{
  "kind": "framework",
  "value": "panel-regression-methodology",
  "collectionKey": "slides:framework:panel-regression-methodology:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 1,
  "page": 1,
  "pageSize": 24,
  "pageCount": 1,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-667802f211ca",
      "docSlug": "36406704ef7f4809",
      "documentTitle": "PwC Women in Work 2025",
      "authorId": "PwC",
      "authorName": "PwC",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.777,
      "pageNumber": 22,
      "slideType": "appendix_methodology",
      "function": "present_framework",
      "notes": "The slide uses a process-flow layout to describe the econometric steps.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Five-step econometric workflow explicitly named.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-667802f211ca/22",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-667802f211ca",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-667802f211ca#slide-22",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 20,
          "name": "Hypothesis Test",
          "slug": "42-hypothesis-test",
          "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations",
          "matchId": "019de8ca-0569-738c-aab8-19b17f0e0830",
          "evidence": "Scene-set, econometric approach, impact channels framework.",
          "position": 4,
          "objective": "Set up the hypothesis that female participation drives productivity",
          "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)",
          "confidence": 68,
          "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 19,
          "beatId": "019de8ca-041b-70a8-be47-ebb54085fa30",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Productivity scene-set, panel regression methodology, impact channels.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        },
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 19,
          "beatId": "019de8ca-04ad-7663-b898-de9cbb396d3c",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Why participation matters: methodology and channels.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 62,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}