{ "kind": "framework", "value": "build-vs-buy", "collectionKey": "slides:framework:build-vs-buy:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 8, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 1, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-24dad7bccd5b", "docSlug": "0ca13b3136727d28", "documentTitle": "2024 Executive Perspectives Maximizing Value Potential from AI in 2025", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 18, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a 'Build vs Buy' framework to guide strategic decision-making.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 2, "evidence": "Header 'Build vs buy comparison' with six decision criteria across BUILD and BUY columns. ยท The slide explicitly compares 'Build' vs 'Buy' across six criteria.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-24dad7bccd5b/18", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-24dad7bccd5b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-24dad7bccd5b#slide-18", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 23, "from": 15, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7df-2a1b4c77fb7b", "evidence": "P15 declares four pillars; p16-23 deep-dive each pillar with consistent banner tag 'Conceptualizing the how with four pillars'.", "position": 4, "objective": "Walk MECE through the four pillars (DMA, tech, upskilling, suppliers)", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 86, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 23, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e38-ef4a2b05f54d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Value drivers (savings/speed/risk), case studies, then four-pillar deep dive.", "position": 4, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-3b57693a8c6b", "docSlug": "bbc9a0337f45ab4c", "documentTitle": "2024 Executive Perspectives Transformation through AI and GenAI", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 17, "slideType": "implementation_plan", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide uses a value chain approach on the left and a decision-making framework on the right.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The right side explicitly compares in-house development vs. partner assessment.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-3b57693a8c6b/17", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-3b57693a8c6b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-3b57693a8c6b#slide-17", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 16, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7df-a3105bab7862", "evidence": "Five 'Path to implementation' slides: insights org (p16), vendors (p17), team structures (p18), architecture (p19), risk practices (p20)", "position": 3, "objective": "Stack the implementation components needed to deliver the GenAI transformation", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 75, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 16, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e39-8581934ae6d8", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "'Path to implementation' pages on insights, vendors, org, architecture, risk + 4-step CTA", "position": 5, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 21, "from": 16, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e39-9173bc091f85", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Path to implementation pages + Call to action", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-b3c9cb9378c3", "docSlug": "8ac2fd285d6b", "documentTitle": "Axon Enterprise (formerly TASER) (AAXN)", "authorId": "54_Spruce_Point_Capital", "authorName": null, "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller", "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller", "presentationDate": "2019-06-19 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.3333334, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "diagnose_problem", "notes": "The slide uses large red 'X' overlays to visually emphasize the failure of Axon's strategy. It contrasts a market structure chart with a table of competitor acquisitions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly contrasts 'Build Approach' and 'Buy Approach' strategies.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-b3c9cb9378c3/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-b3c9cb9378c3", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-b3c9cb9378c3#slide-16", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 6, "beatId": "49062d09-dbfd-4729-a1b6-97f294c2891e", "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster", "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster", "beatName": "The Monster", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "The report presents various 'monsters' or challenges facing Axon Enterprises, including fundamental challenges, financial struggles, and governance concerns", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-50837595339d", "docSlug": "e8f9f91666206ee0", "documentTitle": "GenAI German Labor Market", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 17, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "McKinsey & Company branding present.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly contrasts internal capability building with external talent recruitment.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-50837595339d/17", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-50837595339d", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-50837595339d#slide-17", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 17, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "a7d9340e-a1bc-44f2-afdb-5ee71e78e8de", "evidence": "The document highlights the importance of upskilling and attracting tech talent", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the consequences of not addressing labor shortages?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 24, "from": 15, "beatId": "2e36796f-3677-44f4-8f8f-c4d15735a7e8", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document outlines implications, recommendations, and conclusions", "position": 4, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-c03621bc134e", "docSlug": "ea57347dc86e66e4", "documentTitle": "GenAI Survey 2024", "authorId": "KPMG", "authorName": "KPMG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses donut charts to represent the distribution of build vs buy strategies.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly compares build vs buy strategies for GenAI initiatives.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-c03621bc134e/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-c03621bc134e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-c03621bc134e#slide-8", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 6, "beatId": "2d28f1e3-f13b-4ef0-a8f2-197677258776", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Slides on next steps and key takeaways outline the approach.", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-33d29840c676", "docSlug": "3948959661e672e4", "documentTitle": "Leading Online Shoppers Finish Line", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 30, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a comparative framework to guide build-vs-buy decisions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly compares build vs buy across five dimensions.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-33d29840c676/30", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-33d29840c676", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-33d29840c676#slide-30", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 28, "name": "Hypothesis Test", "slug": "42-hypothesis-test", "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-fef56b141cef", "evidence": "Quote raises build-vs-buy -> traffic-mix exhibit -> Five Dimensions -> custom underperforms.", "position": 8, "objective": "Test the build-your-own-platform hypothesis against like-for-like data", "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)", "confidence": 80, "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 16, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-6bb4c09efa76", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Per-area exhibits 10-20 + Platforms divider with build-vs-buy hypothesis test.", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019de50f-fd10-73b4-9aa3-e074036eea8c", "docSlug": "77d779af9516429de198bec0b23ee5d9", "documentTitle": "Palantir | IPO Presentation Deck | 55 slides", "authorId": "palantir", "authorName": "Palantir", "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck", "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "investment_bank", "sourceTypeLabel": "Investment bank", "presentationDate": "2020-09-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.7777778, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "why_now", "function": "argue_timing", "notes": "The slide uses a 'Build vs. Buy' framework to position the company's solution against the status quo of custom development.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly uses 'BUILD VS. BUY' as the central framing for the industry trend.", "slideHref": "/slides/019de50f-fd10-73b4-9aa3-e074036eea8c/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019de50f-fd10-73b4-9aa3-e074036eea8c", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de50f-fd10-73b4-9aa3-e074036eea8c#slide-9", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-605d-726d-81a4-3fa2cc952355", "docSlug": "bi-a3c8f3b79c908c49", "documentTitle": "Ramp: Crypto payments startup used this pitch deck to raise $53 million", "authorId": "Pitchdecks", "authorName": "Ramp", "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck", "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.777, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "why_now", "function": "argue_timing", "notes": "Uses a scale illustration to represent the decision-making process.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly compares the strategic choice between building internal infrastructure versus buying/outsourcing it.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-605d-726d-81a4-3fa2cc952355/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-605d-726d-81a4-3fa2cc952355", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-605d-726d-81a4-3fa2cc952355#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 2, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "a79810d4-69b0-4a37-ba22-4cd33ead16d3", "evidence": "The loop is opened on page 2 and closed on page 14", "position": 0, "objective": "Why crypto-enabled startups won't build their on-ramps themselves", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }