{
  "kind": "framework",
  "value": "organizational-design",
  "collectionKey": "slides:framework:organizational-design:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 1,
  "page": 1,
  "pageSize": 24,
  "pageCount": 1,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc",
      "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664",
      "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.445,
      "pageNumber": 364,
      "slideType": "key_takeaways",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": "The slide uses a comparison diagram to illustrate the shift from customer-centric to process-centric organizational structures.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Comparison of customer-centric vs process-centric organizational structure",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/364",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-364",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 365,
          "from": 322,
          "name": "Scenario Fork",
          "slug": "35-scenario-fork",
          "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-6e9175aa6c84",
          "evidence": "5 designkriterier -> 4 konkrete modeller (page 334-336) -> recommendation + 14 mio. kr. kursusadm.",
          "position": 11,
          "objective": "Compare four models for administrative faellesskaber plus kursusadministration",
          "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation",
          "confidence": 86,
          "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 420,
          "from": 322,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2a66536a5837",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Admin fællesskaber + nyordning af logistik + insourcing benchmarks and business cases.",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        },
        {
          "to": 365,
          "from": 166,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-37e90642ab06",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
          "evidence": "Potentialeestimater, benchmark gaps, comparison tables.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
          "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}