{ "schemaVersion": "deck-intelligence.v1", "id": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cca3d92ef182", "slug": "df6572694f87", "title": "US REIT sector (15 underperforming large-cap REITs)", "subtitle": "Land and Buildings · 2025-06", "author": "Land and Buildings", "date": "2025-06-01 00:00:00", "pageCount": 4, "kind": "research-note", "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.7777778, "targetCompany": "US REIT sector (15 underperforming large-cap REITs)", "document": { "id": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cca3d92ef182", "slug": "df6572694f87", "title": "US REIT sector (15 underperforming large-cap REITs)", "rawTitle": "The Executive Comp Conundrum", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land and Buildings", "authorDisplay": "Land and Buildings", "kind": { "slug": "research-note", "label": "Research note" }, "sourceType": { "slug": "activist_investor", "label": "Activist investor" }, "fileName": "2025-06-The-Executive-Comp-Conundrum.pdf", "sourceUrl": "https://landandbuildings.com", "sourceDate": "2025-06-15 00:00:00", "presentationDate": "2025-06-01 00:00:00", "ingestedAt": "2026-04-22 18:39:25+00", "status": "ready", "pageCount": 4, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.7777778, "targetCompany": "US REIT sector (15 underperforming large-cap REITs)", "targetTicker": null, "metadata": { "local_root": "/tmp/legacy-images/df6572694f87", "activist_firm": "Land & Buildings", "origin_corpus": "contrarian", "extraction_seconds": 127.4586808681488 } }, "coverage": { "pageCount": 4, "pagesIndexed": 4, "pagesWithImages": 4, "pagesWithMetadata": 4, "imageCoveragePct": 100, "metadataCoveragePct": 100, "componentCount": 23, "chartCount": 0, "metricSlides": 0, "toolMatches": 3, "documentToolMatches": 3, "frameworkMatches": 0, "arcMatches": 1, "beatMatches": 3, "loopMatches": 1, "patternMatches": 0, "storymakersMatch": false, "scoreAvailable": false, "reviewAvailable": false, "activistThesisAvailable": true, "pitchdeckMetadataAvailable": false, "pitchdeckProfileAvailable": false }, "blocks": [], "matches": { "arcs": [ { "arc": { "name": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "slug": "problem-agitate-solution", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Sales pitches, urgency-driven, competitive displacement", "canonId": "019dd956-5ec6-70f9-9fd8-fdbaaff39acf", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "Problem (Identify pain) -> Agitate (Make it worse) -> Solution (Provide relief)", "description": null, "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Strategy & Business", "categorySlug": "strategy-business" }, "matchId": "73202b11-0dfe-43c8-9a6b-6c8865035173", "evidence": "The sequence of slides presents a problem, analysis, and proposed solution", "isPrimary": true, "confidence": 0.7, "extraction": { "at": "2026-07-16 21:57:09.474587+00", "model": "or:meta-llama/llama-4-scout", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": "doc-narrative-v1" } } ], "beats": [ { "to": 1, "arc": { "name": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "slug": "problem-agitate-solution", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Sales pitches, urgency-driven, competitive displacement", "canonId": "019dd956-5ec6-70f9-9fd8-fdbaaff39acf", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "Problem (Identify pain) -> Agitate (Make it worse) -> Solution (Provide relief)", "description": null, "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Strategy & Business", "categorySlug": "strategy-business" }, "from": 1, "name": "Problem (Identify pain)", "beatId": "7d49a804-102b-4943-be21-3635a8164078", "matchId": "73202b11-0dfe-43c8-9a6b-6c8865035173", "beatType": { "name": "Problem (Identify pain)", "slug": "problem-agitate-solution-problem-identify-pain", "status": "active", "canonId": "019dd9b8-0e78-74bb-b8f6-54348367a131", "version": 1, "description": null }, "evidence": "The executive summary presents the problem", "position": 0, "isPrimaryArc": true, "parentBeatType": { "name": "Complication", "slug": "complication", "status": "active", "canonId": "019dd9b8-0275-7709-b2d6-4f77c3fc7579", "version": 1, "description": "The point in the narrative where the audience should feel discomfort. Required for argumentative arcs." }, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 0.7 }, { "to": 2, "arc": { "name": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "slug": "problem-agitate-solution", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Sales pitches, urgency-driven, competitive displacement", "canonId": "019dd956-5ec6-70f9-9fd8-fdbaaff39acf", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "Problem (Identify pain) -> Agitate (Make it worse) -> Solution (Provide relief)", "description": null, "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Strategy & Business", "categorySlug": "strategy-business" }, "from": 2, "name": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatId": "8e158b42-80b0-456b-95c1-db5f8f237342", "matchId": "73202b11-0dfe-43c8-9a6b-6c8865035173", "beatType": { "name": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "slug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "status": "active", "canonId": "019dd9b8-0f5a-71dd-bae7-8fadb0d09456", "version": 1, "description": null }, "evidence": "The proposal slide implies the need for change", "position": 1, "isPrimaryArc": true, "parentBeatType": { "name": "Development", "slug": "development", "status": "active", "canonId": "019dd9b8-0332-7008-b3aa-11b0840a57b1", "version": 1, "description": "The middle stretch in arcs that have one. Often where length problems creep in." }, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 0.7 }, { "to": 4, "arc": { "name": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "slug": "problem-agitate-solution", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Sales pitches, urgency-driven, competitive displacement", "canonId": "019dd956-5ec6-70f9-9fd8-fdbaaff39acf", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "Problem (Identify pain) -> Agitate (Make it worse) -> Solution (Provide relief)", "description": null, "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Strategy & Business", "categorySlug": "strategy-business" }, "from": 3, "name": "Solution (Provide relief)", "beatId": "f2e51cdb-9e32-4d99-a71a-f593859d9734", "matchId": "73202b11-0dfe-43c8-9a6b-6c8865035173", "beatType": { "name": "Solution (Provide relief)", "slug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief", "status": "active", "canonId": "019dd9b8-0fee-73e9-9ae5-799c7f3895cd", "version": 1, "description": null }, "evidence": "The precedent table and appendix provide supporting evidence", "position": 2, "isPrimaryArc": true, "parentBeatType": { "name": "Resolution", "slug": "resolution", "status": "active", "canonId": "019dd9b8-045d-703b-8dd7-e92aba3ba91b", "version": 1, "description": "How the deck ends. Required in 19/20 arcs. The exception (Sparkline) ends with new bliss which is functionally a resolution." }, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 0.7 } ], "loops": [ { "to": 3, "from": 1, "loop": { "name": "39_benchmark_gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "canonId": "019dd956-75a4-7522-8d1a-af94da4703e9", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2420-77be-bc41-ded96d08cb21", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Comparison", "categorySlug": "comparison" }, "matchId": "22dc6f8a-509f-4f77-9fc0-44903b3c61ed", "evidence": "The document implies a gap between current pay and ideal pay", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the benchmark for executive compensation?", "confidence": 0.6, "extraction": { "at": "2026-07-16 21:57:09.614767+00", "model": "or:meta-llama/llama-4-scout", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": "doc-narrative-v1" } } ], "tools": [ { "tool": { "name": "Peer gap chart", "slug": "peer-gap", "status": "active", "bestFor": "When relative underperformance is the core argument", "canonId": "019dd9e1-54f1-775a-94a1-d5cf3bb75abf", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019dd9a1-8653-7748-9050-807f067196c3", "description": "A single visual that benchmarks the target against its best-in-class peers on\na single quantitative KPI — and shows the target losing. The gap is the\npunchline.", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": null, "categorySlug": null }, "agent": null, "layer": "document", "agents": null, "matchId": "e9c2d776-9b11-4ffd-90f9-c3333d9c5f3c", "evidence": null, "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": "When relative underperformance is the core argument", "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-04-29 12:07:49.936794+00", "model": "unknown-legacy", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": null, "whyItWorks": "- It's the **most credible claim in the deck** because it's arithmetic, not\n opinion.\n- It's immediately **actionable** — close this gap and value accrues.\n- It **pre-empts the \"context is different\" defence** by pitting the target\n against direct peers in the same category.", "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Villain naming", "slug": "villain-naming", "status": "active", "bestFor": "When governance or specific decisions are the core thesis", "canonId": "019dd9e1-55a4-74db-9314-0ced4cd46cd2", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019dd9a1-88f1-72ad-8f4e-56ec29d7b369", "description": "You identify a **specific person** responsible for the target's underperformance\nor the behaviour you want changed — and name them. Not \"management\" or \"the\nboard\". A named executive or director with a specific failure attributable to\nthem.", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": null, "categorySlug": null }, "agent": null, "layer": "document", "agents": null, "matchId": "7f338df1-85fd-45f3-8b6e-787786ea1de0", "evidence": "Named compensation committee members at the 15 underperforming REITs (e.g., Thornton III, Goldsmith, Kabat and Stephens at Crown Castle; Lewis, Cartwright and Connor at Healthpeak; Stein, Baglivo, Hogan Preusse and Smith at Host Hotels)", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": "When governance or specific decisions are the core thesis", "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-04-29 12:07:49.936794+00", "model": "unknown-legacy", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": null, "whyItWorks": "- **Accountability needs a face.** Voters (shareholders, regulators,\n journalists) act faster against people than institutions.\n- **Credibility rises with specificity.** \"The CFO has repeatedly missed\n guidance\" > \"Management has missed guidance\".\n- It **pre-empts evasion**. An individual can be removed; an abstraction\n cannot.\n- It **forces the target to respond personally** — and their defensive\n response usually generates more attention for your thesis.", "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Villain slide", "slug": "villain-slide", "status": "active", "bestFor": "In activist decks where the personality matters", "canonId": "019dd9e1-518c-7404-976a-5be5a517b659", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "A dedicated slide presenting the named villain visually", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": null, "categorySlug": null }, "agent": null, "layer": "document", "agents": null, "matchId": "be387103-c53a-492c-b495-9dcfc90355d4", "evidence": null, "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": "In activist decks where the personality matters", "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-04-29 12:07:49.936794+00", "model": "unknown-legacy", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": null, "whyItWorks": "Makes the antagonist concrete", "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null } ], "frameworks": [], "patterns": [] }, "storymakers": null, "score": null, "review": null, "activistThesis": { "tone": "analytical", "notes": "Sector-wide governance/comp white paper rather than a single-target activist campaign. Written in first person (references author's 1990s sell-side background) — almost certainly by Jonathan Litt, L&B founder, but no explicit signature on the visible pages, so author_name left null. Filename carries '2025-05' but cover, header and page-3 publication line all read 'June 2025'; date set to 2025-06-01. Names 52+ individual comp committee members by last name across 15 REIT boards — unusually direct villain-naming for a thought piece. Page 1 uses a distinctive blue 'KEY POINTS' sidebar that doubles as the SCQA compression. No valuation framework, no stake disclosed — this is a proxy-season voting call, not a single-name thesis.", "kpisCited": [ { "detail": "Americold -193%, Crown Castle -167%, SBA Communications -97%, NNN REIT -86%, Alexandria -83%, National Storage Affiliates -76%, Healthpeak -72%, WP Carey -68%, Sun Communities -64%, Host Hotels -58%, Equity Residential -52%", "metric": "Trailing 5-year total shareholder return (vs. proxy peers)" }, { "detail": "Alexandria -52%, Host Hotels -42%, Americold -33%, Rexford -29%, NNN REIT -17%, Sun Communities -16%, CubeSmart -14%, Crown Castle -11%, SBA -8%, Healthpeak -7%, WP Carey -6%", "metric": "Trailing 1-year total shareholder return (vs. proxy peers)" }, { "detail": "Rexford $26.3M, Crown Castle $16.4M, Host Hotels $16.4M, Realty Income $15.2M, Americold $11.0M, Equity Residential $11.4M, SBA $8.8M, NNN $8.4M, Healthpeak $8.5M, CubeSmart $8.0M, AvalonBay $9.1M, WP Carey $10.2M, Alexandria $10.3M", "metric": "2024 CEO compensation" }, { "detail": "59 REITs over $4bn equity market cap analyzed for 2025 proxy season; 15 identified as consistent underperformers across trailing 1-, 3- and 5-year periods", "metric": "Sample size" } ], "closingAsk": "Exercise your right to vote against the members of the compensation committee and against the advisory vote on executive compensation (say on pay) at the 15 underperforming REITs.", "extraction": { "at": "2026-04-22 18:39:25+00", "model": "unknown-legacy", "runId": null, "seconds": 127.45868, "promptVersion": null }, "scqaReward": "Alignment of CEO pay with shareholder returns, elimination of structural overpayment at chronically underperforming REITs, and a credible threat of termination-without-severance that restores fiduciary discipline to boards.", "thesisTypes": [ "governance_board", "management_change" ], "top3Reasons": [ "15 large-cap REITs underperformed proxy peers over trailing 1-, 3- and 5-year periods while CEO pay was rarely adjusted", "Benchmarking CEO pay against similarly sized companies is flawed — it rewards growth over shareholder returns", "Comp consultants and cross-sector proxy peer groups serve as a smokescreen to rationalize inflated packages" ], "scqaSituation": "REIT compensation committees benchmark CEO pay against similarly sized or cross-sector peers and rarely adjust for shareholder returns, leaving packages of $4-28M in place regardless of performance.", "thesisSummary": "Land & Buildings' June 2025 white paper argues that 15 REITs above $4bn market cap consistently underperformed their proxy peers on total shareholder return over trailing 1-, 3- and 5-year periods ending March 31, 2025, yet executive compensation was rarely adjusted — often exceeding $10M at names like Healthpeak, Host Hotels, Crown Castle, Rexford and WP Carey. The firm contends that benchmarking CEO pay against similarly sized companies is fundamentally flawed, incentivizing empire-building over returns, with compensation consultants serving as a smokescreen and boards selecting unrelated-sector proxy peers with notoriously high pay. With 2025 annual meetings approaching, Land & Buildings names the compensation committee members at each of the 15 REITs and urges shareholders to vote against them and against say-on-pay at Healthpeak, Realty Income, Alexandria, Crown Castle, AvalonBay, Equity Residential and the others.", "primaryDemands": [ "Vote against compensation committee members at the 15 underperforming REITs", "Vote against the advisory say-on-pay proposals at those REITs", "Solicit and integrate shareholder perspectives into executive compensation design", "Benchmark compensation against truly comparable companies (e.g. apartment REITs vs. apartment REITs), not cross-sector proxies", "Implement accountability measures escalating to termination without severance for underperforming executives" ], "scqaResolution": "Vote against the named compensation committee members and against say-on-pay at the 2025 annual meetings, and hold executives to the same accountability standards — including termination without severance — as other employees.", "thesisOneLiner": "15 large-cap REITs persistently underperformed their proxy peers over 1-, 3- and 5-year periods yet kept paying CEOs the same — shareholders should vote against comp committees and say-on-pay.", "precedentsCited": [], "scqaComplication": "Analysis of 59 REITs over $4bn market cap found 15 — including Healthpeak, Crown Castle, Alexandria, Host Hotels and Rexford — underperformed proxy peers on 1-, 3- and 5-year TSR while comp was held flat or raised.", "narrativeInterest": 3, "notableSlidePages": [ 1, 2, 3 ], "peerCompaniesCited": [ "Healthpeak Properties (DOC)", "National Storage Affiliates (NSA)", "NNN REIT (NNN)", "Realty Income (O)", "Host Hotels & Resorts (HST)", "Alexandria Real Estate Equities (ARE)", "Sun Communities (SUI)", "Americold Realty Trust (COLD)", "CubeSmart (CUBE)", "Crown Castle (CCI)", "AvalonBay Communities (AVB)", "SBA Communications (SBAC)", "Rexford Industrial Realty (REXR)", "WP Carey (WPC)", "Equity Residential (EQR)" ], "valuationFrameworks": [ "not_shown" ], "visualCraftInterest": 3 }, "pitchdeck": { "metadata": null, "profile": null }, "slides": [ { "page": 1, "type": "setup", "title": "The slide serves as an introduction to a white paper or research note on executive pay practices in the REIT sector.", "function": "summarize", "imagePath": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/LOnub_ZZejwrCFQd33PJvEOAzSGdk2xfR0yRXa7eoIw/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9kZjY1NzI2OTRmODcvcDAwMS5qcGc", "rawType": "executive_summary", "block": null, "metadata": { "slideType": "executive_summary", "slideTypeCanon": { "name": "Executive summary", "slug": "executive_summary", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-06be-73ff-81b3-f99fe7f0025e", "version": 1, "description": null }, "function": "summarize", "functionCanon": { "name": "Summarize", "slug": "summarize", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-1541-704f-b86f-bf7b75056373", "version": 1, "description": null }, "density": "balanced", "densityScore": 28, "componentCount": 5, "textChars": 686, "nDataPoints": 1, "notes": "The slide serves as an introduction to a white paper or research note on executive pay practices in the REIT sector.", "elementsJson": [ "headline_text", "paragraph", "callout_box", "footnote", "logo_grid" ], "confidence": 1, "extraction": { "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "at": "2026-05-02 20:54:27.879+00", "seconds": 3.121, "promptVersion": "v2-canon-conditioned" } }, "links": { "slide": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cca3d92ef182/1", "deck": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cca3d92ef182", "deckAnchor": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cca3d92ef182#slide-1", "deckJson": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cca3d92ef182.json" }, "components": [ { "bbox": { "h": 0.65, "w": 0.2, "x": 0.75, "y": 0.23 }, "kind": "callout", "text": "KEY POINTS: 15 REIT CEOs have consistently underperformed their proxy peers, yet their executive compensation was rarely adjusted. Executives should be subject to the same review standards... Shareholders can best express their frustration...", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Callout", "slug": "callout", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f8d3-761a-8953-7d37080de5e2", "version": 1, "description": "Highlighted callout box." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Primary callout", "slug": "primary", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fbd1-70eb-a9ce-8997f8674c1d", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "primary", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 20:54:27.879+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "051916d6-9bdb-4dba-b7a6-2ae1c75823e3", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": null, "kind": "callout", "text": "Shareholders can best express their frustration by voting against the compensation committee members and say on pay", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Callout", "slug": "callout", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f8d3-761a-8953-7d37080de5e2", "version": 1, "description": "Highlighted callout box." }, "tool": { "name": "Visual emphasis", "slug": "visual-emphasis", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd9e1-474b-736b-a8eb-a794dd88241c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Drawing the eye to one element above the rest of the slide.", "familyLabel": null }, "subkind": null, "framework": null }, "subkind": null, "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-04-22 23:45:16+00", "model": "unknown-legacy", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "019dd953-5370-75b3-9c67-d22fd20f4bed", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.65, "w": 0.65, "x": 0.05, "y": 0.23 }, "kind": "paragraph", "text": "Executive compensation: a topic guaranteed to ignite passionate discussions... Our analysis of 59 REITs over $4 billion equity market cap for the 2025 proxy season revealed a troubling pattern...", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "5f2affc0-941d-4d07-959d-4bfc1930cea4", "version": 1, "description": "Single prose block in the body of a slide." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fb80-75af-aa5c-a7a4bfac2433", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "paragraph", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 20:54:27.879+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "c23d6a0b-fffe-4e18-a4a5-e56b43ffa4f3", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.02, "w": 0.4, "x": 0.05, "y": 0.89 }, "kind": "source-note", "text": "See \"Legal Disclosure\" at the end of white paper for additional disclosures", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Source note", "slug": "source-note", "status": "active", "canonId": "23484952-494b-4a5e-b1ad-550d0d70e948", "version": 1, "description": "Attribution / source / caveat placed at the slide footer. Numbered footnotes use attrs.numbered." }, "tool": null, "subkind": null, "framework": null }, "subkind": null, "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 20:54:27.879+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "e9773645-393e-4016-86ec-93833d2e1449", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.08, "w": 0.8, "x": 0.05, "y": 0.11 }, "kind": "title", "text": "THE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION CONUNDRUM: HOW MUCH IS TOO MUCH?", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Title", "slug": "title", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f7dd-76d9-b848-b1f12bd85cf4", "version": 1, "description": "Slide title or headline." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Headline", "slug": "headline", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fae1-7463-9a7c-d60668eced0d", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "headline", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 20:54:27.879+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "f85eed98-ce6b-4b4f-9913-bf530e50a31b", "parentComponentId": null } ], "metrics": [], "tools": [], "frameworks": [], "arcBeats": [ { "to": 1, "arc": { "name": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "slug": "problem-agitate-solution", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Sales pitches, urgency-driven, competitive displacement", "canonId": "019dd956-5ec6-70f9-9fd8-fdbaaff39acf", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "Problem (Identify pain) -> Agitate (Make it worse) -> Solution (Provide relief)", "description": null, "familyLabel": null }, "from": 1, "name": "Problem (Identify pain)", "beatId": "7d49a804-102b-4943-be21-3635a8164078", "matchId": "73202b11-0dfe-43c8-9a6b-6c8865035173", "beatType": { "name": "Problem (Identify pain)", "slug": "problem-agitate-solution-problem-identify-pain", "status": "active", "canonId": "019dd9b8-0e78-74bb-b8f6-54348367a131", "version": 1, "description": null }, "evidence": "The executive summary presents the problem", "position": 0, "isPrimaryArc": true, "parentBeatType": { "name": "Complication", "slug": "complication", "status": "active", "canonId": "019dd9b8-0275-7709-b2d6-4f77c3fc7579", "version": 1, "description": "The point in the narrative where the audience should feel discomfort. Required for argumentative arcs." }, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 0.7 } ], "loops": [ { "to": 3, "from": 1, "loop": { "name": "39_benchmark_gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "canonId": "019dd956-75a4-7522-8d1a-af94da4703e9", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2420-77be-bc41-ded96d08cb21", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity", "familyLabel": null }, "matchId": "22dc6f8a-509f-4f77-9fc0-44903b3c61ed", "evidence": "The document implies a gap between current pay and ideal pay", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the benchmark for executive compensation?", "confidence": 0.6, "extraction": { "at": "2026-07-16 21:57:09.614767+00", "model": "or:meta-llama/llama-4-scout", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": "doc-narrative-v1" } } ], "thumbSrc": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/Zf2szqSK0DdLydXHPs0lh5xWUybCKVQKm_mJQwnZv_I/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9kZjY1NzI2OTRmODcvcDAwMS5qcGc", "imagePathAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/p2UVUoXzOqGLDYKfE41LXnNsHoQoq70qsVvsWIfVmB0/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9kZjY1NzI2OTRmODcvcDAwMS5wbmc", "thumbSrcAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/UnQ2IUum7MJG_N51XJqC2h_8WQtDoyQsq6lUyPe7dvY/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9kZjY1NzI2OTRmODcvcDAwMS5wbmc" }, { "page": 2, "type": "setup", "title": "The table highlights a disconnect between poor shareholder returns and high executive compensation.", "function": "propose_solution", "rawType": "propose_solution", "block": null, "metadata": { "slideType": "propose_solution", "slideTypeCanon": { "name": "Propose solution (contrarian)", "slug": "propose_solution", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-1274-703c-81c6-5550f451697b", "version": 1, "description": null }, "function": "propose_solution", "functionCanon": { "name": "Propose solution (contrarian)", "slug": "propose_solution", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-185b-74e9-bdfd-ea8cf318563f", "version": 1, "description": null }, "density": "dense", "densityScore": 63, "componentCount": 8, "textChars": 977, "nDataPoints": 182, "notes": "The table highlights a disconnect between poor shareholder returns and high executive compensation.", "elementsJson": [ "headline_text", "bullet_list", "data_table", "footnote" ], "confidence": 1, "extraction": { "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "at": "2026-05-02 20:54:27.669+00", "seconds": 2.876, "promptVersion": "v2-canon-conditioned" } }, "links": { "slide": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cca3d92ef182/2", "deck": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cca3d92ef182", "deckAnchor": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cca3d92ef182#slide-2", "deckJson": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cca3d92ef182.json" }, "components": [ { "bbox": null, "kind": "callout", "text": "To ensure equitable and effective executive compensation, we believe a board's Compensation Committee must prioritize the following:", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Callout", "slug": "callout", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f8d3-761a-8953-7d37080de5e2", "version": 1, "description": "Highlighted callout box." }, "tool": { "name": "Visual emphasis", "slug": "visual-emphasis", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd9e1-474b-736b-a8eb-a794dd88241c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Drawing the eye to one element above the rest of the slide.", "familyLabel": null }, "subkind": null, "framework": null }, "subkind": null, "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-04-22 23:45:16+00", "model": "unknown-legacy", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "019dd953-5370-75b3-9c67-b4ace83305af", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.2, "w": 0.9, "x": 0.05, "y": 0.15 }, "kind": "list", "text": "Solicit and integrate shareholder perspectives; Identify truly comparable companies; Deemphasize market cap driven comparisons; Implement robust accountability measures; Acknowledge the disparity between general employee annual reviews and CEO compensation.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "List", "slug": "list", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f94b-779b-a53b-fd4904a5f4d2", "version": 1, "description": "Bullet or numbered list." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Bullet list", "slug": "bullet", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fc98-7169-a083-5cab805076ca", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "bullet", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 20:54:27.669+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "6eaff720-c670-402e-a4f9-576f8434f4ab", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": null, "kind": "metric", "text": "Total Shareholder Returns: 15", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Metric", "slug": "metric", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f923-73bf-8081-d0b1a8c5264d", "version": 1, "description": "Big-number or KPI value." }, "tool": { "name": "Quantification", "slug": "quantification", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd9e1-47ab-72ce-a079-aab1f5299e88", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Translating a claim into numbers, charts, or tables.", "familyLabel": null }, "subkind": null, "framework": null }, "subkind": "primary", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-04-22 23:45:16+00", "model": "unknown-legacy", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "019dd953-5370-75b3-9c67-b9c47d8146b1", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.05, "w": 0.9, "x": 0.05, "y": 0.1 }, "kind": "paragraph", "text": "To ensure equitable and effective executive compensation, we believe a board's Compensation Committee must prioritize the following:", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "5f2affc0-941d-4d07-959d-4bfc1930cea4", "version": 1, "description": "Single prose block in the body of a slide." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fb80-75af-aa5c-a7a4bfac2433", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "paragraph", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 20:54:27.669+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "871001ce-aaef-4fb6-8600-f9d6cbd09f47", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.02, "w": 0.7, "x": 0.05, "y": 0.9 }, "kind": "source-note", "text": "Source: Bloomberg, Company SEC Filings; Note: Performance as of 3/31/2025; 2024 Proxy Compensation Peers consistent with disclosure in 2025 proxy.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Source note", "slug": "source-note", "status": "active", "canonId": "23484952-494b-4a5e-b1ad-550d0d70e948", "version": 1, "description": "Attribution / source / caveat placed at the slide footer. Numbered footnotes use attrs.numbered." }, "tool": null, "subkind": null, "framework": null }, "subkind": null, "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 20:54:27.669+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "68dab9e0-d447-48b0-a63f-f5c2b5abcb4c", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.45, "w": 0.9, "x": 0.05, "y": 0.42 }, "kind": "table", "text": "Table showing Company Name, Ticker, Annual General Meeting, Total Shareholder Returns (1, 3, 5 year), and Compensation ($M) for 2023 and 2024.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Table", "slug": "table", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f9c8-7148-8119-eaac9594cd28", "version": 1, "description": "Tabular data layout." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Data table", "slug": "data", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-02d5-75b8-8abf-88e92bf63569", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "data", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 20:54:27.669+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "3d11bb74-d9de-4d77-b406-e42aa4924379", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.03, "w": 0.7, "x": 0.05, "y": 0.38 }, "kind": "title", "text": "15 REITs With Consistent Underperformance in Trailing 1-, 3- and 5- Year Periods", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Title", "slug": "title", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f7dd-76d9-b848-b1f12bd85cf4", "version": 1, "description": "Slide title or headline." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Headline", "slug": "headline", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fae1-7463-9a7c-d60668eced0d", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "headline", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 20:54:27.669+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "15a2a61a-bde0-4cd9-b0dd-5e203d3ca84b", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.03, "w": 0.5, "x": 0.05, "y": 0.05 }, "kind": "title", "text": "The Executive Compensation Conundrum: How Much is Too Much?", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Title", "slug": "title", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f7dd-76d9-b848-b1f12bd85cf4", "version": 1, "description": "Slide title or headline." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Headline", "slug": "headline", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fae1-7463-9a7c-d60668eced0d", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "headline", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 20:54:27.669+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "6e91928c-23a3-4948-b049-abf67f3f1b96", "parentComponentId": null } ], "metrics": [], "tools": [], "frameworks": [], "arcBeats": [ { "to": 2, "arc": { "name": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "slug": "problem-agitate-solution", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Sales pitches, urgency-driven, competitive displacement", "canonId": "019dd956-5ec6-70f9-9fd8-fdbaaff39acf", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "Problem (Identify pain) -> Agitate (Make it worse) -> Solution (Provide relief)", "description": null, "familyLabel": null }, "from": 2, "name": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatId": "8e158b42-80b0-456b-95c1-db5f8f237342", "matchId": "73202b11-0dfe-43c8-9a6b-6c8865035173", "beatType": { "name": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "slug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "status": "active", "canonId": "019dd9b8-0f5a-71dd-bae7-8fadb0d09456", "version": 1, "description": null }, "evidence": "The proposal slide implies the need for change", "position": 1, "isPrimaryArc": true, "parentBeatType": { "name": "Development", "slug": "development", "status": "active", "canonId": "019dd9b8-0332-7008-b3aa-11b0840a57b1", "version": 1, "description": "The middle stretch in arcs that have one. Often where length problems creep in." }, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 0.7 } ], "loops": [ { "to": 3, "from": 1, "loop": { "name": "39_benchmark_gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "canonId": "019dd956-75a4-7522-8d1a-af94da4703e9", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2420-77be-bc41-ded96d08cb21", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity", "familyLabel": null }, "matchId": "22dc6f8a-509f-4f77-9fc0-44903b3c61ed", "evidence": "The document implies a gap between current pay and ideal pay", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the benchmark for executive compensation?", "confidence": 0.6, "extraction": { "at": "2026-07-16 21:57:09.614767+00", "model": "or:meta-llama/llama-4-scout", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": "doc-narrative-v1" } } ], "locked": true }, { "page": 3, "type": "tension", "title": "The slide highlights a potential conflict of interest or lack of accountability by showing the specific committee members responsible for compensation at underp", "function": "expose_contradiction", "rawType": "precedent_table", "block": null, "metadata": { "slideType": "precedent_table", "slideTypeCanon": { "name": "Precedent table", "slug": "precedent_table", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-115e-757e-a38f-486981054171", "version": 1, "description": null }, "function": "expose_contradiction", "functionCanon": { "name": "Expose contradiction", "slug": "expose_contradiction", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-171f-776f-887c-73edaff4cf9c", "version": 1, "description": null }, "density": "balanced", "densityScore": 42, "componentCount": 8, "textChars": 519, "nDataPoints": 0, "notes": "The slide highlights a potential conflict of interest or lack of accountability by showing the specific committee members responsible for compensation at underperforming firms.", "elementsJson": [ "headline_text", "data_table", "footnote" ], "confidence": 1, "extraction": { "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "at": "2026-05-02 20:54:28.256+00", "seconds": 3.357, "promptVersion": "v2-canon-conditioned" } }, "links": { "slide": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cca3d92ef182/3", "deck": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cca3d92ef182", "deckAnchor": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cca3d92ef182#slide-3", "deckJson": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cca3d92ef182.json" }, "components": [ { "bbox": null, "kind": "callout", "text": "Low 2024 CEO compensation warrants committee support", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Callout", "slug": "callout", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f8d3-761a-8953-7d37080de5e2", "version": 1, "description": "Highlighted callout box." }, "tool": { "name": "Visual emphasis", "slug": "visual-emphasis", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd9e1-474b-736b-a8eb-a794dd88241c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Drawing the eye to one element above the rest of the slide.", "familyLabel": null }, "subkind": null, "framework": null }, "subkind": null, "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-04-22 23:45:16+00", "model": "unknown-legacy", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "019dd953-5370-75b3-9c67-ebea184fc5a0", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.02, "w": 0.2, "x": 0.05, "y": 0.85 }, "kind": "paragraph", "text": "Publication Date: June 2025", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "5f2affc0-941d-4d07-959d-4bfc1930cea4", "version": 1, "description": "Single prose block in the body of a slide." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fb80-75af-aa5c-a7a4bfac2433", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "paragraph", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 20:54:28.256+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "1f279aba-d3f1-4e2b-9480-a47822e20f66", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.02, "w": 0.7, "x": 0.05, "y": 0.9 }, "kind": "source-note", "text": "Source: Bloomberg, Company SEC Filings; Note: Performance as of 3/31/2025; 2024 Proxy Compensation Peers consistent with disclosure in 2025 proxy.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Source note", "slug": "source-note", "status": "active", "canonId": "23484952-494b-4a5e-b1ad-550d0d70e948", "version": 1, "description": "Attribution / source / caveat placed at the slide footer. Numbered footnotes use attrs.numbered." }, "tool": null, "subkind": null, "framework": null }, "subkind": null, "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 20:54:28.256+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "b2ae6312-8089-4243-a76e-588cc5cf4d76", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.3, "w": 0.9, "x": 0.05, "y": 0.52 }, "kind": "table", "text": "Table of REITs, tickers, and proxy compensation peers", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Table", "slug": "table", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f9c8-7148-8119-eaac9594cd28", "version": 1, "description": "Tabular data layout." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Data table", "slug": "data", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-02d5-75b8-8abf-88e92bf63569", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "data", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 20:54:28.256+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "132815db-c0e5-44ca-b602-eb5604a34f48", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.3, "w": 0.8, "x": 0.05, "y": 0.14 }, "kind": "table", "text": "Table of REITs, tickers, and committee members", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Table", "slug": "table", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f9c8-7148-8119-eaac9594cd28", "version": 1, "description": "Tabular data layout." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Data table", "slug": "data", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-02d5-75b8-8abf-88e92bf63569", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "data", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 20:54:28.256+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "89feed36-a35c-4b55-951c-589c0c2e2aca", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.03, "w": 0.6, "x": 0.05, "y": 0.1 }, "kind": "title", "text": "Compensation Committee Members of Consistently Underperforming REITs", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Title", "slug": "title", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f7dd-76d9-b848-b1f12bd85cf4", "version": 1, "description": "Slide title or headline." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Headline", "slug": "headline", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fae1-7463-9a7c-d60668eced0d", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "headline", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 20:54:28.256+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "4c37d3af-c499-47b0-ab15-235028de4f4b", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.03, "w": 0.6, "x": 0.05, "y": 0.48 }, "kind": "title", "text": "Proxy Compensation Peer Detail of Consistently Underperforming REITs", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Title", "slug": "title", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f7dd-76d9-b848-b1f12bd85cf4", "version": 1, "description": "Slide title or headline." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Headline", "slug": "headline", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fae1-7463-9a7c-d60668eced0d", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "headline", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 20:54:28.256+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "763f68d2-a80d-4e9c-9162-e09fcdfa4d87", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.03, "w": 0.5, "x": 0.05, "y": 0.05 }, "kind": "title", "text": "The Executive Compensation Conundrum: How Much is Too Much?", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Title", "slug": "title", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f7dd-76d9-b848-b1f12bd85cf4", "version": 1, "description": "Slide title or headline." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Headline", "slug": "headline", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fae1-7463-9a7c-d60668eced0d", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "headline", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 20:54:28.256+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "844581c7-b74c-412b-a0f7-d8d7b740cb95", "parentComponentId": null } ], "metrics": [], "tools": [], "frameworks": [], "arcBeats": [ { "to": 4, "arc": { "name": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "slug": "problem-agitate-solution", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Sales pitches, urgency-driven, competitive displacement", "canonId": "019dd956-5ec6-70f9-9fd8-fdbaaff39acf", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "Problem (Identify pain) -> Agitate (Make it worse) -> Solution (Provide relief)", "description": null, "familyLabel": null }, "from": 3, "name": "Solution (Provide relief)", "beatId": "f2e51cdb-9e32-4d99-a71a-f593859d9734", "matchId": "73202b11-0dfe-43c8-9a6b-6c8865035173", "beatType": { "name": "Solution (Provide relief)", "slug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief", "status": "active", "canonId": "019dd9b8-0fee-73e9-9ae5-799c7f3895cd", "version": 1, "description": null }, "evidence": "The precedent table and appendix provide supporting evidence", "position": 2, "isPrimaryArc": true, "parentBeatType": { "name": "Resolution", "slug": "resolution", "status": "active", "canonId": "019dd9b8-045d-703b-8dd7-e92aba3ba91b", "version": 1, "description": "How the deck ends. Required in 19/20 arcs. The exception (Sparkline) ends with new bliss which is functionally a resolution." }, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 0.7 } ], "loops": [ { "to": 3, "from": 1, "loop": { "name": "39_benchmark_gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "canonId": "019dd956-75a4-7522-8d1a-af94da4703e9", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2420-77be-bc41-ded96d08cb21", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity", "familyLabel": null }, "matchId": "22dc6f8a-509f-4f77-9fc0-44903b3c61ed", "evidence": "The document implies a gap between current pay and ideal pay", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the benchmark for executive compensation?", "confidence": 0.6, "extraction": { "at": "2026-07-16 21:57:09.614767+00", "model": "or:meta-llama/llama-4-scout", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": "doc-narrative-v1" } } ], "locked": true }, { "page": 4, "type": "setup", "function": "other", "rawType": "appendix_disclosure", "block": null, "metadata": { "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "slideTypeCanon": { "name": "Appendix disclosure", "slug": "appendix_disclosure", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-07b2-7549-8e8b-932a19f6e616", "version": 1, "description": null }, "function": "other", "functionCanon": { "name": "Other (fallback)", "slug": "other", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-15e1-75bc-99dc-07732380e2ce", "version": 1, "description": null }, "density": "sparse", "densityScore": 7, "componentCount": 2, "textChars": 271, "nDataPoints": 0, "notes": null, "elementsJson": [ "paragraph" ], "confidence": 1, "extraction": { "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "at": "2026-05-02 20:54:31.399+00", "seconds": 6.271, "promptVersion": "v2-canon-conditioned" } }, "links": { "slide": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cca3d92ef182/4", "deck": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cca3d92ef182", "deckAnchor": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cca3d92ef182#slide-4", "deckJson": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cca3d92ef182.json" }, "components": [ { "bbox": { "h": 0.75, "w": 0.9, "x": 0.05, "y": 0.12 }, "kind": "disclaimer", "text": "This white paper is for discussion and informational purposes only and is not intended to be, nor should it be construed as, a solicitation of any proxy, consent, or authorization with respect to any securities or any matter subject to a shareholder vote.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Disclaimer", "slug": "disclaimer", "status": "active", "canonId": "91173477-d91f-4024-bbaf-d4f93e3f82dc", "version": 1, "description": "Legal/cautionary text that occupies most of the body of its slide." }, "tool": null, "subkind": null, "framework": null }, "subkind": null, "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 20:54:31.399+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "0dd540fa-e757-404f-878d-756205937087", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.02, "w": 0.15, "x": 0.05, "y": 0.08 }, "kind": "title", "text": "Legal disclosure", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Title", "slug": "title", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f7dd-76d9-b848-b1f12bd85cf4", "version": 1, "description": "Slide title or headline." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Headline", "slug": "headline", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fae1-7463-9a7c-d60668eced0d", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "headline", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 20:54:31.399+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "6aa899de-8e3d-415c-8254-3fe1f6eade16", "parentComponentId": null } ], "metrics": [], "tools": [], "frameworks": [], "arcBeats": [ { "to": 4, "arc": { "name": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "slug": "problem-agitate-solution", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Sales pitches, urgency-driven, competitive displacement", "canonId": "019dd956-5ec6-70f9-9fd8-fdbaaff39acf", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "Problem (Identify pain) -> Agitate (Make it worse) -> Solution (Provide relief)", "description": null, "familyLabel": null }, "from": 3, "name": "Solution (Provide relief)", "beatId": "f2e51cdb-9e32-4d99-a71a-f593859d9734", "matchId": "73202b11-0dfe-43c8-9a6b-6c8865035173", "beatType": { "name": "Solution (Provide relief)", "slug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief", "status": "active", "canonId": "019dd9b8-0fee-73e9-9ae5-799c7f3895cd", "version": 1, "description": null }, "evidence": "The precedent table and appendix provide supporting evidence", "position": 2, "isPrimaryArc": true, "parentBeatType": { "name": "Resolution", "slug": "resolution", "status": "active", "canonId": "019dd9b8-045d-703b-8dd7-e92aba3ba91b", "version": 1, "description": "How the deck ends. Required in 19/20 arcs. The exception (Sparkline) ends with new bliss which is functionally a resolution." }, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 0.7 } ], "loops": [], "locked": true } ], "arcBeats": [ { "from": 1, "to": 1, "label": "Problem (Identify pain)", "description": "The executive summary presents the problem" }, { "from": 2, "to": 2, "label": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "description": "The proposal slide implies the need for change" }, { "from": 3, "to": 4, "label": "Solution (Provide relief)", "description": "The precedent table and appendix provide supporting evidence" } ], "loops": [ { "from": 1, "to": 3, "label": "Benchmark Gap", "description": "What is the benchmark for executive compensation?" } ] }