{
  "kind": "framework",
  "value": "comparison-matrix",
  "collectionKey": "slides:framework:comparison-matrix:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 3,
  "page": 1,
  "pageSize": 24,
  "pageCount": 1,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-41de656a4417",
      "docSlug": "a13515c298f3fbf2",
      "documentTitle": "ALTAGAMMA 2018 WORLDWIDE LUXURY MARKET MONITOR",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "Bain",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 8,
      "slideType": "comparison_table",
      "function": "compare_options",
      "notes": "The slide uses a split-screen layout: left side compares crisis drivers, right side lists resilience factors for the luxury sector.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Two-column 2008-2009 vs 2022-? with paired causes and impacts.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-41de656a4417/8",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-41de656a4417",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-41de656a4417#slide-8",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 9,
          "from": 4,
          "name": "Scenario Fork",
          "slug": "35-scenario-fork",
          "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b310-cb334407de8e",
          "evidence": "p7 explicitly forks Better vs Realistic 2023; p8 contrasts crises; p9 projects 2030.",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "Project personal luxury through 2023 scenarios into 2030",
          "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation",
          "confidence": 78,
          "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 9,
          "from": 2,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e5-47ac081726a9",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Situation & Context",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context",
          "evidence": "Global luxury sizing, recovery vs 2019, scenarios to 2030.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 72,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        },
        {
          "to": 9,
          "from": 2,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e5-5a02795721a6",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Market sizing and recovery facts laid out.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 60,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e87-7479-8207-9871de845f52",
      "docSlug": "6e797928f9997e0d",
      "documentTitle": "e-Conomy SEA Unlocking the $200 billion digital opportunity in Southeast Asia",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "Google, Temasek, Bain",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.707,
      "pageNumber": 30,
      "slideType": "impact_sizing",
      "function": "quantify_impact",
      "notes": "The slide uses a comparison table structure to contrast Metro vs Beyond Metros growth.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Two-column compare: Metros vs Beyond Metros across Growth driver / User benefits / Society",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e87-7479-8207-9871de845f52/30",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e87-7479-8207-9871de845f52",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e87-7479-8207-9871de845f52#slide-30",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 30,
          "from": 27,
          "name": "Tale Two Worlds",
          "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds",
          "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-08f7-737a-a002-2baef4e5d716",
          "evidence": "p.30 explicitly frames Metros 2x vs Beyond Metros 4x with side-by-side benefits table.",
          "position": 4,
          "objective": "Contrast Metros vs Non-Metros as growth opportunity",
          "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication",
          "confidence": 85,
          "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 43,
          "from": 27,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-07a6-74c7-9027-3726981ab46f",
          "arcName": "The Onion",
          "arcSlug": "onion",
          "beatName": "Deeper Layer",
          "beatSlug": "onion-deeper-layer",
          "evidence": "Beyond Metros + sector evolution + engagement heatmap",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Development",
          "parentBeatSlug": "development"
        },
        {
          "to": 43,
          "from": 17,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-07a6-74c7-9027-4bdb18ce9735",
          "arcName": "The Sparkline",
          "arcSlug": "sparkline",
          "beatName": "What Is",
          "beatSlug": "sparkline-what-is-3",
          "evidence": "Today's country and sector reality",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 62,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-4dda27d9d887",
      "docSlug": "67e4131ec199fc70",
      "documentTitle": "Technology Trends Outlook 2022",
      "authorId": "McKinsey",
      "authorName": "McKinsey",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 46,
      "slideType": "industry_trends",
      "function": "present_framework",
      "notes": "The slide uses a structured table format to compare technology, description, and experience across four categories.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide uses a structured table to compare four distinct technologies across three attributes.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-4dda27d9d887/46",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-4dda27d9d887",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-4dda27d9d887#slide-46",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}