{ "kind": "framework", "value": "governance", "collectionKey": "slides:framework:governance:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 689, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 29, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 125, "slideType": "appendix", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "Includes a 'Draft - for discussion only' watermark on the left chart. BCG branding.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Mentions IT enabler topic governance", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/125", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-125", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 148, "from": 98, "name": "Quick Win Big Bet", "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet", "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-54fbecd2dba5", "evidence": "Process in waves (p.112) + decision required on option (p.115) + 200-220 mil. recommended.", "position": 5, "objective": "Sequence IT consolidation in waves with two option scenarios", "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap", "confidence": 84, "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 165, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-30a6df91c9fe", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Baselines, segmentations, current-state diagnoses dominate first half.", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 374, "slideType": "org_design", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide outlines a governance structure for material management within the Danish Defense.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide defines clear roles and responsibilities (RACI-like) for material management.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/374", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-374", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 420, "from": 367, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-713edc37f29d", "evidence": "Current fragmenteret VFK -> enstrenget logistikstruktur -> 35-60 mio. kr. potentiale + business cases.", "position": 12, "objective": "Compare current logistics structure to enstrenget LOGTJ nyordning", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 84, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 420, "from": 322, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2a66536a5837", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Admin fællesskaber + nyordning af logistik + insourcing benchmarks and business cases.", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 482, "from": 366, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-3ad263fdddff", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Logistic nyordning, kortlægning, skalering and realiserbarhed methodology.", "position": 3, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 49, "slideType": "org_design", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a two-column structure to contrast support provided vs. support needed.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide defines roles, responsibilities, and decision-making support between a core team and the organization.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/49", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-49", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 51, "from": 48, "name": "Stakeholder Map", "slug": "45-stakeholder-map", "bestFor": "Change management, political navigation, implementation planning", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-9766ac37d89e", "evidence": "Steering Committee -> BCO Core Team -> Business leads -> Initiative leads -> Change agents.", "position": 6, "objective": "Define BCO governance and roles", "structure": "The Decision -> Key Stakeholders -> Their Interests/Concerns -> The Alignment Strategy", "confidence": 70, "description": "Identify key players, their interests, and how to navigate them" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 48, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-29344368199c", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "BCO Core Team org design, field force work approach, closing 'Questions?'.", "position": 5, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-75d8e267c76f", "docSlug": "e01ca0dd732f0beb", "documentTitle": "Future-back Breakthrough Growth", "authorId": "Innosight", "authorName": "Innosight", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "implementation_plan", "function": "plan_implementation", "notes": "The slide discusses the importance of a 'New Growth Board' and the CEO's role in innovation governance, citing A.G. Lafley of P&G.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Discusses the design of a governance system and the formation of a New Growth Board.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-75d8e267c76f/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-75d8e267c76f", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-75d8e267c76f#slide-8", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 7, "beatId": "545bdd40-071d-4142-b308-0f1d94f56c95", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The strategic opportunity areas and implementation plan provide evidence and proof", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2", "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 131, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide evaluates four models: Subdivision within a department, Independent department, Partially privatized, and Completely privatized.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly compares different governance structures for public services.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/131", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-131", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 142, "from": 97, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-56b00e0e002c", "evidence": "Full report Rec 1 mission → Rec 7 efficiency, each with sub-initiatives", "position": 17, "objective": "Detailed exposition of all 7 recommendations and supporting initiatives", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 85, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 142, "from": 45, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-9f808a4e90ee", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Deep-dive recommendations, full report exhibits, peer benchmarks, S/N math", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2", "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 136, "slideType": "org_design", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide outlines a governance structure for an advisory commission, emphasizing expertise-based subcommittees and conflict-of-interest mitigation.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide proposes a committee structure and conflict-of-interest policies for a public commission.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/136", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-136", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 142, "from": 97, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-56b00e0e002c", "evidence": "Full report Rec 1 mission → Rec 7 efficiency, each with sub-initiatives", "position": 17, "objective": "Detailed exposition of all 7 recommendations and supporting initiatives", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 85, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 142, "from": 45, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-9f808a4e90ee", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Deep-dive recommendations, full report exhibits, peer benchmarks, S/N math", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2", "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 251, "slideType": "org_design", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a numbered list structure to map organizational areas to governance impacts.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly discusses the impact of organization and governance models on operational areas.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/251", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-251", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 267, "from": 161, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-5934a57a4387", "evidence": "Repeated triplet pattern: e.g., p.166/167/168, p.178/179/180, p.188/189", "position": 18, "objective": "For each initiative, build up Overview → Estimated Impact → Resource Requirements", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 82, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2", "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 252, "slideType": "strategic_options", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a column-based comparison framework to categorize municipal animal services governance.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Categorization of organizational structures for municipal services", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/252", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-252", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 267, "from": 161, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-5934a57a4387", "evidence": "Repeated triplet pattern: e.g., p.166/167/168, p.178/179/180, p.188/189", "position": 18, "objective": "For each initiative, build up Overview → Estimated Impact → Resource Requirements", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 82, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2", "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 260, "slideType": "org_design", "function": "recommend", "notes": "The slide outlines a governance structure for the commission, emphasizing specific expertise requirements for each subcommittee.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide proposes a committee structure to manage oversight and independence.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/260", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-260", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 267, "from": 161, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-5934a57a4387", "evidence": "Repeated triplet pattern: e.g., p.166/167/168, p.178/179/180, p.188/189", "position": 18, "objective": "For each initiative, build up Overview → Estimated Impact → Resource Requirements", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 82, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-b634d854020e", "docSlug": "ec0360e3af750352", "documentTitle": "Our Impact Plan 2023", "authorId": "KPMG", "authorName": "KPMG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 18, "slideType": "governance", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "The slide is part of a larger ESG report, specifically under the 'Governance' section.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly discusses the Enterprise Risk Management Program and oversight committees.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-b634d854020e/18", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-b634d854020e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-b634d854020e#slide-18", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 4, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "4f141e7e-ec97-4f1b-8c9f-2a0cc40abe13", "evidence": "The sections on purpose and values explain the why behind KPMG's ESG commitments.", "position": 0, "objective": "Why KPMG's ESG commitments matter", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 0.8, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 6, "beatId": "d46cf082-c17c-44d5-a9dc-bc14d382a412", "arcName": "The Sparkline", "arcSlug": "sparkline", "beatName": "Interest", "beatSlug": "aida-interest", "evidence": "The contents and material topics generate interest in KPMG's impact plan.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-c553eedbe70f", "docSlug": "08d91cc64caaba96", "documentTitle": "Our Impact Plan 2024", "authorId": "KPMG", "authorName": "KPMG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "governance", "function": "summarize", "notes": "Includes a quote from Jane Lawrie, Global Head of Corporate Affairs.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Slide title and content focus on ESG governance framework", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-c553eedbe70f/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-c553eedbe70f", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-c553eedbe70f#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 8, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "56fb49f8-745a-4bcc-8a69-5a9d0e979441", "evidence": "Governance section aligns with the Golden Circle model", "position": 0, "objective": "Explain KPMG's purpose and approach", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 0.8, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 8, "beatId": "05ebabfb-26d8-48bb-8e60-6bd0a0dd5486", "arcName": "The Sparkline", "arcSlug": "sparkline", "beatName": "Why", "beatSlug": "golden-circle-why", "evidence": "Governance section, explaining KPMG's approach", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57", "docSlug": "09ad2cf031bccf07", "documentTitle": "Proposal Spend Analysis Procurement Virginia", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 43, "slideType": "appendix_methodology", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "Contains two distinct figures: Figure 29 (Initiative Charter Template) and Figure 30 (Activist PMO Concepts).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Activist PMO concepts and steering committee structure", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57/43", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57#slide-43", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 45, "from": 40, "name": "Domino Effect", "slug": "13-domino-effect", "bestFor": "Strategy roadmaps, showing ROI of a specific feature, causal analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-cbfa98847df6", "evidence": "Category playbooks -> initiative charters -> integrated workplan with milestones.", "position": 5, "objective": "Sequence Phase 2 detailed initiative plans into integrated transformation roadmap", "structure": "The Trigger Action -> First Reaction -> Second Reaction -> Final Impact", "confidence": 70, "description": "Demonstrate how a single small strategic move triggers a cascade of positive outcomes" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 45, "from": 17, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-c2dfe9db308a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "6-component framework, Phase 1 & Phase 2 detailed methodology, tools & timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57", "docSlug": "09ad2cf031bccf07", "documentTitle": "Proposal Spend Analysis Procurement Virginia", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 56, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "other", "notes": "The slide contains a placeholder for personnel information (black box) and a detailed narrative on conflict of interest policies.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Description of internal processes and policies to mitigate conflict of interest.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57/56", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57#slide-56", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 60, "from": 55, "name": "Expert Witness", "slug": "23-expert-witness", "bestFor": "Technical validation, regulatory compliance, skeptical executives", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-d32589ee03ee", "evidence": "Six pages of key-personnel bios with senior State/Federal procurement experience.", "position": 7, "objective": "Establish authority via senior BCG/FMP/Spinnaker key-personnel credentials", "structure": "The Authority's Credentials -> Their Finding/Opinion -> Applied to Our Case", "confidence": 80, "description": "Borrow credibility from a recognized authority to validate your position" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 60, "from": 46, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-c57a45a3c889", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "990 projects, $1B/$900M/$400M case studies, key personnel credentials.", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51", "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435", "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.401, "pageNumber": 56, "slideType": "org_design", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a hierarchical structure to define governance roles for a transition program.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide defines roles and responsibilities for a program management structure.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/56", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-56", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 58, "from": 53, "name": "Quick Win Big Bet", "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet", "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-0ec52c8f107a", "evidence": "p53-54 prioritize 110 opportunities, sequence ~40 near-term; p56-58 EPMO + tracking tools.", "position": 10, "objective": "Prioritize ~110 opportunities and stand up EPMO governance to execute", "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap", "confidence": 82, "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 68, "from": 50, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-f39a4bb1bd76", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Implementation plan, EPMO, risks, progress to date — closes with 'continued commitment'.", "position": 5, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51", "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435", "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.401, "pageNumber": 57, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a three-column structure to map EPMO roles to specific outcomes.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly defines 'Activist Governance' as a core role of the EPMO.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/57", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-57", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 58, "from": 53, "name": "Quick Win Big Bet", "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet", "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-0ec52c8f107a", "evidence": "p53-54 prioritize 110 opportunities, sequence ~40 near-term; p56-58 EPMO + tracking tools.", "position": 10, "objective": "Prioritize ~110 opportunities and stand up EPMO governance to execute", "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap", "confidence": 82, "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 68, "from": 50, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-f39a4bb1bd76", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Implementation plan, EPMO, risks, progress to date — closes with 'continued commitment'.", "position": 5, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51", "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435", "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.401, "pageNumber": 98, "slideType": "org_design", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a split-column layout to contrast two distinct organizational functions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Separation of board and management roles", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/98", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-98", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 102, "from": 95, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-1e9daff2c96d", "evidence": "p98 governance framework; p100-101 'unique vs PHAs / inconsistent with best practice'; p102 must-do changes.", "position": 14, "objective": "Diagnose NYCHA board governance against PHA peers and corporate best practice, then recommend changes", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 80, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51", "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435", "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.401, "pageNumber": 101, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses checkmarks and X marks to indicate adherence to governance standards.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide evaluates corporate governance practices against a set of standards.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/101", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-101", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 102, "from": 95, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-1e9daff2c96d", "evidence": "p98 governance framework; p100-101 'unique vs PHAs / inconsistent with best practice'; p102 must-do changes.", "position": 14, "objective": "Diagnose NYCHA board governance against PHA peers and corporate best practice, then recommend changes", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 80, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51", "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435", "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.401, "pageNumber": 102, "slideType": "recommendation", "function": "recommend", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide outlines specific changes to board governance processes and roles.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/102", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-102", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 102, "from": 95, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-1e9daff2c96d", "evidence": "p98 governance framework; p100-101 'unique vs PHAs / inconsistent with best practice'; p102 must-do changes.", "position": 14, "objective": "Diagnose NYCHA board governance against PHA peers and corporate best practice, then recommend changes", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 80, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51", "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435", "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.401, "pageNumber": 106, "slideType": "org_design", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide uses a side-by-side list format to delineate governance responsibilities.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Delineation of board roles and responsibilities", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/106", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-106", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-1905a2ddbc1f", "docSlug": "ad42cfa8e31c0209", "documentTitle": "Rise of Agentic AI Report", "authorId": "Capgemini", "authorName": "Capgemini", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 87, "slideType": "key_messages", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "Includes two expert quotes and references to ISO/IEC 42001.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Mentions layered governance, AI ethicists, and ISO/IEC 42001", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-1905a2ddbc1f/87", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-1905a2ddbc1f", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-1905a2ddbc1f#slide-87", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-123e7212de26", "docSlug": "4d74f98a9e00a900", "documentTitle": "Sustainability Report", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "A&M", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 23, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide outlines the firm's ethical framework and lists various internal policy documents.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly details the firm's governance approach and compliance policies.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-123e7212de26/23", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-123e7212de26", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-123e7212de26#slide-23", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 26, "from": 23, "name": "Expert Witness", "slug": "23-expert-witness", "bestFor": "Technical validation, regulatory compliance, skeptical executives", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-c267b810e92f", "evidence": "Governance approach + family foundation case (39,160 training hours) + whistleblowing + chemicals EHS case", "position": 7, "objective": "Establish governance credibility through frameworks and case proof", "structure": "The Authority's Credentials -> Their Finding/Opinion -> Applied to Our Case", "confidence": 65, "description": "Borrow credibility from a recognized authority to validate your position" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e37-2a7f2e5ec061", "arcName": "The Golden Circle", "arcSlug": "golden-circle", "beatName": "What", "beatSlug": "golden-circle-what", "evidence": "Case studies, GHG data, DEI programs, governance, supplier diversity", "position": 3, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 26, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e37-3b50542a82c9", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Six client case studies plus GHG and DEI metrics", "position": 4, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-b93fac438b3e", "docSlug": "d1aa560e6ec238e4", "documentTitle": "Tillsonburg IT Strategic Review", "authorId": "Deloitte", "authorName": "Deloitte", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "recommendation", "function": "recommend", "notes": "The slide uses a RACI-like mapping approach to delineate responsibilities between the Town and the County.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly outlines a governance framework and roles/responsibilities.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-b93fac438b3e/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-b93fac438b3e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-b93fac438b3e#slide-16", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 10, "beatId": "64b78e60-30a0-46a7-959b-6dac9c6cd004", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document presents a 5-year roadmap, cost summary, and targeted future state of IT.", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-df215e4f0bc1", "docSlug": "b89c4b2a8f5b0c45", "documentTitle": "Transformation Ebook", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 2.5, "pageNumber": 83, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide describes the setup of a PMO, steering committee, and cross-functional teams to drive transformation.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Mentions steering committee and PMO for governance and tracking.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-df215e4f0bc1/83", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-df215e4f0bc1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-df215e4f0bc1#slide-83", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 85, "from": 71, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30e-d193bc65f629", "evidence": "Process diagram of 4 stages followed by stage-by-stage detail and CEO/board cases.", "position": 7, "objective": "Drill from CEO 4-stage process into specific leadership behaviors", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 75, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 120, "from": 68, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e2-a46981f3662e", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Part II execution chapters densely loaded with named-company case studies.", "position": 4, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 120, "from": 69, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e2-b3d6e5d451ad", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Part II - leading, managing, building capabilities.", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-df215e4f0bc1", "docSlug": "b89c4b2a8f5b0c45", "documentTitle": "Transformation Ebook", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 2.5, "pageNumber": 102, "slideType": "org_design", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a hierarchical and functional organizational structure to define governance.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly defines a governance structure for a change program.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-df215e4f0bc1/102", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-df215e4f0bc1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-df215e4f0bc1#slide-102", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 103, "from": 87, "name": "Domino Effect", "slug": "13-domino-effect", "bestFor": "Strategy roadmaps, showing ROI of a specific feature, causal analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30e-d40023ea6b84", "evidence": "Chapter introduces Change Delta with 4 interlocking elements (executional certainty -> leaders -> engagement -> governance).", "position": 8, "objective": "Show how Change Delta elements compound into sustainable change", "structure": "The Trigger Action -> First Reaction -> Second Reaction -> Final Impact", "confidence": 80, "description": "Demonstrate how a single small strategic move triggers a cascade of positive outcomes" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 120, "from": 68, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e2-a46981f3662e", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Part II execution chapters densely loaded with named-company case studies.", "position": 4, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 120, "from": 69, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e2-b3d6e5d451ad", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Part II - leading, managing, building capabilities.", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }