{
  "kind": "framework",
  "value": "peer-benchmark-bar-chart",
  "collectionKey": "slides:framework:peer-benchmark-bar-chart:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 1,
  "page": 1,
  "pageSize": 24,
  "pageCount": 1,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5b-73d2fcd4c63f",
      "docSlug": "b24f1791b15f452b",
      "documentTitle": "barclays americas select franchise conference final 5 8 24",
      "authorId": "Barclays",
      "authorName": "Citizens Financial Group",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "equity_research",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Equity research",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.333,
      "pageNumber": 5,
      "slideType": "peer_benchmark",
      "function": "compare_peers",
      "notes": "Data sources and dates provided in footer.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Ranked horizontal bars of CET1 ratio vs named peers (CMA, FITB, HBAN, KEY, MTB, PNC, RF, TFC, USB)",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5b-73d2fcd4c63f/5",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5b-73d2fcd4c63f",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5b-73d2fcd4c63f#slide-5",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 8,
          "from": 5,
          "name": "Benchmark Gap",
          "slug": "39-benchmark-gap",
          "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-08f7-737a-a005-401e9eee26fb",
          "evidence": "Four consecutive peer-benchmark slides with CFG highlighted in green vs Peer 1-9 in grey",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "Position CFG against peer banks across capital, deposits, beta and credit",
          "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity",
          "confidence": 86,
          "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 6,
          "from": 5,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-07a7-7579-bd60-79f28997682b",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "regulatory/capital pressures and deposit base composition framed as challenges",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        },
        {
          "to": 8,
          "from": 4,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-07a7-7579-bd60-8e77f55f227c",
          "arcName": "AIDA",
          "arcSlug": "aida",
          "beatName": "Interest",
          "beatSlug": "aida-interest",
          "evidence": "franchise reach + peer benchmarks build credibility",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 62,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}