{
  "kind": "framework",
  "value": "productivity-frontier",
  "collectionKey": "slides:framework:productivity-frontier:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 1,
  "page": 1,
  "pageSize": 24,
  "pageCount": 1,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019f6b8f-3a40-7700-bc89-ea71d781ff11",
      "docSlug": "jarvis-mckinsey-us-productivity-growth-the-company-and-sector-story",
      "documentTitle": "McKinsey US Productivity Growth The Company and Sector Story",
      "authorId": "mckinsey-us-productivity-growth-the-company-and-sector-story",
      "authorName": null,
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": null,
      "aspectRatio": null,
      "pageNumber": 12,
      "slideType": "initiative_list",
      "function": "prioritize",
      "notes": "The slide uses a bubble chart format to represent initiatives. The color coding (grey vs orange) is not explicitly defined in a legend, but the size of the bubbles represents relative impact.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Closing the gap vs Pushing the frontier axis",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019f6b8f-3a40-7700-bc89-ea71d781ff11/12",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019f6b8f-3a40-7700-bc89-ea71d781ff11",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019f6b8f-3a40-7700-bc89-ea71d781ff11#slide-12",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 2,
          "name": "Logic Chain",
          "slug": "01-logic-chain",
          "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis",
          "matchId": "39042d9c-98fa-43ce-823b-ff9b7565f2df",
          "evidence": "The deck presents a logical chain of analysis and conclusions",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "Understand the factors behind productivity performance",
          "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion"
        },
        {
          "to": 12,
          "from": 10,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "7fb153ba-9fed-41a8-b715-8db8a6331fa1",
          "evidence": "The deck emphasizes the potential benefits of action",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Highlight the potential of accelerating productivity growth",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 0.6,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 15,
          "from": 12,
          "beatId": "c60d1144-491c-4cf8-87b6-566a1cd0a2e9",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "The deck outlines opportunities to accelerate productivity growth",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}