{ "kind": "framework", "value": "quantify-impact", "collectionKey": "slides:framework:quantify-impact:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 7, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 1, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5b-00929d11a886", "docSlug": "ab253afb16771f06", "documentTitle": "529 cpe", "authorId": "JPMorgan", "authorName": "J.P. Morgan", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "equity_research", "sourceTypeLabel": "Equity research", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.308, "pageNumber": 26, "slideType": "financial_analysis", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "Includes J.P. Morgan Asset Management branding and detailed methodology footnotes.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Shows the negative financial impact of withdrawing retirement funds for college.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5b-00929d11a886/26", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5b-00929d11a886", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5b-00929d11a886#slide-26", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 21, "beatId": "09ed0643-9787-4b27-a352-54abbeb745a7", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence", "beatSlug": "evidence", "evidence": "Data tables and financial analysis supporting 529 plans", "position": 4, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "docSlug": "4055ca7b5fd4017d", "documentTitle": "AUTOMOTIVE –OES", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 17, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a 100% stacked bar chart format to show the distribution of impact severity across five categories for two industry segments.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Quantifies business risks associated with organizational failure", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437/17", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437#slide-17", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 17, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "019de0c4-9510-7124-82ef-7eb4572980c2", "evidence": "p17 sizes loss bands (>5% cost/talent), p18 sizes incremental RODI from closing the same deficits.", "position": 5, "objective": "Quantify what's lost by inaction vs gained by closing deficits", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 88, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 8, "beatId": "019de0c4-9356-77a3-8ed2-0eb71e802e2f", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Champions vs Cadets gap, funding/alignment roadblocks, cost of inaction", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 18, "from": 14, "beatId": "019de0c4-9431-756b-86ed-e47000952195", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "diagnosis of deficits and cost vs gain of acting", "position": 2, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 25, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide details the baseline calculation (1.349 billion DKK), the 3% potential savings rate, and the resulting 45 million DKK impact. It also notes that geographic impact is not relevant.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly calculates potential savings based on a baseline and a percentage benchmark.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/25", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-25", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 9, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-45efc998ae59", "evidence": "Problem statement -> segmentation -> diagnosis -> IPT recommendation -> 45 mio. kr. potentiale -> implementation plan.", "position": 1, "objective": "Frame procurement-coordination problem and recommend Integrated Project Teams", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 85, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 165, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-30a6df91c9fe", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Baselines, segmentations, current-state diagnoses dominate first half.", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-f222b31ea833", "docSlug": "0e5e77bd2a5ace9c", "documentTitle": "Hydrogen applications and business models", "authorId": "Kearney", "authorName": "Kearney", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 64, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart uses a waterfall-style logic to show CO2 breakdown (released, avoided, extra captured) across different CCS scenarios.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide quantifies the cost (LCOH) and environmental (CO2) impact of CCS implementation.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-f222b31ea833/64", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-f222b31ea833", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-f222b31ea833#slide-64", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 74, "from": 41, "beatId": "f9ea891c-c87e-40cc-b162-7e1b241a710e", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "The document outlines potential solutions and approaches for hydrogen applications and business models.", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-093f3fd1ecfe", "docSlug": "5ee5a9db2750184a", "documentTitle": "Lebanon Economic Vision", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 929, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a benchmark-based growth projection to estimate economic impact.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide calculates the incremental impact of a specific growth rate on student numbers and revenue.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-093f3fd1ecfe/929", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-093f3fd1ecfe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-093f3fd1ecfe#slide-929", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2", "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 200, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a bottom-up calculation based on survey data and current intake numbers to estimate the impact of improved account management.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide calculates the specific numerical impact of a proposed strategic initiative.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/200", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-200", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 267, "from": 161, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-5934a57a4387", "evidence": "Repeated triplet pattern: e.g., p.166/167/168, p.178/179/180, p.188/189", "position": 18, "objective": "For each initiative, build up Overview → Estimated Impact → Resource Requirements", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 82, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "docSlug": "78bb0ae4454c2778", "documentTitle": "Socio-economic case for deepening solar PV deployment in Nigeria", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 67, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a clear problem-solution structure, contrasting the current reliance on expensive, dangerous generators with the benefits of solar mini-grids.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly links a problem (generator reliance) to quantitative economic outcomes (sales/GDP uplift).", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb/67", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb#slide-67", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 76, "from": 66, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-9b29295c56f0", "evidence": "$4-5bn lost annually (p71), 10% of fires (p72); solar markets see 30-40% revenue lift (p74) yields $1-2bn GDP uplift", "position": 9, "objective": "Trade dimension: MSME income lift from solar", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 84, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 76, "from": 21, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-8370f154005a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Health, Education, Food security, Environment, Trade dimension chapters", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 76, "from": 21, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-8ddb0b48fe56", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "Lost ANC coverage, study hours, food, MSME revenue, GHG emissions piled up", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }