{ "kind": "framework", "value": "issue-tree", "collectionKey": "slides:framework:issue-tree:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 38, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 2, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-42e9078455d0", "docSlug": "4bc8260cae8e26dd", "documentTitle": "2024 Executive Perspectives Unlocking potential from AI and GenAI", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "other", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a hierarchical decomposition (driver tree) to map financial outcomes to operational inputs.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Hierarchical decomposition of transportation costs into operational drivers.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-42e9078455d0/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-42e9078455d0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-42e9078455d0#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 10, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7df-b28c35ffd506", "evidence": "Case I: 17% forecast error to 50%+ accuracy / 80%+ variance reduction with driver tree", "position": 4, "objective": "Prove forecasting case with context/solution/impact + driver-tree deep dive", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 88, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e39-a2adf74a45d8", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Three AI-in-action client cases: forecasting, GenAI BI, annual report", "position": 4, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5e-3b8ef57c8e5a", "docSlug": "5f0f0535ee1c7800", "documentTitle": "2025 Investor Day", "authorId": "Blue-Owl", "authorName": "Blue Owl", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 49, "slideType": "segmentation", "function": "decompose_segments", "notes": "The slide uses a tree-like structure to categorize credit types.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Tree decomposing Private Credit → ABF segments", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5e-3b8ef57c8e5a/49", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5e-3b8ef57c8e5a", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5e-3b8ef57c8e5a#slide-49", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 57, "from": 47, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019deac5-4f25-74ad-8c0d-e2f9e11a818e", "evidence": "Explicit iceberg metaphor (p.48), $11T TAM and 4x penetration headroom (p.52)", "position": 6, "objective": "Reveal Alternative Credit's hidden opportunity beneath the surface", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 90, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 136, "from": 28, "beatId": "019deac5-4d27-728d-b01b-f04c5ad3cec9", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "5-year targets and segment-by-segment growth strategy across Credit/GP/Real Assets/Insurance/Wealth", "position": 3, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 101, "from": 33, "beatId": "019deac5-4e00-7728-9937-443a2cf6e314", "arcName": "The Sparkline", "arcSlug": "sparkline", "beatName": "What Is", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Each segment's current platform and track record", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 156, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a hub-and-spoke style diagram to show how the FMI organization is broken down into six specific focus areas (A-F).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Analysen bygget op omkring seks delomraader.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/156", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-156", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 172, "from": 150, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-5b4fc08a2941", "evidence": "1.752 ansatte mapping -> 6 delområder -> 16-28 mio. kr. samlet potentiale -> indfasning.", "position": 6, "objective": "Diagnose FMI organisation and propose six delforslag", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 82, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 165, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-30a6df91c9fe", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Baselines, segmentations, current-state diagnoses dominate first half.", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 233, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide outlines a structured diagnostic approach to procurement centralization, referencing a 2016 report.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Analysen fordelt paa seks delanalyser.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/233", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-233", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 229, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-6a47af522484", "evidence": "538 mio. addresserbar -> 6 delanalyser -> centralisation, in-sourcing, VTC, hotel, kontorartikler, TV, SIM, kursus.", "position": 10, "objective": "MECE breakdown of Ovrig Drift baseline into six delanalyser plus sub-initiatives", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 365, "from": 166, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-37e90642ab06", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Potentialeestimater, benchmark gaps, comparison tables.", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 307, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a logic tree structure to map cost drivers to specific optimization levers and concrete examples.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a hierarchical decomposition of cost drivers into levers and specific actions.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/307", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-307", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 229, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-6a47af522484", "evidence": "538 mio. addresserbar -> 6 delanalyser -> centralisation, in-sourcing, VTC, hotel, kontorartikler, TV, SIM, kursus.", "position": 10, "objective": "MECE breakdown of Ovrig Drift baseline into six delanalyser plus sub-initiatives", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 365, "from": 166, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-37e90642ab06", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Potentialeestimater, benchmark gaps, comparison tables.", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-25ef6f36a244", "docSlug": "2c43dda4fcc7daa0", "documentTitle": "COVID-19 Business Recovery Vancouver", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "Vancouver Economic Commission", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a hierarchical tree structure to decompose the problem of herd immunity into its constituent drivers.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a hierarchical decomposition of factors influencing herd immunity.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-25ef6f36a244/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-25ef6f36a244", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-25ef6f36a244#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 4, "name": "Aha Moment", "slug": "03-aha-moment", "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments", "matchId": "1075ccb9-cd05-4a59-ab99-63518981ba25", "evidence": "The deck presents scenario analysis and probability assessments for economic recovery (p4-9).", "position": 0, "objective": "Understand the economic impact of COVID-19 scenarios", "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 4, "beatId": "8decff1e-4bf7-46f7-999a-b7856dce780a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "The deck analyzes scenarios for the economic impact of COVID-19 and factors influencing the timeline to a 'return to normal' (p4-9).", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "docSlug": "62a3ea47159781a7", "documentTitle": "Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 74, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a three-column structure to map the current state, the problems, and the solutions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide structure (Characteristics -> Barriers -> Initiatives) follows a logical diagnostic flow.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180/74", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180#slide-74", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-aa0e0d57c92b", "docSlug": "0455fc7f0c3ac29a", "documentTitle": "Global Health Partnerships Stop TB", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 21, "slideType": "kpi_dashboard", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a tree structure to decompose a high-level objective into actionable metrics.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a hierarchical decomposition structure to break down an objective into KPIs.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-aa0e0d57c92b/21", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-aa0e0d57c92b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-aa0e0d57c92b#slide-21", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 30, "from": 21, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "0ba9f1e0-bfce-4b01-9ee9-3c5fcc604d56", "evidence": "The document presents a framework for performance management", "position": 1, "objective": "Breaking down performance into manageable components", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 21, "beatId": "66f65256-343a-4961-b405-9245f503b134", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "The document presents implementation plans and next steps", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-2a4c3fe346c9", "docSlug": "f355bb3ba498875b", "documentTitle": "International Comparison of Australia’s Freight and Supply Chain Performance 2019", "authorId": "LEK", "authorName": "L.E.K.", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 90, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide uses a structured table format to map problems to solutions, with qualitative impact indicators.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide decomposes problems into issues, impacts, and opportunities.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-2a4c3fe346c9/90", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-2a4c3fe346c9", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-2a4c3fe346c9#slide-90", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 90, "from": 87, "name": "Quick Win Big Bet", "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet", "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation", "matchId": "08dc3540-f6ec-431c-a219-56e462b79536", "evidence": "The document presents a list of opportunities for improvement, with a focus on quick wins and big bets.", "position": 1, "objective": "To prioritize opportunities for improvement in the waste and wine supply chains", "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-2a4c3fe346c9", "docSlug": "f355bb3ba498875b", "documentTitle": "International Comparison of Australia’s Freight and Supply Chain Performance 2019", "authorId": "LEK", "authorName": "L.E.K.", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 153, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a structured table format to present diagnostic findings. The 'Impact on freight efficiency' column uses pie charts as qualitative indicators.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Structured table breaking down issues into impacts and opportunities", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-2a4c3fe346c9/153", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-2a4c3fe346c9", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-2a4c3fe346c9#slide-153", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-2a4c3fe346c9", "docSlug": "f355bb3ba498875b", "documentTitle": "International Comparison of Australia’s Freight and Supply Chain Performance 2019", "authorId": "LEK", "authorName": "L.E.K.", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 154, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a structured table format to map issues to opportunities, with a qualitative 'Impact on freight efficiency' indicator column.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Structured breakdown of issues, impacts, and opportunities", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-2a4c3fe346c9/154", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-2a4c3fe346c9", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-2a4c3fe346c9#slide-154", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-093f3fd1ecfe", "docSlug": "5ee5a9db2750184a", "documentTitle": "Lebanon Economic Vision", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 940, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "prioritize", "notes": "The slide uses a structured table format to link current pain points to specific actionable recommendations.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide decomposes a high-level goal into four specific initiatives linked to situational diagnosis.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-093f3fd1ecfe/940", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-093f3fd1ecfe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-093f3fd1ecfe#slide-940", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2", "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 360, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide breaks down a high-level objective into three specific research questions.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/360", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-360", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 378, "from": 359, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-6b6450df5662", "evidence": "Benchmark sub-deck: San Antonio 90% LRR, NKLA, Austin 96%, Jacksonville 90%", "position": 22, "objective": "Profile peer cities (San Antonio, LA, Austin, etc.) to set targets", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 86, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-c4d36e9b9f01", "docSlug": "46d5dfdba759e446", "documentTitle": "McKinsey NJ Distributive Energy Resource", "authorId": "proposals", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 44, "slideType": "appendix_methodology", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide contains significant redactions labeled as 'Proprietary or info providing an unfair advantage to competitors'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Mentions development of issue trees and hypothesis trees for structuring interviews.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-c4d36e9b9f01/44", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-c4d36e9b9f01", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-c4d36e9b9f01#slide-44", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 60, "from": 41, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "9f09ad75-6f71-4ee0-8575-f33b2077eee3", "evidence": "The document's discussion of the potential risks and challenges of not implementing distributive energy resources", "position": 2, "objective": "To highlight the potential costs of inaction", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 60, "from": 41, "beatId": "4588b02a-cc30-4655-a163-892561e3f3e5", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document's inclusion of data, case studies, and testimonials to support McKinsey's approach", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-c8c7c89d1e97", "docSlug": "1b64d126e472d1d4", "documentTitle": "Media Entertainment Industry NYC", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 40, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide uses a table-like structure to link problem categories to specific examples of industry initiatives.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide maps specific challenges to corresponding initiatives in a structured, categorical way.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-c8c7c89d1e97/40", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-c8c7c89d1e97", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-c8c7c89d1e97#slide-40", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 39, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-00308dd247f9", "evidence": "Diversity challenges flagged then list of initiatives", "position": 11, "objective": "Surface diversity gap and remediation", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 60, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 43, "from": 39, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87de-52c163783cb8", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Diversity challenges + perceived NYC challenges to mitigate", "position": 2, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 43, "from": 39, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87de-6ad4c97cdaf2", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Climax", "beatSlug": "mountain-climax", "evidence": "Diversity + cost/critical-mass challenges surface", "position": 3, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5", "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a hub-and-spoke diagram to represent the central role of the government in relation to five specific fiscal issues.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Central Government node fans into 5 issue branches", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 6, "name": "Root Cause Tree", "slug": "37-root-cause-tree", "bestFor": "Problem diagnosis, quality issues, operational failures", "matchId": "019de98a-55e1-76ea-b3ef-38f2e2b7e256", "evidence": "p6 central Government node fans into 5 challenge circles, p7-9 detail each with charts.", "position": 1, "objective": "Decompose fiscal weakness into 5 root causes", "structure": "The Problem -> Branch 1 (Cause A) -> Branch 2 (Cause B) -> Branch 3 (Cause C) -> The Primary Root", "confidence": 80, "description": "Branch out from a problem to its multiple contributing causes" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 4, "beatId": "019de98a-54a0-722e-a491-86c4fa6a3eb0", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Debt stock + 5 challenges to fiscus with charts", "position": 2, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 15, "from": 4, "beatId": "019de98a-5567-7574-b7e7-836bd7c7f68f", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Debt, expenditure, revenue data", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-6dd6e7ce8a5d", "docSlug": "cf721953f722", "documentTitle": "Kao Corporation (4452.JP)", "authorId": "25_Oasis_Management", "authorName": "Oasis", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.7777778, "pageNumber": 19, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "diagnose_problem", "notes": "Oasis Management's critique of Kao Corporation's performance.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide breaks down a high-level problem (performance) into four distinct root causes.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-6dd6e7ce8a5d/19", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-6dd6e7ce8a5d", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-6dd6e7ce8a5d#slide-19", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 12, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "7562ad33-be28-4243-9029-2239a074085d", "evidence": "The deck highlights the consequences of Kao's inaction, including a lack of growth and underperformance.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction for Kao's growth?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 1, "beatId": "d082725f-12a4-4e06-b410-ac4b8fec6d00", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem (Identify pain)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-problem-identify-pain", "evidence": "The deck identifies several problems, including Kao's underperformance and dependence on the domestic market.", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.9, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-3adfcbc4d5cc", "docSlug": "e758a2eef8bdf9dd", "documentTitle": "Private Markets Decarbonisation Roadmap Summary", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "Bain", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a decision tree framework to operationalize ESG classification criteria.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide presents a hierarchical decision-making process (Step 1, 2, 3) to reach a classification conclusion.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-3adfcbc4d5cc/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-3adfcbc4d5cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-3adfcbc4d5cc#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 11, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b312-e23de2e2ee80", "evidence": "p11 big picture (buyout scale), p12 plan-criteria detail, p13 three-step 'No Pathway' process, p14 enabler logic tree", "position": 2, "objective": "Zoom into mechanics that operationalise the framework", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 75, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 24, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a5-761b-9144-2cb0ab916d42", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Adoption learnings, framework deep-dives, applied across 5 asset classes", "position": 4, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5f69-752d-a9b7-d81c700e90b8", "docSlug": "RS7T5y1EtLAgCoxi0trx", "documentTitle": "Respira raised over $2 million to disrupt the embattled vape industry with a heat-free vaporizer. Here's the pitch deck that made it happen.", "authorId": "Pitchdecks", "authorName": "Respira Technologies", "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck", "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.777, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "unfair_advantage", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a tree diagram to categorize IP assets under the umbrella of 'Aerosolizing Systems'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Hierarchical breakdown of IP categories", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5f69-752d-a9b7-d81c700e90b8/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5f69-752d-a9b7-d81c700e90b8", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5f69-752d-a9b7-d81c700e90b8#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 7, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "80eef7a1-6f53-45bf-9c89-03a57e463b27", "evidence": "Slides 7-9 explain WAVE's benefits and regulatory alignment.", "position": 1, "objective": "Why does WAVE matter?", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 7, "beatId": "c2b20be4-b1af-486f-92ac-71debb48ce50", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Solution (Provide relief)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief", "evidence": "Slides 7-9 present the solution, WAVE, as a safer alternative.", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-31a82b5026d5", "docSlug": "d11f93df83b7d47b", "documentTitle": "Transportation Warehousing Sector", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a structured table format to present diagnostic data points for each of the five identified challenges.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide decomposes a complex topic (Mobility in DC) into five distinct, mutually exclusive challenges.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-31a82b5026d5/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-31a82b5026d5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-31a82b5026d5#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 8, "name": "Aha Moment", "slug": "03-aha-moment", "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments", "matchId": "ba842ba8-5711-4ebd-baae-427dd4bf5fc6", "evidence": "The document presents a clear problem statement and highlights the complications faced by the transportation sector in DC.", "position": 1, "objective": "Identify the challenges faced by the transportation sector in DC", "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 8, "beatId": "a84e2f23-db6b-4bff-bb43-9b8de44fcde6", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem Statement", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "The document presents a clear problem statement, highlighting the five core challenges faced by the transportation sector in DC.", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bb8662e8046e", "docSlug": "0f638186bb9b059e", "documentTitle": "UK Electricity Efficiency Potential", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": null, "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 35, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a hierarchical table structure to map barriers to their descriptions and real-world examples.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Hierarchical categorization of barriers to energy efficiency", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bb8662e8046e/35", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bb8662e8046e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bb8662e8046e#slide-35", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 77, "from": 6, "beatId": "02a14110-f7eb-4a8e-ad6c-56f071f97bab", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document provides data tables and analysis to support the potential for electricity efficiency measures.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-7c7f95dc2833", "docSlug": "717a4a3b9695902b", "documentTitle": "US Natural Gas Future", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "market_landscape", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a value chain diagram for the top half and a decision-tree/segmentation matrix for the bottom half.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Branching tree: Natural gas to Global/Domestic to US LNG/Electric power/Other sectors.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-7c7f95dc2833/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-7c7f95dc2833", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-7c7f95dc2833#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 12, "name": "Value Chain Walk", "slug": "44-value-chain-walk", "bestFor": "Operations improvement, cost reduction, competitive advantage", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-786704cf0e09", "evidence": "p12 displays an explicit natural-gas + LNG value chain; p13 unpacks six business models on top of it.", "position": 4, "objective": "Walk the natural-gas value chain to surface segment-specific plays", "structure": "Input -> Process Step 1 -> Process Step 2 -> Process Step 3 -> Output -> Value Assessment", "confidence": 85, "description": "Walk through each step of the value chain to identify where value is created or destroyed" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 12, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-4f20bf580e11", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Value chain growth plays + six LNG business models (p12-13).", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 16, "from": 12, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-63a2bedff6e6", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Strategy plays for upstream, LNG, midstream players.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-827bc8d6204c", "docSlug": "7561802f6a67abba", "documentTitle": "US Natural Gas Future Standalone", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.777, "pageNumber": 23, "slideType": "strategic_options", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a tree diagram to segment the market and a table to compare metrics.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Hierarchical decomposition Natural gas → Global/Domestic → US LNG, Electric power, Other sectors with metric columns.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-827bc8d6204c/23", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-827bc8d6204c", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-827bc8d6204c#slide-23", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 23, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-ac169fc6ba32", "evidence": "p.23 segments demand by type; p.24 names six LNG business models; p.25 maps strategies per player by scenario.", "position": 5, "objective": "Segment players, business models and scenario strategies", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 82, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 22, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-8c25da9e956f", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "'Tomorrow's Growth Plays' frames strategic-fit table and six LNG business models (pp.22-25).", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 31, "from": 22, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-a0492190366c", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Strategic options and player-specific recommendations close on action.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bdc494860b5e", "docSlug": "16896d30600f353d", "documentTitle": "Veteran Opportunity", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "business_case", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide uses a logical tree structure to categorize the benefits of hiring veterans into business case (capabilities, skills, incentives) and social responsibility.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a hierarchical structure to break down the main question into sub-arguments.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bdc494860b5e/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bdc494860b5e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bdc494860b5e#slide-5", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 5, "name": "Aha Moment", "slug": "03-aha-moment", "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments", "matchId": "e10dd89e-f900-4951-9f26-f68d6466d1ac", "evidence": "The deck provides data on the benefits of hiring veteran employees, including tax credits and distinctive capabilities.", "position": 0, "objective": "Highlight the benefits of hiring veteran employees", "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }