{
  "kind": "framework",
  "value": "malmquist-index",
  "collectionKey": "slides:framework:malmquist-index:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 1,
  "page": 1,
  "pageSize": 24,
  "pageCount": 1,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180",
      "docSlug": "62a3ea47159781a7",
      "documentTitle": "Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale",
      "authorId": "McKinsey",
      "authorName": "McKinsey",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.333,
      "pageNumber": 16,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The slide uses a waterfall-style logic to reconcile different efficiency potential estimates. It includes a specific callout box explaining the Malmquist index components (technological progress vs. individual catch-up).",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide explicitly defines and uses the Malmquist index to decompose productivity growth into technological progress and individual catch-up.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180/16",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180#slide-16",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 20,
          "from": 6,
          "name": "Logic Chain",
          "slug": "01-logic-chain",
          "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis",
          "matchId": "37a5cd6f-935c-4a17-a19a-e3061505d608",
          "evidence": "The document presents a logical chain of reasoning to support its findings.",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "To identify the key barriers to efficiency improvements.",
          "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 20,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "892a1ecd-e11d-4609-8dab-9369f04f8efa",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "The document identifies various barriers to efficiency improvements.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}