{ "kind": "framework", "value": "risk-mitigation-matrix", "collectionKey": "slides:framework:risk-mitigation-matrix:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 6, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 1, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-2a26d35cbd8f", "docSlug": "6cb6906ccd008ecf", "documentTitle": "2019 Global Treasury Benchmarking", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.775, "pageNumber": 30, "slideType": "risk_register", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a table format to map specific risks to 'Our take' (mitigation strategies) and includes a bar chart for context.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Four-row table mapping Risk to Our take with PwC CEO Survey chart", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-2a26d35cbd8f/30", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-2a26d35cbd8f", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-2a26d35cbd8f#slide-30", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 28, "name": "Aha Moment", "slug": "03-aha-moment", "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments", "matchId": "019de971-02b9-75c9-91ff-ddef89478a9f", "evidence": "p29 risk types -> p30 maps CEO threats to treasury implications -> p31 commodity collaboration gap", "position": 7, "objective": "Diagnose risk-monitoring gap and link it to CEO-level external threats", "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight", "confidence": 65, "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de971-0121-72c2-8e7d-3ec771855007", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Cash/banking and financial-risk benchmarks back recommendations", "position": 4, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 33, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de971-01cb-76b0-9041-0db3601859ac", "arcName": "The Transformation Tale", "arcSlug": "transformation-tale", "beatName": "The Bridge", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Cash/banking, risk, tax recommendations and partner sign-off", "position": 3, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019de50e-5cec-7165-bbab-81de55946f7f", "docSlug": "b13ed5a40e81a57bc4df9e138316840e", "documentTitle": "Forethought | Other Presentation Deck | 11 slides", "authorId": "forethought", "authorName": "Christopher Columbus", "documentKindSlug": "deck", "documentKindLabel": "Deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "investor_relations", "sourceTypeLabel": "Investor relations", "presentationDate": "1987-04-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294673, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "other", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a retro, pixelated aesthetic. It maps specific threats to coping mechanisms.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide maps specific risks to corresponding mitigation strategies in a structured table format.", "slideHref": "/slides/019de50e-5cec-7165-bbab-81de55946f7f/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019de50e-5cec-7165-bbab-81de55946f7f", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de50e-5cec-7165-bbab-81de55946f7f#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 2, "name": "Why Now", "slug": "15-why-now", "bestFor": "Sales pitches, fundraising, requesting immediate budget approval", "matchId": "f28354b7-fd7b-4a96-8c16-c263855b6d31", "evidence": "The document presents a clear problem statement and a compelling solution, making the case for why now is the right time to explore a new trade route.", "position": 0, "objective": "Why is now the right time to explore a new trade route?", "structure": "The Context (Trends) -> The Trigger Event -> The Window of Opportunity", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Create temporal urgency by proving that the window of opportunity is opening or closing" }, { "to": 10, "from": 2, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "a151feb2-00a2-4dde-9883-d260bff94758", "evidence": "The document implies that not exploring a new trade route will result in missed opportunities and continued reliance on lengthy and costly existing routes.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the costs of not exploring a new trade route?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51", "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435", "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.401, "pageNumber": 64, "slideType": "risk_register", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide uses a checkmark matrix to show the relationship between mitigation tools and identified risks.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Matrix mapping tools to risks", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/64", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-64", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 64, "from": 60, "name": "Pre Mortem", "slug": "19-pre-mortem", "bestFor": "Project kick-offs, risk management, building trust with skeptical stakeholders", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-110fb9622709", "evidence": "p61-63 'continued success requires NYCHA addresses ongoing challenges and risks (I-III/III)'.", "position": 11, "objective": "Surface ongoing risks/challenges and the structures put in place to address them", "structure": "The Future Disaster (Hypothetical) -> What Went Wrong -> The Prevention Plan", "confidence": 85, "description": "Build trust by anticipating failure modes before they happen and solving them in advance" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 68, "from": 50, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-f39a4bb1bd76", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Implementation plan, EPMO, risks, progress to date — closes with 'continued commitment'.", "position": 5, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-59126082c3bc", "docSlug": "da8c5afac80dbcb5", "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.401, "pageNumber": 64, "slideType": "risk_register", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide uses a checkmark matrix to show the relationship between mitigation tools and identified risks.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Matrix mapping tools to risks", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-59126082c3bc/64", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-59126082c3bc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-59126082c3bc#slide-64", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 112, "from": 49, "beatId": "55d037b9-055e-4f1b-9888-c8e5fc1448e7", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Pages 49-112 outline the expected impact and next steps for implementation", "position": 4, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-3b5110685e9e", "docSlug": "e699e84a98121dc2", "documentTitle": "Resilient supply chains for raw materials", "authorId": "RolandBerger", "authorName": "Roland Berger", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "risk_register", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide combines a qualitative suitability matrix for risk mitigation with a quantitative analysis of supply chain security.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Matrix mapping risk types to mitigation strategies based on suitability and time frame", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-3b5110685e9e/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-3b5110685e9e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-3b5110685e9e#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 8, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "8071947a-a33c-4a10-a88f-40485976540c", "evidence": "The need for resilient supply chains and the risks of not doing so are discussed in pages 8-11.", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the consequences of not securing critical value chains?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 11, "from": 10, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "3f1f9889-b332-48ad-900f-eb45b2440bb7", "evidence": "The risk register provides a breakdown of risks and their management in pages 10-11.", "position": 1, "objective": "How can risks be categorized and managed?", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 8, "beatId": "b0cee13b-4580-4264-9eea-e2aaa0fa924b", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "The recommendations for risk containment are presented in pages 8-10.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 11, "from": 10, "beatId": "4f329046-058f-4814-90e4-56a9cab227e2", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The risk register and key messages provide evidence and proof of the solution approach in pages 10-11.", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-605c-759f-b6b2-8947d4e61e29", "docSlug": "bi-299410752528b9b4", "documentTitle": "See pitch deck music data startup Chartmetric used to raise $2 million", "authorId": "Pitchdecks", "authorName": "Chartmetric", "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck", "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.779, "pageNumber": 21, "slideType": "competitive_analysis", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a two-column layout to map specific risks to strategic mitigations.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly maps risks to mitigants in a structured table format.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-605c-759f-b6b2-8947d4e61e29/21", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-605c-759f-b6b2-8947d4e61e29", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-605c-759f-b6b2-8947d4e61e29#slide-21", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 21, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "d506ebff-ab57-4357-8172-b33adacfd3eb", "evidence": "The loop highlights risks and mitigants.", "position": 2, "objective": "What are the risks of not using Chartmetric?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }