{
  "kind": "framework",
  "value": "perception-gap",
  "collectionKey": "slides:framework:perception-gap:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 3,
  "page": 1,
  "pageSize": 24,
  "pageCount": 1,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2",
      "docSlug": "bc0ba3d90f68cf59",
      "documentTitle": "Beyond good intentions",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 6,
      "slideType": "key_takeaways",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "The slide uses a series of bar charts to illustrate the 'perception gap' between leadership and employees regarding D&I progress.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 2,
      "evidence": "Each of three charts labels exec-vs-employee 'Perception gap' · Visual comparison of executive vs non-executive survey responses",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2/6",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2#slide-6",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 7,
          "from": 4,
          "name": "Iceberg",
          "slug": "10-iceberg",
          "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-dab8d4d86583",
          "evidence": "p4 visible obstacles -> p5-6 hidden perception gap diverse vs control / exec vs non-exec -> p7 leadership-commitment root cause.",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Surface the hidden perception gap underneath the visible obstacles",
          "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause",
          "confidence": 78,
          "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 7,
          "from": 4,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-e1a3ac0804dc",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Obstacles, perception gaps, executive optimism, leadership-commitment failure",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        },
        {
          "to": 7,
          "from": 4,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-f2b0a83684eb",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Survey data on obstacles and perception gaps",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2",
      "docSlug": "bc0ba3d90f68cf59",
      "documentTitle": "Beyond good intentions",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 5,
      "slideType": "diagnosis",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "The slide uses a 'control group' (white, heterosexual men) to establish a baseline for comparison.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Chart explicitly brackets and labels 'Perception gap' between groups",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2/5",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2#slide-5",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 7,
          "from": 4,
          "name": "Iceberg",
          "slug": "10-iceberg",
          "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-dab8d4d86583",
          "evidence": "p4 visible obstacles -> p5-6 hidden perception gap diverse vs control / exec vs non-exec -> p7 leadership-commitment root cause.",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Surface the hidden perception gap underneath the visible obstacles",
          "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause",
          "confidence": 78,
          "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 7,
          "from": 4,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-e1a3ac0804dc",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Obstacles, perception gaps, executive optimism, leadership-commitment failure",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        },
        {
          "to": 7,
          "from": 4,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-f2b0a83684eb",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Survey data on obstacles and perception gaps",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-e0a9d5c6383f",
      "docSlug": "2e2a30baea42149b",
      "documentTitle": "EARTH DAY 2023",
      "authorId": "misc",
      "authorName": "Ipsos",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 38,
      "slideType": "diagnosis",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "The chart highlights the 'perception gap' where the public ranks ozone depletion as the #1 contributor, while industry/electricity is the actual #1.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Comparison of public opinion vs scientific reality",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-e0a9d5c6383f/38",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-e0a9d5c6383f",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-e0a9d5c6383f#slide-38",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}