{
  "kind": "framework",
  "value": "make-vs-buy",
  "collectionKey": "slides:framework:make-vs-buy:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 2,
  "page": 1,
  "pageSize": 24,
  "pageCount": 1,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc",
      "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664",
      "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.445,
      "pageNumber": 203,
      "slideType": "financial_analysis",
      "function": "quantify_impact",
      "notes": "The chart shows a 'make vs buy' (own vs rent) optimization model for a vehicle fleet.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Analysis of owning vs renting vehicles based on cost ratios",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/203",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-203",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 228,
          "from": 193,
          "name": "Before After",
          "slug": "21-before-after",
          "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-6422ce1c8ecc",
          "evidence": "Current bilbase -> optimal 763/916 -> 29% reduction -> 8-12 mio. kr. varigt provenu.",
          "position": 9,
          "objective": "Show old fleet vs hybrid pool model with quantified delta",
          "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta",
          "confidence": 82,
          "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 321,
          "from": 19,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        },
        {
          "to": 365,
          "from": 166,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-37e90642ab06",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
          "evidence": "Potentialeestimater, benchmark gaps, comparison tables.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
          "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019f6b8f-304d-70f4-b2e7-f7f29ec7a401",
      "docSlug": "jarvis-locus-pitch-deck",
      "documentTitle": "Locus pitch deck",
      "authorId": "locus-pitch-deck",
      "authorName": null,
      "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "investor_relations",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Investor relations",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": null,
      "aspectRatio": null,
      "pageNumber": 5,
      "slideType": "why_now",
      "function": "argue_timing",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide explicitly argues against building in-house in favor of buying the platform as a service.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019f6b8f-304d-70f4-b2e7-f7f29ec7a401/5",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019f6b8f-304d-70f4-b2e7-f7f29ec7a401",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019f6b8f-304d-70f4-b2e7-f7f29ec7a401#slide-5",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 5,
          "from": 5,
          "name": "Why Now",
          "slug": "15-why-now",
          "bestFor": "Sales pitches, fundraising, requesting immediate budget approval",
          "matchId": "81d729f2-f457-414f-a50e-8ed858f4980d",
          "evidence": "The 'why now' slide presents a clear reason for the timing of Locus",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "Why now is the right time for Locus",
          "structure": "The Context (Trends) -> The Trigger Event -> The Window of Opportunity",
          "confidence": 0.6,
          "description": "Create temporal urgency by proving that the window of opportunity is opening or closing"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 6,
          "from": 4,
          "beatId": "1300335f-2990-45db-a3ac-fc526248e517",
          "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch",
          "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch",
          "beatName": "Solution",
          "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-solution",
          "evidence": "The solution is presented on pages 4-6",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}