{
  "kind": "framework",
  "value": "innovator-s-dilemma",
  "collectionKey": "slides:framework:innovator-s-dilemma:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 6,
  "page": 1,
  "pageSize": 24,
  "pageCount": 1,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-d97b47181c2f",
      "docSlug": "df6f7ffbb24bfbd2",
      "documentTitle": "Banking: The future is back",
      "authorId": "Accenture",
      "authorName": "Accenture",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 42,
      "slideType": "section_divider",
      "function": "transition",
      "notes": "The slide uses a stylized abstract background and a photo of a professional in a workspace.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 2,
      "evidence": "Explicit mention in title · Section divider title names Christensen's framework directly",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-d97b47181c2f/42",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-d97b47181c2f",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-d97b47181c2f#slide-42",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 45,
          "from": 42,
          "name": "Pre Mortem",
          "slug": "19-pre-mortem",
          "bestFor": "Project kick-offs, risk management, building trust with skeptical stakeholders",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b772-e95060625d4d",
          "evidence": "Divider invokes 'innovator's dilemma'; p.44 says next-gen platforms have 'long way to go'; p.45 forecasts who survives",
          "position": 11,
          "objective": "Warn platform providers about disruption risk",
          "structure": "The Future Disaster (Hypothetical) -> What Went Wrong -> The Prevention Plan",
          "confidence": 72,
          "description": "Build trust by anticipating failure modes before they happen and solving them in advance"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 45,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-303a18385e57",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
          "evidence": "Ten trend chapters with charts/data and 'so what' action titles",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 88,
          "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
          "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
        },
        {
          "to": 45,
          "from": 38,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-46547984dd73",
          "arcName": "Voyage and Return",
          "arcSlug": "voyage-return",
          "beatName": "The Return",
          "beatSlug": "voyage-return-the-return",
          "evidence": "Trends 9-10 modernize legacy code and platforms — back to fundamentals",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 62,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-853951586965",
      "docSlug": "76ea6cc397533e35",
      "documentTitle": "2022 Benedict Evans 2022 The New Gatekeepers",
      "authorId": "BenedictEvans",
      "authorName": "Benedict Evans",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "independent_analyst",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Independent analyst",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 54,
      "slideType": "financial_analysis",
      "function": "quantify_impact",
      "notes": "The chart uses a diverging bar structure to show the contrast between a profitable incumbent/disruptor (Netflix) and the heavy investment losses of a legacy player (Disney) entering the D2C space.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Title quotes 'innovator's dilemma' and applies it to legacy media spend",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-853951586965/54",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-853951586965",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-853951586965#slide-54",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 58,
          "from": 51,
          "name": "Before After",
          "slug": "21-before-after",
          "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-08f8-7619-ac2e-8b9d55219f3a",
          "evidence": "Blockbuster $5bn cap p51, Netflix vs YouTube p57, MrBeast vs top-10 Netflix p58",
          "position": 7,
          "objective": "Show legacy media's decline and streaming/creator-economy displacement",
          "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta",
          "confidence": 72,
          "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 69,
          "from": 18,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-07a7-7579-bd65-11bd74463cfe",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
          "evidence": "'The New Gatekeepers' divider p18; retail media, unbundling, brand reset",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
          "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
        },
        {
          "to": 58,
          "from": 18,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-07a7-7579-bd65-1d44db232db5",
          "arcName": "The Mountain",
          "arcSlug": "mountain",
          "beatName": "Rising Action",
          "beatSlug": "mountain-rising-action",
          "evidence": "category-by-category gatekeeper sweep: retail, media, content",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 60,
          "parentBeatName": "Development",
          "parentBeatSlug": "development"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019f6b8f-0639-7395-b0ce-6cbd2302ef78",
      "docSlug": "jarvis-climate-tech-investments-an-opportunity-for-europe",
      "documentTitle": "Climate Tech Investments An Opportunity for Europe",
      "authorId": "climate-tech-investments-an-opportunity-for-europe",
      "authorName": null,
      "documentKindSlug": "deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "investor_relations",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Investor relations",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": null,
      "aspectRatio": null,
      "pageNumber": 38,
      "slideType": "key_messages",
      "function": "establish_context",
      "notes": "The slide discusses the Innovator's Dilemma and provides context for climate tech funding.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Explicit mention of Clayton Christensen and the theory of incumbent companies failing to pursue disruptive innovation.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019f6b8f-0639-7395-b0ce-6cbd2302ef78/38",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019f6b8f-0639-7395-b0ce-6cbd2302ef78",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019f6b8f-0639-7395-b0ce-6cbd2302ef78#slide-38",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 44,
          "from": 25,
          "beatId": "ec1ac43e-1ebe-4b61-9ed3-9066403800e1",
          "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
          "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
          "beatName": "Solution",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "The document presents climate tech investments as a solution, highlighting their financial benefits and potential for growth",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019f6b8f-1773-72df-85f1-63761dd5317b",
      "docSlug": "jarvis-eximius-ventures-just-an-agent-away-an-ai-thesis",
      "documentTitle": "Eximius Ventures Just an Agent Away An AI Thesis",
      "authorId": "eximius-ventures-just-an-agent-away-an-ai-thesis",
      "authorName": null,
      "documentKindSlug": "deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "investor_relations",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Investor relations",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": null,
      "aspectRatio": null,
      "pageNumber": 12,
      "slideType": "section_divider",
      "function": "transition",
      "notes": "The slide discusses the 'Innovator's Dilemma' concept without explicitly naming it, focusing on the friction of updating legacy systems.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Discussion of incumbents' inability to innovate due to existing customer base constraints",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019f6b8f-1773-72df-85f1-63761dd5317b/12",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019f6b8f-1773-72df-85f1-63761dd5317b",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019f6b8f-1773-72df-85f1-63761dd5317b#slide-12",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 14,
          "from": 12,
          "name": "David Goliath",
          "slug": "16-david-goliath",
          "bestFor": "Startups, disruptive innovation, competitive displacement",
          "matchId": "6e00d55d-2a8d-4e92-80fc-262ead3b82d2",
          "evidence": "The deck uses a David vs Goliath loop to discuss competitive advantages.",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "David vs Goliath",
          "structure": "The Giant's Weakness -> Our Slingshot (Unique Edge) -> The Topple",
          "confidence": 0.6,
          "description": "Frame your initiative as the nimble underdog taking on a slow, bloated incumbent"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 14,
          "from": 10,
          "beatId": "ce87619c-a994-4799-8082-67d8578a9702",
          "arcName": "The Sparkline",
          "arcSlug": "sparkline",
          "beatName": "What Could Be",
          "beatSlug": "sparkline-what-could-be-4",
          "evidence": "The deck discusses strategic moats across application domains.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019f6b8f-1773-72df-85f1-63761dd5317b",
      "docSlug": "jarvis-eximius-ventures-just-an-agent-away-an-ai-thesis",
      "documentTitle": "Eximius Ventures Just an Agent Away An AI Thesis",
      "authorId": "eximius-ventures-just-an-agent-away-an-ai-thesis",
      "authorName": null,
      "documentKindSlug": "deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "investor_relations",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Investor relations",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": null,
      "aspectRatio": null,
      "pageNumber": 13,
      "slideType": "key_messages",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The slide discusses the 'Innovator's Dilemma' without explicitly naming it.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Discusses how incumbents are constrained by existing business models and revenue streams when facing disruptive innovation.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019f6b8f-1773-72df-85f1-63761dd5317b/13",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019f6b8f-1773-72df-85f1-63761dd5317b",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019f6b8f-1773-72df-85f1-63761dd5317b#slide-13",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 14,
          "from": 12,
          "name": "David Goliath",
          "slug": "16-david-goliath",
          "bestFor": "Startups, disruptive innovation, competitive displacement",
          "matchId": "6e00d55d-2a8d-4e92-80fc-262ead3b82d2",
          "evidence": "The deck uses a David vs Goliath loop to discuss competitive advantages.",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "David vs Goliath",
          "structure": "The Giant's Weakness -> Our Slingshot (Unique Edge) -> The Topple",
          "confidence": 0.6,
          "description": "Frame your initiative as the nimble underdog taking on a slow, bloated incumbent"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 14,
          "from": 10,
          "beatId": "ce87619c-a994-4799-8082-67d8578a9702",
          "arcName": "The Sparkline",
          "arcSlug": "sparkline",
          "beatName": "What Could Be",
          "beatSlug": "sparkline-what-could-be-4",
          "evidence": "The deck discusses strategic moats across application domains.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5fec-763b-95d2-7095ed598116",
      "docSlug": "bi-7df5eb57138bf3bb",
      "documentTitle": "PunchUp Live pitch deck: How ex-Meta employees built comedy startup",
      "authorId": "Pitchdecks",
      "authorName": "PunchUp",
      "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.782,
      "pageNumber": 6,
      "slideType": "problem_statement",
      "function": "frame_problem",
      "notes": "The slide outlines three specific structural issues causing data fragmentation for entertainers.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Explicitly mentioned as a header for the first bullet point.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5fec-763b-95d2-7095ed598116/6",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5fec-763b-95d2-7095ed598116",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5fec-763b-95d2-7095ed598116#slide-6",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 6,
          "from": 4,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "c8a9b255-d953-4039-be79-cc8f5cf14e63",
          "evidence": "The deck presents two problem statements, highlighting the challenges of reaching fans and collecting data.",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "What are the costs of not solving the problem of reaching fans and collecting data?",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 6,
          "from": 4,
          "beatId": "dfe11e32-b71f-4c36-88cf-64469d25fbf6",
          "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch",
          "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch",
          "beatName": "Problem",
          "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-problem",
          "evidence": "The deck presents two problem statements, highlighting the challenges of reaching fans and collecting data.",
          "position": 0,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}