples 'Skaleringsoversigt' pages showing 5-7 scenarios per capacity (Thetis, EH101, IKK, Leopard, Absalon, etc.).", "position": 24, "objective": "Show up/down scenarios for each of the 15 operative capacities", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 90, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 179, "slideType": "scenario_analysis", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide compares five scenarios for Hercules aircraft usage, ranging from reduced activity to full operational capacity, including cost drivers like flight hours, crew, and aircraft count.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide presents five distinct operational scenarios with varying inputs and financial outcomes.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/179", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-179", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 183, "from": 164, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-40d41af340bf", "evidence": "20 small-multiples 'Skaleringsoversigt' pages showing 5-7 scenarios per capacity (Thetis, EH101, IKK, Leopard, Absalon, etc.).", "position": 24, "objective": "Show up/down scenarios for each of the 15 operative capacities", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 90, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 181, "slideType": "scenario_analysis", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide is redacted; the table structure is visible but the content is blacked out. Includes a disclaimer note at the bottom.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Table structure comparing 5 scenarios across multiple variables", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/181", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-181", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 183, "from": 164, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-40d41af340bf", "evidence": "20 small-multiples 'Skaleringsoversigt' pages showing 5-7 scenarios per capacity (Thetis, EH101, IKK, Leopard, Absalon, etc.).", "position": 24, "objective": "Show up/down scenarios for each of the 15 operative capacities", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 90, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 87, "slideType": "scenario_analysis", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a table to map task types to headcount, then groups them into two distinct scenarios for outsourcing strategy.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly defines two scenarios for task management and outsourcing.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/87", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-87", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 97, "from": 84, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-52e9a3c46a82", "evidence": "Scenario 1 (drift+vedl, fravalgt) vs scenario 2 (udvikling, 3 sub-scenarios).", "position": 4, "objective": "Compare insourcing scenarios for IT development", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 88, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 165, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-30a6df91c9fe", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Baselines, segmentations, current-state diagnoses dominate first half.", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 90, "slideType": "scenario_analysis", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "Includes a waterfall chart for cost baseline and a scenario comparison table for recruitment, cost, and revenue.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly structures the analysis into three scenarios (A, B, C) to evaluate outcomes.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/90", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-90", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 97, "from": 84, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-52e9a3c46a82", "evidence": "Scenario 1 (drift+vedl, fravalgt) vs scenario 2 (udvikling, 3 sub-scenarios).", "position": 4, "objective": "Compare insourcing scenarios for IT development", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 88, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 165, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-30a6df91c9fe", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Baselines, segmentations, current-state diagnoses dominate first half.", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 93, "slideType": "recommendation", "function": "recommend", "notes": "The slide uses a comparison table to highlight Scenario B, with a callout box explaining the rationale and a footer note addressing the primary risk.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Comparison of scenarios A, B, and C", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/93", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-93", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 97, "from": 84, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-52e9a3c46a82", "evidence": "Scenario 1 (drift+vedl, fravalgt) vs scenario 2 (udvikling, 3 sub-scenarios).", "position": 4, "objective": "Compare insourcing scenarios for IT development", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 88, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 165, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-30a6df91c9fe", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Baselines, segmentations, current-state diagnoses dominate first half.", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 283, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "Includes a waterfall chart for travel classification and a scenario analysis table for potential savings.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Table showing three levels of ambition and corresponding financial impact", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/283", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-283", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 229, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-6a47af522484", "evidence": "538 mio. addresserbar -> 6 delanalyser -> centralisation, in-sourcing, VTC, hotel, kontorartikler, TV, SIM, kursus.", "position": 10, "objective": "MECE breakdown of Ovrig Drift baseline into six delanalyser plus sub-initiatives", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 365, "from": 166, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-37e90642ab06", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Potentialeestimater, benchmark gaps, comparison tables.", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fc7f78e76a18", "docSlug": "25cda12aac1298b5", "documentTitle": "Commercial payments, reinvented Your blueprint for accelerating payments revenue growth", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 41, "slideType": "appendix_methodology", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide outlines data sources (GlobalData, World Bank, ECB, Juniper Research) and the combination of bottom-up/top-down modeling and scenario analysis.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Mentions using scenario analysis to estimate future opportunity", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fc7f78e76a18/41", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fc7f78e76a18", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fc7f78e76a18#slide-41", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e", "docSlug": "07cb2674ed07a20d", "documentTitle": "January Macro Brief Special edition: 2024 outlook and top 10 macro trends", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "scenario_analysis", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The 'Weakflation' scenario is highlighted as the 'Most likely' base case.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Comparison of three distinct economic outcomes with drivers and implications.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 13, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d36-e01df46fc288", "evidence": "p13–16 each present 3 scenarios (Soft landing/Weakflation/Mild recession etc.) with one tagged 'Most likely'.", "position": 3, "objective": "Lay out per-region scenarios and identify the most-likely path", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 88, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-ac20a70ee510", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Exec summary + economic outlook data with country PMIs, scenarios", "position": 1, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 17, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-bcf9311edd9b", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Sluggish growth, structural forces, scenario risks per region", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e", "docSlug": "07cb2674ed07a20d", "documentTitle": "January Macro Brief Special edition: 2024 outlook and top 10 macro trends", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "scenario_analysis", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a table structure to compare scenarios across three dimensions: Description, Key scenario drivers and assumptions, and Corporate implications.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Table comparing three distinct economic scenarios with drivers and implications.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 13, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d36-e01df46fc288", "evidence": "p13–16 each present 3 scenarios (Soft landing/Weakflation/Mild recession etc.) with one tagged 'Most likely'.", "position": 3, "objective": "Lay out per-region scenarios and identify the most-likely path", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 88, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-ac20a70ee510", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Exec summary + economic outlook data with country PMIs, scenarios", "position": 1, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 17, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-bcf9311edd9b", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Sluggish growth, structural forces, scenario risks per region", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e", "docSlug": "07cb2674ed07a20d", "documentTitle": "January Macro Brief Special edition: 2024 outlook and top 10 macro trends", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "scenario_analysis", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The 'Sluggish recovery' scenario is highlighted as the 'Most likely' outcome.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly compares three distinct economic scenarios with drivers and implications.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e#slide-15", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 13, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d36-e01df46fc288", "evidence": "p13–16 each present 3 scenarios (Soft landing/Weakflation/Mild recession etc.) with one tagged 'Most likely'.", "position": 3, "objective": "Lay out per-region scenarios and identify the most-likely path", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 88, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-ac20a70ee510", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Exec summary + economic outlook data with country PMIs, scenarios", "position": 1, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 17, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-bcf9311edd9b", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Sluggish growth, structural forces, scenario risks per region", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e", "docSlug": "07cb2674ed07a20d", "documentTitle": "January Macro Brief Special edition: 2024 outlook and top 10 macro trends", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "scenario_analysis", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The 'Deceleration to new normal' scenario is highlighted as the 'Most likely' base case.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Comparison of three distinct economic outcomes for China", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e#slide-16", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 13, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d36-e01df46fc288", "evidence": "p13–16 each present 3 scenarios (Soft landing/Weakflation/Mild recession etc.) with one tagged 'Most likely'.", "position": 3, "objective": "Lay out per-region scenarios and identify the most-likely path", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 88, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-ac20a70ee510", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Exec summary + economic outlook data with country PMIs, scenarios", "position": 1, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 17, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-bcf9311edd9b", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Sluggish growth, structural forces, scenario risks per region", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-50c3a80593bc", "docSlug": "80cd99a578787b77", "documentTitle": "Ready for take-off Why niche markets are the next big thing", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 32, "slideType": "appendix_methodology", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "This slide details the assumptions and approach for three specific market value models.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Use of scenario projections for market opportunities", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-50c3a80593bc/32", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-50c3a80593bc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-50c3a80593bc#slide-32", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-9da085bdac1f", "docSlug": "52e21d70f3295259", "documentTitle": "True-Luxury Global Consumer Insights 9th Edition", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "scenario_analysis", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a bar chart to show 2022 vs 2023F, with callouts indicating the percentage growth ranges for the two scenarios.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly defines 'Optimistic' and 'Base' scenarios for market growth.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-9da085bdac1f/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-9da085bdac1f", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-9da085bdac1f#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 5, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-28a7f3c9d586", "evidence": "Total market growth (p5) -> scenarios (p6) -> geography (p7) -> top-of-pyramid (p8).", "position": 1, "objective": "Zoom from total luxury market to wealthiest-segment focus", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 78, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e2-fac699524ddb", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Study intro + 'Futureproof' market thriving and pyramid analysis", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 17, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-0d57d0183315", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Market sizing, growth, trends — the data layer", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-7c7f95dc2833", "docSlug": "717a4a3b9695902b", "documentTitle": "US Natural Gas Future", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 2, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "The slide provides a narrative summary of the US natural gas sector's current state and future outlook.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Mentions five future scenarios (Blue Rush, America First, etc.) identified by BCG.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-7c7f95dc2833/2", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-7c7f95dc2833", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-7c7f95dc2833#slide-2", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 4, "from": 2, "name": "Aha Moment", "slug": "03-aha-moment", "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-6cf827d86df9", "evidence": "Setup p2-3 builds the question; exec summary p4 delivers BCG's five-scenario insight.", "position": 1, "objective": "Frame the question and reveal BCG's headline finding (no peak in 10 years)", "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight", "confidence": 75, "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-47c492dd7fd5", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Industry context, superpower rise, demand trifecta charts (p5-9).", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-7c7f95dc2833", "docSlug": "717a4a3b9695902b", "documentTitle": "US Natural Gas Future", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "scenario_analysis", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide combines a diagnostic overview of industry challenges with a scenario-based framework for future outlooks.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly outlines 'Five possible futures' for the industry.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-7c7f95dc2833/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-7c7f95dc2833", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-7c7f95dc2833#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 10, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-77dc71d9f4e4", "evidence": "Five named scenarios (Blue Rush, America First, Export Rush, Slow Burn, Energy Insecurity) plus three constraint pillars.", "position": 3, "objective": "Enumerate five futures and the constraints that decide which one occurs", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 90, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-4b24bc58ec38", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Five scenarios + three constraints framing market strain (p10-11).", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 11, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-5fe582f382c2", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Constraints + scenario forecasts spell out implications.", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }