{ "kind": "framework", "value": "peer-gap-chart", "collectionKey": "slides:framework:peer-gap-chart:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 17, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 1, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5eff-723e-9be4-f957b17f68a1", "docSlug": "676f9c6fd83e1020", "documentTitle": "2019 Investor Day from SEC", "authorId": "Salesforce", "authorName": "Salesforce", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 70, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a billboard metaphor to present data on corporate growth sustainability.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Bar comparing companies achieving 3yr vs 5yr 20%+ growth.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5eff-723e-9be4-f957b17f68a1/70", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5eff-723e-9be4-f957b17f68a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5eff-723e-9be4-f957b17f68a1#slide-70", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 73, "from": 68, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019de92e-0503-746a-9c8a-6f55b89d0870", "evidence": "9 of 1,300 companies do 10yr 20%+; line chart vs MSFT/Oracle/SAP shows fastest-to-$10B.", "position": 10, "objective": "Prove rarity of sustained growth and superiority vs Microsoft/Oracle/SAP", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 86, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 73, "from": 67, "beatId": "019de92e-02e2-7256-a929-8c4818e1b047", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Closing thoughts, 20-yr rarity proof, $35B FY24 vs peers.", "position": 5, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 73, "from": 47, "beatId": "019de92e-0374-719e-a05d-99519a5a8e9c", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Climax", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Margin frontier model + $35B vs peers as triumphant peer-gap peak.", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5eff-723e-9be4-f957b17f68a1", "docSlug": "676f9c6fd83e1020", "documentTitle": "2019 Investor Day from SEC", "authorId": "Salesforce", "authorName": "Salesforce", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 73, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart plots revenue growth against years since company founding, showing Salesforce's superior growth rate.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Salesforce vs Microsoft/Oracle/SAP revenue lines normalized by years founded.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5eff-723e-9be4-f957b17f68a1/73", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5eff-723e-9be4-f957b17f68a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5eff-723e-9be4-f957b17f68a1#slide-73", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 73, "from": 68, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019de92e-0503-746a-9c8a-6f55b89d0870", "evidence": "9 of 1,300 companies do 10yr 20%+; line chart vs MSFT/Oracle/SAP shows fastest-to-$10B.", "position": 10, "objective": "Prove rarity of sustained growth and superiority vs Microsoft/Oracle/SAP", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 86, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 73, "from": 67, "beatId": "019de92e-02e2-7256-a929-8c4818e1b047", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Closing thoughts, 20-yr rarity proof, $35B FY24 vs peers.", "position": 5, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 73, "from": 47, "beatId": "019de92e-0374-719e-a05d-99519a5a8e9c", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Climax", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Margin frontier model + $35B vs peers as triumphant peer-gap peak.", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5eff-723e-9be5-1309376a6a70", "docSlug": "936e98b4587c5d4f", "documentTitle": "2023 Investor Day", "authorId": "Samsara", "authorName": "Samsara", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.777, "pageNumber": 47, "slideType": "market_landscape", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The funnel illustrates market segmentation based on financial performance metrics.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Funnel benchmarking Samsara vs US-listed peer set", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5eff-723e-9be5-1309376a6a70/47", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5eff-723e-9be5-1309376a6a70", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5eff-723e-9be5-1309376a6a70#slide-47", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 47, "from": 46, "name": "Funnel Analysis", "slug": "32-funnel-analysis", "bestFor": "Sales optimization, customer journey, process efficiency", "matchId": "019de950-39bd-743d-8b3f-4647301ecbb6", "evidence": "p46 $850M+ ARR; p47 funnel narrows 200 to 58 to 6 peers.", "position": 7, "objective": "Position Samsara inside an elite peer set on growth+profitability", "structure": "Top of Funnel -> Stage 1 Conversion -> Stage 2 Conversion -> Bottom of Funnel -> The Leak", "confidence": 86, "description": "Show progressive filtering through stages to identify where drop-off occurs" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 64, "from": 46, "beatId": "019de950-3690-716a-b3f4-6c719378c1ca", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "ARR scale, peer funnel, multi-product adoption, expansion case study, unit economics.", "position": 4, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 47, "from": 47, "beatId": "019de950-37be-703b-ba8d-e4e947ab8e40", "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch", "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch", "beatName": "Competition", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Funnel narrowing 200 software peers to 6.", "position": 5, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 64, "from": 46, "beatId": "019de950-386b-7598-ba2e-a76ca0fe68e2", "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch", "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch", "beatName": "Financials", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "$850M+ ARR, 41% growth, LTV:CAC >8x, 59pp margin gain.", "position": 9, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5efe-75c0-8dfe-e7a37290e177", "docSlug": "943b1c6e14024bca", "documentTitle": "2026 02 Capital Markets Day", "authorId": "Orange", "authorName": "Orange", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 47, "slideType": "kpi_dashboard", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a combination of a bar chart for historical performance and a waterfall-style step chart for dividend progression.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "TSR bar chart Orange 82% vs Stoxx 600 telco 53% vs CAC 40 36%", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5efe-75c0-8dfe-e7a37290e177/47", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5efe-75c0-8dfe-e7a37290e177", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5efe-75c0-8dfe-e7a37290e177#slide-47", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 47, "from": 45, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019deab6-1599-738a-94a5-d6d2ff23bc8d", "evidence": "EPS CAGR + TSR vs Stoxx 600 telco/CAC 40 (82% vs 53%/36%) + dividend step chart.", "position": 13, "objective": "Demonstrate shareholder return outperformance", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 82, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 51, "from": 40, "beatId": "019deab6-138a-718a-b600-f1da956c495d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Financial trajectory, EPS bridge, TSR, 2026/2028 guidance, takeaways.", "position": 5, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 51, "from": 41, "beatId": "019deab6-1405-76f8-9480-2526e10c029c", "arcName": "The Golden Circle", "arcSlug": "golden-circle", "beatName": "What", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Cash flow, EPS, TSR, dividend outcomes + guidance.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-b43d907adb44", "docSlug": "3c210b1fcba7", "documentTitle": "Tempus AI, Inc. (TEM)", "authorId": "54_Spruce_Point_Capital", "authorName": "Spruce Point Capital Management", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller", "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller", "presentationDate": "2025-05-28 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.3333334, "pageNumber": 32, "slideType": "expose_contradiction", "function": "expose_contradiction", "notes": "Highlights the specific covenant language in yellow text.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Comparison table of debt covenants vs peers", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-b43d907adb44/32", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-b43d907adb44", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-b43d907adb44#slide-32", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 41, "from": 32, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019de87d-e60e-7069-8d2e-28f4aad62fde", "evidence": "Surface (AZ/GSK/SoftBank deals) vs hidden system (Pathos money cycle, debt covenant pressure).", "position": 4, "objective": "Show partnerships are surface-level — round-tripping underneath", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 80, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 69, "from": 12, "beatId": "019de87d-e40d-7574-b4dc-522b102a6735", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Five evidence sections: insiders, AI hype, partnerships, accounting, billing.", "position": 4, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 69, "from": 12, "beatId": "019de87d-e501-7638-91f7-175bec763c5d", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Rising Action", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Mounting evidence across insiders, AI, partnerships, accounting, billing.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-b43d907adb44", "docSlug": "3c210b1fcba7", "documentTitle": "Tempus AI, Inc. (TEM)", "authorId": "54_Spruce_Point_Capital", "authorName": "Spruce Point Capital Management", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller", "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller", "presentationDate": "2025-05-28 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.3333334, "pageNumber": 57, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide highlights a valuation anomaly (low EV/Sales multiple) for Ambry Genetics compared to peers like Exact Science, Veracyte, and GeneDx.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "EV/Sales multiples table vs diagnostic peers", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-b43d907adb44/57", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-b43d907adb44", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-b43d907adb44#slide-57", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 66, "from": 57, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019de87d-e6ef-77cf-9281-b1f3dc9c1d8c", "evidence": "Ambry 78% CAGR vs Myriad -3%, Invitae 24%, Caris 28% — explicit peer-gap chart with CAGR boxes.", "position": 7, "objective": "Show Ambry as outlier vs peers on CPT 81479 billing", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 87, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 69, "from": 12, "beatId": "019de87d-e40d-7574-b4dc-522b102a6735", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Five evidence sections: insiders, AI hype, partnerships, accounting, billing.", "position": 4, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 69, "from": 12, "beatId": "019de87d-e501-7638-91f7-175bec763c5d", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Rising Action", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Mounting evidence across insiders, AI, partnerships, accounting, billing.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-b43d907adb44", "docSlug": "3c210b1fcba7", "documentTitle": "Tempus AI, Inc. (TEM)", "authorId": "54_Spruce_Point_Capital", "authorName": "Spruce Point Capital Management", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller", "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller", "presentationDate": "2025-05-28 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.3333334, "pageNumber": 60, "slideType": "expose_contradiction", "function": "expose_contradiction", "notes": "The slide uses a yellow highlight for Ambry to visually distinguish it as the subject of the critique.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Four small-multiple bar charts comparing CAGR by peer", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-b43d907adb44/60", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-b43d907adb44", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-b43d907adb44#slide-60", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 66, "from": 57, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019de87d-e6ef-77cf-9281-b1f3dc9c1d8c", "evidence": "Ambry 78% CAGR vs Myriad -3%, Invitae 24%, Caris 28% — explicit peer-gap chart with CAGR boxes.", "position": 7, "objective": "Show Ambry as outlier vs peers on CPT 81479 billing", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 87, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 69, "from": 12, "beatId": "019de87d-e40d-7574-b4dc-522b102a6735", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Five evidence sections: insiders, AI hype, partnerships, accounting, billing.", "position": 4, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 69, "from": 12, "beatId": "019de87d-e501-7638-91f7-175bec763c5d", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Rising Action", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Mounting evidence across insiders, AI, partnerships, accounting, billing.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-b43d907adb44", "docSlug": "3c210b1fcba7", "documentTitle": "Tempus AI, Inc. (TEM)", "authorId": "54_Spruce_Point_Capital", "authorName": "Spruce Point Capital Management", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller", "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller", "presentationDate": "2025-05-28 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.3333334, "pageNumber": 71, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The table uses a 'Hype-AI' vs 'Diagnostics' segmentation to frame the peer group.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "SBC% table comparing TEM to AI and diagnostics peers", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-b43d907adb44/71", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-b43d907adb44", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-b43d907adb44#slide-71", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 76, "from": 71, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019de87d-e73d-71fb-b18c-f8a3706a6be9", "evidence": "SBC vs peers (77% vs 25%), EV/Rev 9.7x vs 3.9x peers, sum-of-parts to $24.87.", "position": 9, "objective": "Conclude that TEM trades at unwarranted premium and warrants 50-60% downside", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 86, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 76, "from": 70, "beatId": "019de87d-e433-73e4-a2a2-dd53aa51dae1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Risk/reward, insider selling, peer multiples, final $24-34 SoP valuation.", "position": 5, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 72, "from": 70, "beatId": "019de87d-e530-710a-a460-ed40fe41a617", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Climax", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Follow-the-money insider selling reveal.", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-b43d907adb44", "docSlug": "3c210b1fcba7", "documentTitle": "Tempus AI, Inc. (TEM)", "authorId": "54_Spruce_Point_Capital", "authorName": "Spruce Point Capital Management", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller", "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller", "presentationDate": "2025-05-28 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.3333334, "pageNumber": 75, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The table highlights that Tempus AI's valuation multiples (EV/Revenues, EV/Gross Profit) are generally higher than the averages of its medical diagnostic peers.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "EV/Revenue, EV/EBITDA tables vs peer groups", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-b43d907adb44/75", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-b43d907adb44", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-b43d907adb44#slide-75", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 76, "from": 71, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019de87d-e73d-71fb-b18c-f8a3706a6be9", "evidence": "SBC vs peers (77% vs 25%), EV/Rev 9.7x vs 3.9x peers, sum-of-parts to $24.87.", "position": 9, "objective": "Conclude that TEM trades at unwarranted premium and warrants 50-60% downside", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 86, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 76, "from": 70, "beatId": "019de87d-e433-73e4-a2a2-dd53aa51dae1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Risk/reward, insider selling, peer multiples, final $24-34 SoP valuation.", "position": 5, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 76, "from": 73, "beatId": "019de87d-e568-7113-864c-4b0fc9058964", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Resolution", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Adjusted capital structure, peer premium, final $24.87 price target.", "position": 4, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-8723ab235efa", "docSlug": "c1199c966e738cd3", "documentTitle": "Global Risks Report 2024", "authorId": "WEF", "authorName": "World Economic Forum", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "academic_think_tank", "sourceTypeLabel": "Academic / think tank", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 112, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "appendix", "notes": "Figure D.1 in Appendix D 'Risk governance'. Source: WEF Global Risks Perception Survey 2023-2024. Bars colored by risk category (Economic, Environmental, Geopolitical, Societal, Technological); Debt leads at 79%.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Ranked horizontal bar chart compares share of respondents across ten risks", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-8723ab235efa/112", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-8723ab235efa", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-8723ab235efa#slide-112", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019de075-a5cb-73ea-a4ef-8f4a27a8a7b0", "docSlug": "2296286e07283457e97b21dc9ce59469", "documentTitle": "Immix Biopharma | Investor Presentation Deck | 46 slides", "authorId": "immix-biopharma", "authorName": "Immix Biopharma", "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck", "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "investor_relations", "sourceTypeLabel": "Investor relations", "presentationDate": "2023-08-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.7777778, "pageNumber": 26, "slideType": "traction", "function": "show_traction", "notes": "Layout splits into three quadrants of charts (survival %, tumor response %, median survival days) plus a navy summary band; Immix Biopharma logo top-right and page number 26 bottom-right.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Bar charts contrast IMX-110 against Trabectedin standard-of-care and a 4-drug combination benchmark.", "slideHref": "/slides/019de075-a5cb-73ea-a4ef-8f4a27a8a7b0/26", "deckHref": "/decks/019de075-a5cb-73ea-a4ef-8f4a27a8a7b0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de075-a5cb-73ea-a4ef-8f4a27a8a7b0#slide-26", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5", "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 27, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Six peer countries lined up on a single corporate-tax-rate scale", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/27", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-27", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 27, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019de98a-568e-7786-87e6-9679f0e84c0d", "evidence": "Side-by-side 6-country teardrop charts for corporate tax and VAT.", "position": 5, "objective": "Position Namibia vs peers on tax rates", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 88, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 32, "from": 20, "beatId": "019de98a-54ef-70fd-8a87-ae8462ad8b9a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "GDP comparisons, peer tax benchmarks, agro-processing case", "position": 4, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 32, "from": 16, "beatId": "019de98a-558f-77bb-a3c5-ab2ccffaa0e7", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Consolidation priorities and benchmarks", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5", "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 28, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a hanging drop chart visualization to display VAT percentages for Namibia, Angola, Botswana, South Africa, Zambia, and Zimbabwe.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Same six-country layout for VAT-rate comparison", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/28", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-28", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 27, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019de98a-568e-7786-87e6-9679f0e84c0d", "evidence": "Side-by-side 6-country teardrop charts for corporate tax and VAT.", "position": 5, "objective": "Position Namibia vs peers on tax rates", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 88, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 32, "from": 20, "beatId": "019de98a-54ef-70fd-8a87-ae8462ad8b9a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "GDP comparisons, peer tax benchmarks, agro-processing case", "position": 4, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 32, "from": 16, "beatId": "019de98a-558f-77bb-a3c5-ab2ccffaa0e7", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Consolidation priorities and benchmarks", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-f8722a61aad1", "docSlug": "ff0e33f691c6", "documentTitle": "AECOM (ACM)", "authorId": "03_Starboard_Value", "authorName": "Peter A. Feld", "documentKindSlug": "shareholder-letter", "documentKindLabel": "Shareholder letter", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2019-06-20 00:00:00", "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.77272725, "pageNumber": 3, "slideType": "expose_contradiction", "function": "expose_contradiction", "notes": "Letter-format page (running prose with embedded charts) rather than a traditional slide. Synergy targets cited: $250M raised to $325M with FY2017 impact promise. EBITDA misses: FY16 14%, FY17 15%, FY18 13%.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Side-by-side bar charts comparing consensus expectations vs. actual Adjusted EBITDA for three consecutive fiscal years.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-f8722a61aad1/3", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-f8722a61aad1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-f8722a61aad1#slide-3", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019de073-0e3e-718f-a619-12ed5a3bf0bd", "docSlug": "64ba5cf989a0cf767f243c357144339d", "documentTitle": "TD Securities | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 40 slides", "authorId": "td-securities", "authorName": "TD Securities", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "investment_bank", "sourceTypeLabel": "Investment bank", "presentationDate": "2022-06-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294673, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart highlights a specific inflection point on March 11, 2022, related to a proposal.