{
  "kind": "framework",
  "value": "pareto-bar-chart",
  "collectionKey": "slides:framework:pareto-bar-chart:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 1,
  "page": 1,
  "pageSize": 24,
  "pageCount": 1,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-998cd2e4c414",
      "docSlug": "93b13afae2ded546",
      "documentTitle": "April Macro Brief: Special edition Tariff distress",
      "authorId": "Accenture",
      "authorName": "Accenture",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 36,
      "slideType": "impact_sizing",
      "function": "quantify_impact",
      "notes": "The chart distinguishes between tariffs 'in effect' and those 'pending or under future consideration'.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Industries ranked top-down by total tariff cost increase, descending order.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-998cd2e4c414/36",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-998cd2e4c414",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-998cd2e4c414#slide-36",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 37,
          "from": 36,
          "name": "Pareto Focus",
          "slug": "50-pareto-focus",
          "bestFor": "Resource allocation, problem prioritization, efficiency improvements",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b772-98b1dc35ea1b",
          "evidence": "Sectors ranked by % cost increase (Industrials 45.2% -> Life Sciences 18.5%) then services-side ranking — focuses attention on top exposures.",
          "position": 7,
          "objective": "Identify the vital few industries facing the highest tariff cost burden",
          "structure": "The Full Distribution -> The Vital Few (20%) -> The Trivial Many (80%) -> Focus Recommendation",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "Show that 80% of results come from 20% of causes to drive prioritization"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 37,
          "from": 20,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-cb2ca5df426b",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
          "evidence": "Americas/EMEA/APAC region impacts and industry exposure — the consequences.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
          "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
        },
        {
          "to": 37,
          "from": 20,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-daca7c03f11c",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "Quantified country/region/industry impacts.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 60,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}