{
  "kind": "framework",
  "value": "constitutional-ai",
  "collectionKey": "slides:framework:constitutional-ai:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 1,
  "page": 1,
  "pageSize": 24,
  "pageCount": 1,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-06b04d219fea",
      "docSlug": "dd91c78f6570bf29",
      "documentTitle": "2023 Air Street Capital The State of AI Report 2023",
      "authorId": "AirStreetCapital",
      "authorName": "Air Street Capital",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "vc_research",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "VC research",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.777,
      "pageNumber": 151,
      "slideType": "industry_trends",
      "function": "present_framework",
      "notes": "Includes a process diagram for the 'Self-Align' technique.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Slide title is 'Constitutional AI and Self-Alignment'.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-06b04d219fea/151",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-06b04d219fea",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-06b04d219fea#slide-151",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 155,
          "from": 149,
          "name": "Pattern Hunter",
          "slug": "02-pattern-hunter",
          "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-1a62463741ad",
          "evidence": "RLHF survey, conditional pretraining, Constitutional AI, scalable supervision, process eval, interpretability, benchmark drift.",
          "position": 15,
          "objective": "Show alignment research progress on RLHF problems",
          "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion",
          "confidence": 70,
          "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 155,
          "from": 121,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-478c8c58938c",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
          "evidence": "Politics + Safety sections explore regulatory, geopolitical and risk implications.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
          "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
        },
        {
          "to": 155,
          "from": 121,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-554ec1797b3a",
          "arcName": "The Mountain",
          "arcSlug": "mountain",
          "beatName": "Climax",
          "beatSlug": "mountain-climax",
          "evidence": "Regulatory divergence and the x-risk debate erupt into the mainstream.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 45,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}