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "TRQ vs peers vs base metals vs copper relative-performance line chart.", "slideHref": "/slides/019de073-0e3e-718f-a619-12ed5a3bf0bd/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019de073-0e3e-718f-a619-12ed5a3bf0bd", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de073-0e3e-718f-a619-12ed5a3bf0bd#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 8, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019debe5-417d-749b-a8a7-fd044f765c1d", "evidence": "Action title p10 states 'TRQ prior to Rio Proposal consistently traded at a discount to peers on P/NAV'; callouts compare TRQ vs peers explicitly.", "position": 2, "objective": "Show TRQ trades at a persistent discount to peers, S&P Base Metals and copper", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 88, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 7, "beatId": "019debe5-4034-71e8-a54a-db2132f8fefb", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Market View shows TRQ trades at persistent P/NAV discount to peers.", "position": 2, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 11, "from": 6, "beatId": "019debe5-40eb-7055-9cb5-f743c4f28c0d", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Capitalization plus market view showing TRQ vs peers.", "position": 1, "confidence": 58, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019de073-0e3e-718f-a619-12ed5a3bf0bd", "docSlug": "64ba5cf989a0cf767f243c357144339d", "documentTitle": "TD Securities | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 40 slides", "authorId": "td-securities", "authorName": "TD Securities", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "investment_bank", "sourceTypeLabel": "Investment bank", "presentationDate": "2022-06-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294673, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "Includes a data table summarizing 5-year, 3-year, and 1-year averages, as well as highs and lows.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Historical P/NAV chart explicitly contrasts TRQ line with peer line.", "slideHref": "/slides/019de073-0e3e-718f-a619-12ed5a3bf0bd/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019de073-0e3e-718f-a619-12ed5a3bf0bd", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de073-0e3e-718f-a619-12ed5a3bf0bd#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 8, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019debe5-417d-749b-a8a7-fd044f765c1d", "evidence": "Action title p10 states 'TRQ prior to Rio Proposal consistently traded at a discount to peers on P/NAV'; callouts compare TRQ vs peers explicitly.", "position": 2, "objective": "Show TRQ trades at a persistent discount to peers, S&P Base Metals and copper", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 88, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 7, "beatId": "019debe5-4034-71e8-a54a-db2132f8fefb", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Market View shows TRQ trades at persistent P/NAV discount to peers.", "position": 2, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 11, "from": 6, "beatId": "019debe5-40eb-7055-9cb5-f743c4f28c0d", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Capitalization plus market view showing TRQ vs peers.", "position": 1, "confidence": 58, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019de073-0e3e-718f-a619-12ed5a3bf0bd", "docSlug": "64ba5cf989a0cf767f243c357144339d", "documentTitle": "TD Securities | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 40 slides", "authorId": "td-securities", "authorName": "TD Securities", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "investment_bank", "sourceTypeLabel": "Investment bank", "presentationDate": "2022-06-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294673, "pageNumber": 19, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "Includes a highlighted 'Selected Range' for P/NAV multiples.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Bar charts compare TRQ vs peer Market Cap and P/NAV with selected range.", "slideHref": "/slides/019de073-0e3e-718f-a619-12ed5a3bf0bd/19", "deckHref": "/decks/019de073-0e3e-718f-a619-12ed5a3bf0bd", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de073-0e3e-718f-a619-12ed5a3bf0bd#slide-19", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 18, "name": "Precedent", "slug": "09-precedent", "bestFor": "Risk mitigation, strategy validation, building confidence in new approaches", "matchId": "019debe5-41c6-746e-80b1-4e12514a6e0a", "evidence": "M&A precedents table feeding into bar-chart trading comparables with 'Selected Range: 0.40x-0.70x'.", "position": 4, "objective": "Anchor multiples via precedent M&A transactions and trading comparables", "structure": "The Precedent Case -> What Happened -> The Parallel -> Applied Learning", "confidence": 80, "description": "Use historical or external examples to validate your approach" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 12, "beatId": "019debe5-4058-73a2-bec8-6d72b2ed1298", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Value Methodology divider, FMV, NAV/EBITDA approach, comparables, synergies.", "position": 3, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 33, "from": 12, "beatId": "019debe5-410f-70ef-8df5-c8fdb4d7b629", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology and model establish what the discount/asset is worth.", "position": 2, "confidence": 58, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }