{
  "kind": "framework",
  "value": "bubble-chart-r-d-intensity-vs-cvc-penetration-",
  "collectionKey": "slides:framework:bubble-chart-r-d-intensity-vs-cvc-penetration-:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 1,
  "page": 1,
  "pageSize": 24,
  "pageCount": 1,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c",
      "docSlug": "2862941a98bffda6",
      "documentTitle": "Corporate Ventures in Sweden",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.445,
      "pageNumber": 11,
      "slideType": "industry_trends",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The chart uses bubble size to represent the number of companies in each industry sector.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Two-axis chart: R&D intensity (%) × Share of companies with CVC (%); bubble size = company count.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c/11",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c#slide-11",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 11,
          "name": "Benchmark Gap",
          "slug": "39-benchmark-gap",
          "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-dcf39861de57",
          "evidence": "R&D-intensity bubble chart + 'Sweden 20% vs global 33%, aspirational 32%' bars + landscape evolution.",
          "position": 4,
          "objective": "Quantify Sweden's CV underperformance vs global benchmarks",
          "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity",
          "confidence": 85,
          "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 14,
          "from": 11,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-cab8ec6916e2",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "R&D-intensity correlation, Sweden 20% vs global 33%, Swedish CVC examples.",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 88,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}