{ "kind": "framework", "value": "business-case", "collectionKey": "slides:framework:business-case:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 10, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 1, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-a440816717ad", "docSlug": "52678616d6f6fb25", "documentTitle": "Bike Sharing 4.0", "authorId": "RolandBerger", "authorName": "Roland Berger", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 26, "slideType": "business_case", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide uses a standard P&L structure to demonstrate the viability of a bike-sharing business model.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide presents a structured financial model for a business venture.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-a440816717ad/26", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-a440816717ad", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-a440816717ad#slide-26", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 26, "from": 17, "beatId": "b1f30bf6-47fb-43cb-b166-0c5dda3e9ed2", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The deck provides case studies and key takeaways, highlighting the impact of bike sharing schemes and next steps for stakeholders.", "position": 4, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 83, "slideType": "business_case", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide uses a structured table format to present a business case for IT transformation within the Danish Defense (Forsvaret).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Structured presentation of baseline, potential, risks, and prerequisites for a strategic initiative.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/83", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-83", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 88, "from": 79, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-1887bc9a6891", "evidence": "Ten one-pagers from 7 mio. (Kammeradvokaten) up to 151-179 mio. kr. (IT-konsolidering).", "position": 14, "objective": "Build up material-/IT-area value via individual initiatives", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 80, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 115, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-08b5faaeae90", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Per-area sizing, 45 one-pagers with provenue, overlap reconciliation.", "position": 4, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-f222b31ea833", "docSlug": "0e5e77bd2a5ace9c", "documentTitle": "Hydrogen applications and business models", "authorId": "Kearney", "authorName": "Kearney", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 149, "slideType": "business_case", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart illustrates the carbon abatement cost (CAC) vs grid emissions intensity for different coupling scenarios (Grid, Grid+Wind, Grid+Solar).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Power-to-gas: blending business case", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-f222b31ea833/149", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-f222b31ea833", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-f222b31ea833#slide-149", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-f222b31ea833", "docSlug": "0e5e77bd2a5ace9c", "documentTitle": "Hydrogen applications and business models", "authorId": "Kearney", "authorName": "Kearney", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 153, "slideType": "business_case", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "B1b label indicates this is part of a larger series of business case analyses.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Slide explicitly labels 'Power-to-gas: methanation business case'", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-f222b31ea833/153", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-f222b31ea833", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-f222b31ea833#slide-153", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-f222b31ea833", "docSlug": "0e5e77bd2a5ace9c", "documentTitle": "Hydrogen applications and business models", "authorId": "Kearney", "authorName": "Kearney", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 162, "slideType": "business_case", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a dual-chart layout to compare net CO2 emissions and abatement costs against SMR benchmarks.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly mentions 'Power-to-chemical: business case refining' and compares costs against a baseline.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-f222b31ea833/162", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-f222b31ea833", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-f222b31ea833#slide-162", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-f222b31ea833", "docSlug": "0e5e77bd2a5ace9c", "documentTitle": "Hydrogen applications and business models", "authorId": "Kearney", "authorName": "Kearney", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 177, "slideType": "business_case", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart illustrates the trade-off between carbon abatement costs and grid emission intensity, highlighting the impact of battery manufacturing footprints.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Power-to-mobility: business case bus", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-f222b31ea833/177", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-f222b31ea833", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-f222b31ea833#slide-177", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2", "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 178, "slideType": "business_case", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a classic 'Impact vs Cost' structure to justify a strategic recommendation.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Structure of impact vs cost analysis", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/178", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-178", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 267, "from": 161, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-5934a57a4387", "evidence": "Repeated triplet pattern: e.g., p.166/167/168, p.178/179/180, p.188/189", "position": 18, "objective": "For each initiative, build up Overview → Estimated Impact → Resource Requirements", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 82, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2", "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 199, "slideType": "executive_summary", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a classic 'Impact vs Cost' business case structure.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide presents a problem, recommendation, methodology, and cost-benefit analysis.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/199", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-199", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 267, "from": 161, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-5934a57a4387", "evidence": "Repeated triplet pattern: e.g., p.166/167/168, p.178/179/180, p.188/189", "position": 18, "objective": "For each initiative, build up Overview → Estimated Impact → Resource Requirements", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 82, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "docSlug": "78bb0ae4454c2778", "documentTitle": "Socio-economic case for deepening solar PV deployment in Nigeria", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 43, "slideType": "business_case", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide uses a three-step process flow (Use case -> Rationale -> Impact Measure) to justify the intervention.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide structure follows a standard problem-solution-impact logic.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb/43", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb#slide-43", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 43, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-92e55069dac4", "evidence": "Highest losses among peers (p45), 9% of GDP lost (p46); solar cold storage saves 4.4M tonnes (p52) - 30% reduction", "position": 7, "objective": "Food security dimension: post-harvest losses curable via solar cold storage", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 83, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 76, "from": 21, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-8370f154005a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Health, Education, Food security, Environment, Trade dimension chapters", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 76, "from": 21, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-8ddb0b48fe56", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "Lost ANC coverage, study hours, food, MSME revenue, GHG emissions piled up", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-7459754068a3", "docSlug": "84aaeee12bdbe285", "documentTitle": "Sustainability Private Markets", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.777, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "business_case", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a structured table-like layout to map value levers to rationales and supporting evidence.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Maps value levers to rationales and quantitative evidence.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-7459754068a3/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-7459754068a3", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-7459754068a3#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 14, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30d-698daaeade17", "evidence": "Value-lever table (p14) -> 50% turnover myth-buster (p15) -> GP/management engagement model (p16)", "position": 4, "objective": "Translate employee data into value levers, myth-buster and engagement playbook", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 75, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 11, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-a019e44d367a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Employee experience pillar with survey, injury-satisfaction, 50% turnover data", "position": 4, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 15, "from": 14, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-ad55ee3127e3", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Value-lever table + 50% turnover myth-buster spelling out the so-what", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }