{ "kind": "framework", "value": "before-after-framing", "collectionKey": "slides:framework:before-after-framing:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 3642, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 152, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-b43d907adb44", "docSlug": "3c210b1fcba7", "documentTitle": "Tempus AI, Inc. (TEM)", "authorId": "54_Spruce_Point_Capital", "authorName": "Spruce Point Capital Management", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller", "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller", "presentationDate": "2025-05-28 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.3333334, "pageNumber": 69, "slideType": "expose_contradiction", "function": "expose_contradiction", "notes": "The slide uses a before-and-after comparison to suggest unethical business practices by the company.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 2, "evidence": "Side-by-side requisition forms showing language change · The slide explicitly compares a 2022 form to a 2023 form to highlight a change in language.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-b43d907adb44/69", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-b43d907adb44", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-b43d907adb44#slide-69", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 69, "from": 68, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019de87d-e716-765b-9d74-aa239ead4621", "evidence": "Before: combined xT assay; After: split into two CPT codes; before/after requisition forms.", "position": 8, "objective": "Expose Tempus billing change as revenue inflation tactic", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 75, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 69, "from": 12, "beatId": "019de87d-e40d-7574-b4dc-522b102a6735", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Five evidence sections: insiders, AI hype, partnerships, accounting, billing.", "position": 4, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 69, "from": 12, "beatId": "019de87d-e501-7638-91f7-175bec763c5d", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Rising Action", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Mounting evidence across insiders, AI, partnerships, accounting, billing.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-dfc8f9e0fa3e", "docSlug": "c0127171790f", "documentTitle": "Bunge Global SA (BG)", "authorId": "54_Spruce_Point_Capital", "authorName": "Ben Axler", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller", "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller", "presentationDate": "2026-03-25 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.3333334, "pageNumber": 38, "slideType": "expose_contradiction", "function": "expose_contradiction", "notes": "Uses a before-after framing to contrast past promises with current performance.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 2, "evidence": "2022 $11+ EPS aspiration vs 2026 $7.50 guidance · Contrasts 2022 aspirational goals with 2026 reality.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-dfc8f9e0fa3e/38", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-dfc8f9e0fa3e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-dfc8f9e0fa3e#slide-38", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 38, "from": 33, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019de85c-5483-76cf-8351-ada1bde89c6a", "evidence": "23% LATAM PP&E, Argentina excuses chronicle, Brazil tax opacity, COFCO threat.", "position": 6, "objective": "Zoom into LATAM concentration risk", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 80, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 66, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de85c-520e-75ff-a0c6-aabe3bf0f17d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Operational, LATAM, Viterra deal, financial strain proof", "position": 4, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 61, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de85c-52d3-718b-91c0-ba5c0749e561", "arcName": "Tragedy", "arcSlug": "tragedy", "beatName": "Downward Spiral", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Operational, LATAM, Viterra integration failures", "position": 3, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 29, "slideType": "situation_overview", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "The slide uses a two-part framework (Before/After contract signing) to structure the rationale for the proposal.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide is structured into 'Før kontraktindgåelse' (Before) and 'Efter kontraktindgåelse' (After).", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/29", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-29", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 28, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-48b7ee098467", "evidence": "Survey data -> tema-effekt -> recommendations -> 33 mio. kr. potentiale -> indfasningstakt.", "position": 2, "objective": "Diagnose contract templates and recommend kommerciel uddannelse", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 82, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 165, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-30a6df91c9fe", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Baselines, segmentations, current-state diagnoses dominate first half.", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 45, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a 'Before-After' framing to contrast current inefficiencies with future state improvements.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly contrasts 'Nuværende model' with 'Fremtidig model'.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/45", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-45", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 28, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-48b7ee098467", "evidence": "Survey data -> tema-effekt -> recommendations -> 33 mio. kr. potentiale -> indfasningstakt.", "position": 2, "objective": "Diagnose contract templates and recommend kommerciel uddannelse", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 82, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 165, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-30a6df91c9fe", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Baselines, segmentations, current-state diagnoses dominate first half.", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 236, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a 'before-after' framing to contrast current inefficiencies with a future centralized state.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly contrasts 'Nuværende setup' (Current) with 'Fremtidigt setup' (Future).", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/236", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-236", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 229, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-6a47af522484", "evidence": "538 mio. addresserbar -> 6 delanalyser -> centralisation, in-sourcing, VTC, hotel, kontorartikler, TV, SIM, kursus.", "position": 10, "objective": "MECE breakdown of Ovrig Drift baseline into six delanalyser plus sub-initiatives", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 365, "from": 166, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-37e90642ab06", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Potentialeestimater, benchmark gaps, comparison tables.", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5d89529e8c57", "docSlug": "0531041e5c74bb5b", "documentTitle": "Climate Change: BCG’s Perspectives and Offerings", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 21, "slideType": "business_case", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "Uses a contrast-based visual layout to frame the economic argument.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Contrasts the negative impact of inaction with the manageable impact of action.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5d89529e8c57/21", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5d89529e8c57", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5d89529e8c57#slide-21", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 20, "name": "Myth Buster", "slug": "12-myth-buster", "bestFor": "Rebranding, changing market perception, correcting false assumptions", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-c6ff5e1d04e5", "evidence": "'Fear is overstated' → 'Clear economic case' → 'But: enormous investment challenge'", "position": 5, "objective": "correct the competitiveness fear and balance it", "structure": "The Common Belief -> The Friction/Failure of that Belief -> The New Truth", "confidence": 72, "description": "Address a common misconception head-on to clear the room for a new truth" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 20, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-a8a942519261", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Competitiveness myth, economic case, sector regulation framework", "position": 4, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 25, "from": 16, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-b4193903c853", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Paths, technologies, economic and regulatory case", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5d89529e8c57", "docSlug": "0531041e5c74bb5b", "documentTitle": "Climate Change: BCG’s Perspectives and Offerings", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 32, "slideType": "key_messages", "function": "summarize", "notes": "Uses a 'This... still requires a lot of this' framing to bridge traditional skills with new energy applications.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Uses 'This... still requires a lot of this' to reframe the perception of petroleum engineering skills.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5d89529e8c57/32", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5d89529e8c57", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5d89529e8c57#slide-32", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 26, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-ac4e95d4335b", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "O&G strategic question, Kodak/Fuji choice, $1T+ opportunity, discussion", "position": 5, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 33, "from": 26, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-bbce0888c281", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "O&G choice & opportunity sizing", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2", "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 38, "slideType": "recommendation", "function": "recommend", "notes": "The slide uses a 'before-after' framing to contrast the current state with the recommended state.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide contrasts 'Today's mission statement' and 'Today's reporting' with 'BCG recommended' versions.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/38", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-38", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 44, "from": 38, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-37e971a98c0a", "evidence": "Rec #1 mission, #2 field intake, #3 outcomes, #4 S/N, #5 community, #6 governance, #7 efficiency", "position": 9, "objective": "One-pager for each of the 7 recommendations", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 90, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 44, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-997f1af86d7b", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "BCG recommends seven actions; Rec #1-#7 one-pagers", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2", "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 39, "slideType": "recommendation", "function": "recommend", "notes": "The slide uses a 'From...To' comparison framework to illustrate the impact of proposed initiatives.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a 'From...To' structure to compare current and future states.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/39", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-39", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 44, "from": 38, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-37e971a98c0a", "evidence": "Rec #1 mission, #2 field intake, #3 outcomes, #4 S/N, #5 community, #6 governance, #7 efficiency", "position": 9, "objective": "One-pager for each of the 7 recommendations", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 90, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 44, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-997f1af86d7b", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "BCG recommends seven actions; Rec #1-#7 one-pagers", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2", "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 42, "slideType": "recommendation", "function": "recommend", "notes": "Uses a 'From... To...' comparison framework to illustrate the desired shift in organizational culture and operations.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly uses a 'From...' and '...To' structure to compare current and future states.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/42", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-42", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 44, "from": 38, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-37e971a98c0a", "evidence": "Rec #1 mission, #2 field intake, #3 outcomes, #4 S/N, #5 community, #6 governance, #7 efficiency", "position": 9, "objective": "One-pager for each of the 7 recommendations", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 90, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 44, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-997f1af86d7b", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "BCG recommends seven actions; Rec #1-#7 one-pagers", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2", "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 43, "slideType": "recommendation", "function": "recommend", "notes": "The slide uses a 'From-To' framework to illustrate the impact of the proposed governance changes.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a 'From... To...' structure to contrast current state with proposed future state.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/43", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-43", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 44, "from": 38, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-37e971a98c0a", "evidence": "Rec #1 mission, #2 field intake, #3 outcomes, #4 S/N, #5 community, #6 governance, #7 efficiency", "position": 9, "objective": "One-pager for each of the 7 recommendations", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 90, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 44, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-997f1af86d7b", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "BCG recommends seven actions; Rec #1-#7 one-pagers", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-3a3680d6162e", "docSlug": "e6b3796b5d45dab4", "documentTitle": "Make the leap, take the lead: Tech strategies for innovation and growth", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a 'Before/After' framing to illustrate the shift in IT spending.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly compares 'Before' and 'After' states of IT budget allocation.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-3a3680d6162e/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-3a3680d6162e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-3a3680d6162e#slide-15", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 13, "name": "Pivot", "slug": "17-pivot", "bestFor": "Project updates, board meetings, agile retrospectives", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d37-3eb3e43d14f7", "evidence": "'Flipping the script' introduces a strategic shift: flip IT budget 70/30 -> 30/70 toward innovation.", "position": 2, "objective": "Reveal the Leapfrogger pivot as a third path", "structure": "The Original Hypothesis -> The New Discovery -> The Strategic Shift", "confidence": 80, "description": "Validate a change in direction by showing it is a reaction to new intelligence, not failure" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-16c5406910c2", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Leapfroggers concept introduced; flip IT budget; three practices preview.", "position": 3, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 18, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-27a827576de1", "arcName": "The Transformation Tale", "arcSlug": "transformation-tale", "beatName": "Future Vision (Gain)", "beatSlug": "transformation-tale-future-vision-gain", "evidence": "Leapfroggers grow 4x; flipped IT budget vision.", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51", "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435", "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.401, "pageNumber": 33, "slideType": "org_design", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide uses a 'before-after' framing for each function, showing the transition from current state to future state.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Each function shows a transition from a negative current state to a positive future state.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/33", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-33", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 30, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-fe15005e58d7", "evidence": "Guiding principles -> 'strategic shift to a new enterprise operating model' on p32-33.", "position": 6, "objective": "Articulate the strategic shift from current to new operating model", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 39, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-e924a2c3eaaf", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Exec summary recommendations + key changes by function + initiatives lists.", "position": 3, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51", "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435", "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.401, "pageNumber": 35, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a before-after framing to contrast operational inefficiencies with proposed improvements.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly contrasts 'Current state' with 'Recommended future state' across multiple functional areas.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/35", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-35", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 39, "from": 34, "name": "Quick Win Big Bet", "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet", "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-003c42db05bf", "evidence": "Comparison tables of changes per function + two pages of specific initiatives.", "position": 7, "objective": "Translate strategy into specific recommended changes and initiatives by function", "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap", "confidence": 75, "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 39, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-e924a2c3eaaf", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Exec summary recommendations + key changes by function + initiatives lists.", "position": 3, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51", "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435", "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.401, "pageNumber": 37, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly contrasts 'Current state' with 'Recommended future state' for two organizational functions.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/37", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-37", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 39, "from": 34, "name": "Quick Win Big Bet", "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet", "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-003c42db05bf", "evidence": "Comparison tables of changes per function + two pages of specific initiatives.", "position": 7, "objective": "Translate strategy into specific recommended changes and initiatives by function", "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap", "confidence": 75, "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 39, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-e924a2c3eaaf", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Exec summary recommendations + key changes by function + initiatives lists.", "position": 3, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-7e1c9fe1bc87", "docSlug": "7a27e27b944e835f", "documentTitle": "Seeing the BIG Picture", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 26, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "Uses a 'Myth vs Reality' framing to challenge industry assumptions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Contrasts 'Industry Myth' with 'Consumer Reality'.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-7e1c9fe1bc87/26", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-7e1c9fe1bc87", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-7e1c9fe1bc87#slide-26", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 26, "name": "Aha Moment", "slug": "03-aha-moment", "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-41c0917c9d9e", "evidence": "'Off-network discovery hugely underestimated - 50-60% on digital' (p.28) + dance-show case (p.33)", "position": 4, "objective": "Reveal that digital discovery is hugely underestimated", "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight", "confidence": 82, "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 23, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-1f22948572f0", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Lights/Camera: discovery + engagement insights driving the approach", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 43, "from": 23, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-2df5adecf56a", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Camera: discovery and engagement implications", "position": 2, "confidence": 80, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-7e1c9fe1bc87", "docSlug": "7a27e27b944e835f", "documentTitle": "Seeing the BIG Picture", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 28, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "Uses a 'Myth vs Reality' framing to challenge industry assumptions about content discovery channels.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Contrasts 'Industry Myth' with 'Consumer Reality' to drive a strategic recommendation.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-7e1c9fe1bc87/28", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-7e1c9fe1bc87", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-7e1c9fe1bc87#slide-28", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 26, "name": "Aha Moment", "slug": "03-aha-moment", "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-41c0917c9d9e", "evidence": "'Off-network discovery hugely underestimated - 50-60% on digital' (p.28) + dance-show case (p.33)", "position": 4, "objective": "Reveal that digital discovery is hugely underestimated", "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight", "confidence": 82, "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 23, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-1f22948572f0", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Lights/Camera: discovery + engagement insights driving the approach", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 43, "from": 23, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-2df5adecf56a", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Camera: discovery and engagement implications", "position": 2, "confidence": 80, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-7e1c9fe1bc87", "docSlug": "7a27e27b944e835f", "documentTitle": "Seeing the BIG Picture", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 34, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "Uses a 'Myth vs Reality' framing to challenge industry assumptions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Contrasts 'Industry Myth' with 'Consumer Reality' to shift perspective.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-7e1c9fe1bc87/34", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-7e1c9fe1bc87", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-7e1c9fe1bc87#slide-34", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 34, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-45c527f858f0", "evidence": "Higher digital engagement -> higher watch times -> churn reduction (pp.34-37)", "position": 5, "objective": "Zoom into digital engagement and its causal link to watch time / churn", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 76, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 23, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-1f22948572f0", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Lights/Camera: discovery + engagement insights driving the approach", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 43, "from": 23, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-2df5adecf56a", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Camera: discovery and engagement implications", "position": 2, "confidence": 80, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-7e1c9fe1bc87", "docSlug": "7a27e27b944e835f", "documentTitle": "Seeing the BIG Picture", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 36, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "Uses a 'myth vs reality' framing to challenge industry assumptions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Contrasts 'Industry Myth'/'Prevailing view' with 'Consumer Reality'.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-7e1c9fe1bc87/36", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-7e1c9fe1bc87", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-7e1c9fe1bc87#slide-36", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 34, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-45c527f858f0", "evidence": "Higher digital engagement -> higher watch times -> churn reduction (pp.34-37)", "position": 5, "objective": "Zoom into digital engagement and its causal link to watch time / churn", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 76, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 23, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-1f22948572f0", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Lights/Camera: discovery + engagement insights driving the approach", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 43, "from": 23, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-2df5adecf56a", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Camera: discovery and engagement implications", "position": 2, "confidence": 80, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-7e1c9fe1bc87", "docSlug": "7a27e27b944e835f", "documentTitle": "Seeing the BIG Picture", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 40, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide uses a 'before/after' or 'iterative process' framing to show how digital feedback loops improve outcomes.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide contrasts a 'prevailing view' (problem) with a 'case study' (solution/result).", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-7e1c9fe1bc87/40", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-7e1c9fe1bc87", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-7e1c9fe1bc87#slide-40", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 38, "name": "Expert Witness", "slug": "23-expert-witness", "bestFor": "Technical validation, regulatory compliance, skeptical executives", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-482539a45ba2", "evidence": "Three case studies: WoM piggyback, Season 2 launch '4th most popular on IMDb', social-listening tone change", "position": 6, "objective": "Validate engagement thesis with branded case studies", "structure": "The Authority's Credentials -> Their Finding/Opinion -> Applied to Our Case", "confidence": 86, "description": "Borrow credibility from a recognized authority to validate your position" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 43, "from": 38, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-22355ccfe1dc", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Three case studies (pp.38-40) + key insights summary (pp.42-43)", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 43, "from": 23, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-2df5adecf56a", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Camera: discovery and engagement implications", "position": 2, "confidence": 80, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-85dd78267d79", "docSlug": "2deda760ae33148f", "documentTitle": "The CEO’s Roadmap on Generative AI", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 19, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "Uses a brain illustration to symbolize the shift from creative/manual tasks to strategic/AI-supervised tasks.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly contrasts 'FROM: Key roles today' with 'TO: New roles tomorrow'.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-85dd78267d79/19", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-85dd78267d79", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-85dd78267d79#slide-19", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 17, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30e-116b2b01726d", "evidence": "Traditional AI augments managers vs GenAI augments ICs; role redefinition; identity concerns.", "position": 4, "objective": "Contrast traditional AI world vs GenAI-augmented workforce", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 24, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e1-806906270882", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Pillars 1 (golden use cases, model choice) and 2 (workforce, org) worked through", "position": 3, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 28, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e1-93235f2deb66", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Use case selection, workforce reshape, risk surface", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-8b79926ba3f5", "docSlug": "2ccd72c2e2b9465a", "documentTitle": "The productivity push Powering the UK’s performance with five digital capabilities", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 28, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide uses a 'before-after' framing to contrast reactive vs. proactive asset management.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Contrasts reactive asset management with proactive digital asset management.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-8b79926ba3f5/28", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-8b79926ba3f5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-8b79926ba3f5#slide-28", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 30, "from": 28, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3a-f80b79c41e99", "evidence": "p28 25% maintenance gain -> p29 industry view -> p30 Coriance case", "position": 9, "objective": "Zoom into Physical asset optimisation capability", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 82, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 30, "from": 16, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e33-4b837b24a0a8", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Each capability proven via industry view + customer case study", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-9dc0071ebbb9", "docSlug": "fb0cf17321bc347e", "documentTitle": "Transforming the Industry that transformed the World: 01 Shift to as-a-serice", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "thesis_headline", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses a 'Where are we today?' vs 'What should we do tomorrow?' structure to frame the strategic shift.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Where are we today? vs What should we do tomorrow?", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-9dc0071ebbb9/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-9dc0071ebbb9", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-9dc0071ebbb9#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 5, "name": "Precedent", "slug": "09-precedent", "bestFor": "Risk mitigation, strategy validation, building confidence in new approaches", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3b-6e4d98b9341d", "evidence": "Apple trailblazer (p.6) → subscription value (p.7) → leader survey (p.8) → 5 actions (p.9)", "position": 2, "objective": "Use Apple as precedent to justify shift to as-a-service and prescribe 5 actions", "structure": "The Precedent Case -> What Happened -> The Parallel -> Applied Learning", "confidence": 85, "description": "Use historical or external examples to validate your approach" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 29, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e33-d9e43591cdf5", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Five sections each with divider, trailblazer, recommendation, framework", "position": 3, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-9dc0071ebbb9", "docSlug": "fb0cf17321bc347e", "documentTitle": "Transforming the Industry that transformed the World: 01 Shift to as-a-serice", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 22, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a 'Where are we today' vs 'What should we do tomorrow' structure to frame the problem and solution.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide contrasts 'Where are we today' with 'What should we do tomorrow'", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-9dc0071ebbb9/22", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-9dc0071ebbb9", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-9dc0071ebbb9#slide-22", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 24, "from": 20, "name": "Precedent", "slug": "09-precedent", "bestFor": "Risk mitigation, strategy validation, building confidence in new approaches", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3b-79a7e857e421", "evidence": "Lenovo trailblazer (p.21) → '60% leaving billions' (p.22) → AI/Cloud data (p.23) → 5-prong (p.24)", "position": 5, "objective": "Use Lenovo as precedent to justify enterprise modernization via 5-prong approach", "structure": "The Precedent Case -> What Happened -> The Parallel -> Applied Learning", "confidence": 82, "description": "Use historical or external examples to validate your approach" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 29, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e33-d9e43591cdf5", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Five sections each with divider, trailblazer, recommendation, framework", "position": 3, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }