{ "kind": "framework", "value": "before-after-bridge", "collectionKey": "slides:framework:before-after-bridge:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 1016, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 43, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e91d3b8478cc", "docSlug": "9fbedbfea0231cbe", "documentTitle": "AI Healthcare Errors", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "Uses a Situation-Approach-Impact structure.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Situation-Approach-Impact structure", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e91d3b8478cc/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e91d3b8478cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e91d3b8478cc#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 4, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "1b36e03c-871f-4ba9-977e-2461066df8bf", "evidence": "The deck presents various case studies and examples of AI applications in healthcare, using the golden circle framework.", "position": 1, "objective": "Explain why AI is different and how it can be applied in healthcare", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 5, "beatId": "d51be049-4dec-43b6-a2f4-36ba79ee1b19", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "The deck presents various case studies and examples of errors and their consequences, making the problem worse.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e91d3b8478cc", "docSlug": "9fbedbfea0231cbe", "documentTitle": "AI Healthcare Errors", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "Uses a classic Situation-Approach-Impact structure.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly uses a 'Before' and 'After' comparison to demonstrate impact.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e91d3b8478cc/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e91d3b8478cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e91d3b8478cc#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 4, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "1b36e03c-871f-4ba9-977e-2461066df8bf", "evidence": "The deck presents various case studies and examples of AI applications in healthcare, using the golden circle framework.", "position": 1, "objective": "Explain why AI is different and how it can be applied in healthcare", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 5, "beatId": "d51be049-4dec-43b6-a2f4-36ba79ee1b19", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "The deck presents various case studies and examples of errors and their consequences, making the problem worse.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-ab160e9e9503", "docSlug": "3cefabf32281316c", "documentTitle": "Better Processes for Data Analytics Insights", "authorId": "ZS", "authorName": "ZS", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide follows a standard Challenge-Approach-Impact structure.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide structure (Challenge -> Approach -> Impact) maps the client's journey from a fragmented state to a unified solution.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-ab160e9e9503/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-ab160e9e9503", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-ab160e9e9503#slide-4", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 4, "name": "Logic Chain", "slug": "01-logic-chain", "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis", "matchId": "611b0036-860e-4380-b024-435415cac7e7", "evidence": "Multiple case studies build a logical argument", "position": 0, "objective": "How can we improve data analytics insights?", "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 4, "beatId": "048d6ef5-61fa-469a-8c88-28d24b57bf30", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Case studies highlight the need for better processes", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-ab160e9e9503", "docSlug": "3cefabf32281316c", "documentTitle": "Better Processes for Data Analytics Insights", "authorId": "ZS", "authorName": "ZS", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "Uses a standard Challenge-Approach-Impact structure for case studies.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Structure of Challenge (Before) -> Approach (Bridge) -> Impact (After)", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-ab160e9e9503/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-ab160e9e9503", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-ab160e9e9503#slide-5", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 4, "name": "Logic Chain", "slug": "01-logic-chain", "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis", "matchId": "611b0036-860e-4380-b024-435415cac7e7", "evidence": "Multiple case studies build a logical argument", "position": 0, "objective": "How can we improve data analytics insights?", "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 4, "beatId": "048d6ef5-61fa-469a-8c88-28d24b57bf30", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Case studies highlight the need for better processes", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-ab160e9e9503", "docSlug": "3cefabf32281316c", "documentTitle": "Better Processes for Data Analytics Insights", "authorId": "ZS", "authorName": "ZS", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "Uses a standard Challenge-Approach-Impact structure.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Challenge-Approach-Impact structure", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-ab160e9e9503/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-ab160e9e9503", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-ab160e9e9503#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 4, "name": "Logic Chain", "slug": "01-logic-chain", "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis", "matchId": "611b0036-860e-4380-b024-435415cac7e7", "evidence": "Multiple case studies build a logical argument", "position": 0, "objective": "How can we improve data analytics insights?", "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 6, "beatId": "00416000-2861-4621-8d4e-287550edd1ca", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Multiple case studies showcase ZS's solutions", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-ab160e9e9503", "docSlug": "3cefabf32281316c", "documentTitle": "Better Processes for Data Analytics Insights", "authorId": "ZS", "authorName": "ZS", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "Uses a standard Challenge-Approach-Impact structure.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Challenge-Approach-Impact structure", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-ab160e9e9503/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-ab160e9e9503", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-ab160e9e9503#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 4, "name": "Logic Chain", "slug": "01-logic-chain", "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis", "matchId": "611b0036-860e-4380-b024-435415cac7e7", "evidence": "Multiple case studies build a logical argument", "position": 0, "objective": "How can we improve data analytics insights?", "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 6, "beatId": "00416000-2861-4621-8d4e-287550edd1ca", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Multiple case studies showcase ZS's solutions", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "Uses a classic Situation-Problem-Solution framework.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Structure of Situation, Problem, Solution", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 9, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-45efc998ae59", "evidence": "Problem statement -> segmentation -> diagnosis -> IPT recommendation -> 45 mio. kr. potentiale -> implementation plan.", "position": 1, "objective": "Frame procurement-coordination problem and recommend Integrated Project Teams", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 85, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-200ed114be36", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "First proposal's problem statement: 'manglende koordination mellem FMI og brugere'.", "position": 2, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 165, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-30a6df91c9fe", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Baselines, segmentations, current-state diagnoses dominate first half.", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 67, "slideType": "client_example", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "Uses a before-after-bridge framework to illustrate process improvement.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Comparison of As-Is and To-Be processes with a bridge/arrow transition.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/67", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-67", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 68, "from": 65, "name": "Precedent", "slug": "09-precedent", "bestFor": "Risk mitigation, strategy validation, building confidence in new approaches", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-a34dd296b278", "evidence": "Case setup -> root-cause questions -> quarterly alignment improvement -> pilot process.", "position": 9, "objective": "Utility Co planning-execution precedent", "structure": "The Precedent Case -> What Happened -> The Parallel -> Applied Learning", "confidence": 75, "description": "Use historical or external examples to validate your approach" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 68, "from": 56, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-27da03e23b04", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Best-practice assessment, issue tables, Utility Co + Gas Ops cases (25-30% savings).", "position": 4, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-c690302f7468", "docSlug": "c4533434f2e6e171", "documentTitle": "Digital Transformation NJ", "authorId": "Deloitte", "authorName": "Deloitte", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "Uses a standard case study structure: Issue, Solution, Approach, Impact.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Structure of Issue vs Solution/Impact", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-c690302f7468/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-c690302f7468", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-c690302f7468#slide-16", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 15, "beatId": "da6cf39d-860e-44cd-88c0-eca24402fbf8", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Presents various case studies and implementation plans", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-c690302f7468", "docSlug": "c4533434f2e6e171", "documentTitle": "Digital Transformation NJ", "authorId": "Deloitte", "authorName": "Deloitte", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 17, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "Uses a standard case study structure: Issue, Role/Approach, Solution, Impact.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Structure of Issue -> Solution -> Impact", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-c690302f7468/17", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-c690302f7468", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-c690302f7468#slide-17", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 15, "beatId": "da6cf39d-860e-44cd-88c0-eca24402fbf8", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Presents various case studies and implementation plans", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-c690302f7468", "docSlug": "c4533434f2e6e171", "documentTitle": "Digital Transformation NJ", "authorId": "Deloitte", "authorName": "Deloitte", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 19, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "Uses a standard Issue-Solution-Impact structure.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Structure of Issue (Before) vs Solution/Impact (After)", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-c690302f7468/19", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-c690302f7468", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-c690302f7468#slide-19", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 15, "beatId": "da6cf39d-860e-44cd-88c0-eca24402fbf8", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Presents various case studies and implementation plans", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-105a91a12da8", "docSlug": "0bb95384eb853696", "documentTitle": "Global Banking Consumer Study Reignite human connections to discover hidden value", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 29, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "Uses a before-after framing to contrast siloed/emotionally-devoid banking with holistic/purpose-driven banking.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly structures the content as a transition from 'Products + Channels' to '(Products x Channels) Purpose'.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-105a91a12da8/29", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-105a91a12da8", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-105a91a12da8#slide-29", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 29, "name": "Maturity Curve", "slug": "36-maturity-curve", "bestFor": "Digital transformation, capability building, benchmarking", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b774-bc797bce62ff", "evidence": "Figure 6 plots Interest→Satisfaction→Trust→Advocacy bullseye as the maturity progression unlocked by the multiplier effect.", "position": 6, "objective": "Show maturity ladder from satisfaction to advocacy", "structure": "Current Maturity Level -> The Gap to Next Level -> Required Capabilities -> The Roadmap", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show where you are on a progression and what it takes to reach the next level" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 15, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-6e405b239df7", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Chapter 2: three pivots + four strategic plays + multiplier", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 31, "from": 15, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-7e17626f78e8", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Chapter 2 derives pivots and strategic plays", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-8d31fa857bad", "docSlug": "01d275675630cbbe", "documentTitle": "How nine digital frontrunners can lead on AI in Europe", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 45, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "Uses a 'Problem-Solution-Impact' narrative structure.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly structures the content as 'The problem', '... the solution', and '... the impact'.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-8d31fa857bad/45", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-8d31fa857bad", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-8d31fa857bad#slide-45", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2", "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 209, "slideType": "recommendation", "function": "recommend", "notes": "The slide uses a 'before-after' or 'problem-solution' framing to link survey data to actionable initiatives.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Maps identified pain points (survey data) to specific strategic actions (bridge).", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/209", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-209", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 267, "from": 161, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-5934a57a4387", "evidence": "Repeated triplet pattern: e.g., p.166/167/168, p.178/179/180, p.188/189", "position": 18, "objective": "For each initiative, build up Overview → Estimated Impact → Resource Requirements", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 82, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-839df80d8003", "docSlug": "ee398100b87a5d80", "documentTitle": "Pharmacy Management Case Study", "authorId": "OliverWyman", "authorName": "Oliver Wyman", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.714, "pageNumber": 2, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "Standard Oliver Wyman case study format.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Structure of Client Situation vs Key Impacts", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-839df80d8003/2", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-839df80d8003", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-839df80d8003#slide-2", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 2, "name": "Logic Chain", "slug": "01-logic-chain", "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis", "matchId": "e93c630a-d995-40cb-8123-0e3a10150eca", "evidence": "The deck presents a logical chain of arguments, from situation to solution and impact.", "position": 0, "objective": "How can pharmacy management be optimized?", "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 2, "from": 1, "beatId": "bb378566-06c0-425f-939d-88d3cb6898c8", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "The deck starts with a section divider and a case study introduction.", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-839df80d8003", "docSlug": "ee398100b87a5d80", "documentTitle": "Pharmacy Management Case Study", "authorId": "OliverWyman", "authorName": "Oliver Wyman", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.714, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "Uses a standard Situation-Approach-Impact structure.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Situation-Approach-Impact structure", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-839df80d8003/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-839df80d8003", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-839df80d8003#slide-5", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 2, "name": "Logic Chain", "slug": "01-logic-chain", "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis", "matchId": "e93c630a-d995-40cb-8123-0e3a10150eca", "evidence": "The deck presents a logical chain of arguments, from situation to solution and impact.", "position": 0, "objective": "How can pharmacy management be optimized?", "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 4, "beatId": "bd4df1d6-3a59-48fe-8e55-04ce47bea7b3", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The deck provides quantified ROI and contract analysis.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-839df80d8003", "docSlug": "ee398100b87a5d80", "documentTitle": "Pharmacy Management Case Study", "authorId": "OliverWyman", "authorName": "Oliver Wyman", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.714, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "Standard case study structure: Situation, Approach, Impact.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Structure of Client Situation -> Approach -> Impact", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-839df80d8003/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-839df80d8003", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-839df80d8003#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 2, "name": "Logic Chain", "slug": "01-logic-chain", "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis", "matchId": "e93c630a-d995-40cb-8123-0e3a10150eca", "evidence": "The deck presents a logical chain of arguments, from situation to solution and impact.", "position": 0, "objective": "How can pharmacy management be optimized?", "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 6, "beatId": "34291d9d-dfed-4dfe-b394-41a308f599e0", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "The deck outlines a value-based contracting strategy and operating model optimization.", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-b7269ec1370c", "docSlug": "594ae7de7557cd40", "documentTitle": "Private Sector Partnership Learnings", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "Uses a classic 'Before-After-Bridge' or 'Situation-Action-Outcome' narrative structure.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide structure follows a clear progression from a problem state (Background) to an intervention (Action) to a positive result (Outcome).", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-b7269ec1370c/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-b7269ec1370c", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-b7269ec1370c#slide-8", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 3, "beatId": "1767c5a7-83d9-4ac5-8240-3615f4eae8fc", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents multiple case studies and examples to support its claims.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51", "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435", "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.401, "pageNumber": 36, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a before-after framing to contrast current operational models with proposed strategic shifts.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly contrasts 'Current state' with 'Recommended future state' for organizational functions.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/36", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-36", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 39, "from": 34, "name": "Quick Win Big Bet", "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet", "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-003c42db05bf", "evidence": "Comparison tables of changes per function + two pages of specific initiatives.", "position": 7, "objective": "Translate strategy into specific recommended changes and initiatives by function", "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap", "confidence": 75, "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 39, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-e924a2c3eaaf", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Exec summary recommendations + key changes by function + initiatives lists.", "position": 3, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-61065ab9340f", "docSlug": "2c961bef6a29da9b", "documentTitle": "Resiliency in the making", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "Uses the 'Before-After-Bridge' narrative structure.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide structure follows a clear challenge (before), solution (bridge), and outcome (after) narrative.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-61065ab9340f/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-61065ab9340f", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-61065ab9340f#slide-16", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 13, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d39-2cb3450a315e", "evidence": "p13 'three important actions', p14 Action 01 chart, p15 actions overview, p16 case 25 ppt", "position": 4, "objective": "Convert maturity data into three actions and prove Action 1", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 78, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 23, "from": 16, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820f-20b17ae5da2c", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Case studies (25 ppt, 12mo→8wks, 50k oil/gas) plus survey data", "position": 4, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 22, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820f-2cd91a9566ea", "arcName": "The Transformation Tale", "arcSlug": "transformation-tale", "beatName": "Future Vision (Gain)", "beatSlug": "transformation-tale-future-vision-gain", "evidence": "Localized reconfigurable chains; reinvented roles; multi-skilled workforce", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 27, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820f-316292e2be57", "arcName": "The Transformation Tale", "arcSlug": "transformation-tale", "beatName": "The Bridge", "beatSlug": "transformation-tale-the-bridge", "evidence": "Three actions and investment mix bridge today to future state", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-61065ab9340f", "docSlug": "2c961bef6a29da9b", "documentTitle": "Resiliency in the making", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 19, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "Uses a standard Challenge-Solution-Outcome structure.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Structure of Challenge-Solution-Outcome", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-61065ab9340f/19", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-61065ab9340f", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-61065ab9340f#slide-19", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 17, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d39-33dbd8b52f15", "evidence": "p17 shift left, p18 17%→63% delta, p19 12 months → 7-8 weeks case", "position": 5, "objective": "Action 2 shift-left: from late-stage rework to embedded resilience", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 23, "from": 16, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820f-20b17ae5da2c", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Case studies (25 ppt, 12mo→8wks, 50k oil/gas) plus survey data", "position": 4, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 22, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820f-2cd91a9566ea", "arcName": "The Transformation Tale", "arcSlug": "transformation-tale", "beatName": "Future Vision (Gain)", "beatSlug": "transformation-tale-future-vision-gain", "evidence": "Localized reconfigurable chains; reinvented roles; multi-skilled workforce", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 27, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820f-316292e2be57", "arcName": "The Transformation Tale", "arcSlug": "transformation-tale", "beatName": "The Bridge", "beatSlug": "transformation-tale-the-bridge", "evidence": "Three actions and investment mix bridge today to future state", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-70d9a4bdce73", "docSlug": "edba7c80493cae2a", "documentTitle": "Scaling 4IR Technologies (with McKinsey)", "authorId": "WEF", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "academic_think_tank", "sourceTypeLabel": "Academic / think tank", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide presents two distinct use cases in a structured format (Goal, Problem, Technology, Results).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The structure of Problem (Before) -> Technology Applied -> Results (After) is a classic B-A-B framework.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-70d9a4bdce73/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-70d9a4bdce73", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-70d9a4bdce73#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 5, "name": "Logic Chain", "slug": "01-logic-chain", "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis", "matchId": "f5fd28fc-42c7-4988-80fb-9574f9434f1b", "evidence": "The deck presents use cases and a value delivery engine", "position": 0, "objective": "How to deliver impact on four production value drivers?", "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 9, "beatId": "8d95a604-19e2-41ad-a0d3-fe2ddd4c8119", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "The deck provides recommendations for business leaders and country leaders", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-5e4c526f13b1", "docSlug": "66e65a6ff08bf1e4", "documentTitle": "The overall positive sentiment was also reflected in the supplier valuation levels that still trade above their long-term average", "authorId": "RolandBerger", "authorName": "Roland Berger", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 50, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide uses a 'Before-After' framing to illustrate a shift in industry value chain dynamics.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly contrasts a 'Before' state with a 'Potential' future state to illustrate a shift in industry roles.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-5e4c526f13b1/50", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-5e4c526f13b1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-5e4c526f13b1#slide-50", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 79, "from": 41, "beatId": "87a3cb93-a131-4726-8499-2832a0c03d91", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document presents strategic options and conclusions for suppliers to navigate the changing industry landscape", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-99776df762ae", "docSlug": "16813e406087702c", "documentTitle": "True-Luxury Global Consumer Insights 7th Edition", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 27, "slideType": "customer_journey", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "Uses a timeline-based comparison framework to contrast past and future states.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Explicit PAST | FUTURE columns x Physical/Digital rows with checkmarks shifting.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-99776df762ae/27", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-99776df762ae", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-99776df762ae#slide-27", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 29, "from": 25, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-23f88463aa39", "evidence": "p27 explicit PAST vs FUTURE columns with checkmarks; p25 defines old, p29 prescribes new model.", "position": 5, "objective": "Show clienteling shifting from physical-only past to digital-equivalent future", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 88, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 29, "from": 11, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e2-dd244fc51d76", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Section 2 'TRUE-LUXURY CONSUMER INSIGHTS' interprets 8 trends with 3 deep dives.", "position": 2, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" }, { "to": 29, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e2-f291c6d1bc98", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Clienteling 2.0 deep dive with case study (p28) and framework (p29).", "position": 4, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }