{ "kind": "framework", "value": "nxn-matrix", "collectionKey": "slides:framework:nxn-matrix:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 28, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 2, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5eff-723e-9be4-f36916bb638c", "docSlug": "9b274ab0479f4b36", "documentTitle": "2018 Investor Day from SEC", "authorId": "Salesforce", "authorName": "Salesforce", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.774, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "competitive_analysis", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a dot-matrix visualization to show presence/absence of product offerings by company.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Vendor-by-product capability matrix with filled/empty dots.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5eff-723e-9be4-f36916bb638c/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5eff-723e-9be4-f36916bb638c", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5eff-723e-9be4-f36916bb638c#slide-16", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 16, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019de926-f8e5-773e-921a-d25eac397e72", "evidence": "Comparison matrix Salesforce vs Oracle/SAP/MSFT/Adobe, depth grid, segment success table, $140B TAM.", "position": 4, "objective": "Show product breadth gap vs competitors and resulting TAM", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 78, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 12, "beatId": "019de926-f716-7292-8dc4-f59086ec7df9", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "'Competitive Advantage' divider, values, Customer 360, technology + product breadth.", "position": 3, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 37, "from": 12, "beatId": "019de926-f7e9-70b9-871a-a05ad8609f30", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Rising Action", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Stacking competitive advantages culminating in synthesis hub.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5eff-723e-9be4-edc0be72acb6", "docSlug": "d1e3e0f8d21b8f30", "documentTitle": "2019 Capital Markets Day Presentation", "authorId": "SAP", "authorName": "SAP", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "competitive_analysis", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "Uses bubble charts to compare growth vs revenue (left) and growth vs operating margin (right).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Two bubble plots with axes (Cloud Revenue x Top-line Growth; Operating Margin x Top-line Growth).", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5eff-723e-9be4-edc0be72acb6/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5eff-723e-9be4-edc0be72acb6", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5eff-723e-9be4-edc0be72acb6#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 5, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019de91d-decf-7368-b571-fd801bc0bac1", "evidence": "p5 incline vs history; p6 bubble charts vs Oracle/Salesforce/IBM; p7 5 levers to sustain.", "position": 1, "objective": "Show SAP outperforms peers and has clear levers to keep doing so", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 80, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 4, "beatId": "019de91d-dd9c-7155-b76f-15c0f986bc26", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Structural Incline timeline, peer bubble charts, profit-growth levers (p4-7).", "position": 1, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 9, "from": 5, "beatId": "019de91d-de6a-763c-88bd-e97ba1d8bc99", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Where SAP is and its strategic levers.", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5eff-723e-9be4-fc73785a7e4b", "docSlug": "4fa6c1f9733a7bc1", "documentTitle": "2020 FY21 Investor Day from SEC", "authorId": "Salesforce", "authorName": "Salesforce", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 22, "slideType": "segmentation", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "Uses a 3D cube metaphor to illustrate market segmentation across three dimensions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "5x5x5 cube grid implies multidimensional segmentation matrix", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5eff-723e-9be4-fc73785a7e4b/22", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5eff-723e-9be4-fc73785a7e4b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5eff-723e-9be4-fc73785a7e4b#slide-22", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 26, "from": 22, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019de935-2761-7706-af48-49c897ff79bb", "evidence": "3D cube big picture (p.22) -> cohort dashboard (p.23-24) -> enterprise example (p.25) -> SMB cohort case (p.26).", "position": 5, "objective": "Zoom from portfolio strategy down to land/expand customer cases", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 72, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 23, "from": 17, "beatId": "019de935-24bb-754c-9d28-eba1d9e9d104", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Competitive moat, diverse 3D growth cube, GTM playbook", "position": 3, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 23, "from": 22, "beatId": "019de935-2639-75af-b3c2-ef703184b862", "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch", "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch", "beatName": "Product", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Diverse growth cube + GTM playbook", "position": 6, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5a-6b2bc553916c", "docSlug": "b516607343964728", "documentTitle": "2021 q4 earnings results presentation", "authorId": "GoldmanSachs", "authorName": "Petershill Partners", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "equity_research", "sourceTypeLabel": "Equity research", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 27, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a 3-column layout to map external threats to industry-wide mitigants and firm-specific strengths.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "3-column x 4-row Challenges/Mitigants/Differentiation matrix", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5a-6b2bc553916c/27", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5a-6b2bc553916c", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5a-6b2bc553916c#slide-27", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 25, "name": "Hypothesis Test", "slug": "42-hypothesis-test", "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations", "matchId": "019de8d8-1eff-74ec-b0ea-29e9e7a53445", "evidence": "Slide 27 explicitly tests four challenges (fundraising, rates, inflation, geo) against sector mitigants and PHP differentiation.", "position": 4, "objective": "Test resilience hypothesis against macro challenges", "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)", "confidence": 80, "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 30, "from": 24, "beatId": "019de8d8-1daa-7608-9637-456bf2b3c378", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Resolution", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section 4 Outlook + Q&A summary closes the arc", "position": 4, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 27, "from": 26, "beatId": "019de8d8-1e11-76a8-89a5-f6b89c50e452", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "'2022 could be a more nuanced fundraising environment'", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 30, "from": 25, "beatId": "019de8d8-1e75-75b9-bf5d-56e680570818", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "2022 strategic direction, guidance, summary", "position": 5, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5efe-75c0-8dff-369f1805e3fc", "docSlug": "02156e9b8b18e145", "documentTitle": "2024 02 Investor Strategy", "authorId": "Zillow", "authorName": "Zillow Group", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.777, "pageNumber": 22, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide uses a structured table to map business segments to specific growth pillars and their associated targets.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Segment (Residential/Mortgages/Rentals) × pillar matrix", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5efe-75c0-8dff-369f1805e3fc/22", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5efe-75c0-8dff-369f1805e3fc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5efe-75c0-8dff-369f1805e3fc#slide-22", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 23, "from": 22, "beatId": "019debf0-db20-73e6-84a5-ad4ce65002d7", "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch", "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch", "beatName": "Business Model", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Growth pillars roadmap and financial philosophy", "position": 7, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 28, "from": 22, "beatId": "019debf0-dc72-7297-9f3e-f5f9a560a9bd", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Growth pillars roadmap, financial philosophy, dilution mgmt, team", "position": 5, "confidence": 68, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5e-3b8ef57c8e5a", "docSlug": "5f0f0535ee1c7800", "documentTitle": "2025 Investor Day", "authorId": "Blue-Owl", "authorName": "Blue Owl", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 56, "slideType": "market_landscape", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide contrasts a simple aggregate Excel model with a multi-dimensional data science model (Risk, Purpose, Delinquency).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Multi-dimensional Risk/Purpose/Delinquency model", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5e-3b8ef57c8e5a/56", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5e-3b8ef57c8e5a", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5e-3b8ef57c8e5a#slide-56", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 57, "from": 47, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019deac5-4f25-74ad-8c0d-e2f9e11a818e", "evidence": "Explicit iceberg metaphor (p.48), $11T TAM and 4x penetration headroom (p.52)", "position": 6, "objective": "Reveal Alternative Credit's hidden opportunity beneath the surface", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 90, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 136, "from": 28, "beatId": "019deac5-4d27-728d-b01b-f04c5ad3cec9", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "5-year targets and segment-by-segment growth strategy across Credit/GP/Real Assets/Insurance/Wealth", "position": 3, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 101, "from": 33, "beatId": "019deac5-4e00-7728-9937-443a2cf6e314", "arcName": "The Sparkline", "arcSlug": "sparkline", "beatName": "What Is", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Each segment's current platform and track record", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-0c97b0f6ced7", "docSlug": "8c975254e7fcb9d0", "documentTitle": "Blurred lines FinTech 2016", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart uses a 2x2 matrix structure to categorize trends based on importance and likelihood to respond.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "axes Level of importance x Likelihood to respond, bubble size = FinTech count", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-0c97b0f6ced7/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-0c97b0f6ced7", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-0c97b0f6ced7#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 9, "name": "2x2 Matrix", "slug": "30-2x2-matrix", "bestFor": "Portfolio analysis, prioritization, strategic positioning", "matchId": "019de951-2a2d-744c-8950-2b85f6ae5e2f", "evidence": "Bubble charts on p10/11/13/14 with axes Level of importance and Likelihood to respond.", "position": 2, "objective": "Map FinTech trends per sector on importance × likelihood-to-respond", "structure": "Dimension 1 (X-axis) -> Dimension 2 (Y-axis) -> The Four Quadrants -> The Sweet Spot", "confidence": 90, "description": "Plot options on two critical dimensions to reveal the optimal quadrant" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 9, "beatId": "019de951-28d9-73c0-a1cd-92b6d6ffdc9f", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "trend frameworks per sector + blockchain so-what synthesis", "position": 3, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 16, "from": 1, "beatId": "019de951-2986-745c-9f3f-7a5bb1313f09", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "ecosystem, methodology, sector trend data", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-0c97b0f6ced7", "docSlug": "8c975254e7fcb9d0", "documentTitle": "Blurred lines FinTech 2016", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart uses a 2x2 matrix structure to map industry trends.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Figure 7 bubble chart importance x likelihood", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-0c97b0f6ced7/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-0c97b0f6ced7", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-0c97b0f6ced7#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 9, "name": "2x2 Matrix", "slug": "30-2x2-matrix", "bestFor": "Portfolio analysis, prioritization, strategic positioning", "matchId": "019de951-2a2d-744c-8950-2b85f6ae5e2f", "evidence": "Bubble charts on p10/11/13/14 with axes Level of importance and Likelihood to respond.", "position": 2, "objective": "Map FinTech trends per sector on importance × likelihood-to-respond", "structure": "Dimension 1 (X-axis) -> Dimension 2 (Y-axis) -> The Four Quadrants -> The Sweet Spot", "confidence": 90, "description": "Plot options on two critical dimensions to reveal the optimal quadrant" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 9, "beatId": "019de951-28d9-73c0-a1cd-92b6d6ffdc9f", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "trend frameworks per sector + blockchain so-what synthesis", "position": 3, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 16, "from": 1, "beatId": "019de951-2986-745c-9f3f-7a5bb1313f09", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "ecosystem, methodology, sector trend data", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-0c97b0f6ced7", "docSlug": "8c975254e7fcb9d0", "documentTitle": "Blurred lines FinTech 2016", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart uses a 2x2 matrix structure to categorize trends based on importance and likelihood to respond.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Figure 8 bubble chart importance x likelihood for AM/WM", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-0c97b0f6ced7/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-0c97b0f6ced7", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-0c97b0f6ced7#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 9, "name": "2x2 Matrix", "slug": "30-2x2-matrix", "bestFor": "Portfolio analysis, prioritization, strategic positioning", "matchId": "019de951-2a2d-744c-8950-2b85f6ae5e2f", "evidence": "Bubble charts on p10/11/13/14 with axes Level of importance and Likelihood to respond.", "position": 2, "objective": "Map FinTech trends per sector on importance × likelihood-to-respond", "structure": "Dimension 1 (X-axis) -> Dimension 2 (Y-axis) -> The Four Quadrants -> The Sweet Spot", "confidence": 90, "description": "Plot options on two critical dimensions to reveal the optimal quadrant" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 9, "beatId": "019de951-28d9-73c0-a1cd-92b6d6ffdc9f", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "trend frameworks per sector + blockchain so-what synthesis", "position": 3, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 16, "from": 1, "beatId": "019de951-2986-745c-9f3f-7a5bb1313f09", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "ecosystem, methodology, sector trend data", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-0c97b0f6ced7", "docSlug": "8c975254e7fcb9d0", "documentTitle": "Blurred lines FinTech 2016", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart uses bubble size to represent the number of related FinTech companies.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Figure 9 bubble chart importance x likelihood for insurance", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-0c97b0f6ced7/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-0c97b0f6ced7", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-0c97b0f6ced7#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 9, "name": "2x2 Matrix", "slug": "30-2x2-matrix", "bestFor": "Portfolio analysis, prioritization, strategic positioning", "matchId": "019de951-2a2d-744c-8950-2b85f6ae5e2f", "evidence": "Bubble charts on p10/11/13/14 with axes Level of importance and Likelihood to respond.", "position": 2, "objective": "Map FinTech trends per sector on importance × likelihood-to-respond", "structure": "Dimension 1 (X-axis) -> Dimension 2 (Y-axis) -> The Four Quadrants -> The Sweet Spot", "confidence": 90, "description": "Plot options on two critical dimensions to reveal the optimal quadrant" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 9, "beatId": "019de951-28d9-73c0-a1cd-92b6d6ffdc9f", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "trend frameworks per sector + blockchain so-what synthesis", "position": 3, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 16, "from": 1, "beatId": "019de951-2986-745c-9f3f-7a5bb1313f09", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "ecosystem, methodology, sector trend data", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-65e903950e8c", "docSlug": "5582858f8334e55e", "documentTitle": "Boardroom Agenda 2022", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.777, "pageNumber": 35, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a 2x2 grid layout to structure the risk factors.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Image confirms 2x2 People/Processes/Technology/Environment quadrants", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-65e903950e8c/35", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-65e903950e8c", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-65e903950e8c#slide-35", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 39, "from": 35, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019de9b0-863e-773f-9329-d43311098a07", "evidence": "2x2 People/Processes/Technology/Environment, then five-pillar focus donut.", "position": 7, "objective": "Categorise cyber risk sources and focus areas", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 44, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de9b0-8412-77cc-9cd3-12ab4aa2f586", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "ESG investor data, breach costs, workforce volatility surveys", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 45, "from": 35, "beatId": "019de9b0-84db-73bd-9a92-7e97b02b27b5", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Cyber sources MECE, focus areas, six workforce moves", "position": 3, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-ff5959cc3717", "docSlug": "13eb135e1f137482", "documentTitle": "Brazil Education Technology Market L.E.K. Perspectives", "authorId": "LEK", "authorName": "L.E.K.", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 25, "slideType": "segmentation", "function": "decompose_segments", "notes": "The chart uses a grid layout to categorize companies by region and sub-segment, with counts provided for each row and column.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Sub-segment by country grid with counts", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-ff5959cc3717/25", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-ff5959cc3717", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-ff5959cc3717#slide-25", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 26, "from": 22, "name": "Pareto Focus", "slug": "50-pareto-focus", "bestFor": "Resource allocation, problem prioritization, efficiency improvements", "matchId": "019de7d8-f62a-753c-ba1e-b48c0094ce00", "evidence": "Six attractive segments (p22), 170 to 41 funnel (p24), 2x2 prioritization (p26).", "position": 4, "objective": "Filter market down to a prioritized vital few", "structure": "The Full Distribution -> The Vital Few (20%) -> The Trivial Many (80%) -> Focus Recommendation", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show that 80% of results come from 20% of causes to drive prioritization" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de7d8-f41e-7455-b8ff-651fed4f48b2", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Funnel to 41 assets; 2x2; customer-journey differentiation (p24-28)", "position": 4, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 28, "from": 13, "beatId": "019de7d8-f4be-74e7-91aa-79a4d542f334", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Investment themes and segment prioritization", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-0356a0f80391", "docSlug": "bf11fb5514698fcd", "documentTitle": "Constraints to growth: supply chain risks facing renewables Presentation", "authorId": "LEK", "authorName": "L.E.K.", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "risk_register", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a color-coded heatmap to represent risk levels (Green=Low, Yellow=Medium, Orange=High).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Risk-by-time horizon grid layout", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-0356a0f80391/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-0356a0f80391", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-0356a0f80391#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 4, "name": "Issue Tree", "slug": "43-issue-tree", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, project scoping, complex analysis", "matchId": "019de7de-f276-70ea-ae54-a93b1899faea", "evidence": "Solar framing (p4), interconnection (p5-6), labor (p7), equipment (p8), heatmap synthesis (p9)", "position": 2, "objective": "Decompose the constraint question into three sub-questions and synthesize answer", "structure": "The Key Question -> Sub-Question A -> Sub-Question B -> Sub-Question C -> Synthesized Answer", "confidence": 80, "description": "Break a key question into sub-questions until you reach answerable, actionable pieces" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 5, "beatId": "019de7de-f0df-7158-bdf5-0f2d70a40509", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Per-constraint deep dives plus heatmap synthesis", "position": 4, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 9, "from": 5, "beatId": "019de7de-f207-766f-b025-e1e661c60e58", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Three constraint diagnoses and risk heatmap", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-0b3d0dba4855", "docSlug": "7a6e6a1272bc13d8", "documentTitle": "Education: 2022 M&A Deal Roundup and Trends to Watch Out for in 2023", "authorId": "LEK", "authorName": "L.E.K.", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 38, "slideType": "market_landscape", "function": "size_opportunity", "notes": "The slide uses a matrix structure to segment companies for potential investment opportunities.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Funding amount × last-funding-year 2D grid.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-0b3d0dba4855/38", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-0b3d0dba4855", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-0b3d0dba4855#slide-38", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 43, "from": 38, "name": "2x2 Matrix", "slug": "30-2x2-matrix", "bestFor": "Portfolio analysis, prioritization, strategic positioning", "matchId": "019de7ea-39f3-75cd-8894-d91d7e1dffe4", "evidence": "p38 funding×vintage matrix; p39-40 US segment grids; p41-42 LatAm heatmap+matrix; p43 APAC region×series matrix.", "position": 7, "objective": "Prioritize US, LatAm and APAC edtech assets via funding/scale matrices", "structure": "Dimension 1 (X-axis) -> Dimension 2 (Y-axis) -> The Four Quadrants -> The Sweet Spot", "confidence": 80, "description": "Plot options on two critical dimensions to reveal the optimal quadrant" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 43, "from": 33, "beatId": "019de7ea-37ea-745b-b24c-d94313b55496", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Asset scans by geography prove investable pipeline exists.", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 44, "from": 33, "beatId": "019de7ea-38dd-7595-bb98-bd8e7d4766fa", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Asset scans by region and explicit 'reach out' CTA.", "position": 3, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-0b3d0dba4855", "docSlug": "7a6e6a1272bc13d8", "documentTitle": "Education: 2022 M&A Deal Roundup and Trends to Watch Out for in 2023", "authorId": "LEK", "authorName": "L.E.K.", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 43, "slideType": "market_landscape", "function": "size_opportunity", "notes": "The slide uses a matrix layout to categorize companies by geography (India, SEA, East Asia, Australia) and funding stage.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Region × last funding series matrix of APAC assets.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-0b3d0dba4855/43", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-0b3d0dba4855", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-0b3d0dba4855#slide-43", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 43, "from": 38, "name": "2x2 Matrix", "slug": "30-2x2-matrix", "bestFor": "Portfolio analysis, prioritization, strategic positioning", "matchId": "019de7ea-39f3-75cd-8894-d91d7e1dffe4", "evidence": "p38 funding×vintage matrix; p39-40 US segment grids; p41-42 LatAm heatmap+matrix; p43 APAC region×series matrix.", "position": 7, "objective": "Prioritize US, LatAm and APAC edtech assets via funding/scale matrices", "structure": "Dimension 1 (X-axis) -> Dimension 2 (Y-axis) -> The Four Quadrants -> The Sweet Spot", "confidence": 80, "description": "Plot options on two critical dimensions to reveal the optimal quadrant" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 43, "from": 33, "beatId": "019de7ea-37ea-745b-b24c-d94313b55496", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Asset scans by geography prove investable pipeline exists.", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 44, "from": 33, "beatId": "019de7ea-38dd-7595-bb98-bd8e7d4766fa", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Asset scans by region and explicit 'reach out' CTA.", "position": 3, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-d65acfc8060e", "docSlug": "5acc72be81397b34", "documentTitle": "EY Academic Resource Center – mission", "authorId": "EY", "authorName": "EY", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.779, "pageNumber": 22, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The table uses shading to indicate applicability of case studies to specific academic courses.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Cases x course rows form coverage grid", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-d65acfc8060e/22", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-d65acfc8060e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-d65acfc8060e#slide-22", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 30, "from": 22, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019de8b3-2ad0-77cd-8e41-4d41e9b23cb0", "evidence": "Nine matrix tables crossing cases x courses/tools/techniques", "position": 3, "objective": "Map every case study to every competency dimension", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 75, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 30, "from": 3, "beatId": "019de8b3-2988-7099-b248-c8e5b3b4130b", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Analytics mindset framework, Tufte principles, master case guide", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 30, "from": 3, "beatId": "019de8b3-2a3d-72f8-b9b3-464287d9fcd1", "arcName": "The Golden Circle", "arcSlug": "golden-circle", "beatName": "How", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Analytics mindset competency framework + Tufte", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-d65acfc8060e", "docSlug": "5acc72be81397b34", "documentTitle": "EY Academic Resource Center – mission", "authorId": "EY", "authorName": "EY", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.779, "pageNumber": 24, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The table uses Roman numerals and asterisks to indicate the level or presence of specific competencies within each case study.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Cases x ETL competencies grid", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-d65acfc8060e/24", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-d65acfc8060e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-d65acfc8060e#slide-24", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 30, "from": 22, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019de8b3-2ad0-77cd-8e41-4d41e9b23cb0", "evidence": "Nine matrix tables crossing cases x courses/tools/techniques", "position": 3, "objective": "Map every case study to every competency dimension", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 75, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 30, "from": 3, "beatId": "019de8b3-2988-7099-b248-c8e5b3b4130b", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Analytics mindset framework, Tufte principles, master case guide", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 30, "from": 3, "beatId": "019de8b3-2a3d-72f8-b9b3-464287d9fcd1", "arcName": "The Golden Circle", "arcSlug": "golden-circle", "beatName": "How", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Analytics mindset competency framework + Tufte", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-d65acfc8060e", "docSlug": "5acc72be81397b34", "documentTitle": "EY Academic Resource Center – mission", "authorId": "EY", "authorName": "EY", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.779, "pageNumber": 25, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The table uses Roman numerals to indicate the level or type of application for each technique within the respective case study.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Cases x analytics-techniques grid", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-d65acfc8060e/25", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-d65acfc8060e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-d65acfc8060e#slide-25", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 30, "from": 22, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019de8b3-2ad0-77cd-8e41-4d41e9b23cb0", "evidence": "Nine matrix tables crossing cases x courses/tools/techniques", "position": 3, "objective": "Map every case study to every competency dimension", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 75, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 30, "from": 3, "beatId": "019de8b3-2988-7099-b248-c8e5b3b4130b", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Analytics mindset framework, Tufte principles, master case guide", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 30, "from": 3, "beatId": "019de8b3-2a3d-72f8-b9b3-464287d9fcd1", "arcName": "The Golden Circle", "arcSlug": "golden-circle", "beatName": "How", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Analytics mindset competency framework + Tufte", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-d65acfc8060e", "docSlug": "5acc72be81397b34", "documentTitle": "EY Academic Resource Center – mission", "authorId": "EY", "authorName": "EY", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.779, "pageNumber": 26, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The table uses Roman numerals to indicate specific modules or sections within each case study, with asterisks denoting optional components.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Cases x tools (Excel/Access/Viz) grid", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-d65acfc8060e/26", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-d65acfc8060e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-d65acfc8060e#slide-26", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 30, "from": 22, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019de8b3-2ad0-77cd-8e41-4d41e9b23cb0", "evidence": "Nine matrix tables crossing cases x courses/tools/techniques", "position": 3, "objective": "Map every case study to every competency dimension", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 75, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 30, "from": 3, "beatId": "019de8b3-2988-7099-b248-c8e5b3b4130b", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Analytics mindset framework, Tufte principles, master case guide", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 30, "from": 3, "beatId": "019de8b3-2a3d-72f8-b9b3-464287d9fcd1", "arcName": "The Golden Circle", "arcSlug": "golden-circle", "beatName": "How", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Analytics mindset competency framework + Tufte", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "docSlug": "190510b49511442d", "documentTitle": "Lazard LCOE+", "authorId": "RolandBerger", "authorName": "Lazard", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 22, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a checkmark matrix to indicate applicability of revenue streams to specific storage configurations.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Revenue streams (rows) x storage use cases (columns) with checkmarks", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04/22", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04#slide-22", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 20, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019de8e9-bb5a-7354-9f03-67db31523c3b", "evidence": "LCOS comparisons by configuration (p.20-21), revenue-stream matrix (p.22), then case-study results decomposed by segment (p.23-25).", "position": 4, "objective": "Segment LCOS economics by storage use case (IFM vs BTM)", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 55, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 29, "from": 9, "beatId": "019de8e9-b9e8-7495-9d03-f088e78d95b4", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "LCOE/LCOS/LCOH benchmarking, sensitivity, cost-component charts", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 29, "from": 7, "beatId": "019de8e9-ba8d-77ee-ae2c-b5633a8eaa8c", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "LCOE, LCOS, LCOH detailed comparisons and sensitivities", "position": 3, "confidence": 35, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "docSlug": "190510b49511442d", "documentTitle": "Lazard LCOE+", "authorId": "RolandBerger", "authorName": "Lazard", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 41, "slideType": "situation_overview", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "The slide uses a table structure to map use cases to descriptions and technologies.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Use-case applications categorized by location and battery technology", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04/41", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04#slide-41", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 47, "from": 30, "beatId": "019de8e9-baaf-7498-afad-9147e9866acd", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology and key-assumptions appendix", "position": 4, "confidence": 35, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-ed07d758b8cd", "docSlug": "3f41fcbc714f036c", "documentTitle": "Reinforcing the New South Wales Southern Shared Network (HumeLink) PADR – EY Market Modelling", "authorId": "EY", "authorName": "EY", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.779, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The table displays millions of real June 2019 dollars discounted to June 2020 dollars over a 25-year horizon.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "12 options × 4 scenarios benefit grid with preferred option highlighted.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-ed07d758b8cd/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-ed07d758b8cd", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-ed07d758b8cd#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 11, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019de8bb-2d4e-774f-8993-debfdd18bdc6", "evidence": "p11 shows all 12 options across 4 scenarios; pp12-15 then drill into Option 3C capacity, benefits and Snowy 2.0 operation.", "position": 2, "objective": "Zoom from full option set into Option 3C outcomes", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 78, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 11, "beatId": "019de8bb-2c3c-7691-827c-f8f1792c0521", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Option-vs-scenario table with Option 3C boxed in red as the preferred choice.", "position": 3, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 15, "from": 11, "beatId": "019de8bb-2ce7-749d-9bdb-49b5dc65a1ab", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Option 3C selected and proven across scenarios.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-7fea38d3796b", "docSlug": "af5f903f507e4879", "documentTitle": "Reset Innovation Priorities", "authorId": "Innosight", "authorName": "Innosight", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.499, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "kpi_dashboard", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a 3x3 grid of mini-dashboards to analyze innovation portfolio health.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Explicit 3x3 grid: 3 strategic questions x 3 lenses", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-7fea38d3796b/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-7fea38d3796b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-7fea38d3796b#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 8, "name": "Issue Tree", "slug": "43-issue-tree", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, project scoping, complex analysis", "matchId": "019de8e0-9672-71d6-a2f7-df2c61168d6e", "evidence": "Step 2 organises 3 questions x 3 views (Fig 3) plus alignment (Fig 4) and zombie (Fig 5) analyses.", "position": 4, "objective": "Decompose portfolio diagnosis into three sub-questions answered by analytical views", "structure": "The Key Question -> Sub-Question A -> Sub-Question B -> Sub-Question C -> Synthesized Answer", "confidence": 85, "description": "Break a key question into sub-questions until you reach answerable, actionable pieces" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 8, "beatId": "019de8e0-9546-7685-91fc-ac649793ba73", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Step 2 portfolio analyses with Figures 3-5", "position": 4, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 11, "from": 2, "beatId": "019de8e0-95a8-73ac-acdc-889fbe6c6d35", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Crisis framing and portfolio analyses", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-0ea49d021bbe", "docSlug": "148a062f7e47b0b5", "documentTitle": "Trends & AI in the Contact Center", "authorId": "Deloitte", "authorName": "Deloitte", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 19, "slideType": "other", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide uses a matrix-like structure to categorize offerings into 'Sales and Service Transformation' and 'Customized Solution Development'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Row labels Areas/Accelerator/Description/Examples vs 2-col split.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-0ea49d021bbe/19", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-0ea49d021bbe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-0ea49d021bbe#slide-19", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 23, "from": 19, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019deab8-552d-7483-8368-36887106dcf8", "evidence": "Solution framework (p19) -> nuts-and-bolts flow (p20) -> GenAI def (p21) -> applicability (p22) -> architecture (p23).", "position": 4, "objective": "Drill from Deloitte assets down to GenAI applicability and architecture", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 72, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 23, "from": 14, "beatId": "019deab8-53af-7352-a807-e611713aa078", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "CAI use cases, value, TrueServe framework, GenAI fit, architecture (p16-23).", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 23, "from": 16, "beatId": "019deab8-546c-7543-b0a1-9efb0c50aa46", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "AI use cases, NPS impact, solution framework.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }