{
  "kind": "framework",
  "value": "peer-comparables-analysis",
  "collectionKey": "slides:framework:peer-comparables-analysis:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 1,
  "page": 1,
  "pageSize": 24,
  "pageCount": 1,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019f6b8f-26c5-776f-afa3-8e84bf5b2fa0",
      "docSlug": "jarvis-jefferies-broadview-columbia-pipelines-presentation-oct-13-2016",
      "documentTitle": "Jefferies Broadview Columbia Pipelines Presentation Oct 13 2016",
      "authorId": "jefferies-broadview-columbia-pipelines-presentation-oct-13-2016",
      "authorName": null,
      "documentKindSlug": "deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "investor_relations",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Investor relations",
      "presentationDate": "2016-01-01 00:00:00",
      "orientation": null,
      "aspectRatio": null,
      "pageNumber": 22,
      "slideType": "peer_benchmark",
      "function": "compare_peers",
      "notes": "Includes bar charts for 2017E and 2018E TEV/EBITDA multiples and a detailed data table for peer metrics.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Standard investment banking valuation methodology comparing peer multiples.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019f6b8f-26c5-776f-afa3-8e84bf5b2fa0/22",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019f6b8f-26c5-776f-afa3-8e84bf5b2fa0",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019f6b8f-26c5-776f-afa3-8e84bf5b2fa0#slide-22",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 5,
          "name": "Logic Chain",
          "slug": "01-logic-chain",
          "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis",
          "matchId": "101b652e-e0c3-4aa0-863d-357677eade48",
          "evidence": "The document presents a clear and structured argument.",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "To demonstrate the logic and reasoning behind the proposed transaction.",
          "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion"
        },
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 15,
          "name": "Mece Breakdown",
          "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
          "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
          "matchId": "763fbcff-c3cd-4eec-9db7-92ee34f3ddc2",
          "evidence": "The document presents a detailed analysis of the company's valuation.",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "To provide a comprehensive breakdown of the valuation analysis.",
          "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
          "confidence": 0.6,
          "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 15,
          "beatId": "c2ea6e30-ef87-4f9b-8694-00343ae90879",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "The document provides detailed valuation analysis and data.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}