{ "kind": "framework", "value": "decomposition", "collectionKey": "slides:framework:decomposition:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 365, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 16, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c04627fe2871", "docSlug": "b7237af725ae5a70", "documentTitle": "Accelerating net zero 2050", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 39, "slideType": "appendix_methodology", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a nested box/funnel-like visualization to show sample reduction.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide decomposes the G2000 universe into smaller, specific subsets based on data availability and target criteria.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c04627fe2871/39", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c04627fe2871", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c04627fe2871#slide-39", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "other", "function": "decompose_segments", "notes": "The slide uses a hierarchical tree structure to map cost drivers in a defense procurement context.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide breaks down total procurement costs into hierarchical categories.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-15", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 9, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-45efc998ae59", "evidence": "Problem statement -> segmentation -> diagnosis -> IPT recommendation -> 45 mio. kr. potentiale -> implementation plan.", "position": 1, "objective": "Frame procurement-coordination problem and recommend Integrated Project Teams", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 85, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-200ed114be36", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "First proposal's problem statement: 'manglende koordination mellem FMI og brugere'.", "position": 2, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 165, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-30a6df91c9fe", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Baselines, segmentations, current-state diagnoses dominate first half.", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 71, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a process flow (left to right) to explain how the total baseline is filtered down to an addressable amount of 1.057 billion DKK.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide breaks down a total baseline into smaller, addressable segments.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/71", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-71", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 82, "from": 54, "name": "Maturity Curve", "slug": "36-maturity-curve", "bestFor": "Digital transformation, capability building, benchmarking", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-4c1dbee5252b", "evidence": "Modenhedsanalyse with 5 development areas (page 61) plus best-in-class procurement framework (page 60).", "position": 3, "objective": "Build kategoristyring capability via maturity model gaps", "structure": "Current Maturity Level -> The Gap to Next Level -> Required Capabilities -> The Roadmap", "confidence": 86, "description": "Show where you are on a progression and what it takes to reach the next level" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 165, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-30a6df91c9fe", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Baselines, segmentations, current-state diagnoses dominate first half.", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 114, "slideType": "recommendation", "function": "recommend", "notes": "The slide uses a funnel-like visual to bridge the bottom-up component analysis to the final top-down options.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Bottom-up analysis of IT components", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/114", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-114", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 148, "from": 98, "name": "Quick Win Big Bet", "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet", "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-54fbecd2dba5", "evidence": "Process in waves (p.112) + decision required on option (p.115) + 200-220 mil. recommended.", "position": 5, "objective": "Sequence IT consolidation in waves with two option scenarios", "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap", "confidence": 84, "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 165, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-30a6df91c9fe", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Baselines, segmentations, current-state diagnoses dominate first half.", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 233, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide outlines a structured diagnostic approach to procurement centralization, referencing a 2016 report.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide breaks down a complex topic (centralization) into 6 distinct sub-analyses.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/233", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-233", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 229, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-6a47af522484", "evidence": "538 mio. addresserbar -> 6 delanalyser -> centralisation, in-sourcing, VTC, hotel, kontorartikler, TV, SIM, kursus.", "position": 10, "objective": "MECE breakdown of Ovrig Drift baseline into six delanalyser plus sub-initiatives", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 365, "from": 166, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-37e90642ab06", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Potentialeestimater, benchmark gaps, comparison tables.", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 266, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a table to segment travel costs by purpose (rows) and duration (columns), highlighting 'Møde/Kursus' as a key area for intervention.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Decomposing travel costs by purpose and duration", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/266", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-266", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 229, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-6a47af522484", "evidence": "538 mio. addresserbar -> 6 delanalyser -> centralisation, in-sourcing, VTC, hotel, kontorartikler, TV, SIM, kursus.", "position": 10, "objective": "MECE breakdown of Ovrig Drift baseline into six delanalyser plus sub-initiatives", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 365, "from": 166, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-37e90642ab06", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Potentialeestimater, benchmark gaps, comparison tables.", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 301, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a waterfall-style chart to show cost components and a logic tree to propose cost-reduction levers.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide breaks down total costs into hardware and drift, and proposes levers to reduce costs.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/301", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-301", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 229, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-6a47af522484", "evidence": "538 mio. addresserbar -> 6 delanalyser -> centralisation, in-sourcing, VTC, hotel, kontorartikler, TV, SIM, kursus.", "position": 10, "objective": "MECE breakdown of Ovrig Drift baseline into six delanalyser plus sub-initiatives", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 365, "from": 166, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-37e90642ab06", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Potentialeestimater, benchmark gaps, comparison tables.", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 344, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a table-based decomposition of administrative processes into task categories and examples, highlighting IT impact.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide breaks down administrative processes into task categories and sub-tasks.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/344", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-344", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 365, "from": 322, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-6e9175aa6c84", "evidence": "5 designkriterier -> 4 konkrete modeller (page 334-336) -> recommendation + 14 mio. kr. kursusadm.", "position": 11, "objective": "Compare four models for administrative faellesskaber plus kursusadministration", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 86, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 420, "from": 322, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2a66536a5837", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Admin fællesskaber + nyordning af logistik + insourcing benchmarks and business cases.", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 365, "from": 166, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-37e90642ab06", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Potentialeestimater, benchmark gaps, comparison tables.", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 346, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "Waterfall chart used to decompose travel handling; horizontal bar chart used to show distribution across VFK units.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Waterfall chart used to break down total travel volume into segments.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/346", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-346", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 365, "from": 322, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-6e9175aa6c84", "evidence": "5 designkriterier -> 4 konkrete modeller (page 334-336) -> recommendation + 14 mio. kr. kursusadm.", "position": 11, "objective": "Compare four models for administrative faellesskaber plus kursusadministration", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 86, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 420, "from": 322, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2a66536a5837", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Admin fællesskaber + nyordning af logistik + insourcing benchmarks and business cases.", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 365, "from": 166, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-37e90642ab06", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Potentialeestimater, benchmark gaps, comparison tables.", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 347, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a waterfall-style breakdown on the left and a histogram/distribution on the right to segment employees by travel volume.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Breakdown of total employees into segments based on travel volume", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/347", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-347", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 365, "from": 322, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-6e9175aa6c84", "evidence": "5 designkriterier -> 4 konkrete modeller (page 334-336) -> recommendation + 14 mio. kr. kursusadm.", "position": 11, "objective": "Compare four models for administrative faellesskaber plus kursusadministration", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 86, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 420, "from": 322, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2a66536a5837", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Admin fællesskaber + nyordning af logistik + insourcing benchmarks and business cases.", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 365, "from": 166, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-37e90642ab06", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Potentialeestimater, benchmark gaps, comparison tables.", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 354, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a waterfall-style decomposition to show the total volume of course administration tasks, narrowing down to VFK's share, and then detailing the distribution across 35 units.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide breaks down total course administration into sub-tasks and then into organizational units.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/354", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-354", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 365, "from": 322, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-6e9175aa6c84", "evidence": "5 designkriterier -> 4 konkrete modeller (page 334-336) -> recommendation + 14 mio. kr. kursusadm.", "position": 11, "objective": "Compare four models for administrative faellesskaber plus kursusadministration", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 86, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 420, "from": 322, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2a66536a5837", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Admin fællesskaber + nyordning af logistik + insourcing benchmarks and business cases.", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 365, "from": 166, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-37e90642ab06", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Potentialeestimater, benchmark gaps, comparison tables.", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a waterfall-like transition to show how the 'Color of Money' (Capital vs O&M) maps to 'Savings Type' (Materials, Contract, Labor) and 'By BU'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Breakdown of savings pipeline by category and business unit", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-16", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 13, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-8008412b1d42", "evidence": "BAU not sustainable + escalating challenges + $200M target + communication summary.", "position": 1, "objective": "Establish case for change", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 75, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 24, "from": 15, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-1e2a7b8bbdea", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Case for change, $200M flat-O&M gap vs growth-with-inflation.", "position": 2, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 25, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "decompose_segments", "notes": "The chart uses a series of stacked bar segments to illustrate the composition of a ~$320M-$550M opportunity pipeline.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide breaks down a single total into multiple categorical dimensions.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/25", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-25", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 24, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-87dc2e3d4e32", "evidence": "$200M target then segmentation by money/category/type/BU, then 5-stage decomposition.", "position": 2, "objective": "Decompose the savings opportunity", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 46, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2242f31eecd3", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Pipeline decomposition, 5 categories, 4-step methodology, scheduling/planning-execution exercises.", "position": 3, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-ccde16d7b812", "docSlug": "2c40ca39f67d1596", "documentTitle": "e-Conomy SEA Unlocking the $200 billion digital opportunity in Southeast Asia", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "Google, Temasek", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.418, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "Uses a multiplicative decomposition framework to explain the total CAGR.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide breaks down a total CAGR into its constituent parts (buyers * frequency * basket size).", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-ccde16d7b812/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-ccde16d7b812", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-ccde16d7b812#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 10, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-08f7-737a-a002-13e2dc06c991", "evidence": "p10 sets $200B total; p13 eCommerce $88B; p16 Travel $90B; p19 Media $20B; p21 Ads $10B with driver decompositions.", "position": 3, "objective": "Build $200B total by adding eCommerce + Travel + Media + Ads with drivers per segment.", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 85, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a6-74c7-9027-16dde5358424", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Segmented sizing approach: $200B decomposed into eCommerce/Travel/Media/Ads.", "position": 3, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 21, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a6-74c7-9027-21aa7acc856a", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Market sizing data: 480m users, $200B by 2025, segment build-up.", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-2a4c3fe346c9", "docSlug": "f355bb3ba498875b", "documentTitle": "International Comparison of Australia’s Freight and Supply Chain Performance 2019", "authorId": "LEK", "authorName": "L.E.K.", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 161, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a structured list format to explain the application of value driver trees in supply chain analysis.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly discusses the decomposition of a supply chain using a value driver tree.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-2a4c3fe346c9/161", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-2a4c3fe346c9", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-2a4c3fe346c9#slide-161", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-067236bfcf89", "docSlug": "6baa9ff6de20f260", "documentTitle": "Introduction to Bain and Report on Resilience", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "Bain", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "key_messages", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a column-based categorization to debunk the myth that resilience is purely financial.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Categorization of resilience into five distinct pillars.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-067236bfcf89/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-067236bfcf89", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-067236bfcf89#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 10, "name": "Myth Buster", "slug": "12-myth-buster", "bestFor": "Rebranding, changing market perception, correcting false assumptions", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b312-b6bf66d5f021", "evidence": "p10 enumerates 'Five Great Myths'; p11-15 carry MYTH 1-4 tags with corrected new-truth headlines.", "position": 2, "objective": "Bust five common beliefs about corporate resilience", "structure": "The Common Belief -> The Friction/Failure of that Belief -> The New Truth", "confidence": 92, "description": "Address a common misconception head-on to clear the room for a new truth" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a5-761b-9143-f073282c46fa", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Cautionary tale + Five Great Myths around resilience + Handelsbanken case.", "position": 2, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-6e239bbc025d", "docSlug": "0f4c2c9dcf80afca", "documentTitle": "Measuring What Matters", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a tree-like decomposition structure to illustrate the cost components of autonomous trucking operations.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide breaks down 'Cost per Mile' into hierarchical drivers and sub-drivers.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-6e239bbc025d/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-6e239bbc025d", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-6e239bbc025d#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 8, "name": "Issue Tree", "slug": "43-issue-tree", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, project scoping, complex analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-c08248fbaae2", "evidence": "p.8 defines CPM equation; p.10 Exhibit 1 is an explicit issue tree of 7 cost categories with sub-elements.", "position": 2, "objective": "Decompose Cost per Mile into MECE driver tree", "structure": "The Key Question -> Sub-Question A -> Sub-Question B -> Sub-Question C -> Synthesized Answer", "confidence": 88, "description": "Break a key question into sub-questions until you reach answerable, actionable pieces" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87de-219b2e6cc155", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "pp.8-12 introduce CPM Framework, principles, driver tree", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-c2f73497811c", "docSlug": "f6506cba246b6e5e", "documentTitle": "New Mexico State Staffing Study", "authorId": "Deloitte", "authorName": "Deloitte", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "other", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a pyramid diagram to illustrate the hierarchy of functions and processes.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly breaks down organizational work into a hierarchy of Functions and Processes.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-c2f73497811c/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-c2f73497811c", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-c2f73497811c#slide-10", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "beatId": "00f4f1a8-1cc6-4e73-9ee5-6213d64f4315", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "The document highlights the complexities of NMSU's organizational structure and the fragmentation of processes across different functions.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-96d45234cce8", "docSlug": "36c414b0255cdfb4", "documentTitle": "Tested, Trusted, Transformed An exploration of the Corporate Affairs Function and its Leaders", "authorId": "Deloitte", "authorName": "Deloitte", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a three-part categorization framework to synthesize qualitative interview data.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Categorizing qualitative interview responses into three distinct themes.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-96d45234cce8/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-96d45234cce8", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-96d45234cce8#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 9, "name": "Hypothesis Test", "slug": "42-hypothesis-test", "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations", "matchId": "6c37ea96-3ead-4b3e-8b8c-d15ed1250ca2", "evidence": "The sections on governance and impact provide insights and recommendations for optimization.", "position": 2, "objective": "How can the Corporate Affairs Function be optimized?", "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 11, "beatId": "953597e7-30ab-43a9-b0f0-657279a5fd36", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "The section on the mission and purpose of the Corporate Affairs Function and its critical attributes highlights the challenges and complexities of the function.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-746ffdbc9114", "docSlug": "6543568fbc47af38", "documentTitle": "The age of AI: Banking’s new reality", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a three-column layout to segment the impact of GenAI on banking workforces.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Three-part categorization of GenAI impact: Automation, Augmentation, All-round support", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-746ffdbc9114/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-746ffdbc9114", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-746ffdbc9114#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 4, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3a-14e25ee29a19", "evidence": "Bank-wide reinvention -> every role -> automation/augmentation buckets -> 2x2 of top 20 roles -> adoption stat", "position": 2, "objective": "Zoom from whole bank to specific roles", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 80, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e32-56063ba5f2fa", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "73% of work impactable, 22-30% productivity, role analysis, 59% adoption stat", "position": 1, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 8, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e32-690f7a407c80", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Stats-heavy context: 73%, 22-30%, 39/34%, 59%", "position": 1, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-f458fc5d5c97", "docSlug": "3e2af39803cc6262", "documentTitle": "The CMO Survey The Highlights and Insights Report February 2022", "authorId": "EY", "authorName": "Deloitte", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 72, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a hierarchical decomposition to explain the 10.8% voluntary resignation rate.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide breaks down a total percentage (10.8%) into constituent parts.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-f458fc5d5c97/72", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-f458fc5d5c97", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-f458fc5d5c97#slide-72", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-cef1acfbea70", "docSlug": "e1c5cbd0ff41f1fd", "documentTitle": "Victorias Creative and Cultural Economy Fact Pack", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a hierarchical decomposition of the C/C economy, narrowing the focus from the total economy to specific cultural industries.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide breaks down the C/C economy into smaller, more specific segments for analysis.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-cef1acfbea70/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-cef1acfbea70", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-cef1acfbea70#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 6, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-cc38e2f31550", "evidence": "Venn definitions then cascading value model adds Economic + Spillover + Social/Cultural layers", "position": 1, "objective": "Define the C/C economy and stack its value layers", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 78, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-c71622d5f173", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Cover, exec summary, scope, definitions, cascading value model", "position": 1, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 26, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-d96445060acb", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Sizing data: jobs, GVA, exports, geography, demographics", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-cef1acfbea70", "docSlug": "e1c5cbd0ff41f1fd", "documentTitle": "Victorias Creative and Cultural Economy Fact Pack", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 23, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "Uses a hierarchical decomposition approach to define the scope of the analysis.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Hierarchical breakdown of industry classifications using Venn diagrams.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-cef1acfbea70/23", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-cef1acfbea70", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-cef1acfbea70#slide-23", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 26, "from": 23, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-d6095a8a104b", "evidence": "Slide 23 explicitly titled 'Deep dive: demographics of the cultural industries'", "position": 3, "objective": "Deep-dive demographics of the cultural industries sub-segment", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 82, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 26, "from": 12, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-ca8394be59c4", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Sizing the C/C economy proves what's at stake (222k jobs, $22.7B GVA)", "position": 2, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 26, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-d96445060acb", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Sizing data: jobs, GVA, exports, geography, demographics", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-aab62a36bb0a", "docSlug": "8ba6a60b371fba68", "documentTitle": "Winning the EV Charging Race", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "financial_analysis", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a waterfall chart to decompose the P&L of a charging station, identifying energy costs and uptime management (hardware/software) as the primary areas for strategic focus.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Waterfall chart breaking down P&L components", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-aab62a36bb0a/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-aab62a36bb0a", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-aab62a36bb0a#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 4, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b310-44b1ce5940fe", "evidence": "p4 introduces 3 pillars; p5 Customer Centricity, p6 Right Locations, p7 Operational Excellence — one slide per pillar.", "position": 2, "objective": "Decompose CPO success into three MECE excellence pillars", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 85, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e4-8ab7617e20f9", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Geo-analytical 3-step approach (Exhibit 3) and unit-economics waterfall (Exhibit 4).", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }