{ "kind": "framework", "value": "impact-sizing", "collectionKey": "slides:framework:impact-sizing:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 12, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 1, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e91d3b8478cc", "docSlug": "9fbedbfea0231cbe", "documentTitle": "AI Healthcare Errors", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 18, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a waterfall-style chart to aggregate value across different levers, with a corresponding impact summary on the right.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Quantifies potential value creation across multiple levers.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e91d3b8478cc/18", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e91d3b8478cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e91d3b8478cc#slide-18", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 18, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "7e5a1b2d-6045-4ae5-9071-3c7f16a0a952", "evidence": "The deck presents a slide on the significant further value at stake, highlighting the cost of inaction.", "position": 0, "objective": "Highlight the cost of inaction in healthcare error prevention", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 26, "from": 10, "beatId": "9b6e4ffe-95ca-40d4-92d5-70f2cd8f60f8", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Solution (Provide relief)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief", "evidence": "The deck offers AI as a solution to prevent healthcare errors and improve patient outcomes.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 46, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses stacked bar charts to show historical data (2018-2022) for two different revenue streams, with a methodology section explaining the 1% estimation basis.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Quantification of financial potential based on baseline data", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/46", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-46", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 28, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-48b7ee098467", "evidence": "Survey data -> tema-effekt -> recommendations -> 33 mio. kr. potentiale -> indfasningstakt.", "position": 2, "objective": "Diagnose contract templates and recommend kommerciel uddannelse", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 82, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 165, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-30a6df91c9fe", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Baselines, segmentations, current-state diagnoses dominate first half.", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 378, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a matrix-like structure to map 10 efficiency levers to two organizational scenarios and two business units (VN I, VN II).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Quantification of potential efficiency gains across scenarios", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/378", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-378", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 420, "from": 367, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-713edc37f29d", "evidence": "Current fragmenteret VFK -> enstrenget logistikstruktur -> 35-60 mio. kr. potentiale + business cases.", "position": 12, "objective": "Compare current logistics structure to enstrenget LOGTJ nyordning", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 84, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 420, "from": 322, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2a66536a5837", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Admin fællesskaber + nyordning af logistik + insourcing benchmarks and business cases.", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 482, "from": 366, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-3ad263fdddff", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Logistic nyordning, kortlægning, skalering and realiserbarhed methodology.", "position": 3, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-56c45bc73b8a", "docSlug": "b8d632c847c89a0f", "documentTitle": "GenAI Norway Productivity", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 19, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart uses bubble size to represent absolute impact in bn NOK, while the axes represent absolute impact (y-axis) and relative impact as % of revenue (x-axis).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Quantifies the potential economic impact of GenAI across different industry sectors.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-56c45bc73b8a/19", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-56c45bc73b8a", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-56c45bc73b8a#slide-19", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 26, "from": 19, "beatId": "c458f98e-1e19-4313-bfb7-27b7a5cfcbaf", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Slides 19-26 discuss the potential value unlock and business functions that can be impacted.", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a168-72f79e6765ec", "docSlug": "801529f85e24d23e", "documentTitle": "Generative AI Making Waves", "authorId": "OliverWyman", "authorName": "AWS", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 57, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses pie charts as a visual proxy for impact intensity across 9 categories and 5 industry segments.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Quantifies potential impact across industry segments using visual indicators", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a168-72f79e6765ec/57", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a168-72f79e6765ec", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a168-72f79e6765ec#slide-57", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 60, "from": 25, "beatId": "47b1b5cb-5ae4-43c1-b920-6173393fb113", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "The document presents the solution and approach, including adoption waves, use cases, and the path forward", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 57, "from": 43, "beatId": "912839c9-3858-40be-af54-4d9d176a522a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document provides evidence and proof of the potential impact of generative AI", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-195889b16033", "docSlug": "76c7dcc62a26302a", "documentTitle": "Innovation in logistics: advanced pooling and robotization", "authorId": "RolandBerger", "authorName": "Roland Berger", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart illustrates the exponential growth of ICT's share of GVA over a 10-year period, categorized by industry impact waves.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Quantifies potential market losses based on industry exposure to digitization.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-195889b16033/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-195889b16033", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-195889b16033#slide-5", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 5, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "53d8a087-f837-4c88-bf65-05796974ffc0", "evidence": "The deck emphasizes the need for logistics players to adapt to digitization to avoid being left behind", "position": 0, "objective": "Highlight the risks of not adapting to digitization", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 5, "beatId": "9e63524b-3ca2-43b2-b548-0be8d6deddc4", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Complication", "beatSlug": "complication", "evidence": "The deck highlights the disruption and challenges faced by the logistics industry", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-093f3fd1ecfe", "docSlug": "5ee5a9db2750184a", "documentTitle": "Lebanon Economic Vision", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 876, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "size_opportunity", "notes": "The slide uses a combination of a bar chart for international benchmarking and a list/iconography for sector prioritization.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Quantifies GDP uplift potential from specific strategic initiatives.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-093f3fd1ecfe/876", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-093f3fd1ecfe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-093f3fd1ecfe#slide-876", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2", "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 179, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a combination of assumptions, stacked bar charts, and waterfall-style logic to justify the impact sizing.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly calculates the incremental impact of a specific initiative.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/179", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-179", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 267, "from": 161, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-5934a57a4387", "evidence": "Repeated triplet pattern: e.g., p.166/167/168, p.178/179/180, p.188/189", "position": 18, "objective": "For each initiative, build up Overview → Estimated Impact → Resource Requirements", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 82, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2", "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 212, "slideType": "recommendation", "function": "recommend", "notes": "Slide 3.4 from a BCG deck regarding Dallas Animal Services (DAS).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly structures the recommendation into 'Estimated Impact' and 'Resource Requirements' to justify the initiative.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/212", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-212", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 267, "from": 161, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-5934a57a4387", "evidence": "Repeated triplet pattern: e.g., p.166/167/168, p.178/179/180, p.188/189", "position": 18, "objective": "For each initiative, build up Overview → Estimated Impact → Resource Requirements", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 82, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-42873dc46c79", "docSlug": "93405cb0c1d4b6d1", "documentTitle": "NY COVID-19 Preliminary Economic Impact Assessment", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 17, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a 'waterfall' style logic to calculate the total economic impact as the sum of the area under the pre-recession GDP line and the area between the trend and the recovery path.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Quantification of economic loss over time relative to a baseline trend.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-42873dc46c79/17", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-42873dc46c79", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-42873dc46c79#slide-17", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 17, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "e6033814-8357-46c3-95a5-9ac9de480542", "evidence": "The document discusses the costs of inaction", "position": 0, "objective": "Highlight the costs of inaction", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 15, "beatId": "7c9a571a-116e-4a9d-81de-16eb39846963", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document provides evidence and proof of the economic impact", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "docSlug": "78bb0ae4454c2778", "documentTitle": "Socio-economic case for deepening solar PV deployment in Nigeria", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 37, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a clear 'problem-solution-impact' structure. It links the lack of reliable power to reduced teaching hours and quantifies the potential benefits of solar.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Quantifies the benefits of a proposed intervention (solar) on specific KPIs (teaching hours, student reach, jobs).", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb/37", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb#slide-37", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 42, "from": 30, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-8d6ffb481990", "evidence": "Current vs benchmark study hours (p32); ICT teaching -57% vs peers (p38); solar adds 86-127% study time and 30% ICT hours", "position": 6, "objective": "Education dimension: study hours and ICT teaching gap closed by solar", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 84, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 76, "from": 21, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-8370f154005a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Health, Education, Food security, Environment, Trade dimension chapters", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 76, "from": 21, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-8ddb0b48fe56", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "Lost ANC coverage, study hours, food, MSME revenue, GHG emissions piled up", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-ac5f8da8dd41", "docSlug": "ca36ef0bb8107011", "documentTitle": "The economic potential of Generative AI in Norway", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.706, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart uses a scatter plot to visualize the concentration of value potential in specific business functions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Quantifies the potential economic impact of GenAI across business functions.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-ac5f8da8dd41/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-ac5f8da8dd41", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-ac5f8da8dd41#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 4, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "c9a9cc03-3ead-4780-b880-ca533d027665", "evidence": "The document presents data on Generative AI's impact on various industries", "position": 0, "objective": "Identify patterns in Generative AI's impact on productivity", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 4, "beatId": "f4026b11-47bc-415f-be2f-d10bf29b0194", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "The diagnosis and impact sizing slides present the problem and complication", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }