{
  "kind": "framework",
  "value": "optimism-bias",
  "collectionKey": "slides:framework:optimism-bias:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 2,
  "page": 1,
  "pageSize": 24,
  "pageCount": 1,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-11b7e92a64ec",
      "docSlug": "2fc377b48ea850a2",
      "documentTitle": "Moving Laggards Early Adopters",
      "authorId": "McKinsey",
      "authorName": "McKinsey",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 12,
      "slideType": "peer_benchmark",
      "function": "compare_peers",
      "notes": "The chart highlights a cognitive bias (optimism bias/overconfidence) where the vast majority of respondents across all countries believe they are not behind their competitors.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide explicitly questions if 'overconfidence' is slowing progress based on the data.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-11b7e92a64ec/12",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-11b7e92a64ec",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-11b7e92a64ec#slide-12",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 16,
          "from": 3,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "80ee5567-d42a-4006-b3ea-47f7058b716b",
          "evidence": "The deck implies that not taking action will lead to missed opportunities.",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "What are the costs of not implementing technology?",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        },
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 6,
          "name": "Hypothesis Test",
          "slug": "42-hypothesis-test",
          "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations",
          "matchId": "bd21d146-59ab-4894-a3cd-c54d538d9e84",
          "evidence": "The deck presents data to support or refute the hypothesis.",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Is our hypothesis on technology implementation correct?",
          "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 9,
          "beatId": "561a882a-14b3-407f-b3c9-95d1866a9b8f",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "The deck presents data and industry trends to support the problem statement.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 0.9,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-d1449f5bb358",
      "docSlug": "eea545ea8b88b2ef",
      "documentTitle": "WHAT THE FUTURE: INTELLIGENCE",
      "authorId": "misc",
      "authorName": "Ipsos",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 41,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "quantify_impact",
      "notes": "The chart uses a grouped bar format to contrast 'Want' (blue) vs 'Likely' (orange) across six scenarios.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide explicitly discusses the 'optimism gap' between desired and likely outcomes.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-d1449f5bb358/41",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-d1449f5bb358",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-d1449f5bb358#slide-41",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 59,
          "from": 37,
          "beatId": "16806d34-606e-4e89-aca4-49b87cb5ab0d",
          "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
          "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
          "beatName": "Action",
          "beatSlug": "monroes-sequence-action",
          "evidence": "The deck concludes with a call to action, emphasizing the need for collaboration and responsible AI development.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}