{
  "kind": "framework",
  "value": "buy-build-partner",
  "collectionKey": "slides:framework:buy-build-partner:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 3,
  "page": 1,
  "pageSize": 24,
  "pageCount": 1,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-96004b13b0f2",
      "docSlug": "9a95b8480d09e70a",
      "documentTitle": "Unlocking alpha in deals",
      "authorId": "Accenture",
      "authorName": "Accenture",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 24,
      "slideType": "client_example",
      "function": "illustrate_case",
      "notes": "The slide uses a split layout with text on the left and a pull-quote on the right.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Title: 'Build a structured buy/build/partner strategy'.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-96004b13b0f2/24",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-96004b13b0f2",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-96004b13b0f2#slide-24",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 26,
          "from": 23,
          "name": "Tradeoff Triangle",
          "slug": "38-tradeoff-triangle",
          "bestFor": "Resource allocation, strategic choices, expectation setting",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3b-994b0801b6c2",
          "evidence": "p24 'structured buy/build/partner strategy'; p25 segments PE (92% buy) vs M&A (40% partner); p26 CTA reconciles three options.",
          "position": 7,
          "objective": "Frame buy vs build vs partner trade-off for sourcing",
          "structure": "Priority A vs Priority B vs Priority C -> What We're Optimizing For -> What We're Sacrificing -> Why This Trade-Off",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Show that you can only optimize for 2 of 3 competing priorities"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 26,
          "from": 17,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e33-f2c5f2b74a1b",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Figures 3-5 with 1.3x, 3.2x, 5.7x benchmarks plus CTAs",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        },
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 14,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e33-fd7b23707725",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
          "evidence": "Three-step framework + benchmark proof of impact",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 60,
          "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
          "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-96004b13b0f2",
      "docSlug": "9a95b8480d09e70a",
      "documentTitle": "Unlocking alpha in deals",
      "authorId": "Accenture",
      "authorName": "Accenture",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 25,
      "slideType": "comparison_table",
      "function": "compare_options",
      "notes": "The chart highlights a stark contrast: PE firms heavily favor 'Buy as a service' (92%), while Corporate M&A teams show a more distributed preference, with 'Buy off the shelf' being the most common (40%).",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Legend lists Develop in-house / Develop with vendor / Buy off shelf / Buy as a service.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-96004b13b0f2/25",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-96004b13b0f2",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-96004b13b0f2#slide-25",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 26,
          "from": 23,
          "name": "Tradeoff Triangle",
          "slug": "38-tradeoff-triangle",
          "bestFor": "Resource allocation, strategic choices, expectation setting",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3b-994b0801b6c2",
          "evidence": "p24 'structured buy/build/partner strategy'; p25 segments PE (92% buy) vs M&A (40% partner); p26 CTA reconciles three options.",
          "position": 7,
          "objective": "Frame buy vs build vs partner trade-off for sourcing",
          "structure": "Priority A vs Priority B vs Priority C -> What We're Optimizing For -> What We're Sacrificing -> Why This Trade-Off",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Show that you can only optimize for 2 of 3 competing priorities"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 26,
          "from": 17,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e33-f2c5f2b74a1b",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Figures 3-5 with 1.3x, 3.2x, 5.7x benchmarks plus CTAs",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        },
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 14,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e33-fd7b23707725",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
          "evidence": "Three-step framework + benchmark proof of impact",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 60,
          "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
          "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-96004b13b0f2",
      "docSlug": "9a95b8480d09e70a",
      "documentTitle": "Unlocking alpha in deals",
      "authorId": "Accenture",
      "authorName": "Accenture",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 26,
      "slideType": "closing_ask",
      "function": "state_next_steps",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Callout reconciles: 'Buy for quick access, build for customization, partner for expertise.'",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-96004b13b0f2/26",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-96004b13b0f2",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-96004b13b0f2#slide-26",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 26,
          "from": 23,
          "name": "Tradeoff Triangle",
          "slug": "38-tradeoff-triangle",
          "bestFor": "Resource allocation, strategic choices, expectation setting",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3b-994b0801b6c2",
          "evidence": "p24 'structured buy/build/partner strategy'; p25 segments PE (92% buy) vs M&A (40% partner); p26 CTA reconciles three options.",
          "position": 7,
          "objective": "Frame buy vs build vs partner trade-off for sourcing",
          "structure": "Priority A vs Priority B vs Priority C -> What We're Optimizing For -> What We're Sacrificing -> Why This Trade-Off",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Show that you can only optimize for 2 of 3 competing priorities"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 26,
          "from": 17,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e33-f2c5f2b74a1b",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Figures 3-5 with 1.3x, 3.2x, 5.7x benchmarks plus CTAs",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        },
        {
          "to": 28,
          "from": 26,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e34-017f482c02be",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
          "evidence": "Final CTA + 'engineer alpha' closing",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 60,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}