{
  "kind": "framework",
  "value": "causal-chain",
  "collectionKey": "slides:framework:causal-chain:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 1586,
  "page": 1,
  "pageSize": 24,
  "pageCount": 67,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073",
      "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.445,
      "pageNumber": 157,
      "slideType": "diagnosis",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "The diagram illustrates a causal chain where task scaling leads to activity changes, which then drive resource and cost requirements.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The diagram shows a sequential flow of cause and effect from task scaling to cost impacts.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/157",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-157",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 162,
          "from": 152,
          "name": "Zoom In",
          "slug": "06-zoom-in",
          "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-3c7d05fd6019",
          "evidence": "Process diagrams walk through 4 trin: kapacitetsudvælgelse → omkostninger → skalering → økonomisk effekt; Thetis worked example on p.160.",
          "position": 23,
          "objective": "Zoom into Track-4 capacity-scaling methodology",
          "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073",
      "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.445,
      "pageNumber": 158,
      "slideType": "diagnosis",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "The slide uses a causal chain/process flow to illustrate how scaling decisions propagate through activity levels to cost impacts.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The diagram explicitly maps the causal relationship between scaling, activity, and cost.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/158",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-158",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 162,
          "from": 152,
          "name": "Zoom In",
          "slug": "06-zoom-in",
          "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-3c7d05fd6019",
          "evidence": "Process diagrams walk through 4 trin: kapacitetsudvælgelse → omkostninger → skalering → økonomisk effekt; Thetis worked example on p.160.",
          "position": 23,
          "objective": "Zoom into Track-4 capacity-scaling methodology",
          "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc",
      "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664",
      "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.445,
      "pageNumber": 101,
      "slideType": "diagnosis",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "The slide uses a causal link structure (observations leading to implications).",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide maps observations to implications, showing a direct cause-effect relationship.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/101",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-101",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 148,
          "from": 98,
          "name": "Quick Win Big Bet",
          "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet",
          "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-54fbecd2dba5",
          "evidence": "Process in waves (p.112) + decision required on option (p.115) + 200-220 mil. recommended.",
          "position": 5,
          "objective": "Sequence IT consolidation in waves with two option scenarios",
          "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap",
          "confidence": 84,
          "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 321,
          "from": 19,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        },
        {
          "to": 165,
          "from": 9,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-30a6df91c9fe",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Baselines, segmentations, current-state diagnoses dominate first half.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc",
      "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664",
      "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.445,
      "pageNumber": 386,
      "slideType": "revenue_buildup",
      "function": "quantify_impact",
      "notes": "The slide uses a multi-step calculation flow (Efficiency % -> Hours -> Hourly Rate -> Revenue).",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide maps a logical flow from efficiency gains to hours to revenue.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/386",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-386",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 420,
          "from": 367,
          "name": "Before After",
          "slug": "21-before-after",
          "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-713edc37f29d",
          "evidence": "Current fragmenteret VFK -> enstrenget logistikstruktur -> 35-60 mio. kr. potentiale + business cases.",
          "position": 12,
          "objective": "Compare current logistics structure to enstrenget LOGTJ nyordning",
          "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta",
          "confidence": 84,
          "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 420,
          "from": 322,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2a66536a5837",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Admin fællesskaber + nyordning af logistik + insourcing benchmarks and business cases.",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        },
        {
          "to": 482,
          "from": 366,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-3ad263fdddff",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
          "evidence": "Logistic nyordning, kortlægning, skalering and realiserbarhed methodology.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0",
      "docSlug": "22f6af8f6e5a7ac9",
      "documentTitle": "Decoding Chinese Internet 2.0 Next Chapter",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.414,
      "pageNumber": 25,
      "slideType": "industry_trends",
      "function": "present_framework",
      "notes": "The slide uses a process-like flow to map drivers to industry impact scope.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide maps driving forces to industry impact levels.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0/25",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0#slide-25",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 27,
          "from": 25,
          "name": "Iceberg",
          "slug": "10-iceberg",
          "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-fa26b0b56c37",
          "evidence": "Surface (3 forces) → hidden (underdeveloped industries) → root cause (leapfrog) on p25-26.",
          "position": 5,
          "objective": "Identify leapfrogging as root cause of market uniqueness",
          "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause",
          "confidence": 78,
          "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 40,
          "from": 25,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-dd85f0f62342",
          "arcName": "The Onion",
          "arcSlug": "onion",
          "beatName": "Core Insight",
          "beatSlug": "onion-core-insight",
          "evidence": "Leapfrogging + application-driven innovation thesis",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 72,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        },
        {
          "to": 55,
          "from": 25,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-ebaba93d7b1a",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
          "evidence": "Drivers, KSFs, future trends explained",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 58,
          "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
          "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0",
      "docSlug": "22f6af8f6e5a7ac9",
      "documentTitle": "Decoding Chinese Internet 2.0 Next Chapter",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.414,
      "pageNumber": 38,
      "slideType": "diagnosis",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "Uses a causal mapping structure to link market gaps to product solutions.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Maps market requirements (cause) to innovations (effect)",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0/38",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0#slide-38",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 40,
          "from": 36,
          "name": "Zoom In",
          "slug": "06-zoom-in",
          "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-05acdffed3a5",
          "evidence": "Industry-wide pattern (p36) → Alipay innovations (p37-38) → healthcare detail (p39) → implication (p40).",
          "position": 8,
          "objective": "Drill from app-driven thesis to Alipay specifics",
          "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 40,
          "from": 25,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-dd85f0f62342",
          "arcName": "The Onion",
          "arcSlug": "onion",
          "beatName": "Core Insight",
          "beatSlug": "onion-core-insight",
          "evidence": "Leapfrogging + application-driven innovation thesis",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 72,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        },
        {
          "to": 55,
          "from": 25,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-ebaba93d7b1a",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
          "evidence": "Drivers, KSFs, future trends explained",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 58,
          "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
          "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-648f0e23d8a6",
      "docSlug": "b0add5c3e5370c49",
      "documentTitle": "Fast-moving consumer goods: Driving value creation in an era of disruption",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 9,
      "slideType": "initiative_list",
      "function": "present_solution",
      "notes": "The slide uses a causal link visual (arrow) between the list of disruptions and the list of imperatives.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide maps disruptions to imperatives using a directional arrow.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-648f0e23d8a6/9",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-648f0e23d8a6",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-648f0e23d8a6#slide-9",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 9,
          "from": 8,
          "name": "Domino Effect",
          "slug": "13-domino-effect",
          "bestFor": "Strategy roadmaps, showing ROI of a specific feature, causal analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-e83906b137c2",
          "evidence": "5 disruptions on left (p8) explicitly mapped 1:1 with arrow to 5 imperatives on right (p9)",
          "position": 3,
          "objective": "Map external disruptions to required strategic responses",
          "structure": "The Trigger Action -> First Reaction -> Second Reaction -> Final Impact",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Demonstrate how a single small strategic move triggers a cascade of positive outcomes"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 9,
          "from": 8,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-f08d857d78a0",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "5 disruptions mapped 1:1 to 5 strategic imperatives",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 88,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        },
        {
          "to": 12,
          "from": 9,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-0b3a9665bb17",
          "arcName": "The Sparkline",
          "arcSlug": "sparkline",
          "beatName": "New Bliss",
          "beatSlug": "sparkline-new-bliss",
          "evidence": "5 imperatives -> 10 actionable levers",
          "position": 5,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2",
      "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 11,
      "slideType": "diagnosis",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "The chart uses a line graph to compare three scenarios: no intervention, DAS collection/placement only, and DAS + low-cost S/N surgeries.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide links specific interventions (DAS, S/N) to population growth outcomes.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/11",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-11",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 12,
          "from": 10,
          "name": "Aha Moment",
          "slug": "03-aha-moment",
          "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-1aa7f9c0a609",
          "evidence": "Setup: ~350k dogs → growth math → 8,700 loose dogs insight",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "Reveal scale of dog and loose-dog population",
          "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 24,
          "from": 9,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-95142a9312b8",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Executive findings on pop growth, bites, flat intake, transfer gap, budget, org issues",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2",
      "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 29,
      "slideType": "recommendation",
      "function": "recommend",
      "notes": "S/N stands for Spay/Neuter.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Links intake/SN levels to specific outcomes like bites and euthanasia",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/29",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-29",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 31,
          "from": 29,
          "name": "Build Up",
          "slug": "33-build-up",
          "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-3277440faaf5",
          "evidence": "Total $20.9MM funding decomposed across FTEs, S/N, other costs",
          "position": 8,
          "objective": "Build up incremental funding requirement and impact",
          "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 44,
          "from": 25,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-997f1af86d7b",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "BCG recommends seven actions; Rec #1-#7 one-pagers",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2",
      "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 94,
      "slideType": "diagnosis",
      "function": "present_framework",
      "notes": "Uses a 'buckets and flows' metaphor to explain system dynamics.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide uses a system dynamics metaphor (buckets and flows) to explain how interventions at one point affect the entire system.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/94",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-94",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 95,
          "from": 94,
          "name": "Analogy",
          "slug": "08-analogy",
          "bestFor": "Complex concepts, new markets, technical explanations for non-experts",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-52b0cd1b5922",
          "evidence": "Ex 22 buckets/flows + 'isolated single actions compromise public safety'",
          "position": 16,
          "objective": "Reprise buckets/flows model and link to coordinated action",
          "structure": "The Familiar Domain -> Key Parallel -> Applied to Our Situation -> Insight",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Explain the unfamiliar through a well-understood parallel domain"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 142,
          "from": 45,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-9f808a4e90ee",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Deep-dive recommendations, full report exhibits, peer benchmarks, S/N math",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2",
      "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 221,
      "slideType": "impact_sizing",
      "function": "quantify_impact",
      "notes": "Uses a waterfall chart to show the cumulative impact of various interventions on dog retention.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide explicitly maps the logic from survey reasons to interventions to projected impact.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/221",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-221",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 267,
          "from": 161,
          "name": "Build Up",
          "slug": "33-build-up",
          "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-5934a57a4387",
          "evidence": "Repeated triplet pattern: e.g., p.166/167/168, p.178/179/180, p.188/189",
          "position": 18,
          "objective": "For each initiative, build up Overview → Estimated Impact → Resource Requirements",
          "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total",
          "confidence": 82,
          "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2",
      "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 224,
      "slideType": "impact_sizing",
      "function": "quantify_impact",
      "notes": "Uses a logic flow at the bottom to explain the calculation steps.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The impact logic flow at the bottom maps the causal steps from euthanasia to incremental adoptions.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/224",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-224",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 267,
          "from": 161,
          "name": "Build Up",
          "slug": "33-build-up",
          "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-5934a57a4387",
          "evidence": "Repeated triplet pattern: e.g., p.166/167/168, p.178/179/180, p.188/189",
          "position": 18,
          "objective": "For each initiative, build up Overview → Estimated Impact → Resource Requirements",
          "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total",
          "confidence": 82,
          "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2",
      "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 237,
      "slideType": "impact_sizing",
      "function": "quantify_impact",
      "notes": "Uses a logical chain/buildup framework to arrive at the final impact figure.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide uses a sequential multiplication of variables (teachers, classes, size, frequency) to arrive at a final impact number.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/237",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-237",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 267,
          "from": 161,
          "name": "Build Up",
          "slug": "33-build-up",
          "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-5934a57a4387",
          "evidence": "Repeated triplet pattern: e.g., p.166/167/168, p.178/179/180, p.188/189",
          "position": 18,
          "objective": "For each initiative, build up Overview → Estimated Impact → Resource Requirements",
          "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total",
          "confidence": 82,
          "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2",
      "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 277,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The slide uses a plus/minus notation to indicate the impact of each metric on the total population calculation.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The table lists sequential inputs that determine the end-of-period dog population.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/277",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-277",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 298,
          "from": 275,
          "name": "Zoom In",
          "slug": "06-zoom-in",
          "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-5c184c18a8b6",
          "evidence": "Section divider '1 Supply of Dogs' + zip-level zoom + waterfall growth math",
          "position": 19,
          "objective": "Zoom into supply of dogs: population sizing and S/N levels",
          "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication",
          "confidence": 78,
          "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2",
      "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 339,
      "slideType": "diagnosis",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "DAS = Dallas Animal Services; LRR = Live Release Rate; RTO = Return to Owner.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide links microchipping to higher RTO, which triggers legal hold requirements, leading to increased kennel demand.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/339",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-339",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 358,
          "from": 311,
          "name": "Zoom In",
          "slug": "06-zoom-in",
          "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-64284a59ff04",
          "evidence": "Section '3 DAS Operations'; intake, kennels, costs, LRR breakdown",
          "position": 21,
          "objective": "Detailed zoom on DAS shelter operations, length-of-stay, costs, outcomes",
          "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication",
          "confidence": 76,
          "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-c8c7c89d1e97",
      "docSlug": "1b64d126e472d1d4",
      "documentTitle": "Media Entertainment Industry NYC",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.294,
      "pageNumber": 23,
      "slideType": "impact_sizing",
      "function": "quantify_impact",
      "notes": "Uses a process flow diagram to explain the economic multiplier effect.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide maps the causal flow of money from production spending to indirect job creation.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-c8c7c89d1e97/23",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-c8c7c89d1e97",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-c8c7c89d1e97#slide-23",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 17,
          "name": "Ripple Effect",
          "slug": "26-ripple-effect",
          "bestFor": "Change management, scaling initiatives, demonstrating broad value",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-e8ee27713ee2",
          "evidence": "Tourism $45M, production-related 37K, indirect ~20K via spend ripple diagram",
          "position": 5,
          "objective": "Show how filming ripples through tourism + jobs",
          "structure": "Individual Impact -> Team Impact -> Organizational Impact -> Market/Industry Impact",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Show how impact spreads from individual to team to organization to market"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 38,
          "from": 7,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87de-591ed7ae15c0",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Data-rich analysis: TV growth, tourism, indie scene, digital, aggregate FTEs",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        },
        {
          "to": 38,
          "from": 7,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87de-6740b2f28d6f",
          "arcName": "The Mountain",
          "arcSlug": "mountain",
          "beatName": "Rising Action",
          "beatSlug": "mountain-rising-action",
          "evidence": "Layered data across film, TV, theatre, digital",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 62,
          "parentBeatName": "Development",
          "parentBeatSlug": "development"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593",
      "docSlug": "ba6f5e1f7c24f1ae",
      "documentTitle": "Port of LA Clean Truck Program",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.294,
      "pageNumber": 8,
      "slideType": "diagnosis",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "The diagram uses a system dynamics approach to show how policy levers (ban, fee, financing) impact truck supply and driver availability.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The diagram maps the cause-and-effect relationships between policy interventions and market outcomes.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593/8",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593#slide-8",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 9,
          "from": 7,
          "name": "Mece Breakdown",
          "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
          "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-abec01fab6a7",
          "evidence": "Numbered 5-element list, interaction diagram, then truck/driver market sizing.",
          "position": 3,
          "objective": "Decompose CTP into five interlocking elements plus market sizing",
          "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
          "confidence": 82,
          "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 12,
          "from": 7,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-a07bf07db208",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "Five CTP elements, interactions, labor market, three options defined.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 88,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        },
        {
          "to": 14,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-b19420ca245c",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
          "evidence": "Objectives, framework, options compared on benefits/risks.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
          "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435",
      "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 99,
      "slideType": "diagnosis",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "The slide uses a causal mapping structure to link structural attributes to operational/governance risks.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide maps specific structural attributes to their direct negative implications using arrows.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/99",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-99",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 102,
          "from": 95,
          "name": "Benchmark Gap",
          "slug": "39-benchmark-gap",
          "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-1e9daff2c96d",
          "evidence": "p98 governance framework; p100-101 'unique vs PHAs / inconsistent with best practice'; p102 must-do changes.",
          "position": 14,
          "objective": "Diagnose NYCHA board governance against PHA peers and corporate best practice, then recommend changes",
          "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-f38eb376832b",
      "docSlug": "2d4845138580cb14",
      "documentTitle": "Saudi Arabia Banking Pulse Quarter 3, 2022",
      "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
      "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 9,
      "slideType": "kpi_dashboard",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The slide uses a causal-style diagram to link Yield on Credit and LDR to NIM, noting the relationship is functional rather than a strict mathematical formula.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Visual links between Yield/LDR and NIM with mathematical operators",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-f38eb376832b/9",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-f38eb376832b",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-f38eb376832b#slide-9",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 10,
          "from": 8,
          "name": "Zoom In",
          "slug": "06-zoom-in",
          "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-7d3da00cf173",
          "evidence": "Op income overview (p.8) -> aggregate NIM trend (p.9) -> per-bank NIM small multiples (p.10).",
          "position": 3,
          "objective": "Zoom from operating income to NIM aggregate to per-bank NIM",
          "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 15,
          "from": 2,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-e558fe4b740c",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Foreword + macro then KPI-by-KPI quarterly data tables and charts.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 75,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        },
        {
          "to": 15,
          "from": 4,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-f699df889704",
          "arcName": "The Mountain",
          "arcSlug": "mountain",
          "beatName": "Rising Action",
          "beatSlug": "mountain-rising-action",
          "evidence": "Sequential KPI improvements: NIM, C/I, asset quality, cost of risk.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": "Development",
          "parentBeatSlug": "development"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-f38eb376832b",
      "docSlug": "2d4845138580cb14",
      "documentTitle": "Saudi Arabia Banking Pulse Quarter 3, 2022",
      "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
      "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 14,
      "slideType": "financial_analysis",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The slide uses a mathematical relationship (Provisions / Loans = Cost of Risk) to explain the trend.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide explicitly links the reduction in impairment charges to the decline in cost of risk via a division operator icon.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-f38eb376832b/14",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-f38eb376832b",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-f38eb376832b#slide-14",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 15,
          "from": 13,
          "name": "Pattern Hunter",
          "slug": "02-pattern-hunter",
          "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-86547e13593c",
          "evidence": "Three slides (asset quality, CoR drivers, per-bank CoR) build evidence of improving risk.",
          "position": 5,
          "objective": "Stack NPL, CoR drivers, per-bank CoR to show credit health pattern",
          "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 15,
          "from": 2,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-e558fe4b740c",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Foreword + macro then KPI-by-KPI quarterly data tables and charts.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 75,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        },
        {
          "to": 15,
          "from": 4,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-f699df889704",
          "arcName": "The Mountain",
          "arcSlug": "mountain",
          "beatName": "Rising Action",
          "beatSlug": "mountain-rising-action",
          "evidence": "Sequential KPI improvements: NIM, C/I, asset quality, cost of risk.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": "Development",
          "parentBeatSlug": "development"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-8b79926ba3f5",
      "docSlug": "2ccd72c2e2b9465a",
      "documentTitle": "The productivity push Powering the UK’s performance with five digital capabilities",
      "authorId": "Accenture",
      "authorName": "Accenture",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 32,
      "slideType": "pain_points",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "The slide uses a three-column layout to detail specific challenges in digital transformation.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide describes a 'vicious circle' where failures in three areas reinforce each other.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-8b79926ba3f5/32",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-8b79926ba3f5",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-8b79926ba3f5#slide-32",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 31,
          "name": "Root Cause Tree",
          "slug": "37-root-cause-tree",
          "bestFor": "Problem diagnosis, quality issues, operational failures",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3a-feb4973f8d74",
          "evidence": "p32 splits paralysis into Ambition / Investment / Delivery branches",
          "position": 10,
          "objective": "Diagnose three root causes blocking digital adoption",
          "structure": "The Problem -> Branch 1 (Cause A) -> Branch 2 (Cause B) -> Branch 3 (Cause C) -> The Primary Root",
          "confidence": 84,
          "description": "Branch out from a problem to its multiple contributing causes"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 33,
          "from": 31,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e33-4e985661e118",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps",
          "evidence": "Three barriers diagnosed; 'Learn more' partnership CTA",
          "position": 5,
          "confidence": 88,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80",
      "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8",
      "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.294,
      "pageNumber": 16,
      "slideType": "peer_benchmark",
      "function": "compare_peers",
      "notes": "The slide uses a dual-chart layout to demonstrate a causal link between broadband adoption and mail volume decline across multiple countries.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide links broadband penetration to mail volume erosion across multiple countries.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/16",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-16",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 17,
          "from": 15,
          "name": "Benchmark Gap",
          "slug": "39-benchmark-gap",
          "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-8a4d57c193f9",
          "evidence": "Section explicitly titled 'Benchmarks from other global posts'; p17 plots CAGR vs broadband across countries",
          "position": 3,
          "objective": "Validate decline thesis using peer-post benchmarks",
          "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity",
          "confidence": 85,
          "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 21,
          "from": 15,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6d59c738dacb",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "Peer post benchmarks, broadband regression, revenue gap, scenarios",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 88,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        },
        {
          "to": 17,
          "from": 7,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-793f9f86b6f5",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Results forecasts and peer benchmarks present the data",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 72,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80",
      "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8",
      "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.294,
      "pageNumber": 17,
      "slideType": "industry_trends",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The chart uses a regression line with an R-squared value of 0.57 to illustrate the relationship.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide explicitly links broadband penetration as a cause for mail volume decline.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/17",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-17",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 17,
          "from": 15,
          "name": "Benchmark Gap",
          "slug": "39-benchmark-gap",
          "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-8a4d57c193f9",
          "evidence": "Section explicitly titled 'Benchmarks from other global posts'; p17 plots CAGR vs broadband across countries",
          "position": 3,
          "objective": "Validate decline thesis using peer-post benchmarks",
          "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity",
          "confidence": 85,
          "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 21,
          "from": 15,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6d59c738dacb",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "Peer post benchmarks, broadband regression, revenue gap, scenarios",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 88,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        },
        {
          "to": 17,
          "from": 7,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-793f9f86b6f5",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Results forecasts and peer benchmarks present the data",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 72,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-abfef498e0ba",
      "docSlug": "9e82e22283607bcc",
      "documentTitle": "Work, workforce, workers Reinvented in the age of generative AI",
      "authorId": "Accenture",
      "authorName": "Accenture",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 31,
      "slideType": "key_messages",
      "function": "present_framework",
      "notes": "The slide uses a visual metaphor of light fusion to represent the combination of training and learning.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide presents a formulaic relationship: Training + Learning = Fusion",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-abfef498e0ba/31",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-abfef498e0ba",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-abfef498e0ba#slide-31",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 27,
          "name": "Golden Circle",
          "slug": "11-golden-circle",
          "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3c-00bb45f6b65f",
          "evidence": "GPS metaphor with 'Lead and learn' core (why) and 5-stage learning roadmap (how/what).",
          "position": 6,
          "objective": "Introduce the Gen AI GPS framework and the leadership why/how/what",
          "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)",
          "confidence": 65,
          "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 18,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e34-77ae9a3a6571",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "'Trifecta of opportunities' and 'Gen AI GPS' framework introduce the approach",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 90,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        },
        {
          "to": 40,
          "from": 26,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e34-897c9d7f122c",
          "arcName": "The Transformation Tale",
          "arcSlug": "transformation-tale",
          "beatName": "The Bridge",
          "beatSlug": "transformation-tale-the-bridge",
          "evidence": "Gen AI GPS plus four accelerators are the explicit bridge to that vision",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 65,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}