{ "kind": "framework", "value": "antithesis", "collectionKey": "slides:framework:antithesis:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 36, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 2, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-80806e6b958f", "docSlug": "b1ac5794d68b3e09", "documentTitle": "2021 Benedict Evans 2021 Three Steps to the Future", "authorId": "BenedictEvans", "authorName": "Benedict Evans", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "independent_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Independent analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 19, "slideType": "thesis_headline", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a rhetorical device (antithesis/paradox) to challenge the binary view of open vs. closed systems.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses the structure 'X is Y, and yet it is not Y' to frame the problem.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-80806e6b958f/19", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-80806e6b958f", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-80806e6b958f#slide-19", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 7, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-08f8-7619-ac2e-302a6445ecce", "evidence": "Voltaire quote → market cap → store-of-value → NFT adoption → traction → 'Early, exciting, unclear' synthesis on p18", "position": 1, "objective": "Frame Web3 as real-but-ambiguous via converging data points", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 75, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 34, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a7-7579-bd64-cef58de09441", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Surface Observation", "beatSlug": "onion-surface-observation", "evidence": "Future-section opens with Web3 + metaverse hype (the surface story everyone debates)", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 34, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a7-7579-bd64-e1cdf8825bc7", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Future section catalogs Web3 + metaverse claims and data", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-c3e7825e1948", "docSlug": "8b6a62f49fba", "documentTitle": "Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD)", "authorId": "54_Spruce_Point_Capital", "authorName": "Ben Axler", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller", "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller", "presentationDate": "2019-09-05 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.3333334, "pageNumber": 84, "slideType": "expose_contradiction", "function": "expose_contradiction", "notes": "Uses a 'Bull vs. Bear' comparison framework to systematically dismantle an analyst's thesis.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Systematic rebuttal of seven points from a bullish analyst report.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-c3e7825e1948/84", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-c3e7825e1948", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-c3e7825e1948#slide-84", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 92, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "d8d41695-ad33-43d2-9478-d227476d9e68", "evidence": "The overall thesis implies that failing to act on Spruce Point's analysis could lead to significant financial losses for investors holding onto CHD stock.", "position": 2, "objective": "The cost of not selling CHD", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 92, "from": 82, "beatId": "2e0f1062-a9eb-4652-b31c-c17952a18aaf", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Solution", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief", "evidence": "The solution is implicitly presented through valuation tables and comparisons, suggesting a sell opinion to mitigate downside risk.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-7af979993e60", "docSlug": "42a707289390", "documentTitle": "Maxar Technologies (MAXR)", "authorId": "54_Spruce_Point_Capital", "authorName": "Ben Axler", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller", "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller", "presentationDate": "2018-08-07 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.3333334, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "expose_contradiction", "notes": "Uses a 'Lemon + Lime = Lemon Aid' metaphor to mock the merger of DigitalGlobe and MDA into Maxar.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Contrasting 'Promotional Upside' vs 'Sober Reality' columns.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-7af979993e60/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-7af979993e60", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-7af979993e60#slide-6", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b9b-7e7228555e88", "docSlug": "36c903ba19aa", "documentTitle": "Allergan, Inc. (AGN)", "authorId": "01_Pershing_Square", "authorName": "William Ackman", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2014-04-22 00:00:00", "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.70665085, "pageNumber": 89, "slideType": "expose_contradiction", "function": "expose_contradiction", "notes": "Uses a binary choice structure to frame the valuation argument.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Presents two opposing explanations for value creation to force a conclusion.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9b-7e7228555e88/89", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9b-7e7228555e88", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9b-7e7228555e88#slide-89", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5eff-723e-9be9-4ed0c2b23998", "docSlug": "6dQELeWztAwAhRojgGTA", "documentTitle": "Ark Kapital offers startups an alternative to VC funding. Check out the 21-slide pitch deck it used to raise $183 million in debt and equity.", "authorId": "Pitchdecks", "authorName": "ArK", "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck", "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.777, "pageNumber": 1, "slideType": "mission", "function": "inspire_vision", "notes": "The slide uses a symmetrical, mirrored logic structure (antithesis/parallel structure).", "imagePath": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/DYqrK4I0Axcn4C1bqUCfZybNmERnyoGi2grWiOMUv4o/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy82ZFFFTGVXenRBd0FoUm9qZ0dUQS9wMDAxLmpwZw", "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The text uses a mirrored structure: 'entrepreneurs make world better' vs 'ArK makes world better for entrepreneurs'.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5eff-723e-9be9-4ed0c2b23998/1", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5eff-723e-9be9-4ed0c2b23998", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5eff-723e-9be9-4ed0c2b23998#slide-1", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/IQ8MkwDo8mWVXmXIYKrTHs00iwjQYZrjIdAqb6RuN_I/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy82ZFFFTGVXenRBd0FoUm9qZ0dUQS9wMDAxLnBuZw", "thumbSrc": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/G3HDi13mxhJeP2i41vbS0HuQJxIZnUcR2J6sVvOnJo0/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy82ZFFFTGVXenRBd0FoUm9qZ0dUQS9wMDAxLmpwZw", "thumbSrcAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/CVdpoO7kjpKM82gynn8lBayk5rAhiEwBldIKOtxVOHw/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy82ZFFFTGVXenRBd0FoUm9qZ0dUQS9wMDAxLnBuZw" }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-96363f3635d5", "docSlug": "96abbaf09d0b", "documentTitle": "E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (DuPont) (DD)", "authorId": "06_Trian_Partners", "authorName": "Nelson Peltz", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2015-04-21 00:00:00", "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.77272725, "pageNumber": 33, "slideType": "expose_contradiction", "function": "expose_contradiction", "notes": "Uses a classic 'Rhetoric vs. Reality' table structure to undermine management credibility.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a direct contrast between rhetoric and reality to persuade the audience.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-96363f3635d5/33", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-96363f3635d5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-96363f3635d5#slide-33", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 21, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "3b4504be-7163-472d-958e-55a976db9700", "evidence": "The deck emphasizes the negative consequences of DuPont's underperformance and poor governance.", "position": 1, "objective": "Highlight the consequences of not taking action", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 21, "beatId": "0a8a3a82-fba6-4f03-a8cb-8990128795d2", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "The deck highlights the consequences of DuPont's underperformance and poor governance, including lack of transparency and value destruction.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5f69-752d-a9b6-c51f8518c42b", "docSlug": "MQ2aLIigWHEem3BSjUvF", "documentTitle": "Check out the 13-slide pitch deck enterprise software firm Ardoq used to raise $125 million in a Series D round led by EQT Growth", "authorId": "Pitchdecks", "authorName": "Ardoq", "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck", "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.776, "pageNumber": 2, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "Uses a rhetorical device (antithesis/irony) to establish a problem-solution narrative.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Contrasting 'We love change' with 'Said no one. Ever.'", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5f69-752d-a9b6-c51f8518c42b/2", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5f69-752d-a9b6-c51f8518c42b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5f69-752d-a9b6-c51f8518c42b#slide-2", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 2, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "d65c7187-34f6-4e4b-8e8f-b766a15b86fb", "evidence": "The deck presents a golden circle narrative, starting with the problem and ending with the solution and vision", "position": 0, "objective": "Why Ardoq's solution is necessary", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" }, { "to": 2, "from": 2, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "70d87373-66b2-44ac-b720-bccd490430d5", "evidence": "The problem statement highlights the cost of inaction", "position": 1, "objective": "The cost of not adopting Ardoq's solution", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 2, "from": 2, "beatId": "2e0fac28-4e41-464d-80ab-fe6b44f62c92", "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch", "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch", "beatName": "Problem", "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-problem", "evidence": "The problem statement is presented on page 2", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-0600c263c598", "docSlug": "915e98b3b4e2", "documentTitle": "Credit Acceptance Corporation (CACC)", "authorId": "52_Citron_Research", "authorName": "Citron Research", "documentKindSlug": "research-note", "documentKindLabel": "Research note", "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller", "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller", "presentationDate": "2026-03-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.77272725, "pageNumber": 3, "slideType": "thesis_headline", "function": "preempt_rebuttal", "notes": "Uses a 'whataboutism' rhetorical strategy to defend CACC's business model against ethical criticism.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Contrasting CACC's business model with Meta, Phillip Morris, and DraftKings to highlight perceived hypocrisy.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-0600c263c598/3", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-0600c263c598", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-0600c263c598#slide-3", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 2, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "75d52b86-e4b1-4b6e-b2c0-10b71ff478a0", "evidence": "The document repeatedly emphasizes the limited window to invest before institutional consensus catches up.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of not investing in CACC now?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 14, "from": 1, "name": "Hypothesis Test", "slug": "42-hypothesis-test", "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations", "matchId": "d8eea9a9-4800-4db5-9b62-ca38d6060cbb", "evidence": "The document presents data and logical reasoning to support its thesis.", "position": 1, "objective": "Is CACC's transformation into a technology platform a viable investment thesis?", "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 4, "from": 1, "beatId": "63b41fa2-d2b7-4875-a4f4-9259a7642b5e", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-problem-identify-pain", "evidence": "The thesis headline and initial valuation table highlight CACC's undervaluation.", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-571191cc7adb", "docSlug": "48a8cbf2f1d7", "documentTitle": "Arconic Inc. (ARNC)", "authorId": "02_Elliott_Management", "authorName": "Elliott", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2017-04-11 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.3333334, "pageNumber": 326, "slideType": "expose_contradiction", "function": "expose_contradiction", "notes": "Uses a Warren Buffett quote to frame the argument that prioritizing customers over pricing power is bad business.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Contrasts customer love with shareholder returns", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-571191cc7adb/326", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-571191cc7adb", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-571191cc7adb#slide-326", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-fc4318e06f9b", "docSlug": "6ded4b1cfe2c", "documentTitle": "Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY)", "authorId": "03_Starboard_Value", "authorName": "Starboard Value", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2019-03-18 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.3333334, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "expose_contradiction", "function": "expose_contradiction", "notes": "Uses a visual equation (Historical Acquisitions + Internal R&D = Success) vs (Celgene Acquisition = High Risk/Patent Cliff) to frame the contradiction.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly contrasts the 'String of Pearls' strategy with the Celgene acquisition as an antithesis.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-fc4318e06f9b/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-fc4318e06f9b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-fc4318e06f9b#slide-9", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-20e710622d80", "docSlug": "0ffe179c4c4e", "documentTitle": "Box, Inc. (BOX)", "authorId": "03_Starboard_Value", "authorName": "Starboard Value", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2021-08-06 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.3333334, "pageNumber": 110, "slideType": "expose_contradiction", "function": "expose_contradiction", "notes": "The slide uses a 'heads I win, tails you lose' framing to highlight the misalignment between employee benefits and shareholder interests.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Contrasting employee benefits with shareholder costs to expose misalignment.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-20e710622d80/110", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-20e710622d80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-20e710622d80#slide-110", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-0a9e4ca95565", "docSlug": "917aed929317", "documentTitle": "Phillips 66 (PSX)", "authorId": "02_Elliott_Management", "authorName": null, "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2025-04-28 00:00:00", "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.77272725, "pageNumber": 61, "slideType": "testimonial", "function": "expose_contradiction", "notes": "The slide uses direct quotes to build a narrative of management failure and loss of investor confidence.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Contrasting management's stated strategy with investor feedback.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-0a9e4ca95565/61", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-0a9e4ca95565", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-0a9e4ca95565#slide-61", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-0a9e4ca95565", "docSlug": "917aed929317", "documentTitle": "Phillips 66 (PSX)", "authorId": "02_Elliott_Management", "authorName": null, "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2025-04-28 00:00:00", "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.77272725, "pageNumber": 106, "slideType": "expose_contradiction", "function": "expose_contradiction", "notes": "Uses a three-column structure to address specific business segments: Midstream/Refining, Chemicals/Midstream, and Refining/M&S.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly contrasts a 'Claim' with a 'Reality' to expose a contradiction.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-0a9e4ca95565/106", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-0a9e4ca95565", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-0a9e4ca95565#slide-106", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-0a9e4ca95565", "docSlug": "917aed929317", "documentTitle": "Phillips 66 (PSX)", "authorId": "02_Elliott_Management", "authorName": null, "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2025-04-28 00:00:00", "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.77272725, "pageNumber": 110, "slideType": "expose_contradiction", "function": "expose_contradiction", "notes": "Uses a dual-chart comparison to show that while gross margin improves with allocation, the opex gap widens, contradicting the company's narrative.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Contrasting the company's claim with the reality of the opex gap.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-0a9e4ca95565/110", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-0a9e4ca95565", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-0a9e4ca95565#slide-110", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-7f2ac9bf331f", "docSlug": "2afd1d7556e8", "documentTitle": "The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT)", "authorId": "02_Elliott_Management", "authorName": "Elliott", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2023-05-11 00:00:00", "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.75, "pageNumber": 27, "slideType": "expose_contradiction", "function": "expose_contradiction", "notes": "Uses expert quotes to frame the quantitative underperformance.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Contrasts industry growth with Goodyear's decline using data and expert quotes.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-7f2ac9bf331f/27", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-7f2ac9bf331f", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-7f2ac9bf331f#slide-27", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 17, "beatId": "82556912-7c3f-4e07-8f10-c064b20bcc41", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-problem-identify-pain", "evidence": "The document highlights Goodyear's underperformance, low operating margins, and ineffective go-to-market strategy.", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 31, "from": 17, "beatId": "46ba0a9a-1e69-49bf-a5c3-61b15bf46752", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "The document emphasizes the consequences of Goodyear's underperformance, such as eroded investor confidence and lowered margin targets.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-e7b68bedf507", "docSlug": "42871e2cc2e7", "documentTitle": "Green Mountain Coffee Roasters (GMCR)", "authorId": "04_Greenlight_Capital", "authorName": "David Einhorn", "documentKindSlug": "conference-presentation", "documentKindLabel": "Conference presentation", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2011-10-17 00:00:00", "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.77272725, "pageNumber": 47, "slideType": "expose_contradiction", "function": "expose_contradiction", "notes": "This slide uses a classic 'thesis-antithesis' structure to undermine a company's public narrative.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide presents a claim (GMCR's control) and immediately refutes it with a counter-fact (patent expiration).", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-e7b68bedf507/47", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-e7b68bedf507", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-e7b68bedf507#slide-47", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 110, "from": 15, "name": "The Reveal", "slug": "05-the-reveal", "bestFor": "Product launches, strategic pivots, unexpected findings", "matchId": "3d366bd3-0742-4ca7-a1dd-2e8ed1e5341f", "evidence": "The presentation builds up to a conclusion that contradicts the bull case", "position": 0, "objective": "Reveal the truth about GMCR's business", "structure": "Setup the Question -> Build Suspense -> The Big Reveal", "confidence": 0.8, "description": "Build mystery and anticipation, then deliver a surprising or powerful conclusion" }, { "to": 56, "from": 45, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "b8114b21-ef92-4cf2-a7a4-0f6e159b32a9", "evidence": "Discusses the risks of patent expiration", "position": 1, "objective": "Highlight the cost of inaction on patent expiration", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 56, "from": 45, "beatId": "b42136b7-82f6-4e8e-b408-9c324d687353", "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster", "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster", "beatName": "The Patent Issue", "beatSlug": "complication", "evidence": "Discusses the patent expiration issue", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 50, "from": 44, "beatId": "4c78bcd8-103d-4365-9014-29dc0e042c43", "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster", "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster", "beatName": "Competition and Patents", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Analyzes competition and patent issues", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b9a-1cc056790523", "docSlug": "340e94a59fc0", "documentTitle": "IonQ Inc. (IONQ)", "authorId": "58_Scorpion_Capital", "authorName": "Scorpion Capital", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller", "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller", "presentationDate": "2022-05-03 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.2941177, "pageNumber": 83, "slideType": "expose_contradiction", "function": "expose_contradiction", "notes": "The slide uses strong, emotive language to discredit the company's technology.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly contrasts the company's narrative with expert opinion.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9a-1cc056790523/83", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9a-1cc056790523", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9a-1cc056790523#slide-83", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019de06f-712c-74af-a205-88bd7c92013e", "docSlug": "1dace4a46399357714a41370b747fac1", "documentTitle": "Pershing Square | Activist Presentation Deck | 48 slides", "authorId": "pershing-square", "authorName": "Pershing Square Capital Management, L.P.", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2016-07-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.3333334, "pageNumber": 22, "slideType": "expose_contradiction", "function": "expose_contradiction", "notes": "Uses legal citations to establish a precedent of regulatory action against similar business models.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Side-by-side comparison of two entities to highlight identical negative findings.", "slideHref": "/slides/019de06f-712c-74af-a205-88bd7c92013e/22", "deckHref": "/decks/019de06f-712c-74af-a205-88bd7c92013e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de06f-712c-74af-a205-88bd7c92013e#slide-22", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5fed-74f2-a96e-dedff5c9f39d", "docSlug": "bi-333a91bd4878e327", "documentTitle": "Pitch deck: AI professional network Goodword raises $4 million", "authorId": "Pitchdecks", "authorName": "Goodword", "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck", "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.779, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "thesis_headline", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a dark brown background with centered, serif typography to create a serious, thoughtful tone.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Contrasts digital connection with the gap in human connection.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5fed-74f2-a96e-dedff5c9f39d/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5fed-74f2-a96e-dedff5c9f39d", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5fed-74f2-a96e-dedff5c9f39d#slide-6", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 6, "beatId": "ac1d417e-0800-4fa6-94a6-04c757c2a647", "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch", "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch", "beatName": "Thesis", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "The thesis is presented on page 6", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b9d-167a31878e2a", "docSlug": "beab175aaed8", "documentTitle": "Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY)", "authorId": "03_Starboard_Value", "authorName": null, "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2019-03-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.3333334, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "expose_contradiction", "function": "expose_contradiction", "notes": "Uses a visual equation (Historical Acquisitions + Internal R&D = Success) vs (Celgene Acquisition = High Risk/Patent Cliff) to frame the contradiction.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide explicitly contrasts the 'String of Pearls' strategy with the Celgene acquisition as an antithesis.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9d-167a31878e2a/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9d-167a31878e2a", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9d-167a31878e2a#slide-9", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 24, "from": 9, "beatId": "1be2f377-bde5-4e96-aa19-6d36bdad8e4b", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "The presentation agitates the problems, providing more details on the acquisition's flaws and potential risks.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5fec-763b-95cd-893d79d84681", "docSlug": "oIRqncK41UJGFZy5YAzP", "documentTitle": "This startup will deliver an iPhone in under an hour. Check out the 10-slide pitch deck Arive used to raise $20 million.", "authorId": "Pitchdecks", "authorName": "Arive", "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck", "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.789, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "vision", "function": "inspire_vision", "notes": "The slide uses anaphora ('We are chasing...') and antithesis to build a narrative about the brand's philosophy.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Contrast between 'chasing' and 'attracting'.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5fec-763b-95cd-893d79d84681/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5fec-763b-95cd-893d79d84681", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5fec-763b-95cd-893d79d84681#slide-10", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 10, "beatId": "6bfe5595-cc28-4e31-b59b-808a07a3c59e", "arcName": "The Sparkline", "arcSlug": "sparkline", "beatName": "Vision", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Slide 10 'WE ARE CONSTANTLY CHASING WE ARE CHASING HAPPINESS CHASING SUCCESS AND LOVE' reiterates the vision.", "position": 8, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-4e5c6908a228", "docSlug": "e685a047c782", "documentTitle": "E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (DuPont) (DD)", "authorId": "06_Trian_Partners", "authorName": "Nelson Peltz", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2015-02-17 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.3333334, "pageNumber": 82, "slideType": "expose_contradiction", "function": "expose_contradiction", "notes": "Uses a classic 'Rhetoric vs. Reality' contrast frame.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Contrasting 'DuPont's Rhetoric' with 'The Reality'", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-4e5c6908a228/82", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-4e5c6908a228", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-4e5c6908a228#slide-82", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 90, "from": 80, "name": "Quick Win Big Bet", "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet", "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation", "matchId": "87c49668-9446-49b6-baee-ded354812320", "evidence": "The presentation outlines potential quick wins and big bets for DuPont, including improving corporate governance.", "position": 3, "objective": "What are the potential quick wins and big bets for DuPont?", "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 95, "from": 60, "beatId": "17930cb1-5e44-4ce1-932b-8378590408cd", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The presentation outlines the potential impact of Trian's initiatives and the next steps for DuPont.", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5f69-752d-a9ba-dd0fd33d7b63", "docSlug": "hFGQn35rDDhadY5YGXGU", "documentTitle": "We got a look at the slide deck of Bind;; a startup that's raised $70 million to upend the way we pay for healthcare", "authorId": "Pitchdecks", "authorName": "Bind Benefits, Inc.", "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck", "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.334, "pageNumber": 2, "slideType": "quote_slide", "function": "inspire_vision", "notes": "Uses a split-screen visual contrast (antithesis) to frame the company's mission.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses parallel structure and contrasting concepts to highlight the difference between two planning philosophies.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5f69-752d-a9ba-dd0fd33d7b63/2", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5f69-752d-a9ba-dd0fd33d7b63", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5f69-752d-a9ba-dd0fd33d7b63#slide-2", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-2b65d6c48f5e", "docSlug": "221a7c1fe12f", "documentTitle": "Xerox Corporation (XRX)", "authorId": "14_Icahn", "authorName": "Carl C. Icahn", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2018-04-17 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.3333334, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "expose_contradiction", "function": "expose_contradiction", "notes": "Uses a process-flow diagram to contrast board claims with expert testimony.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Contrasting the board's claim with the expert's critique", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-2b65d6c48f5e/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-2b65d6c48f5e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-2b65d6c48f5e#slide-13", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 11, "beatId": "9db058f1-06a6-4de1-8925-586982018b20", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence", "beatSlug": "evidence", "evidence": "The document presents evidence to support its claims, including financial data and expert opinions.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }