{ "kind": "framework", "value": "matrix-nxn", "collectionKey": "slides:framework:matrix-nxn:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 745, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 32, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-28a586004c6a", "docSlug": "12fe3b32e8bb3609", "documentTitle": "Agility Successful Supply Chains", "authorId": "ArthurDLittle", "authorName": "Arthur D. Little", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 2, "slideType": "other", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide features a matrix-style framework mapping 'Volume flexibility' and 'Mix flexibility' against 'Material', 'Facilities', and 'Manpower'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide presents a 2x3 matrix mapping flexibility types against production resources.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-28a586004c6a/2", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-28a586004c6a", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-28a586004c6a#slide-2", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 2, "from": 2, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019de0f7-1e63-7788-aea7-d82f21aeaad7", "evidence": "p2 Figure 1 splits levers across Material / Facilities / Manpower (resource MECE) crossed with Volume/Mix flexibility", "position": 2, "objective": "Decompose flexibility levers into distinct, exhaustive resource categories", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 75, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 2, "from": 2, "beatId": "019de0f7-1d1f-709e-8258-2292b0657fc8", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "p2 framework + 5-step transformation; flexibility-levers matrix", "position": 3, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 2, "from": 2, "beatId": "019de0f7-1de6-778a-9699-dd96eb721e7e", "arcName": "The Transformation Tale", "arcSlug": "transformation-tale", "beatName": "Future Vision (Gain)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "p2 framework defines the agile target state", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a checkmark matrix to show which levers apply to which operational areas.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide presents a grid mapping operational categories against specific levers.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 10, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-ee82db654b80", "evidence": "Three coverage matrices map the 8 levers (columns) against operative / material-IT / cross-cutting categories (rows) with checkmarks.", "position": 3, "objective": "Show the 8 levers applied MECE across the 3 domains", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 90, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 23, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-0625f7d01f7e", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "8 levers applied across operative/material-IT/cross-cutting; capacity-scaling concept.", "position": 3, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 12, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1441905b54cf", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "8 levers explain where potential comes from.", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 106, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a matrix structure to compare IT spending across functional domains and technical layers. It highlights the disparity between centralized (KAKI/ITP) and total IT spending.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide organizes IT spending data into a grid of functional domains vs. technical layers.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/106", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-106", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 148, "from": 98, "name": "Quick Win Big Bet", "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet", "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-54fbecd2dba5", "evidence": "Process in waves (p.112) + decision required on option (p.115) + 200-220 mil. recommended.", "position": 5, "objective": "Sequence IT consolidation in waves with two option scenarios", "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap", "confidence": 84, "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 165, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-30a6df91c9fe", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Baselines, segmentations, current-state diagnoses dominate first half.", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 326, "slideType": "appendix_methodology", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a comparison matrix structure to contrast two analytical approaches.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a grid structure to compare two distinct methodologies across four dimensions (Formål, Metode, Udbytte, Opmærksomhedspunkter).", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/326", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-326", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 365, "from": 322, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-6e9175aa6c84", "evidence": "5 designkriterier -> 4 konkrete modeller (page 334-336) -> recommendation + 14 mio. kr. kursusadm.", "position": 11, "objective": "Compare four models for administrative faellesskaber plus kursusadministration", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 86, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 420, "from": 322, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2a66536a5837", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Admin fællesskaber + nyordning af logistik + insourcing benchmarks and business cases.", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 365, "from": 166, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-37e90642ab06", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Potentialeestimater, benchmark gaps, comparison tables.", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 338, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a matrix-like structure to map task types to their future state (centralized vs. decentralized/discontinued).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a structured grid to categorize tasks by their nature and future management approach.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/338", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-338", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 365, "from": 322, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-6e9175aa6c84", "evidence": "5 designkriterier -> 4 konkrete modeller (page 334-336) -> recommendation + 14 mio. kr. kursusadm.", "position": 11, "objective": "Compare four models for administrative faellesskaber plus kursusadministration", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 86, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 420, "from": 322, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2a66536a5837", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Admin fællesskaber + nyordning af logistik + insourcing benchmarks and business cases.", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 365, "from": 166, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-37e90642ab06", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Potentialeestimater, benchmark gaps, comparison tables.", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 435, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses a matrix-like structure to categorize findings into horizontal and vertical overlaps.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide organizes findings into a grid comparing horizontal and vertical overlaps across organizational levels.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/435", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-435", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 482, "from": 422, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-74bf64322c2e", "evidence": "Six hovedaktiviteter -> niveau III enheder -> individual capacity assessments -> skalering methodology.", "position": 13, "objective": "MECE map Forsvaret organisation, capacities, and economic baseline", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 81, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 482, "from": 421, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2f76348a029e", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Kortlægning af forsvaret, capacity assessments, skalering & realiserbarhed methodology.", "position": 5, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 482, "from": 366, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-3ad263fdddff", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Logistic nyordning, kortlægning, skalering and realiserbarhed methodology.", "position": 3, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 479, "slideType": "strategic_options", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a structured grid layout to categorize capacity scaling considerations.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Structured grid layout for categorization", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/479", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-479", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 482, "from": 422, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-74bf64322c2e", "evidence": "Six hovedaktiviteter -> niveau III enheder -> individual capacity assessments -> skalering methodology.", "position": 13, "objective": "MECE map Forsvaret organisation, capacities, and economic baseline", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 81, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 482, "from": 421, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2f76348a029e", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Kortlægning af forsvaret, capacity assessments, skalering & realiserbarhed methodology.", "position": 5, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 482, "from": 366, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-3ad263fdddff", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Logistic nyordning, kortlægning, skalering and realiserbarhed methodology.", "position": 3, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c", "docSlug": "2862941a98bffda6", "documentTitle": "Corporate Ventures in Sweden", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "market_landscape", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The chart uses pie-chart icons to represent the intensity or prevalence of each tool within specific industries.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide presents a grid comparing three venturing tools against seven industries.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 8, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-d961b1a1cab4", "evidence": "CV positioned in Ansoff matrix, contrasted with M&A, then split into 3 vehicles × 7 industries.", "position": 3, "objective": "Introduce Corporate Venturing as a complementary, MECE-decomposed solution space", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 82, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-c40e152757b5", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "CV expands Ansoff matrix; three vehicles (CVC, accelerators, labs) by industry.", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c", "docSlug": "2862941a98bffda6", "documentTitle": "Corporate Ventures in Sweden", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "client_example", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide uses a matrix-like structure to compare company snapshots, CVC activities, and strategies.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a 3x3 grid to compare three companies across three dimensions.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 14, "name": "Precedent", "slug": "09-precedent", "bestFor": "Risk mitigation, strategy validation, building confidence in new approaches", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-e07caa472dcc", "evidence": "Three Swedish CV success cases (MTG, Volvo, AstraZeneca) + three global hub precedents (Silicon Valley, Israel, Munich).", "position": 5, "objective": "Cite working precedents to make the recommendation feel achievable", "structure": "The Precedent Case -> What Happened -> The Parallel -> Applied Learning", "confidence": 80, "description": "Use historical or external examples to validate your approach" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 11, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-cab8ec6916e2", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "R&D-intensity correlation, Sweden 20% vs global 33%, Swedish CVC examples.", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ecd1373a3c4b", "docSlug": "c7911803d8bab6f8", "documentTitle": "Digital consumer spending India", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 23, "slideType": "segmentation", "function": "decompose_segments", "notes": "The slide uses a vertical axis to distinguish between triggers and barriers, and a horizontal axis to categorize offerings.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Grid structure mapping categories against shopper types.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ecd1373a3c4b/23", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ecd1373a3c4b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ecd1373a3c4b#slide-23", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 22, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-4eea96c8834e", "evidence": "'What does this mean for you?' → triggers/barriers matrix → key interventions cascade.", "position": 5, "objective": "Pivot from data to actionable interventions per segment", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 86, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 23, "from": 11, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-1e4904ec09f8", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Five sector deep-dives + triggers/barriers synthesis matrix.", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 23, "from": 22, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-2b2f60c89b91", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Transition slide and triggers/barriers framework.", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76", "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d", "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.401, "pageNumber": 29, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a custom matrix format to evaluate subsectors. BCG copyright present.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide organizes data into a structured grid comparing subsectors against trend categories.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/29", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-29", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 30, "from": 29, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-af1c0b65612f", "evidence": "p.29 is the trend matrix (data → outlook arrows); p.30 translates outlook into growth-area recommendations.", "position": 5, "objective": "Move from observed subsector trends to where future NYC growth will come from", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 80, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 29, "from": 27, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-af870a2f6899", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Interview-derived concerns and subsector trend implications", "position": 3, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 29, "from": 27, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-bd59b1030f24", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Interview synthesis + subsector trend matrix", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-052ae7e18115", "docSlug": "36e0f5ea390bc410", "documentTitle": "Future of Sales Marketing Executive Perspectives", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "strategic_options", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a 4x3 matrix structure to categorize strategic options by channel function and technology application.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "4x3 grid comparing channel strategies against implementation dimensions", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-052ae7e18115/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-052ae7e18115", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-052ae7e18115#slide-16", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 13, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-ffdc9a0d3a06", "evidence": "Eight numbered recommendation slides (2.1-2.8) grouped into the 3 pillars introduced on page 12.", "position": 4, "objective": "Decompose 'what leaders should do' into 8 distinct, parallel recommendations", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-19012fdbcc92", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Seven recommendation slides each with named example proof (Starbucks, Amazon Go, IKEA, CDPs).", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 20, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-2ae75796f0ac", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Eight numbered prescriptive recommendations.", "position": 3, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2", "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 195, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "prioritize", "notes": "The slide uses a qualitative scoring system (+, -, |) to evaluate intake types.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a grid to compare intake types against criteria.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/195", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-195", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 267, "from": 161, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-5934a57a4387", "evidence": "Repeated triplet pattern: e.g., p.166/167/168, p.178/179/180, p.188/189", "position": 18, "objective": "For each initiative, build up Overview → Estimated Impact → Resource Requirements", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 82, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-c8c7c89d1e97", "docSlug": "1b64d126e472d1d4", "documentTitle": "Media Entertainment Industry NYC", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a matrix-like structure to categorize shows by year (2009 vs 2014) and season length (full-length vs short-run) and network type (broadcast vs cable).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a grid to categorize shows by year and season length.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-c8c7c89d1e97/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-c8c7c89d1e97", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-c8c7c89d1e97#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 10, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-e0f57571e7b5", "evidence": "Sequenced evidence: nationwide shift -> network commissioning -> shorter seasons -> NYC mirrors", "position": 3, "objective": "Build national-to-NYC scripted-TV pattern", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 82, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 38, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87de-591ed7ae15c0", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Data-rich analysis: TV growth, tourism, indie scene, digital, aggregate FTEs", "position": 4, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 38, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87de-6740b2f28d6f", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Rising Action", "beatSlug": "mountain-rising-action", "evidence": "Layered data across film, TV, theatre, digital", "position": 2, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51", "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435", "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.401, "pageNumber": 28, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a color-coded matrix to visualize organizational accountability structures.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a matrix to compare organizational structures across multiple dimensions.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/28", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-28", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 29, "from": 27, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-fa448cebcac1", "evidence": "p27 2x2 NYCHA vs PHAs; p28-29 explicit 'NYCHA significantly different / lagging'.", "position": 5, "objective": "Show NYCHA's distance from PMCO / best-in-class PHA benchmarks", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 90, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 39, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-e924a2c3eaaf", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Exec summary recommendations + key changes by function + initiatives lists.", "position": 3, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51", "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435", "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.401, "pageNumber": 55, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a matrix structure to categorize initiatives by department and priority status.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide organizes data into a grid of departments vs priority classifications.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/55", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-55", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 58, "from": 53, "name": "Quick Win Big Bet", "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet", "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-0ec52c8f107a", "evidence": "p53-54 prioritize 110 opportunities, sequence ~40 near-term; p56-58 EPMO + tracking tools.", "position": 10, "objective": "Prioritize ~110 opportunities and stand up EPMO governance to execute", "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap", "confidence": 82, "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 68, "from": 50, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-f39a4bb1bd76", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Implementation plan, EPMO, risks, progress to date — closes with 'continued commitment'.", "position": 5, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-671619672db6", "docSlug": "be7f58e911596f6c", "documentTitle": "Strategy at the Pace of Technology", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 25, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a matrix to show which segments exhibit specific characteristics (indicated by filled squares).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide presents a matrix comparing company segments against specific traits.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-671619672db6/25", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-671619672db6", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-671619672db6#slide-25", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-33718c0bb3d5", "docSlug": "6cfacd78cbd42db5", "documentTitle": "Technology Foresight", "authorId": "ArthurDLittle", "authorName": "Arthur D. Little", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide presents a 'Checkerboard framework' which is a matrix-based diagnostic tool for technology assessment.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly labels the visual as a 'Checkerboard framework' organizing dimensions into a grid.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-33718c0bb3d5/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-33718c0bb3d5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-33718c0bb3d5#slide-5", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 3, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d40-1a7a4dc5e49d", "evidence": "Numbered 10 imperatives covering horizon, alignment, pragmatism, push/pull, indicators, comparisons, sector nuances, expert bias, and ongoing process — distinct categories aiming for completeness.", "position": 2, "objective": "Break technology foresight success into 10 distinct imperatives", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e37-f124cdbe7732", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "10 strategic imperatives walked through pp3-6", "position": 3, "confidence": 75, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 5, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e37-f6a736ddaf5e", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Figure 2 gated approach, Figure 3 checkerboard, Graphene Flagship + solar PV examples", "position": 4, "confidence": 75, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 6, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e38-03e7401ed786", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "10 imperatives = implications for getting foresight right", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-2fbadb07987d", "docSlug": "5047425e21d3eb97", "documentTitle": "Transformation by Radical Innovation", "authorId": "ArthurDLittle", "authorName": "Arthur D. Little", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 3, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a 'checkerboard' matrix to map megatrends and emerging technologies against global end markets.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The 'checkerboard' matrix maps market segments against megatrends and emerging technologies.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-2fbadb07987d/3", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-2fbadb07987d", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-2fbadb07987d#slide-3", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 4, "from": 3, "beatId": "0a62a865-a8b2-4360-b260-c53244b02339", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "The industry trends and case study provide a solution and approach to radical innovation", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-df215e4f0bc1", "docSlug": "b89c4b2a8f5b0c45", "documentTitle": "Transformation Ebook", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 2.5, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The text discusses how financial health and industry stability dictate the levers used in a transformation, referencing a BCG screening framework.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The text describes a two-dimensional screen (financial performance vs. strategic position) to assess starting position.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-df215e4f0bc1/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-df215e4f0bc1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-df215e4f0bc1#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 14, "name": "2x2 Matrix", "slug": "30-2x2-matrix", "bestFor": "Portfolio analysis, prioritization, strategic positioning", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30e-bddd191a484f", "evidence": "Exhibit 4 is a labelled 2x2 (Strategic Stability vs Financial Health) with 4 named quadrants.", "position": 2, "objective": "Type companies into transformation archetypes", "structure": "Dimension 1 (X-axis) -> Dimension 2 (Y-axis) -> The Four Quadrants -> The Sweet Spot", "confidence": 90, "description": "Plot options on two critical dimensions to reveal the optimal quadrant" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e2-9976a5237ff3", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Transformation imperative + disruption + always-on era data.", "position": 1, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 67, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e2-ad6495641025", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Context and 3-pillar framework definition.", "position": 1, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-df215e4f0bc1", "docSlug": "b89c4b2a8f5b0c45", "documentTitle": "Transformation Ebook", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 2.5, "pageNumber": 53, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a 4x3 grid to represent organizational context factors, feeding into a list of five organizational outcomes.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "4x3 grid of organizational context factors", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-df215e4f0bc1/53", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-df215e4f0bc1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-df215e4f0bc1#slide-53", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 67, "from": 51, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30e-cc69a0ef0e4a", "evidence": "Chapter leads with 'inspire through authentic purpose', purpose-driven retailer case, then structures/HR.", "position": 6, "objective": "Anchor sustained performance in authentic purpose (why) before structure", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 75, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 67, "from": 23, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e2-a351b5a5af36", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Part I introduces holistic 3-pillar framework chapter by chapter.", "position": 3, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 67, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e2-ad6495641025", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Context and 3-pillar framework definition.", "position": 1, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-9dc0071ebbb9", "docSlug": "fb0cf17321bc347e", "documentTitle": "Transforming the Industry that transformed the World: 01 Shift to as-a-serice", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 3, "slideType": "market_landscape", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "The slide uses a structured grid to map industry triggers to specific business impacts.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide organizes information into a grid of categories and impact types.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-9dc0071ebbb9/3", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-9dc0071ebbb9", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-9dc0071ebbb9#slide-3", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 4, "from": 2, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3b-6ab74a7f8169", "evidence": "Eight trends (p.2) + categorized triggers (p.3) → conclude five imperatives (p.4)", "position": 1, "objective": "Aggregate eight trends + triggers + imperatives into a 'new industry paradigm'", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 80, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 3, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e33-d2b10a0e428e", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Cover, eight trends hex map, paradigm triggers matrix", "position": 1, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 20, "slideType": "scenario_analysis", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The matrix uses a 3x3 grid to show volume outcomes. Callouts provide context for the extreme scenarios (top-right and bottom-left).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "3x3 sensitivity matrix", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/20", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-20", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 19, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-8fc7077006e7", "evidence": "p20 'All reasonable scenarios suggest volume will continue to decline'; p21 lists external/USPS events", "position": 4, "objective": "Test robustness of decline through revenue gap and scenarios", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 75, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 15, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6d59c738dacb", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Peer post benchmarks, broadband regression, revenue gap, scenarios", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 21, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-7d013d49ef95", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Implications section: revenue gap, scenarios, external events", "position": 2, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-cef1acfbea70", "docSlug": "e1c5cbd0ff41f1fd", "documentTitle": "Victorias Creative and Cultural Economy Fact Pack", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 62, "slideType": "appendix_methodology", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a matrix-like structure to define the approach for different economic metrics across two categories: Creative and Cultural Industries and Embedded jobs.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a grid structure to map methodology steps against economic categories.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-cef1acfbea70/62", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-cef1acfbea70", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-cef1acfbea70#slide-62", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }