{
  "kind": "framework",
  "value": "evaluation-rubric",
  "collectionKey": "slides:framework:evaluation-rubric:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 3,
  "page": 1,
  "pageSize": 24,
  "pageCount": 1,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019f6b8e-e062-73cd-a715-56106833c13e",
      "docSlug": "jarvis-31-october-2014-bps-rfp-for-audit",
      "documentTitle": "31 October 2014 BPS RFP for audit",
      "authorId": "31-october-2014-bps-rfp-for-audit",
      "authorName": null,
      "documentKindSlug": "deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "investor_relations",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Investor relations",
      "presentationDate": "2014-10-01 00:00:00",
      "orientation": null,
      "aspectRatio": null,
      "pageNumber": 18,
      "slideType": "comparison_table",
      "function": "compare_peers",
      "notes": "The slide appears to be a continuation of a larger table, starting mid-section with 'Advantageous' and 'Highly Advantageous' rows, followed by a new section '-Project Plan'.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide uses a structured rating scale (Not Advantageous, Advantageous, Highly Advantageous) to define qualitative criteria.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019f6b8e-e062-73cd-a715-56106833c13e/18",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019f6b8e-e062-73cd-a715-56106833c13e",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019f6b8e-e062-73cd-a715-56106833c13e#slide-18",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 20,
          "from": 17,
          "name": "Mece Breakdown",
          "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
          "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
          "matchId": "49828f5c-e3b8-42af-8575-2cdbbfcf08f7",
          "evidence": "The document provides a comparison table for evaluating proposals.",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "To evaluate proposals based on specific criteria",
          "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 20,
          "from": 11,
          "beatId": "9697ed9c-5e0e-4d85-8f85-a7158032624b",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "The document provides evaluation criteria and proposal checklists.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019f6b8e-e062-73cd-a715-56106833c13e",
      "docSlug": "jarvis-31-october-2014-bps-rfp-for-audit",
      "documentTitle": "31 October 2014 BPS RFP for audit",
      "authorId": "31-october-2014-bps-rfp-for-audit",
      "authorName": null,
      "documentKindSlug": "deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "investor_relations",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Investor relations",
      "presentationDate": "2014-10-01 00:00:00",
      "orientation": null,
      "aspectRatio": null,
      "pageNumber": 19,
      "slideType": "comparison_table",
      "function": "present_framework",
      "notes": "The slide outlines a scoring rubric for evaluating proposals, likely for a government or institutional contract.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide presents a structured set of criteria for evaluating proposals across different categories.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019f6b8e-e062-73cd-a715-56106833c13e/19",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019f6b8e-e062-73cd-a715-56106833c13e",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019f6b8e-e062-73cd-a715-56106833c13e#slide-19",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 20,
          "from": 17,
          "name": "Mece Breakdown",
          "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
          "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
          "matchId": "49828f5c-e3b8-42af-8575-2cdbbfcf08f7",
          "evidence": "The document provides a comparison table for evaluating proposals.",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "To evaluate proposals based on specific criteria",
          "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 20,
          "from": 11,
          "beatId": "9697ed9c-5e0e-4d85-8f85-a7158032624b",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "The document provides evaluation criteria and proposal checklists.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-7e086806c4e2",
      "docSlug": "08c8ca383c0783b1",
      "documentTitle": "Global Parity Alliance DEI Lighthouses (with McKinsey)",
      "authorId": "WEF",
      "authorName": "World Economic Forum",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "academic_think_tank",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Academic / think tank",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.707,
      "pageNumber": 56,
      "slideType": "appendix_methodology",
      "function": "present_framework",
      "notes": "The slide also contains biographical snippets of two individuals (Robert Livingston and Sheila Penrose) at the top.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide explicitly defines a four-criteria scoring system for initiative evaluation.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-7e086806c4e2/56",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-7e086806c4e2",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-7e086806c4e2#slide-56",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}