{
  "kind": "framework",
  "value": "bcg-agent-assessment-framework",
  "collectionKey": "slides:framework:bcg-agent-assessment-framework:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 1,
  "page": 1,
  "pageSize": 24,
  "pageCount": 1,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-47815abb602b",
      "docSlug": "485b1e996a637b43",
      "documentTitle": "2025 AI Agents and the Model Context Protocol",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 16,
      "slideType": "other",
      "function": "present_framework",
      "notes": "The slide presents a proprietary BCG framework for AI agent evaluation.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Explicitly titled as BCG's Agent Assessment Framework with 6 dimensions.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-47815abb602b/16",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-47815abb602b",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-47815abb602b#slide-16",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 17,
          "from": 16,
          "name": "Capability Gap",
          "slug": "48-capability-gap",
          "bestFor": "M&A strategy, digital transformation, organizational design",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7df-fbe911d5d520",
          "evidence": "p16 defines 6 dimensions; p17 plots Low/Med/High maturity per dimension with limitations and what-needs-to-happen",
          "position": 4,
          "objective": "Diagnose where agents fall short across 6 capabilities",
          "structure": "Required Capabilities -> Current State -> The Gap -> Build vs Buy vs Partner Decision",
          "confidence": 78,
          "description": "Compare required capabilities vs. current capabilities to define the build/buy/partner decision"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 17,
          "from": 10,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e39-efdc0c3bfe92",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "PMF reached only narrowly; 6-dim assessment exposes capability gaps",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        },
        {
          "to": 17,
          "from": 13,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e3a-022aa9a7736c",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
          "evidence": "Section 03 reliability benchmarks and BCG capability framework",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
          "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}