{
  "kind": "framework",
  "value": "methodology",
  "collectionKey": "slides:framework:methodology:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 4,
  "page": 1,
  "pageSize": 24,
  "pageCount": 1,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-e8f1ef5d4b41",
      "docSlug": "a888efab1defd2b2",
      "documentTitle": "2025 Sovereign AI report",
      "authorId": "Accenture",
      "authorName": "Accenture",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 22,
      "slideType": "appendix_methodology",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": "The slide outlines the research design, including the weighting of the Sovereignty Index components.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Describes research design, sample, and index construction",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-e8f1ef5d4b41/22",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-e8f1ef5d4b41",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-e8f1ef5d4b41#slide-22",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc",
      "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664",
      "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.445,
      "pageNumber": 351,
      "slideType": "impact_sizing",
      "function": "quantify_impact",
      "notes": "Slide 350 from a BCG/Struensee deck. Contains detailed methodology for calculating administrative savings potential.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Detailed explanation of survey, interview, and calculation logic for administrative savings.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/351",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-351",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 365,
          "from": 322,
          "name": "Scenario Fork",
          "slug": "35-scenario-fork",
          "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-6e9175aa6c84",
          "evidence": "5 designkriterier -> 4 konkrete modeller (page 334-336) -> recommendation + 14 mio. kr. kursusadm.",
          "position": 11,
          "objective": "Compare four models for administrative faellesskaber plus kursusadministration",
          "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation",
          "confidence": 86,
          "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 420,
          "from": 322,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2a66536a5837",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Admin fællesskaber + nyordning af logistik + insourcing benchmarks and business cases.",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        },
        {
          "to": 365,
          "from": 166,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-37e90642ab06",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
          "evidence": "Potentialeestimater, benchmark gaps, comparison tables.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
          "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-7e086806c4e2",
      "docSlug": "08c8ca383c0783b1",
      "documentTitle": "Global Parity Alliance DEI Lighthouses (with McKinsey)",
      "authorId": "WEF",
      "authorName": "World Economic Forum",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "academic_think_tank",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Academic / think tank",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.707,
      "pageNumber": 10,
      "slideType": "appendix_methodology",
      "function": "present_framework",
      "notes": "The slide outlines the criteria (Significance, Quantifiability, Scalability, Sustainability) used by an independent panel to select DEI Lighthouse initiatives.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Process and methodology for identifying DEI Lighthouses",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-7e086806c4e2/10",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-7e086806c4e2",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-7e086806c4e2#slide-10",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-d7a66052de17",
      "docSlug": "a587d39c6652536d",
      "documentTitle": "Global Retail Expansion at Crossroads",
      "authorId": "Kearney",
      "authorName": "Kearney",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.678,
      "pageNumber": 29,
      "slideType": "appendix_methodology",
      "function": "present_framework",
      "notes": "The slide outlines a weighted scoring system for ranking developing countries based on retail market potential.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide details the criteria and weighting for the Global Retail Development Index.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-d7a66052de17/29",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-d7a66052de17",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-d7a66052de17#slide-29",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 31,
          "from": 26,
          "beatId": "7ec704e2-8ecd-4b5d-bcbe-7de80ab88c34",
          "arcName": "Monroe's Motivated Sequence",
          "arcSlug": "monroes-sequence",
          "beatName": "Visualization",
          "beatSlug": "monroes-sequence-visualization",
          "evidence": "The document provides a conclusion and appendix",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}