{ "kind": "framework", "value": "halo-effect", "collectionKey": "slides:framework:halo-effect:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 9, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 1, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-3e15c6e3bf72", "docSlug": "da48f73eb97e2470", "documentTitle": "2018 True-Luxury Global Consumer Insight", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 39, "slideType": "segmentation", "function": "decompose_segments", "notes": "The slide uses a 'halo effect' concept to link primary segments to secondary ones.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly mentions a 'Positive halo effect on neighboring segments'.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-3e15c6e3bf72/39", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-3e15c6e3bf72", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-3e15c6e3bf72#slide-39", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 39, "from": 31, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d40-3be42660165c", "evidence": "Opens with 4 Millennial segments (~70% spend), then drills into collaborations, mix&match, loyalty, brand ranking.", "position": 8, "objective": "Zoom into the Millennial segment", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 85, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 51, "from": 14, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e38-15ef0d1686df", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Data on casualwear, social, channels, then Millennial & Chinese deep dives", "position": 4, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 51, "from": 30, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e38-23f7258e57dc", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Millennial + Chinese segment deep dives", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b9a-1a3bea94baf9", "docSlug": "c358888161f0", "documentTitle": "Ginkgo Bioworks (DNA)", "authorId": "58_Scorpion_Capital", "authorName": "Scorpion Capital", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller", "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller", "presentationDate": "2021-10-06 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.2941177, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "preempt_rebuttal", "function": "preempt_rebuttal", "notes": "Uses specific examples of financial fraud and regulatory trouble to counter the 'halo effect' of Tiger Cub investment.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Argues that investors incorrectly assume legitimacy based on the reputation of Tiger Cub funds.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9a-1a3bea94baf9/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9a-1a3bea94baf9", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9a-1a3bea94baf9#slide-15", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 29, "from": 7, "beatId": "e2f93575-983e-42f9-ba25-92d6aaff36aa", "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster", "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster", "beatName": "Villain Critique", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "The deck critiques Ginkgo's founders and business practices.", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 175, "from": 9, "beatId": "ffe290af-3a4f-4e06-8d60-dfbfc07d2e08", "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster", "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster", "beatName": "Expose Contradiction", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "The deck presents evidence contradicting Ginkgo's claims and highlighting potential wrongdoings.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5e87-7479-8207-ea93d084e70f", "docSlug": "0bdba6d36ae450b6", "documentTitle": "ipsos global trustworthiness monitor stability in an unstable world", "authorId": "IPSOS", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 32, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses a narrative structure to explain complex correlations between pandemic outcomes and public sentiment.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Mentions 'positive halo effect of citizens turning towards their government'", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e87-7479-8207-ea93d084e70f/32", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e87-7479-8207-ea93d084e70f", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e87-7479-8207-ea93d084e70f#slide-32", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 35, "from": 30, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "1ac75a85-4325-498c-8683-a065d9d768af", "evidence": "The document presents insights into trust in government across various demographics.", "position": 2, "objective": "What do citizens think about trust in government?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e", "docSlug": "995a3793461c4fe2", "documentTitle": "Moneyball Moment Marketing Canada", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "transition", "function": "transition", "notes": "The slide uses a silhouette of a baseball player as a background image, likely metaphorically representing 'impact' or 'driving' results.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly mentions 'halo effect' in the context of marketing attribution.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 13, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d38-0b31552eaa3c", "evidence": "p.15 without halo $16.14, p.16 with halo $14.34 +23% TV bar.", "position": 3, "objective": "Show TV ROI before vs after attributing the halo effect", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 88, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-b79e21ab0886", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Halo effect framing, response curves, 53% TV allocation rec.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 25, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-c79f80d42f32", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Halo effect, marginal ROI, LFVC opportunity.", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e", "docSlug": "995a3793461c4fe2", "documentTitle": "Moneyball Moment Marketing Canada", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "key_messages", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a contrast-based visual to show the negative impact of removing TV (left) versus the positive halo effect of including it (right).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly defines and quantifies the 'Halo Effect' in the context of advertising ROI.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 13, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d38-0b31552eaa3c", "evidence": "p.15 without halo $16.14, p.16 with halo $14.34 +23% TV bar.", "position": 3, "objective": "Show TV ROI before vs after attributing the halo effect", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 88, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-b79e21ab0886", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Halo effect framing, response curves, 53% TV allocation rec.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 25, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-c79f80d42f32", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Halo effect, marginal ROI, LFVC opportunity.", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e", "docSlug": "995a3793461c4fe2", "documentTitle": "Moneyball Moment Marketing Canada", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The chart uses a dashed horizontal line to establish a baseline for comparison across channels.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Title explicitly mentions the halo effect as the core diagnostic factor.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e#slide-15", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 13, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d38-0b31552eaa3c", "evidence": "p.15 without halo $16.14, p.16 with halo $14.34 +23% TV bar.", "position": 3, "objective": "Show TV ROI before vs after attributing the halo effect", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 88, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-b79e21ab0886", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Halo effect framing, response curves, 53% TV allocation rec.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 25, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-c79f80d42f32", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Halo effect, marginal ROI, LFVC opportunity.", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019de070-33b3-745d-8072-46921cecce4b", "docSlug": "5a5dcc7331e3d5727136da28569c31ab", "documentTitle": "Oak Street Health | IPO Presentation Deck | 35 slides", "authorId": "oak-street-health", "authorName": "Oak Street Health", "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck", "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "investment_bank", "sourceTypeLabel": "Investment bank", "presentationDate": "2020-07-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.7777778, "pageNumber": 23, "slideType": "why_now", "function": "argue_timing", "notes": "The slide uses a combination of strategic bullet points in circles and photographic evidence to support the 'why now' narrative.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Explicitly mentioned in the fourth circle.", "slideHref": "/slides/019de070-33b3-745d-8072-46921cecce4b/23", "deckHref": "/decks/019de070-33b3-745d-8072-46921cecce4b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de070-33b3-745d-8072-46921cecce4b#slide-23", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 23, "from": 8, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "7bd6d561-8bd4-480a-b930-2a8f4c8bb499", "evidence": "The deck highlights the potential long-term tailwinds of improving primary care", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the consequences of not improving primary care for Medicare patients?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 23, "from": 7, "name": "Why Now", "slug": "15-why-now", "bestFor": "Sales pitches, fundraising, requesting immediate budget approval", "matchId": "a6c33a4d-96f3-4b33-952c-8e96e22825d5", "evidence": "The deck emphasizes the intersection of two big trends in healthcare and the company's preparedness to capitalize on them", "position": 1, "objective": "Why is now the right time to invest in Oak Street Health?", "structure": "The Context (Trends) -> The Trigger Event -> The Window of Opportunity", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Create temporal urgency by proving that the window of opportunity is opening or closing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019de076-0d96-7007-9621-a33a2a15ad0f", "docSlug": "1f3babbc925f87f5c6aee28f1cf19c55", "documentTitle": "On Holding | Investor Day Presentation Deck | 137 slides", "authorId": "on-holding", "authorName": "On Holding", "documentKindSlug": "conference-presentation", "documentKindLabel": "Conference presentation", "sourceTypeSlug": "investor_relations", "sourceTypeLabel": "Investor relations", "presentationDate": "2023-10-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.7777778, "pageNumber": 52, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide uses a split-screen layout with text on the left and a high-quality photograph of an On retail store on the right.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Explicit mention of 'Halo effect uplifts all channels' as a strategic driver.", "slideHref": "/slides/019de076-0d96-7007-9621-a33a2a15ad0f/52", "deckHref": "/decks/019de076-0d96-7007-9621-a33a2a15ad0f", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de076-0d96-7007-9621-a33a2a15ad0f#slide-52", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-c9322619fccd", "docSlug": "1979be6b3c9d674c", "documentTitle": "Reinventing with a Digital Core", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 25, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The diagram uses a Sankey-like flow to represent correlations between two identical sets of digital core components.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly names the 'Technology halo effect' and describes how improvements in one area spill over to others.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-c9322619fccd/25", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-c9322619fccd", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-c9322619fccd#slide-25", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 26, "from": 24, "name": "Maturity Curve", "slug": "36-maturity-curve", "bestFor": "Digital transformation, capability building, benchmarking", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d39-5595fe7abc7c", "evidence": "'Getting started' lays out gap analysis (p.24, 34% standardized) and halo-effect roadmap logic (p.25).", "position": 7, "objective": "Map current maturity gaps to a roadmap for becoming reinvention-ready", "structure": "Current Maturity Level -> The Gap to Next Level -> Required Capabilities -> The Roadmap", "confidence": 70, "description": "Show where you are on a progression and what it takes to reach the next level" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 20, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820f-401f7f5d4a37", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "2X benchmark charts, ecosystem chart, technology halo effect figure validate ACT.", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 25, "from": 14, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820f-4d1dd1d3dacc", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "ACT principles + 2X benchmark charts spell out implications.", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }