{
  "kind": "framework",
  "value": "bain-resilience-index",
  "collectionKey": "slides:framework:bain-resilience-index:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 3,
  "page": 1,
  "pageSize": 24,
  "pageCount": 1,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-067236bfcf89",
      "docSlug": "6baa9ff6de20f260",
      "documentTitle": "Introduction to Bain and Report on Resilience",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "Bain",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 16,
      "slideType": "peer_benchmark",
      "function": "compare_peers",
      "notes": "The slide addresses the myth that resilience can be achieved without trade-offs by showing industry-specific benchmarks.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 2,
      "evidence": "Explicitly named in title and chart · Title names it; chart labelled 'Bain Resilience Index industry benchmarks'",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-067236bfcf89/16",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-067236bfcf89",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-067236bfcf89#slide-16",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 17,
          "from": 16,
          "name": "Benchmark Gap",
          "slug": "39-benchmark-gap",
          "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b312-ba4dbccfca37",
          "evidence": "p16 industry benchmark bars w/ Nordic overlay lines; p17 zooms to within-Nordic variance.",
          "position": 3,
          "objective": "Position Nordic firms against advanced-economy benchmark via the Bain Resilience Index",
          "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 17,
          "from": 16,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-07a5-761b-9143-f6ee044e735a",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "Bain Resilience Index introduced and applied to Nordic peers.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 90,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-067236bfcf89",
      "docSlug": "6baa9ff6de20f260",
      "documentTitle": "Introduction to Bain and Report on Resilience",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "Bain",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 17,
      "slideType": "peer_benchmark",
      "function": "compare_peers",
      "notes": "The chart uses a floating bar/range plot style to visualize the spread of resilience scores within each industry.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Same Index applied to Nordic distribution",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-067236bfcf89/17",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-067236bfcf89",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-067236bfcf89#slide-17",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 17,
          "from": 16,
          "name": "Benchmark Gap",
          "slug": "39-benchmark-gap",
          "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b312-ba4dbccfca37",
          "evidence": "p16 industry benchmark bars w/ Nordic overlay lines; p17 zooms to within-Nordic variance.",
          "position": 3,
          "objective": "Position Nordic firms against advanced-economy benchmark via the Bain Resilience Index",
          "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 17,
          "from": 16,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-07a5-761b-9143-f6ee044e735a",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "Bain Resilience Index introduced and applied to Nordic peers.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 90,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-067236bfcf89",
      "docSlug": "6baa9ff6de20f260",
      "documentTitle": "Introduction to Bain and Report on Resilience",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "Bain",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 18,
      "slideType": "comparison_table",
      "function": "compare_peers",
      "notes": "The chart illustrates the volatility of low-resilience firms compared to the more stable performance of high-resilience firms.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Legend splits cohorts by 'High Resilience (Index >70)' vs 'Low (<70)'",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-067236bfcf89/18",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-067236bfcf89",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-067236bfcf89#slide-18",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 19,
          "from": 18,
          "name": "Paradox Resolver",
          "slug": "20-paradox-resolver",
          "bestFor": "Strategic pivots, innovation pitches, challenging conventional wisdom",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b312-bc9f63455143",
          "evidence": "p18 'higher risk marginally outperform (so long as they stay afloat)' -> p19 'nearly double survival rate'.",
          "position": 4,
          "objective": "Resolve the paradox that high-risk firms outperform yet resilient firms survive twice as often",
          "structure": "The Apparent Contradiction -> Why Both Seem True -> The Deeper Truth That Reconciles",
          "confidence": 78,
          "description": "Introduce a seeming contradiction that captures attention, then resolve it with a deeper truth"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 20,
          "from": 18,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-07a5-761b-9143-f8e077cd9522",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "TSR cycle data, ~2x survival, 2020 ops-strategy rebalancing validation.",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 90,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}