{
  "kind": "framework",
  "value": "amc-structural-taxonomy",
  "collectionKey": "slides:framework:amc-structural-taxonomy:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 1,
  "page": 1,
  "pageSize": 24,
  "pageCount": 1,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-5bdb4b29bc2d",
      "docSlug": "cb70fa2fdc72b67f",
      "documentTitle": "Deleveraging Europe",
      "authorId": "Deloitte",
      "authorName": "Deloitte",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "square",
      "aspectRatio": 1,
      "pageNumber": 19,
      "slideType": "key_messages",
      "function": "present_framework",
      "notes": "The slide contains two pages of content (36 and 37) presented as a single view. It includes a diagram illustrating the taxonomy of AMC structures.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Diagram showing classification of AMC models (Decentralised vs Centralised)",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-5bdb4b29bc2d/19",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-5bdb4b29bc2d",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-5bdb4b29bc2d#slide-19",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 61,
          "from": 3,
          "name": "Tale Two Worlds",
          "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds",
          "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change",
          "matchId": "c08a30e0-a357-432d-8459-5fd63a148514",
          "evidence": "The report contrasts the current market situation with potential future opportunities.",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "To present a comprehensive overview of the European deleveraging landscape.",
          "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity"
        },
        {
          "to": 20,
          "from": 17,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "5fbdf711-91eb-4f37-8df6-2c76d23237d5",
          "evidence": "The report emphasizes the importance of strategic partnerships and asset management companies.",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "To highlight the consequences of inaction in the European loan market.",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 0.6,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 20,
          "from": 17,
          "beatId": "0626f1a0-0d09-47b6-a82c-8c630f5e2c18",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "The report presents asset management companies and strategic partnerships as solutions.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}