{
  "kind": "framework",
  "value": "conglomerate-discount",
  "collectionKey": "slides:framework:conglomerate-discount:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 3,
  "page": 1,
  "pageSize": 24,
  "pageCount": 1,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-48cf2415e3d9",
      "docSlug": "b672c185ded3",
      "documentTitle": "Phillips 66 (PSX)",
      "authorId": "02_Elliott_Management",
      "authorName": null,
      "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2025-05-01 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.77272725,
      "pageNumber": 47,
      "slideType": "expose_contradiction",
      "function": "expose_contradiction",
      "notes": "Includes a secondary section below the main chart titled 'WHY PHILLIPS 66'S CONGLOMERATE STRUCTURE DOESN'T WORK' which contrasts the business models of midstream vs refining assets.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Argues that combining midstream and refining assets under one structure leads to a valuation discount.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-48cf2415e3d9/47",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-48cf2415e3d9",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-48cf2415e3d9#slide-47",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 47,
          "from": 46,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "844768d5-6780-446e-93ea-9dc8d8e8eee6",
          "evidence": "The potential consequences of inaction",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Highlight the risks of not supporting Elliott's plan",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 0.6,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-28e86a7ca5c3",
      "docSlug": "efcae84676a2",
      "documentTitle": "Sony Corporation (6758.T)",
      "authorId": "05_Third_Point",
      "authorName": "Third Point",
      "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2019-06-13 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.77272725,
      "pageNumber": 12,
      "slideType": "problem_statement",
      "function": "diagnose_problem",
      "notes": "This is a classic 'conglomerate discount' argument used by activist investors to justify a breakup or restructuring.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide explicitly attributes the valuation discount to portfolio complexity and diverse business holdings.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-28e86a7ca5c3/12",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-28e86a7ca5c3",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-28e86a7ca5c3#slide-12",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 12,
          "from": 5,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "a3a9c54c-7e5b-4b43-9eca-5fa03913482c",
          "evidence": "The deck emphasizes the consequences of not taking action to address Sony's challenges.",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "Highlight the cost of inaction and the need for transformation",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 12,
          "from": 5,
          "beatId": "1f23ace2-448e-411a-97a0-ff05f0ceef88",
          "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
          "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
          "beatName": "Problem (Identify pain)",
          "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-problem-identify-pain",
          "evidence": "The deck identifies Sony's current pain points, including its depressed stock price and valuation discount.",
          "position": 0,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019de06f-d4b7-72ab-9bef-74ff505356b5",
      "docSlug": "e6ccdccde9e4f314d35e33b1eb767bd3",
      "documentTitle": "Third Point Management | Activist Presentation Deck | 102 slides",
      "authorId": "third-point-management",
      "authorName": "Third Point",
      "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2019-06-01 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.2938006,
      "pageNumber": 15,
      "slideType": "problem_statement",
      "function": "diagnose_problem",
      "notes": "The chart illustrates the 'conglomerate discount' phenomenon, a common activist argument for divestiture or restructuring.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Chart showing negative percentage adjustments to price targets by analysts",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019de06f-d4b7-72ab-9bef-74ff505356b5/15",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019de06f-d4b7-72ab-9bef-74ff505356b5",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de06f-d4b7-72ab-9bef-74ff505356b5#slide-15",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 19,
          "from": 9,
          "name": "Before After",
          "slug": "21-before-after",
          "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification",
          "matchId": "1a25e14a-b3a3-4c71-a968-e44aa294e049",
          "evidence": "The loop uses before-after comparisons to illustrate the potential benefits of change",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "Show the potential for value creation through transformation",
          "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 20,
          "from": 11,
          "beatId": "a261a2c1-fbe2-4a55-bf3a-3c24d1789c8f",
          "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
          "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
          "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)",
          "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse",
          "evidence": "Slides 11-20 highlight the consequences of not addressing the issue, including the discount to peers",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Development",
          "parentBeatSlug": "development"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}