{ "kind": "framework", "value": "gap-analysis", "collectionKey": "slides:framework:gap-analysis:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 51, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 3, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-a8b527cc1fe8", "docSlug": "72ab3e69351c1c34", "documentTitle": "2012 Bond Cap Internet Trends 2012", "authorId": "BondCap", "authorName": "Mary Meeker", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "vc_research", "sourceTypeLabel": "VC research", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 18, "slideType": "market_sizing", "function": "size_opportunity", "notes": "The slide uses a gap analysis between time spent and ad spend to quantify the market opportunity.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Comparing time spent vs ad spend to identify market opportunity", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-a8b527cc1fe8/18", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-a8b527cc1fe8", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-a8b527cc1fe8#slide-18", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 5, "beatId": "897cc069-3d9f-4d7d-9408-eaa22c9f162a", "arcName": "Monroe's Motivated Sequence", "arcSlug": "monroes-sequence", "beatName": "Need", "beatSlug": "monroes-sequence-need", "evidence": "The report highlights the need for mobile monetization and the challenges associated with it.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-b315287f7ee1", "docSlug": "fc0c90c9b630fa00", "documentTitle": "2014 Bond Cap Internet Trends 2014", "authorId": "BondCap", "authorName": "Mary Meeker", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "vc_research", "sourceTypeLabel": "VC research", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "market_sizing", "function": "size_opportunity", "notes": "Uses a gap analysis approach to identify market opportunity by comparing consumption share to spend share.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Comparing time spent vs ad spend to calculate a $30B opportunity", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-b315287f7ee1/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-b315287f7ee1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-b315287f7ee1#slide-16", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 14, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019de7cf-8629-756a-991d-3378849ded0e", "evidence": "p.14 ad spend → p.15 ARPU gap → p.16 explicit '~$30B+ Opportunity in USA' callout → p.17 app vs ad split", "position": 2, "objective": "Drive ad data to a $30B+ mobile-ad opportunity recommendation", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 78, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 13, "beatId": "019de7cf-8422-74ff-9edf-05e1f1711346", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "First Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Mobile ad opp + cyber + tech-stocks/edu/health 'inflection point' status updates", "position": 2, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 91, "from": 4, "beatId": "019de7cf-858f-724f-8f90-9bc5829b709d", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Bulk of deck is data slides establishing the trend facts", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-bd77826b2230", "docSlug": "9f887ebe7e9bc626", "documentTitle": "2017 Bond Cap Internet Trends 2017", "authorId": "BondCap", "authorName": "Mary Meeker", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "vc_research", "sourceTypeLabel": "VC research", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "market_sizing", "function": "size_opportunity", "notes": "Part of the Kleiner Perkins Internet Trends 2017 deck.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Comparing time spent vs ad spend to identify the $16B opportunity gap.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-bd77826b2230/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-bd77826b2230", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-bd77826b2230#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 11, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019de7e0-c72e-712a-ac4d-d9f9f8056e31", "evidence": "Each chart (pp.13-19) chains to a deeper so-what; ad-blocking risk closes the cascade.", "position": 2, "objective": "Online advertising = increasingly measurable + actionable", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 75, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" }, { "to": 16, "from": 13, "name": "Funnel Analysis", "slug": "32-funnel-analysis", "bestFor": "Sales optimization, customer journey, process efficiency", "matchId": "019de7e0-c753-717d-a9c1-2fcb317c4f1d", "evidence": "Spend-vs-time gap (~$16B) and 85% growth share concentrate funnel-style.", "position": 3, "objective": "Show ad spend mix, gap to usage, and duopoly capture", "structure": "Top of Funnel -> Stage 1 Conversion -> Stage 2 Conversion -> Bottom of Funnel -> The Leak", "confidence": 70, "description": "Show progressive filtering through stages to identify where drop-off occurs" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 333, "from": 4, "beatId": "019de7e0-c523-7666-bff1-a849bfac7344", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Sections 1-9 (Global, Ads, Games, Media, Cloud, China, India, Healthcare, Companies) present trend data.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 19, "from": 5, "beatId": "019de7e0-c5b5-760d-8e71-19f9f0d05a38", "arcName": "The Sparkline", "arcSlug": "sparkline", "beatName": "What Is", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Current state of internet user growth and ad spend baselines.", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-c276e85d51e3", "docSlug": "a31ffd211a1fe680", "documentTitle": "2018 Bond Cap Internet Trends 2018", "authorId": "BondCap", "authorName": "Mary Meeker", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "vc_research", "sourceTypeLabel": "VC research", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 97, "slideType": "market_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart uses arrows to indicate year-over-year shifts in share. The mobile opportunity is calculated as the difference between time spent and ad spend.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Comparison of time spent vs ad spend to identify opportunity", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-c276e85d51e3/97", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-c276e85d51e3", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-c276e85d51e3#slide-97", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 295, "from": 51, "beatId": "b9b70551-f8fb-4594-b90e-6e898c73b030", "arcName": "Monroe's Motivated Sequence", "arcSlug": "monroes-sequence", "beatName": "Action", "beatSlug": "monroes-sequence-action", "evidence": "The report concludes with a call to action for internet companies to adapt to changing trends.", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-7792191b0575", "docSlug": "ca94acfa263b", "documentTitle": "Pfizer Inc. (PFE)", "authorId": "03_Starboard_Value", "authorName": "Starboard Value", "documentKindSlug": "conference-presentation", "documentKindLabel": "Conference presentation", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2024-10-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.7777778, "pageNumber": 22, "slideType": "thesis_headline", "function": "diagnose_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a visual gap analysis to demonstrate underperformance against a market benchmark.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Visual comparison of projected sales against a defined threshold", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-7792191b0575/22", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-7792191b0575", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-7792191b0575#slide-22", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 73, "from": 10, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "54ce6058-bed8-43c5-8780-84fb43f33c5e", "evidence": "The document highlights the significant losses in value that Pfizer has experienced due to its poor performance, and urges the board to take action to improve this.", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the consequences of not improving Pfizer's performance?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 73, "from": 3, "name": "Quick Win Big Bet", "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet", "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation", "matchId": "f6f940a6-6451-4a43-940f-82e2afbdbeb8", "evidence": "The document presents several potential solutions to improve Pfizer's performance, including improving its return on R&D investments and holding management accountable for improving performance.", "position": 1, "objective": "Can Pfizer achieve higher returns on capital?", "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 60, "from": 11, "beatId": "06f958bd-fafa-4ea3-a570-c80d16e2354b", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "The document highlights several issues with Pfizer's strategy, including its poor capital allocation and forecasting and budgeting issues, which have made its performance worse.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-7792191b0575", "docSlug": "ca94acfa263b", "documentTitle": "Pfizer Inc. (PFE)", "authorId": "03_Starboard_Value", "authorName": "Starboard Value", "documentKindSlug": "conference-presentation", "documentKindLabel": "Conference presentation", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2024-10-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.7777778, "pageNumber": 23, "slideType": "valuation_reveal", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a visual gap analysis to demonstrate that the drug will underperform relative to the blockbuster benchmark.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Visual comparison of projected sales against a fixed $1B threshold.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-7792191b0575/23", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-7792191b0575", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-7792191b0575#slide-23", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 73, "from": 10, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "54ce6058-bed8-43c5-8780-84fb43f33c5e", "evidence": "The document highlights the significant losses in value that Pfizer has experienced due to its poor performance, and urges the board to take action to improve this.", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the consequences of not improving Pfizer's performance?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 73, "from": 3, "name": "Quick Win Big Bet", "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet", "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation", "matchId": "f6f940a6-6451-4a43-940f-82e2afbdbeb8", "evidence": "The document presents several potential solutions to improve Pfizer's performance, including improving its return on R&D investments and holding management accountable for improving performance.", "position": 1, "objective": "Can Pfizer achieve higher returns on capital?", "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 60, "from": 11, "beatId": "06f958bd-fafa-4ea3-a570-c80d16e2354b", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "The document highlights several issues with Pfizer's strategy, including its poor capital allocation and forecasting and budgeting issues, which have made its performance worse.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a168-55bbbbc3eed0", "docSlug": "75a24b4b5695da66", "documentTitle": "Bold moves: Leading Southeast Asia's next wave of consumer growth", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "Bain", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 54, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The chart uses a grouped bar chart format to visualize the 'say-do' or 'opportunity-preparedness' gap.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Comparison of opportunity vs preparedness scores", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a168-55bbbbc3eed0/54", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a168-55bbbbc3eed0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a168-55bbbbc3eed0#slide-54", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 60, "from": 53, "name": "Capability Gap", "slug": "48-capability-gap", "bestFor": "M&A strategy, digital transformation, organizational design", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-7c75ac31258b", "evidence": "p54 'not prepared' + biggest gaps → p55 evolved model → p60 build vs become scale insurgent", "position": 9, "objective": "Diagnose readiness gap and prescribe evolved model", "structure": "Required Capabilities -> Current State -> The Gap -> Build vs Buy vs Partner Decision", "confidence": 80, "description": "Compare required capabilities vs. current capabilities to define the build/buy/partner decision" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-0213d98f59f1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Seven trend deep-dives + p54 'leaders recognize but not prepared' diagnosis", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 54, "from": 53, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-12795af8eadd", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "p54 'biggest gaps in Gen Z, AI, insurgents'", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5d89529e8c57", "docSlug": "0531041e5c74bb5b", "documentTitle": "Climate Change: BCG’s Perspectives and Offerings", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The chart highlights the 'emissions gap' between current policy trajectories and climate targets.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Visual representation of the delta between current state and target state.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5d89529e8c57/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5d89529e8c57", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5d89529e8c57#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 7, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-b9aacdba192a", "evidence": "GDP-loss scenarios, 50 Gt emissions, orange 'Gap' between commitments and 2°C path", "position": 2, "objective": "make inaction feel expensive and urgent", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 72, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-a37c9dcf3071", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "GDP losses, 50 Gt gap, <2% of countries with sufficient policies", "position": 2, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 15, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-b0ab4c0d2c9f", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Atmospheric and policy data", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5e87-7479-8207-9f9581f7bc57", "docSlug": "f35672098bfcb228", "documentTitle": "Digital Revolution Awards", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "Bain", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 17, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a gap analysis approach to highlight the talent deficit in key digital capabilities.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Comparison of current state vs top-performing benchmark", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e87-7479-8207-9f9581f7bc57/17", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e87-7479-8207-9f9581f7bc57", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e87-7479-8207-9f9581f7bc57#slide-17", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 17, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-de5a90727b62", "evidence": "p.17 'long way to go' gap framing; p.18 'Many opportunities to revamp Talent System' with 5-tool stack.", "position": 5, "objective": "Move from talent gap diagnostic to revamped Talent System", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-7a24bbd8ccfb", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Customer/Country/Companies data sections deliver hard facts.", "position": 1, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 18, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-896ba2cc937f", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Rising Action", "beatSlug": "mountain-rising-action", "evidence": "Cumulative evidence across Customer, Country, Companies.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-aa28bd32979b", "docSlug": "427acb0947e20afd", "documentTitle": "Everyday Moments of Truth", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "Bain", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide highlights the 'conference room' as the critical gap area for intervention, contrasting it with classroom and boardroom efforts.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Focus on the gap in the conference room between classroom and boardroom efforts.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-aa28bd32979b/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-aa28bd32979b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-aa28bd32979b#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 12, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b312-0bdc53a6c6a6", "evidence": "Figure 7 highlights conference room (red) between greyed-out classroom and boardroom; title states 'we focus on the gap in the conference room.'", "position": 3, "objective": "Narrow focus from broad gender efforts to the conference room", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 86, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 12, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-bc288f53070f", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Classroom/Conference room/Boardroom framework focuses on conference room", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 13, "from": 12, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a4-702a-b0b2-5e1c9ac79c6c", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Conference room is where the gap can be closed", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15", "docSlug": "7183f5a47999c314", "documentTitle": "FULL VALUE. FULL STOP How to scale innovation and achieve full value with Future Systems", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart uses an area-based visualization to show the cumulative revenue gap between two growth trajectories.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly quantifies the 'Gap' between two performance trajectories.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 6, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b774-003b2ff61a5b", "evidence": "p6 names the 'innovation achievement gap'; p7 shows 2X revenue gap; p8 projects 46% gap to 2023; p9 sets up 'Think like the top 10%'.", "position": 1, "objective": "Establish the Leaders vs Laggards gap as the core tension", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 88, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820a-b8788e340134", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "'Innovation achievement gap', 2X revenue gap, 46% projected loss frames pain.", "position": 2, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 16, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820a-c8e62209c904", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Survey data on Leaders vs Laggards behaviour and Future Systems traits.", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5fed-74f2-a96f-d3ef3301bcfe", "docSlug": "bi-690e3b8b12d28317", "documentTitle": "Legit Security raises $10 million to tackle supply chain attacks", "authorId": "Pitchdecks", "authorName": "Legit Security", "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck", "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.777, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "Uses a network diagram to show fragmented coverage. The asterisk note clarifies that the highlighted logos are representative of 'point security solutions'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Highlights what is missing in current security coverage", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5fed-74f2-a96f-d3ef3301bcfe/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5fed-74f2-a96f-d3ef3301bcfe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5fed-74f2-a96f-d3ef3301bcfe#slide-4", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 4, "from": 2, "beatId": "b26e64c9-969e-4614-9f5f-f086e8eaedf9", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-problem-identify-pain", "evidence": "Slides 2-4 identify the problem and pain points", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.9, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e", "docSlug": "995a3793461c4fe2", "documentTitle": "Moneyball Moment Marketing Canada", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The chart uses arrows to indicate the direction and magnitude of the gap between current and optimal spend.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Comparison of current vs optimal states", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 7, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d38-07f0c943a58e", "evidence": "1.7% Canada vs US, 5% current-vs-optimal TV gap, $1.4B missed.", "position": 2, "objective": "Quantify Canada-vs-optimal spend gap and missed sales", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 85, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-b1bdf31f78b6", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "5 insights, 1.7% spend, 5% TV gap, $1.4B missed sales.", "position": 2, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 12, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-c323f729f0d8", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Study scope and Canadian spend benchmarks.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-84595e2c37a3", "docSlug": "08680a75fcb3", "documentTitle": "Pfizer Inc. (PFE)", "authorId": "03_Starboard_Value", "authorName": "Starboard Value", "documentKindSlug": "conference-presentation", "documentKindLabel": "Conference presentation", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2024-10-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.7777778, "pageNumber": 23, "slideType": "other", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a visual gap analysis to emphasize the shortfall against a market benchmark.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Visual comparison of projected sales against a defined threshold ($1B) to highlight a shortfall.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-84595e2c37a3/23", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-84595e2c37a3", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-84595e2c37a3#slide-23", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 73, "from": 10, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "28cefacd-d8d3-4ae9-ba09-ae3e05acdb07", "evidence": "The document highlights the potential costs of inaction for Pfizer, including continued underperformance and loss of value.", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the costs of inaction for Pfizer?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 71, "from": 11, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "02f3fffa-109d-4115-8a3f-00c62628d55f", "evidence": "The document proposes a breakdown of Pfizer's challenges and potential solutions.", "position": 1, "objective": "How can Pfizer improve its performance?", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 11, "beatId": "70a41b1b-59a4-4dcf-8d45-92e3a16e689b", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "The document highlights various challenges facing Pfizer, including lack of internal innovation and poor capital allocation.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-605d-726d-81a4-3844698c4350", "docSlug": "bi-01936e74a075aa79", "documentTitle": "Read pitch deck AI intimacy startup Arya used to raise $21 million", "authorId": "Pitchdecks", "authorName": "Arya", "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck", "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.779, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "why_now", "function": "size_opportunity", "notes": "Uses a visual 'gap' metaphor to illustrate market opportunity.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Visual representation of a market gap between two industry segments.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-605d-726d-81a4-3844698c4350/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-605d-726d-81a4-3844698c4350", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-605d-726d-81a4-3844698c4350#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 6, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "5952f37e-1f08-4c8d-aa26-2a6c27d38a2e", "evidence": "The cost of inaction is implied on pages 6-8", "position": 1, "objective": "The cost of inaction in the relationship and intimacy market", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-c9322619fccd", "docSlug": "1979be6b3c9d674c", "documentTitle": "Reinventing with a Digital Core", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 24, "slideType": "situation_overview", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "Mentions 'magic 60:40 effect' and 'gap analysis'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "conducting a gap analysis using established frameworks", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-c9322619fccd/24", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-c9322619fccd", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-c9322619fccd#slide-24", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 26, "from": 24, "name": "Maturity Curve", "slug": "36-maturity-curve", "bestFor": "Digital transformation, capability building, benchmarking", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d39-5595fe7abc7c", "evidence": "'Getting started' lays out gap analysis (p.24, 34% standardized) and halo-effect roadmap logic (p.25).", "position": 7, "objective": "Map current maturity gaps to a roadmap for becoming reinvention-ready", "structure": "Current Maturity Level -> The Gap to Next Level -> Required Capabilities -> The Roadmap", "confidence": 70, "description": "Show where you are on a progression and what it takes to reach the next level" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 20, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820f-401f7f5d4a37", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "2X benchmark charts, ecosystem chart, technology halo effect figure validate ACT.", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 25, "from": 14, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820f-4d1dd1d3dacc", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "ACT principles + 2X benchmark charts spell out implications.", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a168-516ee1323c41", "docSlug": "5f83c7bb8eeb6521", "documentTitle": "SOUTHEAST ASIA’S GREEN ECONOMY 2024", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "Bain", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.914, "pageNumber": 22, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The chart uses a waterfall-style gap analysis to show the difference between BAU and NDC targets.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Visual comparison of BAU vs NDC targets", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a168-516ee1323c41/22", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a168-516ee1323c41", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a168-516ee1323c41#slide-22", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 20, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-08f8-7619-ac2c-e62e21a97a6f", "evidence": "p.21 'critical role globally' -> p.25 '10 SEA countries, ~100 corporates, 3 emission sectors'.", "position": 3, "objective": "Zoom from global climate to SEA scope of assessment", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 72, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a7-7579-bd63-ab76faabfa1f", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Forewords, 5th annual report, SEA's role, scope: 10 countries / ~100 corporates / 3 sectors", "position": 1, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 45, "from": 20, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a7-7579-bd63-bce22823fff0", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Section 'State of Play' assesses 10 SEA countries with index + matrix", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-cbb60c6d54dd", "docSlug": "02937c7c09c0", "documentTitle": "Advance Auto Parts (AAP)", "authorId": "03_Starboard_Value", "authorName": "Starboard Value", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2015-09-30 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.3333334, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "diagnose_problem", "notes": "The chart uses a visual gap to represent missed sales opportunities.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Visual comparison of required vs actual SKUs to identify missed sales", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-cbb60c6d54dd/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-cbb60c6d54dd", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-cbb60c6d54dd#slide-16", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-6d41c9349b25", "docSlug": "9b24bcd38f15752d", "documentTitle": "The Hidden Value of Culture Makers", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a 'perception gap' narrative to contrast leadership optimism with employee reality.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Contrasting leader vs employee sentiment", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-6d41c9349b25/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-6d41c9349b25", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-6d41c9349b25#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 7, "name": "Aha Moment", "slug": "03-aha-moment", "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d39-e1f34c2cf0a0", "evidence": "Diagnosis slides building to '20% vs 2%, 10x higher than leaders believe' callout.", "position": 2, "objective": "Reveal the 10x perception gap insight", "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight", "confidence": 85, "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e32-18b741b6da43", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Perception gap dramatized: 10x divergence leaders vs employees.", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 10, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e32-2865e90f4e7d", "arcName": "The Transformation Tale", "arcSlug": "transformation-tale", "beatName": "Current Reality (Pain)", "beatSlug": "transformation-tale-current-reality-pain", "evidence": "Perception gap and stalled progress.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-67b2c082e364", "docSlug": "5c08d15ab76e5ae9", "documentTitle": "Trend Compendium 2050 Six megatrends that will shape the world", "authorId": "RolandBerger", "authorName": "Roland Berger", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 35, "slideType": "market_sizing", "function": "size_opportunity", "notes": "Includes a sidebar navigation menu and a footer callout regarding the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Comparison of current flows vs future needs to identify a funding gap", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-67b2c082e364/35", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-67b2c082e364", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-67b2c082e364#slide-35", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 86, "from": 21, "beatId": "a3d8d094-939c-4863-83e3-400ab70554cb", "arcName": "Monroe's Motivated Sequence", "arcSlug": "monroes-sequence", "beatName": "Action", "beatSlug": "monroes-sequence-action", "evidence": "The document concludes by emphasizing the need for action to address the megatrends.", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.7, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-67b2c082e364", "docSlug": "5c08d15ab76e5ae9", "documentTitle": "Trend Compendium 2050 Six megatrends that will shape the world", "authorId": "RolandBerger", "authorName": "Roland Berger", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 38, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a 'gap' framework to quantify the challenge in food production, land use, and emissions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly identifies three 'gaps' (food, land, GHG) that must be closed.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-67b2c082e364/38", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-67b2c082e364", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-67b2c082e364#slide-38", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 86, "from": 21, "beatId": "a3d8d094-939c-4863-83e3-400ab70554cb", "arcName": "Monroe's Motivated Sequence", "arcSlug": "monroes-sequence", "beatName": "Action", "beatSlug": "monroes-sequence-action", "evidence": "The document concludes by emphasizing the need for action to address the megatrends.", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.7, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-a66a0d3463c0", "docSlug": "bccc7ca74c5344e0", "documentTitle": "USPS Future Business Model", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 29, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a 'gap' visualization to show the difference between a 'Base Case' (red line) and an 'Actions within Postal Service control' scenario (orange line).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Visual representation of the delta between two financial projections", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-a66a0d3463c0/29", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-a66a0d3463c0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-a66a0d3463c0#slide-29", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 36, "from": 22, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "ebe3a496-98eb-48eb-b1e4-b2b90b2d3590", "evidence": "The deck presents a framework for addressing the challenge, including product and service initiatives, pricing opportunities, and workforce opportunities.", "position": 1, "objective": "Break down the problem into manageable parts", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 38, "from": 22, "beatId": "6d80f5a5-15f2-424b-aae4-9524e06b6575", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "The deck presents potential solutions, including actions within USPS control and fundamental changes to increase flexibility.", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5f69-752d-a9b7-a3c0753f7723", "docSlug": "QgPjzaDJdaxotwn9DMVQ", "documentTitle": "We got an exclusive look at the pitch deck customer service startup Dixa used to bag a $105 million Series C led by Uber-backer General Atlantic", "authorId": "Pitchdecks", "authorName": "Dixa", "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck", "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.784, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "Uses a gap analysis framework to contrast current state vs desired state.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Visual representation of the delta between current performance and customer expectations.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5f69-752d-a9b7-a3c0753f7723/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5f69-752d-a9b7-a3c0753f7723", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5f69-752d-a9b7-a3c0753f7723#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 7, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "bf38d332-b523-4048-a8e8-f631a936067e", "evidence": "Slides 7-9 imply the cost of inaction", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the consequences of not adopting a conversational approach?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 7, "beatId": "f3170234-86ff-4e2e-911b-7b10ea554e68", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-problem-identify-pain", "evidence": "Slides 7-8 present the problem", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.9, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5eff-723e-9be9-6f743401f4cd", "docSlug": "7WQYPNCeWMwdGa45VhbY", "documentTitle": "We got an exclusive look at the pitch deck no-code spreadsheet startup Rows used to raise $16 million", "authorId": "Pitchdecks", "authorName": "Rows", "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck", "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.777, "pageNumber": 2, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "Uses a visual spectrum from 'For developers' to 'for end-users' with a shrug emoji representing the gap for end-users in the API/Integrated development space.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Visual representation of current developer tools vs missing end-user empowerment", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5eff-723e-9be9-6f743401f4cd/2", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5eff-723e-9be9-6f743401f4cd", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5eff-723e-9be9-6f743401f4cd#slide-2", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 2, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "2b41c69c-9ab3-4389-9308-c7f8d6a8d716", "evidence": "Slides imply that current solutions are insufficient.", "position": 0, "objective": "The cost of not enhancing spreadsheet capabilities", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 3, "from": 2, "beatId": "4c3fb53e-4eda-4075-b629-74006c588991", "arcName": "The Sparkline", "arcSlug": "sparkline", "beatName": "What Is", "beatSlug": "sparkline-what-is-1", "evidence": "Slides describe current spreadsheet limitations and potential.", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }