{ "kind": "framework", "value": "mece-principle", "collectionKey": "slides:framework:mece-principle:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 88, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 4, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-54f6dd681b65", "docSlug": "aa2787b7fc5d789e", "documentTitle": "2023 Manufacturing Survey", "authorId": "LEK", "authorName": "L.E.K.", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "prioritize", "notes": "The slide uses a vertical axis to indicate 'Increasing near-term importance' for the listed items.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Categorization of priorities into three distinct, non-overlapping buckets.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-54f6dd681b65/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-54f6dd681b65", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-54f6dd681b65#slide-5", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 2, "name": "Logic Chain", "slug": "01-logic-chain", "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis", "matchId": "f6448ba9-e8f1-4f95-ae8f-3b0cf101d8e1", "evidence": "clear logic chain from challenges to priorities", "position": 0, "objective": "Understand challenges and priorities", "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 4, "beatId": "73a60f4e-2133-433d-b646-189669ce7b93", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Solution", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief", "evidence": "priorities and key initiatives listed", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-bc879d1b6d64", "docSlug": "17680cec2cbd3510", "documentTitle": "Accelerated Access Review UK Mapping", "authorId": "Deloitte", "authorName": "Deloitte", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "prioritize", "notes": "The slide uses a simple list-based framework to categorize 12 items into 3 groups of 4.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The 12 opportunities are grouped into 3 mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive categories.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-bc879d1b6d64/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-bc879d1b6d64", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-bc879d1b6d64#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 5, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "216c31e8-2aee-4a6b-81ea-25d4d04ac422", "evidence": "The document highlights the consequences of not addressing the challenges, such as limited access to new treatments and technologies.", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the consequences of not improving access to medical innovations?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 10, "beatId": "aacd1ccc-bd28-4624-b7f6-626b3a9a4a01", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "The document highlights the consequences of not addressing these challenges, such as limited access to new treatments and technologies.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-1fa9253061d3", "docSlug": "4c338f628428a490", "documentTitle": "Annual Report 2018", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.776, "pageNumber": 34, "slideType": "executive_summary", "function": "summarize", "notes": "This is a page from an annual report, including a table of contents on the left and a performance summary on the right.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Structured table with three distinct columns for strategy analysis", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-1fa9253061d3/34", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-1fa9253061d3", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-1fa9253061d3#slide-34", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 71, "from": 14, "beatId": "bb779c68-468c-42bb-8e53-79a4f550b8cd", "arcName": "The Sparkline", "arcSlug": "sparkline", "beatName": "Report of the Board of Management", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "The report of the Board of Management provides detailed information on PwC's strategy, achievements, and financial performance.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-c6600823b681", "docSlug": "dc60737d0fab3b3d", "documentTitle": "Blockchain and Digital Assets", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 32, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a three-column layout to categorize the impact of blockchain technology on consumer goods.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide categorizes the impact into three distinct, non-overlapping core functions.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-c6600823b681/32", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-c6600823b681", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-c6600823b681#slide-32", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 69, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide uses a structured table format to detail a specific efficiency proposal (number 24) for the Danish Defence (VFK).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a structured, mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categorization of the initiative (Baseline, Potential, Description, Risks, Assumptions, Overlap).", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/69", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-69", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 70, "from": 64, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-0dd70a729798", "evidence": "Six initiative one-pagers (16-32, 21-39, 3, 20-32, 5-10, 5-10 mio. kr.) summing operative cross-cutting savings.", "position": 11, "objective": "Add operative cross-cutting personnel/process initiatives", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 70, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 115, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-08b5faaeae90", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Per-area sizing, 45 one-pagers with provenue, overlap reconciliation.", "position": 4, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 30, "slideType": "situation_overview", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "The slide uses a BCG-style layout with a clear methodology description on the left and supporting data visualizations on the right.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Categorization into three mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive groups", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/30", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-30", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 28, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-48b7ee098467", "evidence": "Survey data -> tema-effekt -> recommendations -> 33 mio. kr. potentiale -> indfasningstakt.", "position": 2, "objective": "Diagnose contract templates and recommend kommerciel uddannelse", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 82, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 165, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-30a6df91c9fe", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Baselines, segmentations, current-state diagnoses dominate first half.", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76", "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d", "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.401, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "market_landscape", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a column-based categorization to define scope boundaries.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categorization to define the scope of the sector.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-4", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-a649f8adf4db", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Cover, intro, exec summary, sector boundaries, agenda", "position": 1, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f5384ab2841e", "docSlug": "8acd487d37400d35", "documentTitle": "Fast Forward Route to Consumers", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "Bain", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.435, "pageNumber": 3, "slideType": "kpi_dashboard", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a 'waterfall-like' stacked bar structure to show market composition. Arrows likely indicate growth trends or performance outlook for 2016.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The data is segmented into mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive categories (Categories, Geographies, Channels).", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f5384ab2841e/3", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f5384ab2841e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f5384ab2841e#slide-3", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 2, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b312-13fff1dfb544", "evidence": "Growth bars (€33B) + waterfall vs €1,081B luxury; closing slide states long-term potential.", "position": 1, "objective": "Show design is healthy yet only 4% of luxury, leaving large headroom", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 78, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a4-702a-b0b2-64831e581b1c", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Market growth, segments, size vs luxury, long-term potential", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 9, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a4-702a-b0b2-781ac1f36727", "arcName": "The Transformation Tale", "arcSlug": "transformation-tale", "beatName": "Current Reality (Pain)", "beatSlug": "transformation-tale-current-reality-pain", "evidence": "Small share of luxury, marginal retail, equation under stress", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-81f9a9d15c02", "docSlug": "ed2d1b7fa5f3723f", "documentTitle": "Future of Growth Report", "authorId": "WEF", "authorName": "World Economic Forum", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "academic_think_tank", "sourceTypeLabel": "Academic / think tank", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 254, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "appendix", "notes": "The table maps specific metrics (e.g., A1.1, B1.1) to their respective ecosystem drivers and thematic pillars.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The table organizes indicators into a mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive structure of drivers and pillars.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-81f9a9d15c02/254", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-81f9a9d15c02", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-81f9a9d15c02#slide-254", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-81f9a9d15c02", "docSlug": "ed2d1b7fa5f3723f", "documentTitle": "Future of Growth Report", "authorId": "WEF", "authorName": "World Economic Forum", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "academic_think_tank", "sourceTypeLabel": "Academic / think tank", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 255, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "This is a reference table defining the metrics for a growth framework.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The table organizes indicators into a structured, non-overlapping framework of drivers.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-81f9a9d15c02/255", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-81f9a9d15c02", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-81f9a9d15c02#slide-255", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-aa0e0d57c92b", "docSlug": "0455fc7f0c3ac29a", "documentTitle": "Global Health Partnerships Stop TB", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 39, "slideType": "kpi_dashboard", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a hierarchical tree-like structure to decompose a single high-level objective into granular operational targets.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide systematically breaks down a high-level objective into mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive categories of audience and metrics.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-aa0e0d57c92b/39", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-aa0e0d57c92b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-aa0e0d57c92b#slide-39", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 34, "beatId": "d0fcdc64-58d7-44b2-a4ac-a55e7f4ad888", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document presents expected impact and project outlook", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-09aee3d61939", "docSlug": "457655daca764762", "documentTitle": "Global MedTech – How to succeed in uncertain times", "authorId": "RolandBerger", "authorName": "Roland Berger", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide contains two distinct sections: a regional performance analysis (G) and a summary of winning characteristics (H).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Categorization of company performance into distinct, non-overlapping segments (Winners, Cash generators, Profitless growers, Underperformers)", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-09aee3d61939/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-09aee3d61939", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-09aee3d61939#slide-7", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-0e5cf0e1ad99", "docSlug": "66e1021b86be5625", "documentTitle": "Global pharma winners – focus and efficiency matter", "authorId": "RolandBerger", "authorName": "Roland Berger", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide combines a framework of four winning characteristics with a specific company case study and supporting data charts on disease focus and ESG performance.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Four distinct characteristics of winning companies presented as a comprehensive set.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-0e5cf0e1ad99/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-0e5cf0e1ad99", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-0e5cf0e1ad99#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 3, "name": "Logic Chain", "slug": "01-logic-chain", "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis", "matchId": "90ec7d40-8102-4183-9181-4f6898343bb0", "evidence": "The document provides a clear and logical structure, connecting the situation and context to the solution and approach", "position": 0, "objective": "To demonstrate the logic and reasoning behind the efficiency measures", "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion" }, { "to": 9, "from": 4, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "af7803fc-7fff-46d4-876f-a01233f27297", "evidence": "The document emphasizes the importance of efficiency measures in driving strong investor returns", "position": 1, "objective": "To highlight the cost of inaction and the importance of efficiency measures", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 7, "beatId": "21f7c979-2bb3-47ff-9b60-6ea8a09521aa", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "The case study and key takeaways provide a solution and approach to addressing the problems and complications", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-093f3fd1ecfe", "docSlug": "5ee5a9db2750184a", "documentTitle": "Lebanon Economic Vision", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 417, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide uses a three-pillar framework to organize seven specific digital transformation initiatives.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide organizes initiatives into three mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive categories.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-093f3fd1ecfe/417", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-093f3fd1ecfe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-093f3fd1ecfe#slide-417", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-093f3fd1ecfe", "docSlug": "5ee5a9db2750184a", "documentTitle": "Lebanon Economic Vision", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 1172, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a structured table to map strategic insights to operational data requirements and gaps.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide categorizes tourism data needs into four mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive categories.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-093f3fd1ecfe/1172", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-093f3fd1ecfe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-093f3fd1ecfe#slide-1172", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-c2f73497811c", "docSlug": "f6506cba246b6e5e", "documentTitle": "New Mexico State Staffing Study", "authorId": "Deloitte", "authorName": "Deloitte", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a stacked bar chart to illustrate the degree of centralization vs. decentralization (fragmentation) across 14 functional areas.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart categorizes all FTEs into either centralized or non-centralized, providing a mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive view of the workforce distribution.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-c2f73497811c/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-c2f73497811c", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-c2f73497811c#slide-11", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "beatId": "00f4f1a8-1cc6-4e73-9ee5-6213d64f4315", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "The document highlights the complexities of NMSU's organizational structure and the fragmentation of processes across different functions.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-c2f73497811c", "docSlug": "f6506cba246b6e5e", "documentTitle": "New Mexico State Staffing Study", "authorId": "Deloitte", "authorName": "Deloitte", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a four-category framework (Organization, Process, Policy, Technology) to structure findings.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide categorizes observations into four distinct, non-overlapping buckets (Organization, Process, Policy, Technology).", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-c2f73497811c/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-c2f73497811c", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-c2f73497811c#slide-15", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "beatId": "00f4f1a8-1cc6-4e73-9ee5-6213d64f4315", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "The document highlights the complexities of NMSU's organizational structure and the fragmentation of processes across different functions.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57", "docSlug": "09ad2cf031bccf07", "documentTitle": "Proposal Spend Analysis Procurement Virginia", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 20, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The table outlines a structured methodology for spend analysis and procurement optimization.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The table structure provides a comprehensive, mutually exclusive, and collectively exhaustive breakdown of project requirements and solutions.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57/20", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57#slide-20", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 17, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-bd2c624f6be5", "evidence": "Figure 2 shows 3 execution + 3 enabler components; Figure 3 splits Phase 1 (90d) / Phase 2 (120d).", "position": 2, "objective": "Break BCG approach into 6 MECE components and 2 phases", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 85, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 45, "from": 17, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-c2dfe9db308a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "6-component framework, Phase 1 & Phase 2 detailed methodology, tools & timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57", "docSlug": "09ad2cf031bccf07", "documentTitle": "Proposal Spend Analysis Procurement Virginia", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 21, "slideType": "implementation_plan", "function": "plan_implementation", "notes": "The slide uses a structured table format to align client requirements with BCG's proprietary tools and outputs.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The table structure logically decomposes the project requirements into distinct, non-overlapping phases and deliverables.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57/21", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57#slide-21", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 17, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-bd2c624f6be5", "evidence": "Figure 2 shows 3 execution + 3 enabler components; Figure 3 splits Phase 1 (90d) / Phase 2 (120d).", "position": 2, "objective": "Break BCG approach into 6 MECE components and 2 phases", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 85, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 45, "from": 17, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-c2dfe9db308a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "6-component framework, Phase 1 & Phase 2 detailed methodology, tools & timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-a36c9aff2eaf", "docSlug": "2be50a4d610e63fc", "documentTitle": "The State of Fashion 2024", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.75, "pageNumber": 56, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "Includes a 'Segment Deep Dive' on the luxury sector and detailed commentary on 'Super Winners' and value creation dynamics.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Data is segmented by ranked quintiles (Top 20%, 21-80%, Bottom 20%)", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-a36c9aff2eaf/56", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-a36c9aff2eaf", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-a36c9aff2eaf#slide-56", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 65, "from": 31, "beatId": "82ce288e-4997-4d2d-8514-cae101b21056", "arcName": "The Sparkline", "arcSlug": "sparkline", "beatName": "Opportunities and Solutions", "beatSlug": "sparkline-new-bliss", "evidence": "The document concludes by highlighting opportunities for growth and innovation, as well as potential solutions for fashion companies.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-df215e4f0bc1", "docSlug": "b89c4b2a8f5b0c45", "documentTitle": "Transformation Ebook", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 2.5, "pageNumber": 26, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide uses a structured table to map strategic levers to operational actions and expected financial outcomes.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide categorizes all business levers into four mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive categories.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-df215e4f0bc1/26", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-df215e4f0bc1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-df215e4f0bc1#slide-26", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 25, "name": "Quick Win Big Bet", "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet", "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30e-c4686f0d35fc", "evidence": "Four levers + cases delivering 10-25% cost cuts and bps EBIT improvement in months.", "position": 4, "objective": "Sequence quick fund-the-journey wins to fuel transformation", "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap", "confidence": 80, "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 67, "from": 23, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e2-a351b5a5af36", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Part I introduces holistic 3-pillar framework chapter by chapter.", "position": 3, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 67, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e2-ad6495641025", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Context and 3-pillar framework definition.", "position": 1, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bb8662e8046e", "docSlug": "0f638186bb9b059e", "documentTitle": "UK Electricity Efficiency Potential", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": null, "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 3, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a clear in-scope/out-of-scope dichotomy to define project boundaries.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bb8662e8046e/3", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bb8662e8046e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bb8662e8046e#slide-3", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 1, "beatId": "409c1241-bb7a-4fd5-a03f-167e322e5225", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "The document provides an overview of the UK's electricity demand and the project scope.", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 12, "from": 3, "beatId": "179bf2f7-ac41-4979-9cfa-17eb2e675542", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "The document discusses the potential for electricity efficiency measures to reduce UK electricity demand.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bb8662e8046e", "docSlug": "0f638186bb9b059e", "documentTitle": "UK Electricity Efficiency Potential", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": null, "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 53, "slideType": "strategic_options", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide uses a structured table to map policy interventions to market barriers.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide categorizes design options into 8 distinct, non-overlapping categories.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bb8662e8046e/53", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bb8662e8046e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bb8662e8046e#slide-53", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 77, "from": 6, "beatId": "02a14110-f7eb-4a8e-ad6c-56f071f97bab", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document provides data tables and analysis to support the potential for electricity efficiency measures.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 129, "from": 53, "beatId": "9060aec2-6eb2-4c62-ad0e-6e1552b9219e", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document discusses design options and policy mechanisms to capture the electricity efficiency potential.", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-a66a0d3463c0", "docSlug": "bccc7ca74c5344e0", "documentTitle": "USPS Future Business Model", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 22, "slideType": "strategic_options", "function": "present_solution", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide categorizes actions into mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive buckets (Internal vs Fundamental/Legislative).", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-a66a0d3463c0/22", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-a66a0d3463c0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-a66a0d3463c0#slide-22", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 19, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "6e74d38d-2ea0-494f-aaea-19fe8eb14848", "evidence": "The deck presents a scenario analysis of the financial outlook for the Postal Service, highlighting the consequences of inaction.", "position": 0, "objective": "Highlight the consequences of inaction", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 36, "from": 22, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "ebe3a496-98eb-48eb-b1e4-b2b90b2d3590", "evidence": "The deck presents a framework for addressing the challenge, including product and service initiatives, pricing opportunities, and workforce opportunities.", "position": 1, "objective": "Break down the problem into manageable parts", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 38, "from": 22, "beatId": "6d80f5a5-15f2-424b-aae4-9524e06b6575", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "The deck presents potential solutions, including actions within USPS control and fundamental changes to increase flexibility.", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }