{ "kind": "framework", "value": "competitive-analysis", "collectionKey": "slides:framework:competitive-analysis:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 48, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 2, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5a-62adc43f0453", "docSlug": "6fba553a146f7fd8", "documentTitle": "2025 05 28 Goldman Sachs Brazil Commodities Days", "authorId": "GoldmanSachs", "authorName": "Suzano", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "equity_research", "sourceTypeLabel": "Equity research", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.714, "pageNumber": 39, "slideType": "competitive_analysis", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "Uses a scatter plot to map competitive positioning based on operational efficiency metrics.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Scatter plot comparing technical age and capacity across industry peers", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5a-62adc43f0453/39", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5a-62adc43f0453", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5a-62adc43f0453#slide-39", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-992480932888", "docSlug": "9d06bebd9e8f", "documentTitle": "Multiple (BILL Holdings, Tripadvisor, Fluor Corporation)", "authorId": "03_Starboard_Value", "authorName": "Starboard Value", "documentKindSlug": "conference-presentation", "documentKindLabel": "Conference presentation", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2025-10-17 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.7777778, "pageNumber": 91, "slideType": "competitive_analysis", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a logo-grid to categorize competitors into 'Current' and 'Past' (Bankruptcy/Distressed or Exit/Scaled Back).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Categorization of industry players into current and past status to demonstrate competitive advantage.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-992480932888/91", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-992480932888", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-992480932888#slide-91", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 114, "from": 81, "beatId": "754df6d6-ed13-48a1-bf5c-0c14bbb2b7b4", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Conclusion and recommendations for investors", "position": 4, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5eff-723e-9be4-acffa689358d", "docSlug": "42b53a13a561676c", "documentTitle": "2025 Q4 Investor Presentation", "authorId": "OpenText", "authorName": "OpenText", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 20, "slideType": "competitive_analysis", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses two industry analyst quadrant charts to demonstrate market leadership.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Use of industry analyst quadrants to position the company against competitors.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5eff-723e-9be4-acffa689358d/20", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5eff-723e-9be4-acffa689358d", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5eff-723e-9be4-acffa689358d#slide-20", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 3, "name": "Logic Chain", "slug": "01-logic-chain", "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis", "matchId": "13b7dca5-76a7-4fd9-bab1-24990a60bf5a", "evidence": "The deck presents a logical flow from introduction to growth strategy and team", "position": 0, "objective": "Understand OpenText's value proposition and growth strategy", "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion" }, { "to": 26, "from": 6, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "e85ea091-9492-439d-970c-d48297d56be3", "evidence": "Slides 6 and 26 emphasize the importance of investing in OpenText", "position": 1, "objective": "Highlight the benefits of investing in OpenText today", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 18, "beatId": "d56d64fd-c421-498a-bf03-303c036bf66c", "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch", "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch", "beatName": "Market Size", "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-market-size", "evidence": "Slides 18-25 provide an overview of OpenText's business clouds and market landscapes", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5e-7825f738cae3", "docSlug": "7e605dfe48cc468a", "documentTitle": "2026 Investor Day", "authorId": "JBT-Marel", "authorName": "JBT Marel", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 71, "slideType": "competitive_analysis", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "Uses a hub-and-spoke style layout to contrast competitors with the central JBT Marel value proposition.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Comparison of JBT Marel against three distinct competitor categories.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5e-7825f738cae3/71", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5e-7825f738cae3", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5e-7825f738cae3#slide-71", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 96, "from": 31, "beatId": "3bea9e06-90d2-43f1-9826-b00c4a657c58", "arcName": "Monroe's Motivated Sequence", "arcSlug": "monroes-sequence", "beatName": "Action", "beatSlug": "monroes-sequence-action", "evidence": "The presentation concludes with a clear call to action, encouraging investors to take action and invest in JBT Marel", "position": 4, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-4fdf89a4b224", "docSlug": "bcbeb3ac7b21", "documentTitle": "Progyny, Inc. (PGNY)", "authorId": "54_Spruce_Point_Capital", "authorName": "Spruce Point Capital Management", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller", "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller", "presentationDate": "2023-02-07 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.3333334, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "competitive_analysis", "function": "name_villain", "notes": "This slide serves as a core thesis argument for an activist short report, focusing on competitive disadvantage.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide systematically breaks down competitive threats, market commoditization, and loss of differentiation.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-4fdf89a4b224/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-4fdf89a4b224", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-4fdf89a4b224#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 6, "name": "Aha Moment", "slug": "03-aha-moment", "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments", "matchId": "29317d8b-0853-47fe-b80c-7bbd608ade0d", "evidence": "The document presents several red flags in PGNY's reporting and management.", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the key issues with PGNY's reporting and management?", "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight", "confidence": 0.8, "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 6, "beatId": "03536da8-6567-4733-bfa6-135f9da8b71f", "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster", "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster", "beatName": "Complication", "beatSlug": "complication", "evidence": "The document outlines several issues with PGNY's reporting, management, and industry position.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-17900a3ad1c6", "docSlug": "4ee8cca82f1a", "documentTitle": "Oatly Group AB (OTLY)", "authorId": "54_Spruce_Point_Capital", "authorName": "Ben Axler", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller", "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller", "presentationDate": "2021-07-14 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.3333334, "pageNumber": 105, "slideType": "competitive_analysis", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a 'Warning' callout box to frame the competitive threat.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Comparison of competitor product offerings against the subject company", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-17900a3ad1c6/105", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-17900a3ad1c6", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-17900a3ad1c6#slide-105", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 124, "from": 85, "beatId": "1c32506f-1c78-4442-a178-fa0f1eb2c40c", "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster", "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster", "beatName": "The Victory", "beatSlug": "overcoming-monster-the-victory", "evidence": "Conclusion and estimation of downside risk, supported by comprehensive evidence.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-ef240a9cc70a", "docSlug": "c3be1f268cc3", "documentTitle": "Prestige Consumer Healthcare Inc. (PBH)", "authorId": "54_Spruce_Point_Capital", "authorName": "Ben Axler", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller", "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller", "presentationDate": "2020-06-30 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.3333334, "pageNumber": 83, "slideType": "competitive_analysis", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a combination of product imagery and trend data to argue that Amazon is successfully encroaching on PBH's market share.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Direct comparison of Amazon private label products against PBH brands and trend analysis.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-ef240a9cc70a/83", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-ef240a9cc70a", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-ef240a9cc70a#slide-83", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 122, "from": 11, "beatId": "fc4ac38d-48bf-454d-9d50-344d1705ba33", "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster", "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster", "beatName": "Expose Contradiction", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "The majority of the document is dedicated to exposing contradictions and concerns in Prestige Brands' financials, operations, and governance.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 122, "from": 10, "beatId": "91479d45-6cb5-49fc-9f03-ea82d8e93c6b", "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster", "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster", "beatName": "Evidence", "beatSlug": "evidence", "evidence": "The document provides extensive evidence to support its claims, including financial data, comparisons to peers, and testimonials.", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-5300aefcfd91", "docSlug": "ed69677379db", "documentTitle": "iRobot Corp (IRBT)", "authorId": "54_Spruce_Point_Capital", "authorName": "Spruce Point Management", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller", "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller", "presentationDate": "2014-05-20 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.3333334, "pageNumber": 26, "slideType": "competitive_analysis", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a list-based narrative to build a case for competitive saturation.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide systematically lists new market entrants and price pressure to argue for a deteriorating competitive environment.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-5300aefcfd91/26", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-5300aefcfd91", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-5300aefcfd91#slide-26", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 64, "from": 4, "beatId": "9276d3d0-eba4-4814-902b-c80843925dd7", "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster", "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster", "beatName": "Expose Contradiction", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "The document presents a series of contradictions and concerns about iRobot Corp's financials, market position, and growth prospects.", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-6d840c1e7ff2", "docSlug": "70f833659b03", "documentTitle": "Samsara Inc. (IOT)", "authorId": "54_Spruce_Point_Capital", "authorName": "Spruce Point Capital Management", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller", "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller", "presentationDate": "2023-09-21 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.3333334, "pageNumber": 49, "slideType": "competitive_analysis", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a list-based comparison to argue that Samsara faces significant, often overlooked competition.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Comparison of Samsara against multiple industry peers across key metrics.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-6d840c1e7ff2/49", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-6d840c1e7ff2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-6d840c1e7ff2#slide-49", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-c3b5db588c7f", "docSlug": "d03852c00030b7b5", "documentTitle": "American Express Investor Day 2024", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "American Express", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.777, "pageNumber": 19, "slideType": "competitive_analysis", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide highlights AXP's competitive advantage in fee generation, spend volume, and a distinct revenue mix compared to the peer average.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Comparison of AXP metrics against industry peers", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-c3b5db588c7f/19", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-c3b5db588c7f", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-c3b5db588c7f#slide-19", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 11, "beatId": "77d0800c-7f35-4916-ab1c-fa5351948786", "arcName": "The Sparkline", "arcSlug": "sparkline", "beatName": "Desire", "beatSlug": "aida-desire", "evidence": "The deck highlights the benefits and advantages of American Express's Membership Model, creating desire in the audience.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5fec-763b-95ce-e0ea27a6abef", "docSlug": "v4uz6qLkR6OniCJExQH2", "documentTitle": "COVID-19 has turbocharged health apps. We got an exclusive look at the pitch deck Ada Health used to raise $90 million from pharma giant Bayer.", "authorId": "Pitchdecks", "authorName": "Ada Health", "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck", "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.777, "pageNumber": 3, "slideType": "executive_summary", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses a split-layout design with company overview on the left and competitive benchmarking on the right.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Comparison charts against competitors and GPs", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5fec-763b-95ce-e0ea27a6abef/3", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5fec-763b-95ce-e0ea27a6abef", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5fec-763b-95ce-e0ea27a6abef#slide-3", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-f82b85203458", "docSlug": "7801cb245682af20", "documentTitle": "Economic Impact of Ford and F-Series", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The chart uses a scatter plot to demonstrate competitive positioning on two dimensions: domestic content (y-axis) and sales volume (x-axis).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Scatter plot comparing market performance and product attributes against competitors.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-f82b85203458/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-f82b85203458", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-f82b85203458#slide-16", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 14, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-7a88f80473cd", "evidence": "2x competitors (p.14), 1-in-5 vehicles (p.15), most American-made (p.16), patent leader (p.17-19) all converge on Ford manufacturing leadership.", "position": 3, "objective": "Pile manufacturing/innovation proof points to a leadership conclusion", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 80, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-70375fde4e94", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Four evidence blocks: Employment, GDP, Manufacturing, Usage with quantitative proof.", "position": 4, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 27, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-78b21ffcc1de", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Quantified evidence across employment, GDP, manufacturing, usage.", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-f82b85203458", "docSlug": "7801cb245682af20", "documentTitle": "Economic Impact of Ford and F-Series", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 17, "slideType": "competitive_analysis", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart uses a bubble size to represent the number of patent families, with Ford highlighted as a leader.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Comparison of automotive companies on patent metrics", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-f82b85203458/17", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-f82b85203458", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-f82b85203458#slide-17", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 14, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-7a88f80473cd", "evidence": "2x competitors (p.14), 1-in-5 vehicles (p.15), most American-made (p.16), patent leader (p.17-19) all converge on Ford manufacturing leadership.", "position": 3, "objective": "Pile manufacturing/innovation proof points to a leadership conclusion", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 80, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-70375fde4e94", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Four evidence blocks: Employment, GDP, Manufacturing, Usage with quantitative proof.", "position": 4, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 27, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-78b21ffcc1de", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Quantified evidence across employment, GDP, manufacturing, usage.", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-87c368bbaffd", "docSlug": "80066eff9a0b", "documentTitle": "Texas Instruments (TXN)", "authorId": "02_Elliott_Management", "authorName": "Jesse Cohn", "documentKindSlug": "shareholder-letter", "documentKindLabel": "Shareholder letter", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2024-05-28 00:00:00", "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.77272725, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "competitive_analysis", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide combines a competitive manufacturing capacity chart with a critical narrative regarding shareholder underperformance.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Comparison of TI vs #2 Player capacity", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-87c368bbaffd/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-87c368bbaffd", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-87c368bbaffd#slide-4", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 3, "beatId": "9bef1476-fb21-4cdf-a0ae-dcbdee8e0c4c", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "The document highlights TI's underperformance and potential issues with capacity buildout", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.9, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-00df25d34319", "docSlug": "a61a52e152e8900c", "documentTitle": "FinTechs in Europe – Challenger and Partner", "authorId": "RolandBerger", "authorName": "Roland Berger", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 25, "slideType": "competitive_analysis", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a Likert-scale style visualization to compare two specific competitive questions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide evaluates the competitive positioning of banks versus FinTechs.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-00df25d34319/25", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-00df25d34319", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-00df25d34319#slide-25", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 35, "from": 21, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "b79fe475-c79e-4f3d-ac2b-04cc42bbe854", "evidence": "discussion of the need for incumbents to adapt to the changing FinTech landscape", "position": 1, "objective": "The cost of inaction for incumbents", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 35, "from": 21, "beatId": "1d2e2878-8063-48cc-9465-eb204d9b3e73", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "discussion of implications and future developments", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5f69-752d-a9b6-715caaa34bf5", "docSlug": "KRPPJeK6MGTyw71Q9rBx", "documentTitle": "Here's the pitch deck a German software startup used to raise $10 million to move to San Francisco and take on Oracle", "authorId": "Pitchdecks", "authorName": "ArangoDB", "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck", "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "competitive_analysis", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart uses a bar-like structure to represent different database categories (Key-Value, Documents, Relational, Graphs) and positions ArangoDB as a comprehensive solution.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Visual comparison of database types and features against competitors", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5f69-752d-a9b6-715caaa34bf5/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5f69-752d-a9b6-715caaa34bf5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5f69-752d-a9b6-715caaa34bf5#slide-15", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-a5c81a21cc99", "docSlug": "39e97f49f6f21bb2", "documentTitle": "INTRODUCTION TO IPSOS", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "competitive_analysis", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a table-like layout to compare competitors across turnover, ownership, and focus areas.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Comparison of market players across key metrics", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-a5c81a21cc99/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-a5c81a21cc99", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-a5c81a21cc99#slide-5", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 5, "beatId": "af3275ec-a5d2-4b87-858e-856369ca3b61", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Slides 5-6 discuss the competitive landscape and the diversity of competitors.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-093f3fd1ecfe", "docSlug": "5ee5a9db2750184a", "documentTitle": "Lebanon Economic Vision", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 304, "slideType": "competitive_analysis", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart uses a connected dot plot (line chart) to highlight Lebanon's specific profile across factors F1-F12.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Comparison of Lebanon against peer countries across 12 industrial factors.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-093f3fd1ecfe/304", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-093f3fd1ecfe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-093f3fd1ecfe#slide-304", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-093f3fd1ecfe", "docSlug": "5ee5a9db2750184a", "documentTitle": "Lebanon Economic Vision", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 1190, "slideType": "competitive_analysis", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a custom framework to evaluate Lebanon's competitive position in construction technology.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Comparison of Lebanon against regional competitors across specific strategic dimensions.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-093f3fd1ecfe/1190", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-093f3fd1ecfe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-093f3fd1ecfe#slide-1190", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-4e6df0b45416", "docSlug": "f980fcfd12cbc5e2", "documentTitle": "Project Spiritus Final report Market Study", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "EY Parthenon", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 85, "slideType": "competitive_analysis", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "Uses pie charts as qualitative indicators of market presence (High to Low).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Comparison of market participants across key metrics", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-4e6df0b45416/85", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-4e6df0b45416", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-4e6df0b45416#slide-85", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 101, "from": 61, "beatId": "ca2cb617-ff0d-4b73-bffe-897c9c22ecc8", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document discusses growth opportunities, initiative list, and appendix", "position": 4, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-4e6df0b45416", "docSlug": "f980fcfd12cbc5e2", "documentTitle": "Project Spiritus Final report Market Study", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "EY Parthenon", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 89, "slideType": "competitive_analysis", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a table-like structure to compare brand metrics and qualitative insights.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Comparison of brand metrics and qualitative perception across competitors.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-4e6df0b45416/89", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-4e6df0b45416", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-4e6df0b45416#slide-89", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 101, "from": 61, "beatId": "ca2cb617-ff0d-4b73-bffe-897c9c22ecc8", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document discusses growth opportunities, initiative list, and appendix", "position": 4, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5fec-763b-95d1-d9e0b0ea921c", "docSlug": "bi-b4038409dd637fd9", "documentTitle": "See the Series A pitch deck for SMB invoice-financing startup Crowdz", "authorId": "Pitchdecks", "authorName": "Crowdz", "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck", "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.652, "pageNumber": 17, "slideType": "competitive_analysis", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a simple logo-grid layout to contrast the company with competitors, highlighting their specific market constraints or focus.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Comparison of company against market peers with specific differentiators.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5fec-763b-95d1-d9e0b0ea921c/17", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5fec-763b-95d1-d9e0b0ea921c", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5fec-763b-95d1-d9e0b0ea921c#slide-17", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-cef1acfbea70", "docSlug": "e1c5cbd0ff41f1fd", "documentTitle": "Victorias Creative and Cultural Economy Fact Pack", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 54, "slideType": "competitive_analysis", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a custom qualitative scoring system (++, +, ~, -, --) to evaluate competitive advantage.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide evaluates competitive advantage across multiple dimensions.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-cef1acfbea70/54", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-cef1acfbea70", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-cef1acfbea70#slide-54", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 57, "from": 54, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-e15fd1d68b19", "evidence": "Competitiveness → government actions → $21.9B upside → questions to be answered", "position": 6, "objective": "Convert findings into competitiveness read, action levers, sizing, and open questions", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 72, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 57, "from": 53, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-d6aa502d3e40", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Competitiveness, government actions, $21.9B opportunity, open questions", "position": 5, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 57, "from": 53, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-e379e96e7fd6", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Competitiveness, action levers, growth target, open questions", "position": 3, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-4862bdde324a", "docSlug": "88d99bc6679a37b8", "documentTitle": "What is and how to navigate the RAS opportunity in LatAm?", "authorId": "LEK", "authorName": "L.E.K.", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "competitive_analysis", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The table uses checkmarks to indicate market presence, with a distinction between active sales and presence without sales.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Comparison of manufacturers and their product presence across markets", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-4862bdde324a/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-4862bdde324a", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-4862bdde324a#slide-9", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 7, "beatId": "0fd52bc5-a4e9-4fba-b29c-82dd7600f9eb", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Market landscape and competitive analysis", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }