{ "kind": "framework", "value": "hypothesis-driven-structure", "collectionKey": "slides:framework:hypothesis-driven-structure:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 49, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 3, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 267, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a bar chart for expense breakdown and a bar chart for monthly travel frequency to support the hypothesis that VTC (video teleconferencing) can reduce travel costs.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly states a hypothesis about travel frequency and uses data to support it.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/267", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-267", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 229, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-6a47af522484", "evidence": "538 mio. addresserbar -> 6 delanalyser -> centralisation, in-sourcing, VTC, hotel, kontorartikler, TV, SIM, kursus.", "position": 10, "objective": "MECE breakdown of Ovrig Drift baseline into six delanalyser plus sub-initiatives", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 365, "from": 166, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-37e90642ab06", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Potentialeestimater, benchmark gaps, comparison tables.", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16a-1e36ee6fd06e", "docSlug": "ee5f48aa450c79bd", "documentTitle": "Building a Best-in-Class DOT", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": null, "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "other", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide outlines a methodology for consulting problem-solving.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Explicit mention of 'Hypothesis-Driven' as a core methodology.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16a-1e36ee6fd06e/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16a-1e36ee6fd06e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16a-1e36ee6fd06e#slide-12", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 11, "beatId": "2080c942-5d25-41f7-86d1-6d5c97d62c58", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "The deck outlines McKinsey's approach to identifying and addressing business problems.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16a-1e36ee6fd06e", "docSlug": "ee5f48aa450c79bd", "documentTitle": "Building a Best-in-Class DOT", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": null, "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "client_example", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide uses a light green background box to highlight the example text. Includes a footer with a call-to-action for a book.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Explicit mention of 'Hypothesis-Driven Approach' and the process of drafting and validating a hypothesis.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16a-1e36ee6fd06e/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16a-1e36ee6fd06e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16a-1e36ee6fd06e#slide-15", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 11, "beatId": "2080c942-5d25-41f7-86d1-6d5c97d62c58", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "The deck outlines McKinsey's approach to identifying and addressing business problems.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 32, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide uses a process-oriented framework on the left to contextualize the current phase (Develop Hypothesis).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The left-hand column outlines a standard consulting hypothesis-testing process.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/32", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-32", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 32, "from": 30, "name": "Maturity Curve", "slug": "36-maturity-curve", "bestFor": "Digital transformation, capability building, benchmarking", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-8a7e90e0a8ee", "evidence": "Best practices for utilities, 4-step develop-test-design-scale, hypothesized actions.", "position": 3, "objective": "Frame the methodology", "structure": "Current Maturity Level -> The Gap to Next Level -> Required Capabilities -> The Roadmap", "confidence": 60, "description": "Show where you are on a progression and what it takes to reach the next level" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 46, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2242f31eecd3", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Pipeline decomposition, 5 categories, 4-step methodology, scheduling/planning-execution exercises.", "position": 3, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 33, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a process-oriented layout to guide a working session.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly lists 'Develop hypothesis' as the first step in the process.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/33", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-33", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 38, "from": 33, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-8d5561e30f57", "evidence": "Frame issue -> utility-co example -> pilot solution -> scale -> measurable result (145).", "position": 4, "objective": "Walk through scheduling/work-plan case study", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 75, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 46, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2242f31eecd3", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Pipeline decomposition, 5 categories, 4-step methodology, scheduling/planning-execution exercises.", "position": 3, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 41, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "prioritize", "notes": "The slide highlights 'Planning-Execution Alignment' with a red box, indicating it as the focus of the current exercise.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly lists 'Develop Hypothesis', 'Test with Data', etc., as a process flow.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/41", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-41", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 46, "from": 41, "name": "Hypothesis Test", "slug": "42-hypothesis-test", "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-9344bc086204", "evidence": "Hypothesis -> recall data ($20M underrun) -> opportunity -> pilot -> scale.", "position": 5, "objective": "Test planning-execution hypothesis", "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)", "confidence": 75, "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 46, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2242f31eecd3", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Pipeline decomposition, 5 categories, 4-step methodology, scheduling/planning-execution exercises.", "position": 3, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 43, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a simple four-step process flow as a header for a central problem statement.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly lists 'Develop hypothesis' as the first step in the process.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/43", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-43", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 46, "from": 41, "name": "Hypothesis Test", "slug": "42-hypothesis-test", "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-9344bc086204", "evidence": "Hypothesis -> recall data ($20M underrun) -> opportunity -> pilot -> scale.", "position": 5, "objective": "Test planning-execution hypothesis", "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)", "confidence": 75, "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 46, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2242f31eecd3", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Pipeline decomposition, 5 categories, 4-step methodology, scheduling/planning-execution exercises.", "position": 3, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 44, "from": 43, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-30833ff25247", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Opportunity to improve planning-execution alignment.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 44, "slideType": "other", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "This appears to be a workshop or working session slide.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly lists 'Develop hypothesis' as the first step in the process.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/44", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-44", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 46, "from": 41, "name": "Hypothesis Test", "slug": "42-hypothesis-test", "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-9344bc086204", "evidence": "Hypothesis -> recall data ($20M underrun) -> opportunity -> pilot -> scale.", "position": 5, "objective": "Test planning-execution hypothesis", "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)", "confidence": 75, "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 46, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2242f31eecd3", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Pipeline decomposition, 5 categories, 4-step methodology, scheduling/planning-execution exercises.", "position": 3, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 44, "from": 43, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-30833ff25247", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Opportunity to improve planning-execution alignment.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 46, "slideType": "other", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a linear process flow as a framework for a working session.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly lists a four-step process starting with 'Develop hypothesis' and ending with 'Implement and scale'.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/46", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-46", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 46, "from": 41, "name": "Hypothesis Test", "slug": "42-hypothesis-test", "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-9344bc086204", "evidence": "Hypothesis -> recall data ($20M underrun) -> opportunity -> pilot -> scale.", "position": 5, "objective": "Test planning-execution hypothesis", "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)", "confidence": 75, "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 46, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2242f31eecd3", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Pipeline decomposition, 5 categories, 4-step methodology, scheduling/planning-execution exercises.", "position": 3, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 46, "from": 45, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-3416302b15ce", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Pilot solution + scale plan slides.", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 62, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a four-step process header (Develop Hypothesis, Test with Data, Design through Pilot, Implement and Scale) to frame the exercise.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly uses a four-step process starting with 'Develop Hypothesis' and 'Test with Data'.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/62", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-62", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 64, "from": 62, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-9ebeb0f062cd", "evidence": "Per-diem labor problem -> spend analysis ($355M) -> 25-30% O&M savings outcome.", "position": 8, "objective": "Gas Ops external-labor precedent case", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 68, "from": 56, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-27da03e23b04", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Best-practice assessment, issue tables, Utility Co + Gas Ops cases (25-30% savings).", "position": 4, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 63, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide uses a process flow at the top and a stacked bar chart to compare O&M and Capital spend composition.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The top process flow (Develop Hypothesis, Test with Data, etc.) indicates a structured problem-solving approach.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/63", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-63", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 64, "from": 62, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-9ebeb0f062cd", "evidence": "Per-diem labor problem -> spend analysis ($355M) -> 25-30% O&M savings outcome.", "position": 8, "objective": "Gas Ops external-labor precedent case", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 68, "from": 56, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-27da03e23b04", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Best-practice assessment, issue tables, Utility Co + Gas Ops cases (25-30% savings).", "position": 4, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 65, "slideType": "client_example", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide uses a process flow structure with a placeholder for content and a callout box asking for data validation.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The list explicitly mentions 'Develop Hypothesis' and 'Test with Data'.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/65", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-65", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 68, "from": 65, "name": "Precedent", "slug": "09-precedent", "bestFor": "Risk mitigation, strategy validation, building confidence in new approaches", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-a34dd296b278", "evidence": "Case setup -> root-cause questions -> quarterly alignment improvement -> pilot process.", "position": 9, "objective": "Utility Co planning-execution precedent", "structure": "The Precedent Case -> What Happened -> The Parallel -> Applied Learning", "confidence": 75, "description": "Use historical or external examples to validate your approach" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 68, "from": 56, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-27da03e23b04", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Best-practice assessment, issue tables, Utility Co + Gas Ops cases (25-30% savings).", "position": 4, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-ca6c71c657c8", "docSlug": "2ba8066535eababa", "documentTitle": "Deloitte Iowa Efficiency Transformation", "authorId": "proposals", "authorName": "Deloitte", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 100, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide acts as a diagnostic framework for university resource management.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Explicit section titled 'Sample Hypotheses' used to guide analysis.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-ca6c71c657c8/100", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-ca6c71c657c8", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-ca6c71c657c8#slide-100", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 120, "from": 81, "beatId": "4d51b6b6-1d18-4415-94f1-10d34a076597", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document provides a detailed plan for implementation and potential impact.", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-ca6c71c657c8", "docSlug": "2ba8066535eababa", "documentTitle": "Deloitte Iowa Efficiency Transformation", "authorId": "proposals", "authorName": "Deloitte", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 107, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide outlines a diagnostic framework for university fundraising operations, citing past experience with similar engagements.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly lists 'Sample Hypotheses' to guide the diagnostic process.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-ca6c71c657c8/107", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-ca6c71c657c8", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-ca6c71c657c8#slide-107", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 120, "from": 81, "beatId": "4d51b6b6-1d18-4415-94f1-10d34a076597", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document provides a detailed plan for implementation and potential impact.", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-f0f0091e2b3d", "docSlug": "b0b6467a20271204", "documentTitle": "Future Energy Landscape Netherlands", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 25, "slideType": "scenario_analysis", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a combination of a bar-line chart for market balance and a list of assumptions to justify the scenario.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly lists 'What you need to believe' as the core assumptions for the scenario.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-f0f0091e2b3d/25", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-f0f0091e2b3d", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-f0f0091e2b3d#slide-25", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 30, "from": 21, "beatId": "015ceb7f-3aa7-4f91-8804-7a68b201e8f2", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "The document presents potential solutions, including accelerating investments in the energy system and developing new economic sectors", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-1ca563606d38", "docSlug": "96a8486593f55ff6", "documentTitle": "Indonesia case study", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 63, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide outlines specific variables (CPM, GDP %, population counts, growth rates) required for the viability of four distinct business models.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly frames the content as 'what you need to believe' for the models to hold true.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-1ca563606d38/63", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-1ca563606d38", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-1ca563606d38#slide-63", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 65, "from": 54, "beatId": "be927f17-a574-4a62-8975-832269b2fe5b", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document provides financial analysis and data to support the proposed solutions", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2", "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 276, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide maps specific research questions to analytical approaches.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/276", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-276", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 298, "from": 275, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-5c184c18a8b6", "evidence": "Section divider '1 Supply of Dogs' + zip-level zoom + waterfall growth math", "position": 19, "objective": "Zoom into supply of dogs: population sizing and S/N levels", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 78, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-c4d36e9b9f01", "docSlug": "46d5dfdba759e446", "documentTitle": "McKinsey NJ Distributive Energy Resource", "authorId": "proposals", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 44, "slideType": "appendix_methodology", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide contains significant redactions labeled as 'Proprietary or info providing an unfair advantage to competitors'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Explicitly mentions 'Once we have formulated hypotheses, we will create an interview guide'.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-c4d36e9b9f01/44", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-c4d36e9b9f01", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-c4d36e9b9f01#slide-44", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 60, "from": 41, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "9f09ad75-6f71-4ee0-8575-f33b2077eee3", "evidence": "The document's discussion of the potential risks and challenges of not implementing distributive energy resources", "position": 2, "objective": "To highlight the potential costs of inaction", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 60, "from": 41, "beatId": "4588b02a-cc30-4655-a163-892561e3f3e5", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document's inclusion of data, case studies, and testimonials to support McKinsey's approach", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-9365824f1309", "docSlug": "9d464cc3f934c322", "documentTitle": "Quantum Technology Monitor", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a combination of a line chart for cumulative growth and a bar chart for annual frequency to illustrate the market trend.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly lists 'Potential hypotheses on the causes of the slowdown'", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-9365824f1309/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-9365824f1309", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-9365824f1309#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 8, "name": "Logic Chain", "slug": "01-logic-chain", "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis", "matchId": "9501e845-ba12-4237-aad5-ebb7139c18e4", "evidence": "The report provides data and insights on quantum technology investment, including total annual start-up investment and the number of deals.", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the key trends in quantum technology investment?", "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 6, "beatId": "71fae6aa-b632-40b0-92b0-f8b03f5ed987", "arcName": "Monroe's Motivated Sequence", "arcSlug": "monroes-sequence", "beatName": "Satisfaction", "beatSlug": "monroes-sequence-satisfaction", "evidence": "The report provides a comprehensive overview of the quantum technology landscape, satisfying the reader's need for information.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-4998d6bd5b33", "docSlug": "1b6868c0bb7481ee", "documentTitle": "Quantum Technology Monitor 2022", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 23, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a cumulative area chart to visualize growth and a table to provide granular annual data.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly lists 'Potential hypotheses on the causes of the slowdown' to explain the observed data trend.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-4998d6bd5b33/23", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-4998d6bd5b33", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-4998d6bd5b33#slide-23", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 10, "beatId": "ee810cdb-e57e-476f-b70f-fec4ddccb6f5", "arcName": "Monroe's Motivated Sequence", "arcSlug": "monroes-sequence", "beatName": "Satisfaction", "beatSlug": "monroes-sequence-satisfaction", "evidence": "The detailed analysis of quantum computing, communications, and sensing provides satisfaction.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-61b88342a372", "docSlug": "03095094c078fb47", "documentTitle": "Review of efficiency of the operation of the federal courts", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "Mentions hypothesis-driven approach and reliance on 2016-17 data.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Explicit mention of 'Hypothesis-based approach to identify opportunities'", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-61b88342a372/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-61b88342a372", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-61b88342a372#slide-14", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-857f3bd5f1bd", "docSlug": "7d062ccd6a83d1bf", "documentTitle": "The Combustion Engine Business Model in the Age of Electromobility", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a split-screen layout: left side provides context/evidence of current debates, right side frames the core strategic question.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly poses a core strategic question to be answered by the analysis.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-857f3bd5f1bd/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-857f3bd5f1bd", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-857f3bd5f1bd#slide-5", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 5, "beatId": "37c291ea-fe6e-41ec-8fa2-8563f6bf002f", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-problem-identify-pain", "evidence": "The document identifies the current debates around electromobility as a problem", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-994c2a270db1", "docSlug": "09cd0f1face7682d", "documentTitle": "The economic and social impact of investment in the nbn network Methodology Report", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 38, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a transition arrow to show the application of a standard framework to a specific business case.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly structures the approach as establishing a hypothesis to test.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-994c2a270db1/38", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-994c2a270db1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-994c2a270db1#slide-38", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 31, "beatId": "de2b4a7e-820d-4666-a484-aed0b25c4e96", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document provides detailed results and implications of the analysis", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bb8662e8046e", "docSlug": "0f638186bb9b059e", "documentTitle": "UK Electricity Efficiency Potential", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": null, "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 61, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a structured table to link problem statements (barriers) to the necessary conditions (beliefs) for a proposed solution (incentives) to work.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly structures content around 'what you need to believe' to validate a hypothesis.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bb8662e8046e/61", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bb8662e8046e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bb8662e8046e#slide-61", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 77, "from": 6, "beatId": "02a14110-f7eb-4a8e-ad6c-56f071f97bab", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document provides data tables and analysis to support the potential for electricity efficiency measures.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 129, "from": 53, "beatId": "9060aec2-6eb2-4c62-ad0e-6e1552b9219e", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document discusses design options and policy mechanisms to capture the electricity efficiency potential.", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }