{ "schemaVersion": "deck-intelligence.v1", "id": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5", "slug": "606681d272d16554", "title": "PwC’s 2019 actuarial robotic process automation (RPA) survey report", "subtitle": "PwC", "author": "PwC", "pageCount": 15, "kind": "consulting-deck", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "document": { "id": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5", "slug": "606681d272d16554", "title": "PwC’s 2019 actuarial robotic process automation (RPA) survey report", "rawTitle": "PwC’s 2019 actuarial robotic process automation (RPA) survey report", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "authorDisplay": "PwC", "kind": { "slug": "consulting-deck", "label": "Consulting deck" }, "sourceType": { "slug": "strategy_consulting", "label": "Strategy consulting" }, "fileName": "PwCs-2019-actuarial-robotic-process-automation-RPA-survey-report.pdf", "sourceUrl": "https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/financial-services/pdf/insurance-rpa-survey-report.pdf", "sourceDate": "2019-01-01 00:00:00", "presentationDate": null, "ingestedAt": "2026-04-23 20:51:42+00", "status": "ready", "pageCount": 15, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "targetCompany": null, "targetTicker": null, "metadata": { "local_root": "/tmp/legacy-images/606681d272d16554", "origin_corpus": "consulting" } }, "coverage": { "pageCount": 15, "pagesIndexed": 15, "pagesWithImages": 15, "pagesWithMetadata": 15, "imageCoveragePct": 100, "metadataCoveragePct": 100, "componentCount": 101, "chartCount": 18, "metricSlides": 0, "toolMatches": 53, "documentToolMatches": 0, "frameworkMatches": 2, "arcMatches": 2, "beatMatches": 7, "loopMatches": 3, "patternMatches": 0, "storymakersMatch": true, "scoreAvailable": true, "reviewAvailable": true, "activistThesisAvailable": false, "pitchdeckMetadataAvailable": false, "pitchdeckProfileAvailable": false }, "blocks": [], "matches": { "arcs": [ { "arc": { "name": "The Consultant's Gambit", "slug": "consultants-gambit", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Business cases, project proposals, strategic recommendations", "canonId": "019dd956-5e0a-73c8-b305-81c38c959e9c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "Situation & Context -> Problem & Complication -> Solution & Approach -> Evidence & Proof -> Impact & Next Steps", "description": null, "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Strategy & Business", "categorySlug": "strategy-business" }, "matchId": "019de91d-95c8-70e9-9817-4a0aa2bc0f9d", "evidence": "Foreword (p2) sets industry context, key takeaways (p3) frame the gap, p4-13 deliver the evidence, p14 looks forward; classic PwC pyramid sequence.", "isPrimary": true, "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null } }, { "arc": { "name": "The Triple Take", "slug": "triple-take", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Data-driven presentations, research findings", "canonId": "019dd956-6221-73ad-bc12-378f8eb1f018", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "The Facts (What) -> The Implications (So What) -> The Action (Now What)", "description": null, "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Analysis & Information", "categorySlug": "analysis-information" }, "matchId": "019de91d-969c-75eb-adf2-1804d7c9aa0c", "evidence": "Survey-style content (Facts) with embedded callouts (So What) and a forward IPA prompt (Now What), though deck inverts canonical order by leading with takeaways.", "isPrimary": false, "confidence": 55, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null } } ], "beats": [ { "to": 2, "arc": { "name": "The Consultant's Gambit", "slug": "consultants-gambit", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Business cases, project proposals, strategic recommendations", "canonId": "019dd956-5e0a-73c8-b305-81c38c959e9c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "Situation & Context -> Problem & Complication -> Solution & Approach -> Evidence & Proof -> Impact & Next Steps", "description": null, "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Strategy & Business", "categorySlug": "strategy-business" }, "from": 1, "name": "Situation & Context", "beatId": "019de91d-95f4-7128-8f54-0414b7008800", "matchId": "019de91d-95c8-70e9-9817-4a0aa2bc0f9d", "beatType": null, "evidence": "Cover + foreword establish insurance-automation backdrop and the actuarial focus.", "position": 1, "isPrimaryArc": true, "parentBeatType": null, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 70 }, { "to": 3, "arc": { "name": "The Consultant's Gambit", "slug": "consultants-gambit", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Business cases, project proposals, strategic recommendations", "canonId": "019dd956-5e0a-73c8-b305-81c38c959e9c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "Situation & Context -> Problem & Complication -> Solution & Approach -> Evidence & Proof -> Impact & Next Steps", "description": null, "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Strategy & Business", "categorySlug": "strategy-business" }, "from": 3, "name": "Problem & Complication", "beatId": "019de91d-961e-748b-9882-2bc13f0acaac", "matchId": "019de91d-95c8-70e9-9817-4a0aa2bc0f9d", "beatType": null, "evidence": "Key takeaways naming early-stage adoption, governance gaps, skill gaps, complexity.", "position": 2, "isPrimaryArc": true, "parentBeatType": null, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 70 }, { "to": 13, "arc": { "name": "The Consultant's Gambit", "slug": "consultants-gambit", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Business cases, project proposals, strategic recommendations", "canonId": "019dd956-5e0a-73c8-b305-81c38c959e9c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "Situation & Context -> Problem & Complication -> Solution & Approach -> Evidence & Proof -> Impact & Next Steps", "description": null, "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Strategy & Business", "categorySlug": "strategy-business" }, "from": 4, "name": "Evidence & Proof", "beatId": "019de91d-9648-777a-a3e3-14bff9f462cc", "matchId": "019de91d-95c8-70e9-9817-4a0aa2bc0f9d", "beatType": null, "evidence": "Survey methodology + 9 chart slides quantifying RPA usage, governance, skills.", "position": 4, "isPrimaryArc": true, "parentBeatType": null, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 70 }, { "to": 15, "arc": { "name": "The Consultant's Gambit", "slug": "consultants-gambit", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Business cases, project proposals, strategic recommendations", "canonId": "019dd956-5e0a-73c8-b305-81c38c959e9c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "Situation & Context -> Problem & Complication -> Solution & Approach -> Evidence & Proof -> Impact & Next Steps", "description": null, "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Strategy & Business", "categorySlug": "strategy-business" }, "from": 14, "name": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatId": "019de91d-9673-76fd-b87c-d70bb799af71", "matchId": "019de91d-95c8-70e9-9817-4a0aa2bc0f9d", "beatType": null, "evidence": "Looking-forward IPA framing on p14 followed by thank-you / contacts on p15.", "position": 5, "isPrimaryArc": true, "parentBeatType": null, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 70 }, { "to": 13, "arc": { "name": "The Triple Take", "slug": "triple-take", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Data-driven presentations, research findings", "canonId": "019dd956-6221-73ad-bc12-378f8eb1f018", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "The Facts (What) -> The Implications (So What) -> The Action (Now What)", "description": null, "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Analysis & Information", "categorySlug": "analysis-information" }, "from": 4, "name": "The Facts (What)", "beatId": "019de91d-96c7-746d-b5c0-bae04f41cb6c", "matchId": "019de91d-969c-75eb-adf2-1804d7c9aa0c", "beatType": null, "evidence": "Methodology plus chart-heavy data section establishing what insurers are doing.", "position": 1, "isPrimaryArc": false, "parentBeatType": null, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 55 }, { "to": 3, "arc": { "name": "The Triple Take", "slug": "triple-take", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Data-driven presentations, research findings", "canonId": "019dd956-6221-73ad-bc12-378f8eb1f018", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "The Facts (What) -> The Implications (So What) -> The Action (Now What)", "description": null, "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Analysis & Information", "categorySlug": "analysis-information" }, "from": 3, "name": "The Implications (So What)", "beatId": "019de91d-96f5-735a-bbe3-1f0784a2b441", "matchId": "019de91d-969c-75eb-adf2-1804d7c9aa0c", "beatType": null, "evidence": "Key takeaways slide synthesises implications (presented up-front, pyramid style).", "position": 2, "isPrimaryArc": false, "parentBeatType": null, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 55 }, { "to": 14, "arc": { "name": "The Triple Take", "slug": "triple-take", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Data-driven presentations, research findings", "canonId": "019dd956-6221-73ad-bc12-378f8eb1f018", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "The Facts (What) -> The Implications (So What) -> The Action (Now What)", "description": null, "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Analysis & Information", "categorySlug": "analysis-information" }, "from": 14, "name": "The Action (Now What)", "beatId": "019de91d-9720-769f-9db2-0b3f4b0bf021", "matchId": "019de91d-969c-75eb-adf2-1804d7c9aa0c", "beatType": null, "evidence": "Looking Forward – IPA invites future exploration and adoption.", "position": 3, "isPrimaryArc": false, "parentBeatType": null, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 55 } ], "loops": [ { "to": 10, "from": 5, "loop": { "name": "02_pattern_hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "canonId": "019dd956-6695-771a-be2e-f1748ef041a4", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2420-77be-bc41-ded96d08cb21", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Logical Reasoning", "categorySlug": "logical-reasoning" }, "matchId": "019de91d-974a-77f1-985f-dea127559a33", "evidence": "Six consecutive bar/stacked-bar slides each showing low current RPA usage across a different function category, all reinforcing the same pattern.", "position": 1, "objective": "Show RPA adoption is early-stage and fragmented across actuarial functions", "confidence": 78, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null } }, { "to": 13, "from": 11, "loop": { "name": "40_mece_breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "canonId": "019dd956-763c-765e-8b68-6ee3ae1ef184", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2420-77be-bc41-ded96d08cb21", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Consulting Framework", "categorySlug": "consulting-framework" }, "matchId": "019de91d-9773-7040-b9a4-4026232b48b2", "evidence": "Three back-to-back slides covering mutually-distinct enabling dimensions (offshoring impact, tools/governance, skills) that together complete the survey picture.", "position": 2, "objective": "Round out the adoption picture with three distinct enabling topics: offshoring, governance, skills", "confidence": 65, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null } }, { "to": 14, "from": 14, "loop": { "name": "24_time_machine", "slug": "24-time-machine", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Vision casting, long-term strategy, investment pitches", "canonId": "019dd956-6f7f-70b2-b087-a16fe20515a7", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2420-77be-bc41-ded96d08cb21", "structure": "Fast Forward to Success -> What Made It Possible -> Back to Today's Decision", "description": "Transport the audience to a future state where your solution has already succeeded", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Vision", "categorySlug": "vision" }, "matchId": "019de91d-979d-739c-a322-b6420b014391", "evidence": "Looking-forward IPA slide projects future state and frames the next adoption wave; only one slide so loop is borderline.", "position": 3, "objective": "Pivot from today's RPA reality to tomorrow's IPA opportunity", "confidence": 50, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null } } ], "tools": [ { "tool": { "name": "Problem Statement Canvas", "slug": "problem-statement-canvas", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-839d-744b-ad11-9bf3e3642a18", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Structured definition of the problem: What? Who? Where? When? Scale?", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Block", "categorySlug": "block" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "block", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-97f3-7747-a4f8-f4cefebb9fb0", "evidence": "Three paragraphs framing what / who / scope of automation gap.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 55, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 2, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "SCQA Framework", "slug": "scqa-framework", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-7bcb-763f-bdf6-1dfedf3bd36c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-a0b0-719e-937e-2ac31e53d32c", "description": "Situation, Complication, Question, Answer - structured problem framing", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Block", "categorySlug": "block" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "block", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-97c8-7585-877f-9096da25f24d", "evidence": "Foreword sets situation (insurance lags) + complication (RPA needed but slow) + question.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": "Core", "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 2, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Governing Thought", "slug": "governing-thought", "status": "active", "bestFor": "When the deck makes a recommendation, decision, or argues a position; when defining the top of a pyramid before structuring supports; when an SCQA opening needs an Answer; when stripping topic-style titles in favour of action titles.", "canonId": "019dd956-8286-760e-8638-77558a0d71ba", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "06f7d5a5-daab-44c1-9d67-63c52ba03962", "description": "The single declarative sentence at the apex of a Minto pyramid that summarises and is supported by everything beneath it — the answer the deck exists to defend.", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Block", "categorySlug": "block" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "block", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-989d-7102-b79c-2c9093e0f48b", "evidence": "Bottom block 05 acts as overarching synthesis tying the four cards together.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": "When the deck makes a recommendation, decision, or argues a position; when defining the top of a pyramid before structuring supports; when an SCQA opening needs an Answer; when stripping topic-style titles in favour of action titles.", "confidence": 65, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 3, "whyItWorks": "Forces the writer to commit to a position before structuring the case — exposes muddled thinking that hides safely inside topic-style headings. Gives busy readers the answer in the first cognitive beat and enables progressive disclosure of the supporting case.", "antipattern": "Topic-style headings ('Strategic options for growth', 'Considerations for Europe') instead of declarative claims with verbs. Multi-sentence apex statements. Qualifier-laden hedges. Noun-phrase labels ('Recommendation: acquisition of Target B') pretending to be sentences. Fake governing thoughts — confident apex the supports don't actually force.", "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": "Anchor the document in one defensible claim with a working verb, so the audience knows the answer before they read the proof and the entire structure ladders up to it." }, { "tool": { "name": "MECE Principle", "slug": "mece-principle", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-7c60-71a8-8758-c79d914489c9", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive - ensuring complete, non-overlapping structure", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Block", "categorySlug": "block" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "block", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9873-7187-85cb-4caf12f17ff0", "evidence": "Four distinct findings (maturity, governance, skills, challenges) with little overlap.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": "Core", "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 75, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 3, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Pyramid Principle", "slug": "pyramid-principle", "status": "active", "bestFor": "When the document has a single governing decision or recommendation the reader is asked to accept, and the case can be decomposed into a small number of clean groups. Strategy decks, board memos, investment committee papers.", "canonId": "019dd956-7cbd-7219-a477-c871e2bc1aff", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "88b6ac56-b880-46f9-8621-ef3491ab6235", "description": "Lead with the answer; group three to five MECE supports beneath it; recurse one level down. Top-down hierarchical structure for any document with a single recommendation.", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Block", "categorySlug": "block" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "block", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9848-77d2-a061-2c11edc417d5", "evidence": "Answer-first: four headline takeaways before any evidence appears.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": "Core", "whenToUse": "When the document has a single governing decision or recommendation the reader is asked to accept, and the case can be decomposed into a small number of clean groups. Strategy decks, board memos, investment committee papers.", "confidence": 85, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 3, "whyItWorks": "Solves the two failure modes of expert communication at once: (1) the long climb where readers wait pages for the answer, and (2) logical mush from non-MECE groupings. Progressive disclosure lets a reader stop at any depth and get the right information.", "antipattern": "Chronological structure (\"what we did, what we found, what we conclude\") instead of logical hierarchy. Top-of-pyramid that is a topic (\"strategic options\") instead of an answer (\"pursue Option B because...\"). Non-MECE supports that overlap or fail to cover the universe.", "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": "Transfer conviction with minimum reader effort by mirroring how decision-makers consume information: answer first, scaffolding behind." }, { "tool": { "name": "MECE Principle", "slug": "mece-principle", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-7c60-71a8-8758-c79d914489c9", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive - ensuring complete, non-overlapping structure", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Block", "categorySlug": "block" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "block", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9dc2-758f-a774-189d92249e98", "evidence": "First of three distinct enabling-topic slides covering offshoring/governance/skills.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": "Core", "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 60, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 11, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Cognitive Load", "slug": "cognitive-load", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-94f5-73dd-8446-ab3f7941bee7", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Total mental effort required to process information - minimize unnecessary complexity", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Block", "categorySlug": "block" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "block", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9f14-762f-8d88-985d5e0e867d", "evidence": "Slide flagged overcrowded — three distinct visual systems compete on one page.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 50, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 12, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Horizontal Logic", "slug": "horizontal-logic", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-9a85-7199-aaa6-4314cd50dcfa", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Logical grouping at the same level - items must relate coherently", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Loop", "categorySlug": "loop" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "loop", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9a46-72a6-bd65-d3a2c789849b", "evidence": "Sibling chart slides at same MECE level (function categories).", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 60, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 5, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Inductive Reasoning", "slug": "inductive-reasoning", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-99c6-705e-94cc-76a504c3da37", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Grouping similar evidence to form a conclusion (Evidence → Pattern → Conclusion)", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Loop", "categorySlug": "loop" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "loop", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9a1c-773f-83d7-35a79edefd41", "evidence": "First slide of pattern-hunter loop: builds 'low maturity' conclusion across pages.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": "Core", "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 5, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Concrete Language", "slug": "concrete-language", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-bcd4-7398-9723-6aa72346170b", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Using specific sensory details instead of abstract terms", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Storyteller", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Storyteller" ], "matchId": "019de91d-981c-75c2-a008-76b22ac42bea", "evidence": "Specific terminology: rules-based software, pre-programmed tasks.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 60, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 2, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Executive summary", "slug": "executive-summary", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd9e1-4b63-72d5-9734-da757d91ca61", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "A condensed view of the entire argument on a single slide / block.", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": null, "categorySlug": null }, "agent": null, "layer": "slide", "agents": null, "matchId": "a8c9767e-23bd-4b44-944f-c93073a9138f", "evidence": "This slide contains a detailed executive summary with multiple paragraphs, indicating a comprehensive overview of the report.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 0.9, "extraction": { "at": "2026-07-16 21:19:17.707242+00", "model": "or:meta-llama/llama-4-scout", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 2, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": "common", "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Action Titles", "slug": "action-titles", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Any decision-grade deliverable — strategy recommendation, board update, investment memo, M&A review, post-mortem — where the reader is being asked to agree, decide, or act and will skim the title bar at speed.", "canonId": "019dd956-ac70-700b-a608-ba58e78f5dcc", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "816dad3c-9983-41c1-a86e-978ebd582841", "description": "The McKinsey-bred discipline of writing every slide title as a complete declarative sentence with a verb and an insight, not a topic label. Each title is a sub-claim that ladders up to the deck's governing thought; read in sequence, the titles reconstruct the executive summary.", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-98c7-76de-a967-553f0a55519c", "evidence": "Each numbered card states a finding ('still in early stages', 'manage centrally').", "pageRefs": null, "priority": "Core", "whenToUse": "Any decision-grade deliverable — strategy recommendation, board update, investment memo, M&A review, post-mortem — where the reader is being asked to agree, decide, or act and will skim the title bar at speed.", "confidence": 80, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 3, "whyItWorks": "Solves two failure modes at once. (1) The buried claim: action titles place the conclusion on the page before any analysis is read, so a busy reader doesn't reverse-engineer it from the chart. (2) The spineless deck: because each title is a claim, slides have to ladder up to the governing thought; logical gaps become visible as topic-shaped titles in a sequence that no longer reads as a story.", "antipattern": "Topic labels disguised as titles — Volume by quarter, Key findings, Pricing strategy, Margins have been impacted. No verb, or a passive verb with no agent, or a fact (Revenue grew 12%) without the so-what. Also: titles that overreach the chart's evidence, multi-claim X-grew-but-Y-fell welded titles, and mechanical repetition of the same X-drove-Y template across the deck.", "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": "Forces the deck to carry its argument in the title bar so a senior reader can extract the recommendation without opening a single slide; converts a binder of topics into a navigable pyramid where every slide is a node defending the apex." }, { "tool": { "name": "Color Strategy", "slug": "color-strategy", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b202-77cf-8a6e-f445b08c0fd3", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Using color for emphasis, categories, sentiment, and hierarchy", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-991e-77df-a6e0-2df4ba1d45d2", "evidence": "Four colour-coded blocks plus dark synthesis bar create a card grid.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 80, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 3, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "So What? Test", "slug": "so-what-test", "status": "active", "bestFor": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "canonId": "019dd956-acd2-76f8-b59a-9bf15a89f10a", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "fec04b06-b2f1-432b-a97b-916dc7563f64", "description": "The recursive editorial discipline of asking so-what of every slide, chart, and statement until the answer is an implication for the audience — that final answer becomes the slide's title; the chain becomes its body.", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-98f3-719b-92c8-fa5dbbc0f92d", "evidence": "Every block delivers an implication, not a topic label.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": "Core", "whenToUse": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "confidence": 75, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 3, "whyItWorks": "Solves the two failure modes of analytical communication at once: stopping at description (analyst-confidence problem) and leaving insight stranded in the analyst's head (translation problem). The recursion is what guarantees the implication makes it into ink.", "antipattern": "Stopping at the first tighter description (still a fact, not an implication), regressing past the audience's decision space into philosophy, smuggling the so-what into speaker notes, or re-using an implication aimed at a previous audience.", "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": "Forces every analytical artefact to close the gap between fact and decision, so the reader holds the recommendation by reading titles alone rather than reconstructing the analyst's mental model from raw evidence." }, { "tool": { "name": "Visual Hierarchy", "slug": "visual-hierarchy", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b2ca-706b-937f-e52441086fd7", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Order of perception through Size > Color > Position > Weight > Space", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9972-70fc-a8e8-a276b1c02e38", "evidence": "Oversized 01-05 numerals dominate; supporting text recedes.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 3, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Von Restorff Effect", "slug": "von-restorff-effect", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-beab-73d8-9f62-30d0332e926e", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Items that stand out are noticed and remembered - make key points visually distinct", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9948-74fe-be83-9d442c25ea45", "evidence": "Dark grey 05 bar stands out from coloured cards above.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 60, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 3, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Chart Selection Guide", "slug": "chart-selection-guide", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b1a0-700b-ba17-0e16c4d5bcae", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Choosing the right chart type for your data and message", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-999b-70ed-b417-669485f5384b", "evidence": "Two donut charts to show participant proportions.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 4, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Concrete Language", "slug": "concrete-language", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-bcd4-7398-9723-6aa72346170b", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Using specific sensory details instead of abstract terms", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Storyteller", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Storyteller" ], "matchId": "019de91d-99f0-745c-a488-0e7f54e2afe9", "evidence": "Specific classification criteria for participants stated.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 60, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 4, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Credibility Transfer", "slug": "credibility-transfer", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-bd34-759a-8e3b-2f14b571a2a1", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Borrowing authority from trusted sources or vivid details", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Storyteller", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Storyteller" ], "matchId": "019de91d-99c6-762e-bdcf-c4c39cb91fda", "evidence": "Sample size 'Survey participants: 44' surfaced as a metric.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 75, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 4, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Annotation", "slug": "annotation", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b5b9-7668-bf0e-3af99823ec5c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Adding explanatory labels to highlight key data points", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9a9a-72fe-b832-1a28d25efbaa", "evidence": "Each bar labelled with its percentage value.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 80, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 5, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Chart Selection Guide", "slug": "chart-selection-guide", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b1a0-700b-ba17-0e16c4d5bcae", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Choosing the right chart type for your data and message", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9a70-736d-8e03-dd7a16b758a3", "evidence": "Horizontal bar charts for ranked category percentages.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 75, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 5, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "So What? Test", "slug": "so-what-test", "status": "active", "bestFor": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "canonId": "019dd956-acd2-76f8-b59a-9bf15a89f10a", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "fec04b06-b2f1-432b-a97b-916dc7563f64", "description": "The recursive editorial discipline of asking so-what of every slide, chart, and statement until the answer is an implication for the audience — that final answer becomes the slide's title; the chain becomes its body.", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9ac4-726e-ab59-906def4b3860", "evidence": "Callout states the 90% have-not-implemented insight explicitly.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": "Core", "whenToUse": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 5, "whyItWorks": "Solves the two failure modes of analytical communication at once: stopping at description (analyst-confidence problem) and leaving insight stranded in the analyst's head (translation problem). The recursion is what guarantees the implication makes it into ink.", "antipattern": "Stopping at the first tighter description (still a fact, not an implication), regressing past the audience's decision space into philosophy, smuggling the so-what into speaker notes, or re-using an implication aimed at a previous audience.", "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": "Forces every analytical artefact to close the gap between fact and decision, so the reader holds the recommendation by reading titles alone rather than reconstructing the analyst's mental model from raw evidence." }, { "tool": { "name": "Annotation", "slug": "annotation", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b5b9-7668-bf0e-3af99823ec5c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Adding explanatory labels to highlight key data points", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9b43-7415-a93c-41d2723fcbd6", "evidence": "Stacked segments labelled with adoption status.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 6, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Chart Selection Guide", "slug": "chart-selection-guide", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b1a0-700b-ba17-0e16c4d5bcae", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Choosing the right chart type for your data and message", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9aee-726d-93e6-452ef881406f", "evidence": "100% stacked bar to compare adoption stages across processes.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 75, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 6, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Small Multiples", "slug": "small-multiples", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b32d-7586-b368-baa1dd388ed4", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Repeating similar charts for comparison across categories or time", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9b19-76c6-bdab-dd4f28a6133f", "evidence": "Same chart template repeats across p6-10 for cross-category comparison.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 65, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 6, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "So What? Test", "slug": "so-what-test", "status": "active", "bestFor": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "canonId": "019dd956-acd2-76f8-b59a-9bf15a89f10a", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "fec04b06-b2f1-432b-a97b-916dc7563f64", "description": "The recursive editorial discipline of asking so-what of every slide, chart, and statement until the answer is an implication for the audience — that final answer becomes the slide's title; the chain becomes its body.", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9b6e-758e-b3fb-f44b332f1d16", "evidence": "Callout: Life vs P&C contrast surfaced as the takeaway.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": "Core", "whenToUse": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 6, "whyItWorks": "Solves the two failure modes of analytical communication at once: stopping at description (analyst-confidence problem) and leaving insight stranded in the analyst's head (translation problem). The recursion is what guarantees the implication makes it into ink.", "antipattern": "Stopping at the first tighter description (still a fact, not an implication), regressing past the audience's decision space into philosophy, smuggling the so-what into speaker notes, or re-using an implication aimed at a previous audience.", "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": "Forces every analytical artefact to close the gap between fact and decision, so the reader holds the recommendation by reading titles alone rather than reconstructing the analyst's mental model from raw evidence." }, { "tool": { "name": "Annotation", "slug": "annotation", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b5b9-7668-bf0e-3af99823ec5c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Adding explanatory labels to highlight key data points", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9bed-77e0-bed0-10bedfef42cf", "evidence": "Bar segments carry status labels.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 7, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Chart Selection Guide", "slug": "chart-selection-guide", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b1a0-700b-ba17-0e16c4d5bcae", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Choosing the right chart type for your data and message", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9b98-73ca-8e69-835bc80bebfe", "evidence": "Stacked bar of adoption by data/reporting process.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 75, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 7, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Small Multiples", "slug": "small-multiples", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b32d-7586-b368-baa1dd388ed4", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Repeating similar charts for comparison across categories or time", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9bc2-77da-9160-d544be458366", "evidence": "Same template as p6 reused for next category.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 65, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 7, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "So What? Test", "slug": "so-what-test", "status": "active", "bestFor": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "canonId": "019dd956-acd2-76f8-b59a-9bf15a89f10a", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "fec04b06-b2f1-432b-a97b-916dc7563f64", "description": "The recursive editorial discipline of asking so-what of every slide, chart, and statement until the answer is an implication for the audience — that final answer becomes the slide's title; the chain becomes its body.", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9c18-74cf-8bb7-e10e1fa6d83a", "evidence": "Callout names where RPA is most used (sending outputs, ETL).", "pageRefs": null, "priority": "Core", "whenToUse": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 7, "whyItWorks": "Solves the two failure modes of analytical communication at once: stopping at description (analyst-confidence problem) and leaving insight stranded in the analyst's head (translation problem). The recursion is what guarantees the implication makes it into ink.", "antipattern": "Stopping at the first tighter description (still a fact, not an implication), regressing past the audience's decision space into philosophy, smuggling the so-what into speaker notes, or re-using an implication aimed at a previous audience.", "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": "Forces every analytical artefact to close the gap between fact and decision, so the reader holds the recommendation by reading titles alone rather than reconstructing the analyst's mental model from raw evidence." }, { "tool": { "name": "Chart Selection Guide", "slug": "chart-selection-guide", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b1a0-700b-ba17-0e16c4d5bcae", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Choosing the right chart type for your data and message", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9c42-768b-9995-864b71008538", "evidence": "Stacked bar of finance/accounting processes.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 75, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 8, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Small Multiples", "slug": "small-multiples", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b32d-7586-b368-baa1dd388ed4", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Repeating similar charts for comparison across categories or time", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9c6d-7072-a240-36c5c177600b", "evidence": "Continues p6-7 chart pattern.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 65, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 8, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "So What? Test", "slug": "so-what-test", "status": "active", "bestFor": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "canonId": "019dd956-acd2-76f8-b59a-9bf15a89f10a", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "fec04b06-b2f1-432b-a97b-916dc7563f64", "description": "The recursive editorial discipline of asking so-what of every slide, chart, and statement until the answer is an implication for the audience — that final answer becomes the slide's title; the chain becomes its body.", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9c98-77aa-bd43-24c55392c06f", "evidence": "Callout flags reconciliations as top RPA target.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": "Core", "whenToUse": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 8, "whyItWorks": "Solves the two failure modes of analytical communication at once: stopping at description (analyst-confidence problem) and leaving insight stranded in the analyst's head (translation problem). The recursion is what guarantees the implication makes it into ink.", "antipattern": "Stopping at the first tighter description (still a fact, not an implication), regressing past the audience's decision space into philosophy, smuggling the so-what into speaker notes, or re-using an implication aimed at a previous audience.", "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": "Forces every analytical artefact to close the gap between fact and decision, so the reader holds the recommendation by reading titles alone rather than reconstructing the analyst's mental model from raw evidence." }, { "tool": { "name": "Chart Selection Guide", "slug": "chart-selection-guide", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b1a0-700b-ba17-0e16c4d5bcae", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Choosing the right chart type for your data and message", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9cc3-70b9-a556-5f6b649d118c", "evidence": "Stacked bar across claims/underwriting processes.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 75, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 9, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Small Multiples", "slug": "small-multiples", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b32d-7586-b368-baa1dd388ed4", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Repeating similar charts for comparison across categories or time", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9cee-7303-9719-cfe16774e49e", "evidence": "Same chart template re-used.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 65, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 9, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "So What? Test", "slug": "so-what-test", "status": "active", "bestFor": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "canonId": "019dd956-acd2-76f8-b59a-9bf15a89f10a", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "fec04b06-b2f1-432b-a97b-916dc7563f64", "description": "The recursive editorial discipline of asking so-what of every slide, chart, and statement until the answer is an implication for the audience — that final answer becomes the slide's title; the chain becomes its body.", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9d19-71c6-96ce-c674f4289812", "evidence": "Callout: 'No P&C insurer is currently using RPA in any of...'", "pageRefs": null, "priority": "Core", "whenToUse": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 9, "whyItWorks": "Solves the two failure modes of analytical communication at once: stopping at description (analyst-confidence problem) and leaving insight stranded in the analyst's head (translation problem). The recursion is what guarantees the implication makes it into ink.", "antipattern": "Stopping at the first tighter description (still a fact, not an implication), regressing past the audience's decision space into philosophy, smuggling the so-what into speaker notes, or re-using an implication aimed at a previous audience.", "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": "Forces every analytical artefact to close the gap between fact and decision, so the reader holds the recommendation by reading titles alone rather than reconstructing the analyst's mental model from raw evidence." }, { "tool": { "name": "Chart Selection Guide", "slug": "chart-selection-guide", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b1a0-700b-ba17-0e16c4d5bcae", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Choosing the right chart type for your data and message", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9d43-755a-bb8e-d5ef4d9a0016", "evidence": "Stacked bar across risk-management processes.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 75, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 10, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Small Multiples", "slug": "small-multiples", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b32d-7586-b368-baa1dd388ed4", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Repeating similar charts for comparison across categories or time", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9d6d-76c9-8c76-c9afb7a17564", "evidence": "Closes the p6-10 small-multiples sweep.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 65, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 10, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "So What? Test", "slug": "so-what-test", "status": "active", "bestFor": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "canonId": "019dd956-acd2-76f8-b59a-9bf15a89f10a", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "fec04b06-b2f1-432b-a97b-916dc7563f64", "description": "The recursive editorial discipline of asking so-what of every slide, chart, and statement until the answer is an implication for the audience — that final answer becomes the slide's title; the chain becomes its body.", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9d97-71ad-b3c2-8ae25d39b8e7", "evidence": "Callout: '91% / no P&C insurer is currently using RPA in risk'.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": "Core", "whenToUse": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 10, "whyItWorks": "Solves the two failure modes of analytical communication at once: stopping at description (analyst-confidence problem) and leaving insight stranded in the analyst's head (translation problem). The recursion is what guarantees the implication makes it into ink.", "antipattern": "Stopping at the first tighter description (still a fact, not an implication), regressing past the audience's decision space into philosophy, smuggling the so-what into speaker notes, or re-using an implication aimed at a previous audience.", "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": "Forces every analytical artefact to close the gap between fact and decision, so the reader holds the recommendation by reading titles alone rather than reconstructing the analyst's mental model from raw evidence." }, { "tool": { "name": "Annotation", "slug": "annotation", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b5b9-7668-bf0e-3af99823ec5c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Adding explanatory labels to highlight key data points", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9e16-7364-bbc9-ba0b293ca748", "evidence": "Percentages labelled directly on chart.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 11, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Chart Selection Guide", "slug": "chart-selection-guide", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b1a0-700b-ba17-0e16c4d5bcae", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Choosing the right chart type for your data and message", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9dec-77da-9add-4b2626d7523f", "evidence": "Donut + horizontal bar combination for current vs. future view.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 75, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 11, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "So What? Test", "slug": "so-what-test", "status": "active", "bestFor": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "canonId": "019dd956-acd2-76f8-b59a-9bf15a89f10a", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "fec04b06-b2f1-432b-a97b-916dc7563f64", "description": "The recursive editorial discipline of asking so-what of every slide, chart, and statement until the answer is an implication for the audience — that final answer becomes the slide's title; the chain becomes its body.", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9e41-71da-aaf5-7001f2236ecc", "evidence": "Callout states the >60% no-outsourcing finding.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": "Core", "whenToUse": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 11, "whyItWorks": "Solves the two failure modes of analytical communication at once: stopping at description (analyst-confidence problem) and leaving insight stranded in the analyst's head (translation problem). The recursion is what guarantees the implication makes it into ink.", "antipattern": "Stopping at the first tighter description (still a fact, not an implication), regressing past the audience's decision space into philosophy, smuggling the so-what into speaker notes, or re-using an implication aimed at a previous audience.", "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": "Forces every analytical artefact to close the gap between fact and decision, so the reader holds the recommendation by reading titles alone rather than reconstructing the analyst's mental model from raw evidence." }, { "tool": { "name": "Annotation", "slug": "annotation", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b5b9-7668-bf0e-3af99823ec5c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Adding explanatory labels to highlight key data points", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9eea-75b1-8a58-b4420ed258e0", "evidence": "All bars and donut wedges carry numeric labels.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 12, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Chart Selection Guide", "slug": "chart-selection-guide", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b1a0-700b-ba17-0e16c4d5bcae", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Choosing the right chart type for your data and message", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9e6b-77fb-a5d5-b72e610a294d", "evidence": "Combines bar chart, icon/percent grid, and donut on one dashboard.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 12, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Color Strategy", "slug": "color-strategy", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b202-77cf-8a6e-f445b08c0fd3", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Using color for emphasis, categories, sentiment, and hierarchy", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9e96-70f8-a047-360d8ef91449", "evidence": "Tool-share cards differ by colour to distinguish vendors.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 12, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Visual Hierarchy", "slug": "visual-hierarchy", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b2ca-706b-937f-e52441086fd7", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Order of perception through Size > Color > Position > Weight > Space", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9ec0-76af-b78f-60e4101deb6f", "evidence": "Large vendor-share percentages anchor lower-left grid.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 65, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 12, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Annotation", "slug": "annotation", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b5b9-7668-bf0e-3af99823ec5c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Adding explanatory labels to highlight key data points", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9f69-77bc-bf1a-9b2e73e9a005", "evidence": "All chart values labelled.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 13, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Chart Selection Guide", "slug": "chart-selection-guide", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b1a0-700b-ba17-0e16c4d5bcae", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Choosing the right chart type for your data and message", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9f3f-72b9-856f-13d559bb3bb4", "evidence": "Donut + two horizontal bars to size skill gap and adoption blockers.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 75, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 13, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "So What? Test", "slug": "so-what-test", "status": "active", "bestFor": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "canonId": "019dd956-acd2-76f8-b59a-9bf15a89f10a", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "fec04b06-b2f1-432b-a97b-916dc7563f64", "description": "The recursive editorial discipline of asking so-what of every slide, chart, and statement until the answer is an implication for the audience — that final answer becomes the slide's title; the chain becomes its body.", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9f94-7288-b564-ef0d90dea21e", "evidence": "Callout: 'Nearly 80% are not using RPA or are in education mode'.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": "Core", "whenToUse": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "confidence": 75, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 13, "whyItWorks": "Solves the two failure modes of analytical communication at once: stopping at description (analyst-confidence problem) and leaving insight stranded in the analyst's head (translation problem). The recursion is what guarantees the implication makes it into ink.", "antipattern": "Stopping at the first tighter description (still a fact, not an implication), regressing past the audience's decision space into philosophy, smuggling the so-what into speaker notes, or re-using an implication aimed at a previous audience.", "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": "Forces every analytical artefact to close the gap between fact and decision, so the reader holds the recommendation by reading titles alone rather than reconstructing the analyst's mental model from raw evidence." }, { "tool": { "name": "Annotation", "slug": "annotation", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b5b9-7668-bf0e-3af99823ec5c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Adding explanatory labels to highlight key data points", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9fe9-705f-b62b-45cb3aed9329", "evidence": "Bars labelled 80% / 16% / 2% / 2% directly.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 75, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 14, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Chart Selection Guide", "slug": "chart-selection-guide", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b1a0-700b-ba17-0e16c4d5bcae", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Choosing the right chart type for your data and message", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9fbe-7599-b9dc-f6946705f9d4", "evidence": "Single horizontal bar chart sized for the four IPA stages.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 75, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 14, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "So What? Test", "slug": "so-what-test", "status": "active", "bestFor": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "canonId": "019dd956-acd2-76f8-b59a-9bf15a89f10a", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "fec04b06-b2f1-432b-a97b-916dc7563f64", "description": "The recursive editorial discipline of asking so-what of every slide, chart, and statement until the answer is an implication for the audience — that final answer becomes the slide's title; the chain becomes its body.", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-a012-70bf-97aa-5d1933b2c5af", "evidence": "Body text states 'majority have not yet started considering...'", "pageRefs": null, "priority": "Core", "whenToUse": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 14, "whyItWorks": "Solves the two failure modes of analytical communication at once: stopping at description (analyst-confidence problem) and leaving insight stranded in the analyst's head (translation problem). The recursion is what guarantees the implication makes it into ink.", "antipattern": "Stopping at the first tighter description (still a fact, not an implication), regressing past the audience's decision space into philosophy, smuggling the so-what into speaker notes, or re-using an implication aimed at a previous audience.", "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": "Forces every analytical artefact to close the gap between fact and decision, so the reader holds the recommendation by reading titles alone rather than reconstructing the analyst's mental model from raw evidence." }, { "tool": { "name": "Closing Techniques", "slug": "closing-techniques", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-af13-774b-a4fd-7db0a3a88d51", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Strong endings: Callback, challenge, vision, clear CTA, memorable line", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Storyteller", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Storyteller" ], "matchId": "019de91d-a03c-7315-9fec-b326d4824bf9", "evidence": "Standard PwC sign-off with named partner contacts.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 15, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null } ], "frameworks": [ { "matchId": "019de91d-a066-755c-8f87-84bca9858c15", "evidence": "Lower bar lists RPA exploration stages: Evaluating → Planning → POC → Deployment.", "framework": null, "confidence": 60, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 5, "frameworkName": "Maturity model" }, { "matchId": "019de91d-a092-71d9-b922-a359d03cdd49", "evidence": "Four IPA stages from 'not exploring' to 'completed deployment' form a maturity ladder.", "framework": null, "confidence": 65, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 14, "frameworkName": "Maturity model" } ], "patterns": [] }, "storymakers": { "model": "claude-cli", "backend": "claude", "rawJson": { "arc": { "id": 1, "slug": "consultants-gambit", "beats": [ { "name": "Situation & Context", "end_page": 2, "evidence": "Cover + foreword establish insurance-automation backdrop and the actuarial focus.", "position": 1, "start_page": 1 }, { "name": "Problem & Complication", "end_page": 3, "evidence": "Key takeaways naming early-stage adoption, governance gaps, skill gaps, complexity.", "position": 2, "start_page": 3 }, { "name": "Evidence & Proof", "end_page": 13, "evidence": "Survey methodology + 9 chart slides quantifying RPA usage, governance, skills.", "position": 4, "start_page": 4 }, { "name": "Impact & Next Steps", "end_page": 15, "evidence": "Looking-forward IPA framing on p14 followed by thank-you / contacts on p15.", "position": 5, "start_page": 14 } ], "evidence": "Foreword (p2) sets industry context, key takeaways (p3) frame the gap, p4-13 deliver the evidence, p14 looks forward; classic PwC pyramid sequence.", "confidence": 70 }, "loops": [ { "id": 2, "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "end_page": 10, "evidence": "Six consecutive bar/stacked-bar slides each showing low current RPA usage across a different function category, all reinforcing the same pattern.", "position": 1, "objective": "Show RPA adoption is early-stage and fragmented across actuarial functions", "confidence": 78, "start_page": 5 }, { "id": 40, "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "end_page": 13, "evidence": "Three back-to-back slides covering mutually-distinct enabling dimensions (offshoring impact, tools/governance, skills) that together complete the survey picture.", "position": 2, "objective": "Round out the adoption picture with three distinct enabling topics: offshoring, governance, skills", "confidence": 65, "start_page": 11 }, { "id": 24, "slug": "24-time-machine", "end_page": 14, "evidence": "Looking-forward IPA slide projects future state and frames the next adoption wave; only one slide so loop is borderline.", "position": 3, "objective": "Pivot from today's RPA reality to tomorrow's IPA opportunity", "confidence": 50, "start_page": 14 } ], "slide_tools": [ { "tools": [ { "id": 1, "slug": "scqa-framework", "layer": "Block", "evidence": "Foreword sets situation (insurance lags) + complication (RPA needed but slow) + question.", "confidence": 70 }, { "id": 20, "slug": "problem-statement-canvas", "layer": "Block", "evidence": "Three paragraphs framing what / who / scope of automation gap.", "confidence": 55 }, { "id": 154, "slug": "concrete-language", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Specific terminology: rules-based software, pre-programmed tasks.", "confidence": 60 } ], "page_number": 2 }, { "tools": [ { "id": 3, "slug": "pyramid-principle", "layer": "Block", "evidence": "Answer-first: four headline takeaways before any evidence appears.", "confidence": 85 }, { "id": 2, "slug": "mece-principle", "layer": "Block", "evidence": "Four distinct findings (maturity, governance, skills, challenges) with little overlap.", "confidence": 75 }, { "id": 17, "slug": "governing-thought", "layer": "Block", "evidence": "Bottom block 05 acts as overarching synthesis tying the four cards together.", "confidence": 65 }, { "id": 118, "slug": "action-titles", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Each numbered card states a finding ('still in early stages', 'manage centrally').", "confidence": 80 }, { "id": 119, "slug": "so-what-test", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Every block delivers an implication, not a topic label.", "confidence": 75 }, { "id": 130, "slug": "color-strategy", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Four colour-coded blocks plus dark synthesis bar create a card grid.", "confidence": 80 }, { "id": 158, "slug": "von-restorff-effect", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Dark grey 05 bar stands out from coloured cards above.", "confidence": 60 }, { "id": 132, "slug": "visual-hierarchy", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Oversized 01-05 numerals dominate; supporting text recedes.", "confidence": 70 } ], "page_number": 3 }, { "tools": [ { "id": 129, "slug": "chart-selection-guide", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Two donut charts to show participant proportions.", "confidence": 70 }, { "id": 155, "slug": "credibility-transfer", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Sample size 'Survey participants: 44' surfaced as a metric.", "confidence": 75 }, { "id": 154, "slug": "concrete-language", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Specific classification criteria for participants stated.", "confidence": 60 } ], "page_number": 4 }, { "tools": [ { "id": 74, "slug": "inductive-reasoning", "layer": "Loop", "evidence": "First slide of pattern-hunter loop: builds 'low maturity' conclusion across pages.", "confidence": 70 }, { "id": 76, "slug": "horizontal-logic", "layer": "Loop", "evidence": "Sibling chart slides at same MECE level (function categories).", "confidence": 60 }, { "id": 129, "slug": "chart-selection-guide", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Horizontal bar charts for ranked category percentages.", "confidence": 75 }, { "id": 138, "slug": "annotation", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Each bar labelled with its percentage value.", "confidence": 80 }, { "id": 119, "slug": "so-what-test", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Callout states the 90% have-not-implemented insight explicitly.", "confidence": 70 } ], "page_number": 5 }, { "tools": [ { "id": 129, "slug": "chart-selection-guide", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "100% stacked bar to compare adoption stages across processes.", "confidence": 75 }, { "id": 133, "slug": "small-multiples", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Same chart template repeats across p6-10 for cross-category comparison.", "confidence": 65 }, { "id": 138, "slug": "annotation", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Stacked segments labelled with adoption status.", "confidence": 70 }, { "id": 119, "slug": "so-what-test", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Callout: Life vs P&C contrast surfaced as the takeaway.", "confidence": 70 } ], "page_number": 6 }, { "tools": [ { "id": 129, "slug": "chart-selection-guide", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Stacked bar of adoption by data/reporting process.", "confidence": 75 }, { "id": 133, "slug": "small-multiples", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Same template as p6 reused for next category.", "confidence": 65 }, { "id": 138, "slug": "annotation", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Bar segments carry status labels.", "confidence": 70 }, { "id": 119, "slug": "so-what-test", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Callout names where RPA is most used (sending outputs, ETL).", "confidence": 70 } ], "page_number": 7 }, { "tools": [ { "id": 129, "slug": "chart-selection-guide", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Stacked bar of finance/accounting processes.", "confidence": 75 }, { "id": 133, "slug": "small-multiples", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Continues p6-7 chart pattern.", "confidence": 65 }, { "id": 119, "slug": "so-what-test", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Callout flags reconciliations as top RPA target.", "confidence": 70 } ], "page_number": 8 }, { "tools": [ { "id": 129, "slug": "chart-selection-guide", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Stacked bar across claims/underwriting processes.", "confidence": 75 }, { "id": 133, "slug": "small-multiples", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Same chart template re-used.", "confidence": 65 }, { "id": 119, "slug": "so-what-test", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Callout: 'No P&C insurer is currently using RPA in any of...'", "confidence": 70 } ], "page_number": 9 }, { "tools": [ { "id": 129, "slug": "chart-selection-guide", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Stacked bar across risk-management processes.", "confidence": 75 }, { "id": 133, "slug": "small-multiples", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Closes the p6-10 small-multiples sweep.", "confidence": 65 }, { "id": 119, "slug": "so-what-test", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Callout: '91% / no P&C insurer is currently using RPA in risk'.", "confidence": 70 } ], "page_number": 10 }, { "tools": [ { "id": 2, "slug": "mece-principle", "layer": "Block", "evidence": "First of three distinct enabling-topic slides covering offshoring/governance/skills.", "confidence": 60 }, { "id": 129, "slug": "chart-selection-guide", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Donut + horizontal bar combination for current vs. future view.", "confidence": 75 }, { "id": 138, "slug": "annotation", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Percentages labelled directly on chart.", "confidence": 70 }, { "id": 119, "slug": "so-what-test", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Callout states the >60% no-outsourcing finding.", "confidence": 70 } ], "page_number": 11 }, { "tools": [ { "id": 129, "slug": "chart-selection-guide", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Combines bar chart, icon/percent grid, and donut on one dashboard.", "confidence": 70 }, { "id": 130, "slug": "color-strategy", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Tool-share cards differ by colour to distinguish vendors.", "confidence": 70 }, { "id": 132, "slug": "visual-hierarchy", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Large vendor-share percentages anchor lower-left grid.", "confidence": 65 }, { "id": 138, "slug": "annotation", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "All bars and donut wedges carry numeric labels.", "confidence": 70 }, { "id": 62, "slug": "cognitive-load", "layer": "Block", "evidence": "Slide flagged overcrowded — three distinct visual systems compete on one page.", "confidence": 50 } ], "page_number": 12 }, { "tools": [ { "id": 129, "slug": "chart-selection-guide", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Donut + two horizontal bars to size skill gap and adoption blockers.", "confidence": 75 }, { "id": 138, "slug": "annotation", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "All chart values labelled.", "confidence": 70 }, { "id": 119, "slug": "so-what-test", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Callout: 'Nearly 80% are not using RPA or are in education mode'.", "confidence": 75 } ], "page_number": 13 }, { "tools": [ { "id": 129, "slug": "chart-selection-guide", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Single horizontal bar chart sized for the four IPA stages.", "confidence": 75 }, { "id": 138, "slug": "annotation", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Bars labelled 80% / 16% / 2% / 2% directly.", "confidence": 75 }, { "id": 119, "slug": "so-what-test", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Body text states 'majority have not yet started considering...'", "confidence": 70 } ], "page_number": 14 }, { "tools": [ { "id": 124, "slug": "closing-techniques", "layer": "Slide", "evidence": "Standard PwC sign-off with named partner contacts.", "confidence": 70 } ], "page_number": 15 } ], "slides_seen": 15, "deck_summary": "Textbook PwC pyramid-style survey deck: takeaways up-front, dense small-multiples evidence sweep, brief forward look — strong on action titles and so-what callouts, weak on a true recommendation/Solution beat.", "secondary_arcs": [ { "id": 11, "slug": "triple-take", "beats": [ { "name": "The Facts (What)", "end_page": 13, "evidence": "Methodology plus chart-heavy data section establishing what insurers are doing.", "position": 1, "start_page": 4 }, { "name": "The Implications (So What)", "end_page": 3, "evidence": "Key takeaways slide synthesises implications (presented up-front, pyramid style).", "position": 2, "start_page": 3 }, { "name": "The Action (Now What)", "end_page": 14, "evidence": "Looking Forward – IPA invites future exploration and adoption.", "position": 3, "start_page": 14 } ], "evidence": "Survey-style content (Facts) with embedded callouts (So What) and a forward IPA prompt (Now What), though deck inverts canonical order by leading with takeaways.", "confidence": 55 } ], "images_inspected": 4, "slide_frameworks": [ { "frameworks": [ { "name": "Maturity model", "slug": "maturity-model", "evidence": "Lower bar lists RPA exploration stages: Evaluating → Planning → POC → Deployment.", "confidence": 60 } ], "page_number": 5 }, { "frameworks": [ { "name": "Maturity model", "slug": "maturity-model", "evidence": "Four IPA stages from 'not exploring' to 'completed deployment' form a maturity ladder.", "confidence": 65 } ], "page_number": 14 } ] }, "matchedAt": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.416+00", "slidesSeen": 15, "deckSummary": "Textbook PwC pyramid-style survey deck: takeaways up-front, dense small-multiples evidence sweep, brief forward look — strong on action titles and so-what callouts, weak on a true recommendation/Solution beat.", "imagesInspected": 4, "extractionSeconds": 326.037 }, "score": { "backend": "claude", "scoredAt": "2026-05-02 12:42:39.036+00", "subScores": { "scqa_arc": 45, "action_titles": 28, "mece_structure": 68, "closing_strength": 28, "evidence_quality": 80, "clarity_of_thesis": 55, "production_quality": 62, "visual_storytelling": 70 }, "totalScore": 56, "coveragePct": 100, "explanations": { "scqa_arc": "Situation and complication are present (slides 2-5: 90% have not meaningfully implemented), but the deck pivots into an analytical dump on slides 6-13 with no explicit Question and no resolved Answer beyond a forward-looking IPA tease on slide 14.", "action_titles": "Titles are topic labels rather than insight sentences - e.g. 'Use of RPA within different functions in the insurer (continued)' (slides 7-10) instead of something like 'P&C insurers have not adopted RPA in any claims or underwriting process'.", "mece_structure": "Sections (Survey Overview -> Uses by Case -> Tools/Governance -> Skills -> IPA) are reasonably MECE, though slides 5 and 6 both frame 'uses by insurer' and the by-function breakdown spans four near-parallel slides without a clear MECE backbone.", "closing_strength": "Slide 15 is a 'Thank you' contact-card sign-off with no recommendation, call to action, or next steps; slide 14's IPA framing is the closest thing to a forward path but stops at observation.", "evidence_quality": "Every claim is anchored to survey data (N=44 insurers) with concrete percentages and 2-14 data points per analytical slide; callouts consistently quantify findings rather than assert.", "clarity_of_thesis": "Slide 3 'Key takeaways' surfaces a thesis (RPA adoption in actuarial is early-stage and concentrated in data/reporting), but it is delivered as four numbered findings rather than a single declarative argument upfront.", "production_quality": "Consistent chevron navigation, callout discipline, and chart styling throughout, but low action-title density and the overcrowded slide 12 pull this below a polished benchmark.", "visual_storytelling": "Generally appropriate matches - stacked bars for adoption status, donuts for proportions, callouts for headline insights - though slide 12 is flagged overcrowded and the four near-identical stacked bars on slides 6-10 lack visual differentiation." }, "slidesAnalyzed": 15 }, "review": { "backend": null, "verdict": "A competent survey-results report with strong quantified callouts but topic-label titles and no recommendation — useful as a teaching example of how good data can be undermined by a missing close and absent action titles.", "reviewedAt": "2026-04-25 07:46:06+00", "slidesSeen": 15, "suggestions": [ "Promote each page's callout sentence to be the slide title (e.g. p.5 becomes '90% of insurers have made no meaningful RPA progress in actuarial')", "Replace the four 'continued' titles (p.7-10) with MECE pillar names — e.g. 'Reporting & ETL: where RPA is live', 'Claims & underwriting: where P&C lags', 'Risk management: the untouched frontier'", "Add a recommendation slide before 'Thank you' that names 2-3 concrete moves actuarial leaders should make in the next 12 months, tied to the survey findings" ], "closingScore": 25, "openingScore": 68, "topStrengths": [ "p.3 'Key takeaways' front-loads the headline finding before the data — correct Storymakers ordering", "Callouts throughout (p.5-13) are genuinely declarative and quantified ('90%', '88%', '79%') — the raw insight material is there", "Consistent 'balanced' density across analytical pages suggests a disciplined chart+takeaway template" ], "topWeaknesses": [ "Four consecutive slides (p.7-10) share the title 'Use of RPA within different functions in the insurer (continued)' — a textbook topic-dump anti-pattern with zero MECE signaling", "Closing is a 'Thank you' (p.15) with no recommendation, next steps, or synthesis — the most important Storymakers slide is missing", "Action titles are nouns ('Survey overview', 'RPA Tools and governance') while the actual insights live only in subordinate callouts" ], "narrativeScore": 52, "pillarCritique": "There are no MECE section dividers — only a single 'Foreword' divider on p.2. Slides 6-10 are all titled 'Use of RPA within different functions (continued)', which signals a topic dump rather than pillar-structured argument.", "closingCritique": "There is no recommendation, call to action, or 'so what' synthesis — p.14 'Looking Forward' is descriptive ('majority have not yet started considering IPA') and p.15 is a bare 'Thank you'. A Storymakers close would name the specific move actuarial leaders should make next.", "openingCritique": "p.3 'Key takeaways' does lead with the answer ('Insurers currently use RPA primarily in data & reporting... see potential opportunity in Actuarial'), which is good Storymakers practice; however, p.1-2 are generic cover/foreword and p.4 'Survey overview' delays the hook with methodology before stakes are framed.", "extractionSeconds": 55.690983, "narrativeCritique": "Setup (Foreword + Key takeaways) and Analysis (p.5-13) are present, but Tension is implicit and Resolution is absent — the deck ends on 'Thank you' (p.15) after a forward-looking context slide, never crystallizing a recommendation. It reads as a survey-results report, not a story arc.", "titleQualityScore": 38, "titleQualityCritique": "Titles are overwhelmingly topic labels rather than action titles: 'Survey overview' (p.4), 'RPA uses by insurers' (p.5), four consecutive 'Use of RPA within different functions... (continued)' (p.7-10), 'RPA Tools and governance' (p.12). The insight-bearing callouts (e.g. '90% of insurers having not made any meaningful progress') sit below the titles instead of being the titles." }, "activistThesis": null, "pitchdeck": { "metadata": null, "profile": null }, "slides": [ { "page": 1, "type": "setup", "function": "front_matter", "imagePath": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/RepTb1tCGzhfUITXddkQwSMtJ9PlM7p1tpB1orWDaPU/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy82MDY2ODFkMjcyZDE2NTU0L3AwMDEuanBn", "rawType": "cover", "block": null, "metadata": { "slideType": "cover", "slideTypeCanon": { "name": "Cover", "slug": "cover", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-05f2-729d-9f93-e0504f0a2410", "version": 1, "description": null }, "function": "front_matter", "functionCanon": { "name": "Front matter", "slug": "front_matter", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-133d-73f0-9e26-201eda96b098", "version": 1, "description": null }, "density": "sparse", "densityScore": 7, "componentCount": 3, "textChars": 67, "nDataPoints": 0, "notes": null, "elementsJson": [ "headline_text", "photo", "logo_grid" ], "confidence": 1, "extraction": { "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:38.816+00", "seconds": 2.487, "promptVersion": "v2-canon-conditioned" } }, "links": { "slide": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5/1", "deck": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5", "deckAnchor": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5#slide-1", "deckJson": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5.json" }, "components": [ { "bbox": { "h": 0.1, "w": 0.1, "x": 0.03, "y": 0.85 }, "kind": "image", "text": null, "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Image", "slug": "image", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f978-701f-a720-51d029d769e7", "version": 1, "description": "Photo, illustration, screenshot or icon." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Logo", "slug": "logo", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fdaf-743d-94c4-d7c6a0e55302", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "logo", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:38.816+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "d92f2469-1fa1-4df5-91f7-58bfa6043032", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 1, "w": 1, "x": 0, "y": 0 }, "kind": "image", "text": null, "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Image", "slug": "image", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f978-701f-a720-51d029d769e7", "version": 1, "description": "Photo, illustration, screenshot or icon." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Photo", "slug": "photo", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fd37-757f-b4a8-ca26d4888875", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "photo", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:38.816+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "b5a62bca-ca3f-442f-9b57-a680dd87e341", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.25, "w": 0.65, "x": 0.03, "y": 0.15 }, "kind": "title", "text": "PwC's 2019 actuarial robotic process automation (RPA) survey report", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Title", "slug": "title", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f7dd-76d9-b848-b1f12bd85cf4", "version": 1, "description": "Slide title or headline." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Headline", "slug": "headline", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fae1-7463-9a7c-d60668eced0d", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "headline", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:38.816+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "da37b5c5-3765-49b7-a149-5093f2ba2a27", "parentComponentId": null } ], "metrics": [], "tools": [], "frameworks": [], "arcBeats": [ { "to": 2, "arc": { "name": "The Consultant's Gambit", "slug": "consultants-gambit", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Business cases, project proposals, strategic recommendations", "canonId": "019dd956-5e0a-73c8-b305-81c38c959e9c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "Situation & Context -> Problem & Complication -> Solution & Approach -> Evidence & Proof -> Impact & Next Steps", "description": null, "familyLabel": null }, "from": 1, "name": "Situation & Context", "beatId": "019de91d-95f4-7128-8f54-0414b7008800", "matchId": "019de91d-95c8-70e9-9817-4a0aa2bc0f9d", "beatType": null, "evidence": "Cover + foreword establish insurance-automation backdrop and the actuarial focus.", "position": 1, "isPrimaryArc": true, "parentBeatType": null, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 70 } ], "loops": [], "thumbSrc": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/sYyKqPi01amZdW9K7R_tqMEXNPQC0lvPE_HLJePONTQ/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy82MDY2ODFkMjcyZDE2NTU0L3AwMDEuanBn", "imagePathAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/78YPapCMNu1TWRVOb6ytvlGv9gV_1vIdKoDj7ULk9Es/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy82MDY2ODFkMjcyZDE2NTU0L3AwMDEucG5n", "thumbSrcAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/K9Q4pGsHLH3rviN1GmdgI-_jyEdmQTOmevPmdtoKK6E/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy82MDY2ODFkMjcyZDE2NTU0L3AwMDEucG5n" }, { "page": 2, "type": "setup", "title": "The slide includes a navigation breadcrumb at the bottom indicating the current section is 'Foreword'.", "function": "front_matter", "rawType": "executive_summary", "block": null, "metadata": { "slideType": "executive_summary", "slideTypeCanon": { "name": "Executive summary", "slug": "executive_summary", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-06be-73ff-81b3-f99fe7f0025e", "version": 1, "description": null }, "function": "front_matter", "functionCanon": { "name": "Front matter", "slug": "front_matter", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-133d-73f0-9e26-201eda96b098", "version": 1, "description": null }, "density": "dense", "densityScore": 70, "componentCount": 7, "textChars": 2029, "nDataPoints": 0, "notes": "The slide includes a navigation breadcrumb at the bottom indicating the current section is 'Foreword'.", "elementsJson": [ "paragraph", "infographic", "timeline_visual" ], "confidence": 1, "extraction": { "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:40.015+00", "seconds": 3.686, "promptVersion": "v2-canon-conditioned" } }, "links": { "slide": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5/2", "deck": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5", "deckAnchor": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5#slide-2", "deckJson": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5.json" }, "components": [ { "bbox": null, "kind": "callout", "text": "The actuarial function, in particular – while an exemplary candidate for the automation of data gathering, preparation, calculation, and reporting – has been slow to automate workflows and implement automation technology.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Callout", "slug": "callout", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f8d3-761a-8953-7d37080de5e2", "version": 1, "description": "Highlighted callout box." }, "tool": { "name": "Visual emphasis", "slug": "visual-emphasis", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd9e1-474b-736b-a8eb-a794dd88241c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Drawing the eye to one element above the rest of the slide.", "familyLabel": null }, "subkind": null, "framework": null }, "subkind": null, "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-04-24 13:46:03+00", "model": "or:google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "019dd951-dfa2-7185-b388-745a632777a6", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.103, "w": 0.927, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.819 }, "kind": "diagram", "text": "Navigation breadcrumb showing sections: Foreword, Key Takeaways, Survey Overview, RPA Uses by Insurers, RPA Uses by Case, Impact on Offshoring, Tools and Governance, Skills Assessment and Development, What's Next: IPA", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Diagram", "slug": "diagram", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f9f0-734a-81de-15382ff28c65", "version": 1, "description": "Schematic or relational diagram." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Timeline", "slug": "timeline", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-03c5-73fc-84aa-4180cbf0f5cf", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "timeline", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:40.015+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "cd8ae72d-b98a-423f-86f4-26317356346e", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.583, "w": 0.205, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.175 }, "kind": "image", "text": "Abstract graphic of connected nodes/cables", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Image", "slug": "image", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f978-701f-a720-51d029d769e7", "version": 1, "description": "Photo, illustration, screenshot or icon." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Illustration", "slug": "illustration", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fe76-7772-a5ac-c0b7294d7615", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "illustration", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:40.015+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "d5ead934-b8f3-4dec-b491-1e961eace26b", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.167, "w": 0.697, "x": 0.266, "y": 0.181 }, "kind": "paragraph", "text": "The demand for automation to reduce costs and make greater use of data has driven a push for adoption of new technologies in the financial services sector. However, the insurance industry has historically lagged behind its financial services counterparts in the exploration and adoption of automation, specifically through robotics. The actuarial function, in particular – while an exemplary candidate for the automation of data gathering, preparation, calculation, and reporting – has been slow to automate workflows and implement automation technology.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "5f2affc0-941d-4d07-959d-4bfc1930cea4", "version": 1, "description": "Single prose block in the body of a slide." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fb80-75af-aa5c-a7a4bfac2433", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "paragraph", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:40.015+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "3f4dfde2-2ad2-439d-9b71-1368cf256f41", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.167, "w": 0.697, "x": 0.266, "y": 0.386 }, "kind": "paragraph", "text": "Innovative insurance carriers have begun turning to robotic process automation (RPA) software as a leading solution to automate workflows and streamline operational activities. RPA is the use of automated rules-based software that executes pre-programmed tasks across multiple platforms. While challenges exist in the design, implementation, and governance of RPA solutions, the benefits of scaling RPA across an enterprise, including deployment within actuarial function, can generate efficiencies to improve the bottom line.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "5f2affc0-941d-4d07-959d-4bfc1930cea4", "version": 1, "description": "Single prose block in the body of a slide." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fb80-75af-aa5c-a7a4bfac2433", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "paragraph", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:40.015+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "6494eefc-2b9e-438f-ae59-8dbaef99aeeb", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.139, "w": 0.697, "x": 0.266, "y": 0.591 }, "kind": "paragraph", "text": "PwC's 2019 actuarial RPA survey report investigates the current and future landscape of RPA within the actuarial function across several topics, exploration & adoption, risks & challenges, areas of use, and governance & controls. In addition, we explore the next steps in automation, intelligent process automation, software that incorporates cognitive intelligence to execute tasks and update rules based on “learned” trends, requiring minimal human oversight.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "5f2affc0-941d-4d07-959d-4bfc1930cea4", "version": 1, "description": "Single prose block in the body of a slide." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fb80-75af-aa5c-a7a4bfac2433", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "paragraph", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:40.015+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "d11b6bd3-d085-42d1-afc5-7ae4c88e5878", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.056, "w": 0.178, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.056 }, "kind": "title", "text": "Foreword", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Title", "slug": "title", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f7dd-76d9-b848-b1f12bd85cf4", "version": 1, "description": "Slide title or headline." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Headline", "slug": "headline", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fae1-7463-9a7c-d60668eced0d", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "headline", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:40.015+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "5dc83fa9-56c9-4d27-8a5c-919782140106", "parentComponentId": null } ], "metrics": [], "tools": [ { "tool": { "name": "Problem Statement Canvas", "slug": "problem-statement-canvas", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-839d-744b-ad11-9bf3e3642a18", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Structured definition of the problem: What? Who? Where? When? Scale?", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Block", "categorySlug": "block" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "block", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-97f3-7747-a4f8-f4cefebb9fb0", "evidence": "Three paragraphs framing what / who / scope of automation gap.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 55, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 2, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "SCQA Framework", "slug": "scqa-framework", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-7bcb-763f-bdf6-1dfedf3bd36c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-a0b0-719e-937e-2ac31e53d32c", "description": "Situation, Complication, Question, Answer - structured problem framing", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Block", "categorySlug": "block" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "block", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-97c8-7585-877f-9096da25f24d", "evidence": "Foreword sets situation (insurance lags) + complication (RPA needed but slow) + question.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": "Core", "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 2, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Concrete Language", "slug": "concrete-language", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-bcd4-7398-9723-6aa72346170b", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Using specific sensory details instead of abstract terms", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Storyteller", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Storyteller" ], "matchId": "019de91d-981c-75c2-a008-76b22ac42bea", "evidence": "Specific terminology: rules-based software, pre-programmed tasks.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 60, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 2, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Executive summary", "slug": "executive-summary", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd9e1-4b63-72d5-9734-da757d91ca61", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "A condensed view of the entire argument on a single slide / block.", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": null, "categorySlug": null }, "agent": null, "layer": "slide", "agents": null, "matchId": "a8c9767e-23bd-4b44-944f-c93073a9138f", "evidence": "This slide contains a detailed executive summary with multiple paragraphs, indicating a comprehensive overview of the report.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 0.9, "extraction": { "at": "2026-07-16 21:19:17.707242+00", "model": "or:meta-llama/llama-4-scout", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 2, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": "common", "narrativePurpose": null } ], "frameworks": [], "arcBeats": [ { "to": 2, "arc": { "name": "The Consultant's Gambit", "slug": "consultants-gambit", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Business cases, project proposals, strategic recommendations", "canonId": "019dd956-5e0a-73c8-b305-81c38c959e9c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "Situation & Context -> Problem & Complication -> Solution & Approach -> Evidence & Proof -> Impact & Next Steps", "description": null, "familyLabel": null }, "from": 1, "name": "Situation & Context", "beatId": "019de91d-95f4-7128-8f54-0414b7008800", "matchId": "019de91d-95c8-70e9-9817-4a0aa2bc0f9d", "beatType": null, "evidence": "Cover + foreword establish insurance-automation backdrop and the actuarial focus.", "position": 1, "isPrimaryArc": true, "parentBeatType": null, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 70 } ], "loops": [], "locked": true }, { "page": 3, "type": "resolution", "function": "summarize", "rawType": "key_takeaways", "block": null, "metadata": { "slideType": "key_takeaways", "slideTypeCanon": { "name": "Key takeaways", "slug": "key_takeaways", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-06e7-7674-a891-9f7de3b11b6d", "version": 1, "description": null }, "function": "summarize", "functionCanon": { "name": "Summarize", "slug": "summarize", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-1541-704f-b86f-bf7b75056373", "version": 1, "description": null }, "density": "dense", "densityScore": 56, "componentCount": 6, "textChars": 932, "nDataPoints": 0, "notes": null, "elementsJson": [ "headline_text", "numbered_list", "paragraph", "process_diagram" ], "confidence": 1, "extraction": { "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:38.956+00", "seconds": 2.419, "promptVersion": "v2-canon-conditioned" } }, "links": { "slide": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5/3", "deck": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5", "deckAnchor": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5#slide-3", "deckJson": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5.json" }, "components": [ { "bbox": null, "kind": "callout", "text": "Insurers currently use RPA primarily in data & reporting and finance/accounting processes and see potential opportunity in Actuarial processes.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Callout", "slug": "callout", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f8d3-761a-8953-7d37080de5e2", "version": 1, "description": "Highlighted callout box." }, "tool": { "name": "Visual emphasis", "slug": "visual-emphasis", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd9e1-474b-736b-a8eb-a794dd88241c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Drawing the eye to one element above the rest of the slide.", "familyLabel": null }, "subkind": null, "framework": null }, "subkind": null, "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-04-24 13:46:04+00", "model": "or:google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "019dd951-dfa2-7185-b389-45cc7990f88a", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.1, "w": 0.928, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.81 }, "kind": "diagram", "text": "Foreword, Key Takeaways, Survey Overview, RPA Uses by Insurers, RPA Uses by Case, Impact on Offshoring, Tools and Governance, Skills Assessment and Development, What's Next: IPA", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Diagram", "slug": "diagram", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f9f0-734a-81de-15382ff28c65", "version": 1, "description": "Schematic or relational diagram." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Process flow", "slug": "process", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-039c-718f-ad3a-efe9c4b3c838", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "process", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:38.956+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "11ae2ba1-2944-428a-9dd1-5f83e0155ae1", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.45, "w": 0.928, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.178 }, "kind": "list", "text": "01 Actuarial functions are still in early stages of adoption of RPA. 02 Life insurers tend to manage RPA more centrally than P&C insurers, through a dedicated RPA center of excellence. 03 There is significant opportunity for insurers to upskill around RPA. 04 Challenges in the adoption of RPA include technical complexity of implementation and instability of current operations.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "List", "slug": "list", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f94b-779b-a53b-fd4904a5f4d2", "version": 1, "description": "Bullet or numbered list." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Bullet list", "slug": "bullet", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fc98-7169-a083-5cab805076ca", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "bullet", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:38.956+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "4c7e43f0-7bda-4d63-8d72-c319ded4407d", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.08, "w": 0.928, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.69 }, "kind": "paragraph", "text": "05 Insurers currently use RPA primarily in data & reporting and finance/accounting processes and see potential opportunity in Actuarial processes.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "5f2affc0-941d-4d07-959d-4bfc1930cea4", "version": 1, "description": "Single prose block in the body of a slide." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fb80-75af-aa5c-a7a4bfac2433", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "paragraph", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:38.956+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "0fac9022-2c8f-4264-8ba2-2f04e007115e", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.02, "w": 0.3, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.95 }, "kind": "source-note", "text": "PwC | PwC's 2019 Actuarial Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Survey Results", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Source note", "slug": "source-note", "status": "active", "canonId": "23484952-494b-4a5e-b1ad-550d0d70e948", "version": 1, "description": "Attribution / source / caveat placed at the slide footer. Numbered footnotes use attrs.numbered." }, "tool": null, "subkind": null, "framework": null }, "subkind": null, "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:38.956+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "a6c8cb91-b8ae-4bd7-95ba-912510c37d93", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.06, "w": 0.25, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.056 }, "kind": "title", "text": "Key takeaways", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Title", "slug": "title", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f7dd-76d9-b848-b1f12bd85cf4", "version": 1, "description": "Slide title or headline." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Headline", "slug": "headline", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fae1-7463-9a7c-d60668eced0d", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "headline", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:38.956+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "87f7dc85-2e31-4b83-8c09-4367ec6de5ab", "parentComponentId": null } ], "metrics": [], "tools": [ { "tool": { "name": "Governing Thought", "slug": "governing-thought", "status": "active", "bestFor": "When the deck makes a recommendation, decision, or argues a position; when defining the top of a pyramid before structuring supports; when an SCQA opening needs an Answer; when stripping topic-style titles in favour of action titles.", "canonId": "019dd956-8286-760e-8638-77558a0d71ba", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "06f7d5a5-daab-44c1-9d67-63c52ba03962", "description": "The single declarative sentence at the apex of a Minto pyramid that summarises and is supported by everything beneath it — the answer the deck exists to defend.", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Block", "categorySlug": "block" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "block", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-989d-7102-b79c-2c9093e0f48b", "evidence": "Bottom block 05 acts as overarching synthesis tying the four cards together.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": "When the deck makes a recommendation, decision, or argues a position; when defining the top of a pyramid before structuring supports; when an SCQA opening needs an Answer; when stripping topic-style titles in favour of action titles.", "confidence": 65, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 3, "whyItWorks": "Forces the writer to commit to a position before structuring the case — exposes muddled thinking that hides safely inside topic-style headings. Gives busy readers the answer in the first cognitive beat and enables progressive disclosure of the supporting case.", "antipattern": "Topic-style headings ('Strategic options for growth', 'Considerations for Europe') instead of declarative claims with verbs. Multi-sentence apex statements. Qualifier-laden hedges. Noun-phrase labels ('Recommendation: acquisition of Target B') pretending to be sentences. Fake governing thoughts — confident apex the supports don't actually force.", "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": "Anchor the document in one defensible claim with a working verb, so the audience knows the answer before they read the proof and the entire structure ladders up to it." }, { "tool": { "name": "MECE Principle", "slug": "mece-principle", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-7c60-71a8-8758-c79d914489c9", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive - ensuring complete, non-overlapping structure", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Block", "categorySlug": "block" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "block", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9873-7187-85cb-4caf12f17ff0", "evidence": "Four distinct findings (maturity, governance, skills, challenges) with little overlap.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": "Core", "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 75, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 3, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Pyramid Principle", "slug": "pyramid-principle", "status": "active", "bestFor": "When the document has a single governing decision or recommendation the reader is asked to accept, and the case can be decomposed into a small number of clean groups. Strategy decks, board memos, investment committee papers.", "canonId": "019dd956-7cbd-7219-a477-c871e2bc1aff", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "88b6ac56-b880-46f9-8621-ef3491ab6235", "description": "Lead with the answer; group three to five MECE supports beneath it; recurse one level down. Top-down hierarchical structure for any document with a single recommendation.", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Block", "categorySlug": "block" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "block", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9848-77d2-a061-2c11edc417d5", "evidence": "Answer-first: four headline takeaways before any evidence appears.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": "Core", "whenToUse": "When the document has a single governing decision or recommendation the reader is asked to accept, and the case can be decomposed into a small number of clean groups. Strategy decks, board memos, investment committee papers.", "confidence": 85, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 3, "whyItWorks": "Solves the two failure modes of expert communication at once: (1) the long climb where readers wait pages for the answer, and (2) logical mush from non-MECE groupings. Progressive disclosure lets a reader stop at any depth and get the right information.", "antipattern": "Chronological structure (\"what we did, what we found, what we conclude\") instead of logical hierarchy. Top-of-pyramid that is a topic (\"strategic options\") instead of an answer (\"pursue Option B because...\"). Non-MECE supports that overlap or fail to cover the universe.", "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": "Transfer conviction with minimum reader effort by mirroring how decision-makers consume information: answer first, scaffolding behind." }, { "tool": { "name": "Action Titles", "slug": "action-titles", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Any decision-grade deliverable — strategy recommendation, board update, investment memo, M&A review, post-mortem — where the reader is being asked to agree, decide, or act and will skim the title bar at speed.", "canonId": "019dd956-ac70-700b-a608-ba58e78f5dcc", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "816dad3c-9983-41c1-a86e-978ebd582841", "description": "The McKinsey-bred discipline of writing every slide title as a complete declarative sentence with a verb and an insight, not a topic label. Each title is a sub-claim that ladders up to the deck's governing thought; read in sequence, the titles reconstruct the executive summary.", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-98c7-76de-a967-553f0a55519c", "evidence": "Each numbered card states a finding ('still in early stages', 'manage centrally').", "pageRefs": null, "priority": "Core", "whenToUse": "Any decision-grade deliverable — strategy recommendation, board update, investment memo, M&A review, post-mortem — where the reader is being asked to agree, decide, or act and will skim the title bar at speed.", "confidence": 80, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 3, "whyItWorks": "Solves two failure modes at once. (1) The buried claim: action titles place the conclusion on the page before any analysis is read, so a busy reader doesn't reverse-engineer it from the chart. (2) The spineless deck: because each title is a claim, slides have to ladder up to the governing thought; logical gaps become visible as topic-shaped titles in a sequence that no longer reads as a story.", "antipattern": "Topic labels disguised as titles — Volume by quarter, Key findings, Pricing strategy, Margins have been impacted. No verb, or a passive verb with no agent, or a fact (Revenue grew 12%) without the so-what. Also: titles that overreach the chart's evidence, multi-claim X-grew-but-Y-fell welded titles, and mechanical repetition of the same X-drove-Y template across the deck.", "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": "Forces the deck to carry its argument in the title bar so a senior reader can extract the recommendation without opening a single slide; converts a binder of topics into a navigable pyramid where every slide is a node defending the apex." }, { "tool": { "name": "Color Strategy", "slug": "color-strategy", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b202-77cf-8a6e-f445b08c0fd3", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Using color for emphasis, categories, sentiment, and hierarchy", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-991e-77df-a6e0-2df4ba1d45d2", "evidence": "Four colour-coded blocks plus dark synthesis bar create a card grid.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 80, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 3, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "So What? Test", "slug": "so-what-test", "status": "active", "bestFor": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "canonId": "019dd956-acd2-76f8-b59a-9bf15a89f10a", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "fec04b06-b2f1-432b-a97b-916dc7563f64", "description": "The recursive editorial discipline of asking so-what of every slide, chart, and statement until the answer is an implication for the audience — that final answer becomes the slide's title; the chain becomes its body.", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-98f3-719b-92c8-fa5dbbc0f92d", "evidence": "Every block delivers an implication, not a topic label.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": "Core", "whenToUse": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "confidence": 75, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 3, "whyItWorks": "Solves the two failure modes of analytical communication at once: stopping at description (analyst-confidence problem) and leaving insight stranded in the analyst's head (translation problem). The recursion is what guarantees the implication makes it into ink.", "antipattern": "Stopping at the first tighter description (still a fact, not an implication), regressing past the audience's decision space into philosophy, smuggling the so-what into speaker notes, or re-using an implication aimed at a previous audience.", "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": "Forces every analytical artefact to close the gap between fact and decision, so the reader holds the recommendation by reading titles alone rather than reconstructing the analyst's mental model from raw evidence." }, { "tool": { "name": "Visual Hierarchy", "slug": "visual-hierarchy", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b2ca-706b-937f-e52441086fd7", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Order of perception through Size > Color > Position > Weight > Space", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9972-70fc-a8e8-a276b1c02e38", "evidence": "Oversized 01-05 numerals dominate; supporting text recedes.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 3, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Von Restorff Effect", "slug": "von-restorff-effect", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-beab-73d8-9f62-30d0332e926e", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Items that stand out are noticed and remembered - make key points visually distinct", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9948-74fe-be83-9d442c25ea45", "evidence": "Dark grey 05 bar stands out from coloured cards above.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 60, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 3, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null } ], "frameworks": [], "arcBeats": [ { "to": 3, "arc": { "name": "The Consultant's Gambit", "slug": "consultants-gambit", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Business cases, project proposals, strategic recommendations", "canonId": "019dd956-5e0a-73c8-b305-81c38c959e9c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "Situation & Context -> Problem & Complication -> Solution & Approach -> Evidence & Proof -> Impact & Next Steps", "description": null, "familyLabel": null }, "from": 3, "name": "Problem & Complication", "beatId": "019de91d-961e-748b-9882-2bc13f0acaac", "matchId": "019de91d-95c8-70e9-9817-4a0aa2bc0f9d", "beatType": null, "evidence": "Key takeaways naming early-stage adoption, governance gaps, skill gaps, complexity.", "position": 2, "isPrimaryArc": true, "parentBeatType": null, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 70 }, { "to": 3, "arc": { "name": "The Triple Take", "slug": "triple-take", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Data-driven presentations, research findings", "canonId": "019dd956-6221-73ad-bc12-378f8eb1f018", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "The Facts (What) -> The Implications (So What) -> The Action (Now What)", "description": null, "familyLabel": null }, "from": 3, "name": "The Implications (So What)", "beatId": "019de91d-96f5-735a-bbe3-1f0784a2b441", "matchId": "019de91d-969c-75eb-adf2-1804d7c9aa0c", "beatType": null, "evidence": "Key takeaways slide synthesises implications (presented up-front, pyramid style).", "position": 2, "isPrimaryArc": false, "parentBeatType": null, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 55 } ], "loops": [], "locked": true }, { "page": 4, "type": "setup", "title": "Includes a navigation breadcrumb at the bottom indicating the current section.", "function": "establish_context", "rawType": "appendix_methodology", "block": null, "metadata": { "slideType": "appendix_methodology", "slideTypeCanon": { "name": "Appendix methodology", "slug": "appendix_methodology", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-07d9-726c-8599-167f2d2ffaa7", "version": 1, "description": null }, "function": "establish_context", "functionCanon": { "name": "Establish context", "slug": "establish_context", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-1314-74e6-9074-d213dc0bdcdf", "version": 1, "description": null }, "density": "overcrowded", "densityScore": 79, "componentCount": 8, "textChars": 1178, "nDataPoints": 5, "notes": "Includes a navigation breadcrumb at the bottom indicating the current section.", "elementsJson": [ "paragraph", "donut_chart", "process_diagram" ], "confidence": 1, "extraction": { "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:39.681+00", "seconds": 3.021, "promptVersion": "v2-canon-conditioned" } }, "links": { "slide": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5/4", "deck": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5", "deckAnchor": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5#slide-4", "deckJson": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5.json" }, "components": [ { "bbox": { "h": 0.333, "w": 0.317, "x": 0.183, "y": 0.478 }, "kind": "chart", "text": "Types of Insurance Carrier", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Chart", "slug": "chart", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f9a0-76ef-adc6-0b859109d1f8", "version": 1, "description": "Quantitative chart." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Donut chart", "slug": "donut", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-0006-752c-9528-0fef476b8004", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "donut", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:39.681+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "6b69fbf5-bf27-40ee-9923-8926bd94ce49", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.333, "w": 0.317, "x": 0.5, "y": 0.478 }, "kind": "chart", "text": "Size of Insurance Carrier", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Chart", "slug": "chart", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f9a0-76ef-adc6-0b859109d1f8", "version": 1, "description": "Quantitative chart." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Donut chart", "slug": "donut", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-0006-752c-9528-0fef476b8004", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "donut", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:39.681+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "f59d3517-f382-414d-af55-bf35ea95f8cb", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.111, "w": 0.928, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.811 }, "kind": "diagram", "text": "Foreword, Key Takeaways, Survey Overview, RPA Uses by Insurers, RPA Uses by Case, Impact on Offshoring, Tools and Governance, Skills Assessment and Development, What's Next: IPA", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Diagram", "slug": "diagram", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f9f0-734a-81de-15382ff28c65", "version": 1, "description": "Schematic or relational diagram." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Timeline", "slug": "timeline", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-03c5-73fc-84aa-4180cbf0f5cf", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "timeline", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:39.681+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "514f4970-97e8-41a4-9eef-586462220899", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": null, "kind": "metric", "text": "Survey participants: 44", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Metric", "slug": "metric", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f923-73bf-8081-d0b1a8c5264d", "version": 1, "description": "Big-number or KPI value." }, "tool": { "name": "Quantification", "slug": "quantification", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd9e1-47ab-72ce-a079-aab1f5299e88", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Translating a claim into numbers, charts, or tables.", "familyLabel": null }, "subkind": null, "framework": null }, "subkind": "primary", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-04-24 13:46:04+00", "model": "or:google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "019dd951-dfa2-7185-b388-f87b5d34f45e", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.044, "w": 0.928, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.389 }, "kind": "paragraph", "text": "Of the survey respondents approximately 80% were aligned with the actuarial function. Other respondents were from the finance, information technology, management or RPA center of excellence functions.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "5f2affc0-941d-4d07-959d-4bfc1930cea4", "version": 1, "description": "Single prose block in the body of a slide." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fb80-75af-aa5c-a7a4bfac2433", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "paragraph", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:39.681+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "660b19a7-5634-4fab-9162-a9b928270910", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.078, "w": 0.928, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.178 }, "kind": "paragraph", "text": "PwC conducted a survey in the 4th quarter of 2018 to understand the current state of the use of RPA technology to support actuarial processes for both Life and P&C companies. We asked approximately 15 questions covering exploration & adoption, risks & challenges, areas of use, and governance & controls.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "5f2affc0-941d-4d07-959d-4bfc1930cea4", "version": 1, "description": "Single prose block in the body of a slide." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fb80-75af-aa5c-a7a4bfac2433", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "paragraph", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:39.681+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "7da5231d-c8e0-4305-8a94-183589ee7dad", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.111, "w": 0.928, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.278 }, "kind": "paragraph", "text": "A total of 44 companies participated in the survey: 20 P&C and 24 Life. For purposes of categorizing responses, company size was assigned based on the company-wide global gross written premium. (P&C: Large: > 10bn US$, Medium: >2bn US$, Small: <2bn US$; Life: Large >10bn US$, Medium >3.5bn US$, Small: <3.5bn US$). Based on this criteria, 15 companies were classified as large, 16 as medium and 13 as small.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "5f2affc0-941d-4d07-959d-4bfc1930cea4", "version": 1, "description": "Single prose block in the body of a slide." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fb80-75af-aa5c-a7a4bfac2433", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "paragraph", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:39.681+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "7e7c3803-2ca3-443c-aa88-43f079019025", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.044, "w": 0.275, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.056 }, "kind": "title", "text": "Survey overview", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Title", "slug": "title", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f7dd-76d9-b848-b1f12bd85cf4", "version": 1, "description": "Slide title or headline." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Headline", "slug": "headline", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fae1-7463-9a7c-d60668eced0d", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "headline", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:39.681+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "81506a03-2af5-4d16-86c8-d5bff1c98651", "parentComponentId": null } ], "metrics": [], "tools": [ { "tool": { "name": "Chart Selection Guide", "slug": "chart-selection-guide", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b1a0-700b-ba17-0e16c4d5bcae", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Choosing the right chart type for your data and message", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-999b-70ed-b417-669485f5384b", "evidence": "Two donut charts to show participant proportions.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 4, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Concrete Language", "slug": "concrete-language", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-bcd4-7398-9723-6aa72346170b", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Using specific sensory details instead of abstract terms", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Storyteller", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Storyteller" ], "matchId": "019de91d-99f0-745c-a488-0e7f54e2afe9", "evidence": "Specific classification criteria for participants stated.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 60, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 4, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Credibility Transfer", "slug": "credibility-transfer", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-bd34-759a-8e3b-2f14b571a2a1", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Borrowing authority from trusted sources or vivid details", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Storyteller", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Storyteller" ], "matchId": "019de91d-99c6-762e-bdcf-c4c39cb91fda", "evidence": "Sample size 'Survey participants: 44' surfaced as a metric.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 75, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 4, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null } ], "frameworks": [], "arcBeats": [ { "to": 13, "arc": { "name": "The Consultant's Gambit", "slug": "consultants-gambit", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Business cases, project proposals, strategic recommendations", "canonId": "019dd956-5e0a-73c8-b305-81c38c959e9c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "Situation & Context -> Problem & Complication -> Solution & Approach -> Evidence & Proof -> Impact & Next Steps", "description": null, "familyLabel": null }, "from": 4, "name": "Evidence & Proof", "beatId": "019de91d-9648-777a-a3e3-14bff9f462cc", "matchId": "019de91d-95c8-70e9-9817-4a0aa2bc0f9d", "beatType": null, "evidence": "Survey methodology + 9 chart slides quantifying RPA usage, governance, skills.", "position": 4, "isPrimaryArc": true, "parentBeatType": null, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 70 }, { "to": 13, "arc": { "name": "The Triple Take", "slug": "triple-take", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Data-driven presentations, research findings", "canonId": "019dd956-6221-73ad-bc12-378f8eb1f018", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "The Facts (What) -> The Implications (So What) -> The Action (Now What)", "description": null, "familyLabel": null }, "from": 4, "name": "The Facts (What)", "beatId": "019de91d-96c7-746d-b5c0-bae04f41cb6c", "matchId": "019de91d-969c-75eb-adf2-1804d7c9aa0c", "beatType": null, "evidence": "Methodology plus chart-heavy data section establishing what insurers are doing.", "position": 1, "isPrimaryArc": false, "parentBeatType": null, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 55 } ], "loops": [], "locked": true }, { "page": 5, "type": "analysis", "title": "Includes a navigation breadcrumb at the bottom indicating this is part of a larger survey report.", "function": "analyze_data", "rawType": "industry_trends", "block": null, "metadata": { "slideType": "industry_trends", "slideTypeCanon": { "name": "Industry trends", "slug": "industry_trends", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-0b1d-7705-a0e0-c663199cd1fa", "version": 1, "description": null }, "function": "analyze_data", "functionCanon": { "name": "Analyze data", "slug": "analyze_data", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-1590-7413-8c82-cc218cff40b4", "version": 1, "description": null }, "density": "overcrowded", "densityScore": 83, "componentCount": 9, "textChars": 990, "nDataPoints": 10, "notes": "Includes a navigation breadcrumb at the bottom indicating this is part of a larger survey report.", "elementsJson": [ "bar_chart_horizontal", "paragraph", "process_diagram" ], "confidence": 1, "extraction": { "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:40.101+00", "seconds": 3.3, "promptVersion": "v2-canon-conditioned" } }, "links": { "slide": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5/5", "deck": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5", "deckAnchor": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5#slide-5", "deckJson": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5.json" }, "components": [ { "bbox": null, "kind": "callout", "text": "The actuarial departments within survey respondents are at an early stage of RPA exploration, with 90% of insurers having not made any meaningful progress to RPA implementation.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Callout", "slug": "callout", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f8d3-761a-8953-7d37080de5e2", "version": 1, "description": "Highlighted callout box." }, "tool": { "name": "Visual emphasis", "slug": "visual-emphasis", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd9e1-474b-736b-a8eb-a794dd88241c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Drawing the eye to one element above the rest of the slide.", "familyLabel": null }, "subkind": null, "framework": null }, "subkind": null, "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-04-24 13:46:07+00", "model": "or:google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "019dd951-dfa2-7185-b38b-5a0ef0b27015", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.16, "w": 0.85, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.576 }, "kind": "chart", "text": "Where is the Actuarial function in your organization’s exploration of RPA?", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Chart", "slug": "chart", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f9a0-76ef-adc6-0b859109d1f8", "version": 1, "description": "Quantitative chart." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Horizontal bar chart", "slug": "bar-horizontal", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fec4-7221-986b-1cb5f5e84b1f", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "bar-horizontal", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:40.101+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "1f0e7e88-ce04-4197-9808-df565c73240f", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.16, "w": 0.75, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.366 }, "kind": "chart", "text": "Who is leading RPA exploration within your organization?", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Chart", "slug": "chart", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f9a0-76ef-adc6-0b859109d1f8", "version": 1, "description": "Quantitative chart." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Horizontal bar chart", "slug": "bar-horizontal", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fec4-7221-986b-1cb5f5e84b1f", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "bar-horizontal", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:40.101+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "da852bcc-c32c-4d09-8f07-e323a498098a", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.08, "w": 0.928, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.816 }, "kind": "diagram", "text": "Navigation breadcrumb showing current slide position", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Diagram", "slug": "diagram", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f9f0-734a-81de-15382ff28c65", "version": 1, "description": "Schematic or relational diagram." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Process flow", "slug": "process", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-039c-718f-ad3a-efe9c4b3c838", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "process", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:40.101+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "1cc575fe-d306-4f2a-b95d-65afcb9b9196", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": null, "kind": "metric", "text": "RPA adoption stage: 90%", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Metric", "slug": "metric", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f923-73bf-8081-d0b1a8c5264d", "version": 1, "description": "Big-number or KPI value." }, "tool": { "name": "Quantification", "slug": "quantification", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd9e1-47ab-72ce-a079-aab1f5299e88", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Translating a claim into numbers, charts, or tables.", "familyLabel": null }, "subkind": null, "framework": null }, "subkind": "primary", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-04-24 13:46:07+00", "model": "or:google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "019dd951-dfa2-7185-b38b-5f5d921a5dfb", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.066, "w": 0.928, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.192 }, "kind": "paragraph", "text": "The actuarial departments within survey respondents are at an early stage of RPA exploration, with 90% of insurers having not made any meaningful progress to RPA implementation and therefore realizing the benefits/cost efficiencies that they have to offer. Life companies were better progressed than P&C companies in their actuarial RPA journey.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "5f2affc0-941d-4d07-959d-4bfc1930cea4", "version": 1, "description": "Single prose block in the body of a slide." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fb80-75af-aa5c-a7a4bfac2433", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "paragraph", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:40.101+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "b0acc01f-136f-4bc1-9c83-f7539bd61a9e", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.044, "w": 0.928, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.136 }, "kind": "paragraph", "text": "RPA tends to be more centrally managed in Life insurers than P&C insurers. P&C respondents tended to have multiple functions exploring RPA usage on a case-by-case basis.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "5f2affc0-941d-4d07-959d-4bfc1930cea4", "version": 1, "description": "Single prose block in the body of a slide." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fb80-75af-aa5c-a7a4bfac2433", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "paragraph", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:40.101+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "c724dc7e-94b0-44c9-b384-17fc148f88f3", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.02, "w": 0.35, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.95 }, "kind": "source-note", "text": "PwC | PwC's 2019 Actuarial Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Survey Results", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Source note", "slug": "source-note", "status": "active", "canonId": "23484952-494b-4a5e-b1ad-550d0d70e948", "version": 1, "description": "Attribution / source / caveat placed at the slide footer. Numbered footnotes use attrs.numbered." }, "tool": null, "subkind": null, "framework": null }, "subkind": null, "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:40.101+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "23c0a0ab-9e57-4219-8396-25ee447ad524", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.056, "w": 0.348, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.056 }, "kind": "title", "text": "RPA uses by insurers", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Title", "slug": "title", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f7dd-76d9-b848-b1f12bd85cf4", "version": 1, "description": "Slide title or headline." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Headline", "slug": "headline", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fae1-7463-9a7c-d60668eced0d", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "headline", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:40.101+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "888c3d9d-5452-4891-8022-69ec2974c52c", "parentComponentId": null } ], "metrics": [], "tools": [ { "tool": { "name": "Horizontal Logic", "slug": "horizontal-logic", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-9a85-7199-aaa6-4314cd50dcfa", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Logical grouping at the same level - items must relate coherently", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Loop", "categorySlug": "loop" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "loop", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9a46-72a6-bd65-d3a2c789849b", "evidence": "Sibling chart slides at same MECE level (function categories).", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 60, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 5, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Inductive Reasoning", "slug": "inductive-reasoning", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-99c6-705e-94cc-76a504c3da37", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Grouping similar evidence to form a conclusion (Evidence → Pattern → Conclusion)", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Loop", "categorySlug": "loop" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "loop", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9a1c-773f-83d7-35a79edefd41", "evidence": "First slide of pattern-hunter loop: builds 'low maturity' conclusion across pages.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": "Core", "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 5, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Annotation", "slug": "annotation", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b5b9-7668-bf0e-3af99823ec5c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Adding explanatory labels to highlight key data points", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9a9a-72fe-b832-1a28d25efbaa", "evidence": "Each bar labelled with its percentage value.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 80, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 5, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Chart Selection Guide", "slug": "chart-selection-guide", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b1a0-700b-ba17-0e16c4d5bcae", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Choosing the right chart type for your data and message", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9a70-736d-8e03-dd7a16b758a3", "evidence": "Horizontal bar charts for ranked category percentages.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 75, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 5, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "So What? Test", "slug": "so-what-test", "status": "active", "bestFor": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "canonId": "019dd956-acd2-76f8-b59a-9bf15a89f10a", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "fec04b06-b2f1-432b-a97b-916dc7563f64", "description": "The recursive editorial discipline of asking so-what of every slide, chart, and statement until the answer is an implication for the audience — that final answer becomes the slide's title; the chain becomes its body.", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9ac4-726e-ab59-906def4b3860", "evidence": "Callout states the 90% have-not-implemented insight explicitly.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": "Core", "whenToUse": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 5, "whyItWorks": "Solves the two failure modes of analytical communication at once: stopping at description (analyst-confidence problem) and leaving insight stranded in the analyst's head (translation problem). The recursion is what guarantees the implication makes it into ink.", "antipattern": "Stopping at the first tighter description (still a fact, not an implication), regressing past the audience's decision space into philosophy, smuggling the so-what into speaker notes, or re-using an implication aimed at a previous audience.", "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": "Forces every analytical artefact to close the gap between fact and decision, so the reader holds the recommendation by reading titles alone rather than reconstructing the analyst's mental model from raw evidence." } ], "frameworks": [ { "matchId": "019de91d-a066-755c-8f87-84bca9858c15", "evidence": "Lower bar lists RPA exploration stages: Evaluating → Planning → POC → Deployment.", "framework": null, "confidence": 60, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 5, "frameworkName": "Maturity model" } ], "arcBeats": [ { "to": 13, "arc": { "name": "The Consultant's Gambit", "slug": "consultants-gambit", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Business cases, project proposals, strategic recommendations", "canonId": "019dd956-5e0a-73c8-b305-81c38c959e9c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "Situation & Context -> Problem & Complication -> Solution & Approach -> Evidence & Proof -> Impact & Next Steps", "description": null, "familyLabel": null }, "from": 4, "name": "Evidence & Proof", "beatId": "019de91d-9648-777a-a3e3-14bff9f462cc", "matchId": "019de91d-95c8-70e9-9817-4a0aa2bc0f9d", "beatType": null, "evidence": "Survey methodology + 9 chart slides quantifying RPA usage, governance, skills.", "position": 4, "isPrimaryArc": true, "parentBeatType": null, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 70 }, { "to": 13, "arc": { "name": "The Triple Take", "slug": "triple-take", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Data-driven presentations, research findings", "canonId": "019dd956-6221-73ad-bc12-378f8eb1f018", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "The Facts (What) -> The Implications (So What) -> The Action (Now What)", "description": null, "familyLabel": null }, "from": 4, "name": "The Facts (What)", "beatId": "019de91d-96c7-746d-b5c0-bae04f41cb6c", "matchId": "019de91d-969c-75eb-adf2-1804d7c9aa0c", "beatType": null, "evidence": "Methodology plus chart-heavy data section establishing what insurers are doing.", "position": 1, "isPrimaryArc": false, "parentBeatType": null, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 55 } ], "loops": [ { "to": 10, "from": 5, "loop": { "name": "02_pattern_hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "canonId": "019dd956-6695-771a-be2e-f1748ef041a4", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2420-77be-bc41-ded96d08cb21", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion", "familyLabel": null }, "matchId": "019de91d-974a-77f1-985f-dea127559a33", "evidence": "Six consecutive bar/stacked-bar slides each showing low current RPA usage across a different function category, all reinforcing the same pattern.", "position": 1, "objective": "Show RPA adoption is early-stage and fragmented across actuarial functions", "confidence": 78, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null } } ], "locked": true }, { "page": 6, "type": "analysis", "title": "The slide includes a navigation breadcrumb at the bottom indicating the current section is 'RPA Uses by Insurers'.", "function": "analyze_data", "rawType": "data_table", "block": null, "metadata": { "slideType": "data_table", "slideTypeCanon": { "name": "Data table", "slug": "data_table", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-0bbd-71b9-9918-417f904abbf8", "version": 1, "description": null }, "function": "analyze_data", "functionCanon": { "name": "Analyze data", "slug": "analyze_data", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-1590-7413-8c82-cc218cff40b4", "version": 1, "description": null }, "density": "dense", "densityScore": 69, "componentCount": 7, "textChars": 727, "nDataPoints": 42, "notes": "The slide includes a navigation breadcrumb at the bottom indicating the current section is 'RPA Uses by Insurers'.", "elementsJson": [ "headline_text", "paragraph", "bar_chart_100pct", "process_diagram" ], "confidence": 1, "extraction": { "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:44.96+00", "seconds": 7.693, "promptVersion": "v2-canon-conditioned" } }, "links": { "slide": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5/6", "deck": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5", "deckAnchor": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5#slide-6", "deckJson": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5.json" }, "components": [ { "bbox": null, "kind": "callout", "text": "Life insurers are considering the use of RPA within more actuarial processes than P&C insurers.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Callout", "slug": "callout", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f8d3-761a-8953-7d37080de5e2", "version": 1, "description": "Highlighted callout box." }, "tool": { "name": "Visual emphasis", "slug": "visual-emphasis", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd9e1-474b-736b-a8eb-a794dd88241c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Drawing the eye to one element above the rest of the slide.", "familyLabel": null }, "subkind": null, "framework": null }, "subkind": null, "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-04-24 13:46:06+00", "model": "or:google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "019dd951-dfa2-7185-b38a-17040603590d", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.45, "w": 0.93, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.34 }, "kind": "chart", "text": "Stacked bar chart showing RPA adoption status across 14 actuarial processes.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Chart", "slug": "chart", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f9a0-76ef-adc6-0b859109d1f8", "version": 1, "description": "Quantitative chart." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Stacked bar chart", "slug": "bar-stacked", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-feec-74bf-9028-15b74f84f0a7", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "bar-stacked", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:44.96+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "8fe0973a-9c84-47d4-8caa-0193d7b9c852", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.02, "w": 0.25, "x": 0.42, "y": 0.735 }, "kind": "legend", "text": "Currently Using, Considering, Not Considering", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Legend", "slug": "legend", "status": "active", "canonId": "31361933-3d22-4c70-bbad-0801e9fffc0c", "version": 1, "description": "Color/symbol decoder placed adjacent to a chart or diagram." }, "tool": null, "subkind": null, "framework": null }, "subkind": null, "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:44.96+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "02c5d535-d98b-4a3b-9b22-34553f3395d7", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": null, "kind": "metric", "text": "RPA adoption status", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Metric", "slug": "metric", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f923-73bf-8081-d0b1a8c5264d", "version": 1, "description": "Big-number or KPI value." }, "tool": { "name": "Quantification", "slug": "quantification", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd9e1-47ab-72ce-a079-aab1f5299e88", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Translating a claim into numbers, charts, or tables.", "familyLabel": null }, "subkind": null, "framework": null }, "subkind": "primary", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-04-24 13:46:06+00", "model": "or:google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "019dd951-dfa2-7185-b38a-1a379e61a551", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.08, "w": 0.93, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.815 }, "kind": "other", "text": "Navigation breadcrumb: Foreword, Key Takeaways, Survey Overview, RPA Uses by Insurers, RPA Uses by Case, Impact on Offshoring, Tools and Governance, Skills Assessment and Development, What's Next: IPA", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Other", "slug": "other", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fa90-743c-8bf6-20d1fbe82b6d", "version": 1, "description": "Fallback when no canonical kind applies." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Unclassified", "slug": "unclassified", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-05ca-77db-81fb-db7d4234bbc0", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "unclassified", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:44.96+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "1f7e12c7-3349-433f-9eed-bc26dbf1f5ba", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.04, "w": 0.93, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.25 }, "kind": "paragraph", "text": "Life insurers are considering the use of RPA within more actuarial processes than P&C insurers. Product design and new product additions in validation models are the two main areas where the least respondents are considering the use of RPA.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "5f2affc0-941d-4d07-959d-4bfc1930cea4", "version": 1, "description": "Single prose block in the body of a slide." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fb80-75af-aa5c-a7a4bfac2433", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "paragraph", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:44.96+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "3760db4e-5e54-40d8-94c9-72990fef2846", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.035, "w": 0.53, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.058 }, "kind": "title", "text": "Use of RPA within different functions in the insurer", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Title", "slug": "title", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f7dd-76d9-b848-b1f12bd85cf4", "version": 1, "description": "Slide title or headline." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Headline", "slug": "headline", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fae1-7463-9a7c-d60668eced0d", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "headline", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:44.96+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "0c6b814b-0fa8-45ad-ab3f-3bea28822471", "parentComponentId": null } ], "metrics": [], "tools": [ { "tool": { "name": "Annotation", "slug": "annotation", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b5b9-7668-bf0e-3af99823ec5c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Adding explanatory labels to highlight key data points", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9b43-7415-a93c-41d2723fcbd6", "evidence": "Stacked segments labelled with adoption status.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 6, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Chart Selection Guide", "slug": "chart-selection-guide", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b1a0-700b-ba17-0e16c4d5bcae", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Choosing the right chart type for your data and message", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9aee-726d-93e6-452ef881406f", "evidence": "100% stacked bar to compare adoption stages across processes.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 75, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 6, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Small Multiples", "slug": "small-multiples", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b32d-7586-b368-baa1dd388ed4", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Repeating similar charts for comparison across categories or time", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9b19-76c6-bdab-dd4f28a6133f", "evidence": "Same chart template repeats across p6-10 for cross-category comparison.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 65, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 6, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "So What? Test", "slug": "so-what-test", "status": "active", "bestFor": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "canonId": "019dd956-acd2-76f8-b59a-9bf15a89f10a", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "fec04b06-b2f1-432b-a97b-916dc7563f64", "description": "The recursive editorial discipline of asking so-what of every slide, chart, and statement until the answer is an implication for the audience — that final answer becomes the slide's title; the chain becomes its body.", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9b6e-758e-b3fb-f44b332f1d16", "evidence": "Callout: Life vs P&C contrast surfaced as the takeaway.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": "Core", "whenToUse": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 6, "whyItWorks": "Solves the two failure modes of analytical communication at once: stopping at description (analyst-confidence problem) and leaving insight stranded in the analyst's head (translation problem). The recursion is what guarantees the implication makes it into ink.", "antipattern": "Stopping at the first tighter description (still a fact, not an implication), regressing past the audience's decision space into philosophy, smuggling the so-what into speaker notes, or re-using an implication aimed at a previous audience.", "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": "Forces every analytical artefact to close the gap between fact and decision, so the reader holds the recommendation by reading titles alone rather than reconstructing the analyst's mental model from raw evidence." } ], "frameworks": [], "arcBeats": [ { "to": 13, "arc": { "name": "The Consultant's Gambit", "slug": "consultants-gambit", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Business cases, project proposals, strategic recommendations", "canonId": "019dd956-5e0a-73c8-b305-81c38c959e9c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "Situation & Context -> Problem & Complication -> Solution & Approach -> Evidence & Proof -> Impact & Next Steps", "description": null, "familyLabel": null }, "from": 4, "name": "Evidence & Proof", "beatId": "019de91d-9648-777a-a3e3-14bff9f462cc", "matchId": "019de91d-95c8-70e9-9817-4a0aa2bc0f9d", "beatType": null, "evidence": "Survey methodology + 9 chart slides quantifying RPA usage, governance, skills.", "position": 4, "isPrimaryArc": true, "parentBeatType": null, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 70 }, { "to": 13, "arc": { "name": "The Triple Take", "slug": "triple-take", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Data-driven presentations, research findings", "canonId": "019dd956-6221-73ad-bc12-378f8eb1f018", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "The Facts (What) -> The Implications (So What) -> The Action (Now What)", "description": null, "familyLabel": null }, "from": 4, "name": "The Facts (What)", "beatId": "019de91d-96c7-746d-b5c0-bae04f41cb6c", "matchId": "019de91d-969c-75eb-adf2-1804d7c9aa0c", "beatType": null, "evidence": "Methodology plus chart-heavy data section establishing what insurers are doing.", "position": 1, "isPrimaryArc": false, "parentBeatType": null, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 55 } ], "loops": [ { "to": 10, "from": 5, "loop": { "name": "02_pattern_hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "canonId": "019dd956-6695-771a-be2e-f1748ef041a4", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2420-77be-bc41-ded96d08cb21", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion", "familyLabel": null }, "matchId": "019de91d-974a-77f1-985f-dea127559a33", "evidence": "Six consecutive bar/stacked-bar slides each showing low current RPA usage across a different function category, all reinforcing the same pattern.", "position": 1, "objective": "Show RPA adoption is early-stage and fragmented across actuarial functions", "confidence": 78, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null } } ], "locked": true }, { "page": 7, "type": "analysis", "title": "The chart displays survey results regarding RPA implementation across 12 specific data-related tasks.", "function": "analyze_data", "rawType": "data_table", "block": null, "metadata": { "slideType": "data_table", "slideTypeCanon": { "name": "Data table", "slug": "data_table", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-0bbd-71b9-9918-417f904abbf8", "version": 1, "description": null }, "function": "analyze_data", "functionCanon": { "name": "Analyze data", "slug": "analyze_data", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-1590-7413-8c82-cc218cff40b4", "version": 1, "description": null }, "density": "overcrowded", "densityScore": 75, "componentCount": 8, "textChars": 718, "nDataPoints": 44, "notes": "The chart displays survey results regarding RPA implementation across 12 specific data-related tasks.", "elementsJson": [ "bar_chart_stacked", "paragraph", "process_diagram" ], "confidence": 1, "extraction": { "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:39.981+00", "seconds": 2.621, "promptVersion": "v2-canon-conditioned" } }, "links": { "slide": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5/7", "deck": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5", "deckAnchor": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5#slide-7", "deckJson": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5.json" }, "components": [ { "bbox": null, "kind": "callout", "text": "The current processes where RPA are most frequently used are sending outputs and running ETL (Extract-Transform-Load) steps.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Callout", "slug": "callout", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f8d3-761a-8953-7d37080de5e2", "version": 1, "description": "Highlighted callout box." }, "tool": { "name": "Visual emphasis", "slug": "visual-emphasis", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd9e1-474b-736b-a8eb-a794dd88241c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Drawing the eye to one element above the rest of the slide.", "familyLabel": null }, "subkind": null, "framework": null }, "subkind": null, "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-04-24 13:46:06+00", "model": "or:google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "019dd951-dfa2-7185-b38a-529cc0655a6d", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.45, "w": 0.9, "x": 0.05, "y": 0.28 }, "kind": "chart", "text": "Stacked bar chart showing adoption levels for 12 data processes.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Chart", "slug": "chart", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f9a0-76ef-adc6-0b859109d1f8", "version": 1, "description": "Quantitative chart." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Stacked bar chart (100%)", "slug": "bar-stacked-100pct", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-ff14-71b8-8d88-860f8d7da84b", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "bar-stacked-100pct", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:39.981+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "937f08b4-1c9f-4255-9ad4-8da47e8a7b28", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.1, "w": 0.9, "x": 0.05, "y": 0.82 }, "kind": "diagram", "text": "Navigation bar showing current section: RPA Uses by Case", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Diagram", "slug": "diagram", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f9f0-734a-81de-15382ff28c65", "version": 1, "description": "Schematic or relational diagram." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Timeline", "slug": "timeline", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-03c5-73fc-84aa-4180cbf0f5cf", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "timeline", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:39.981+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "2cfd9605-62a9-4c9c-99f0-cb989f10fb93", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.02, "w": 0.3, "x": 0.05, "y": 0.95 }, "kind": "disclaimer", "text": "PwC | PwC's 2019 Actuarial Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Survey Results", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Disclaimer", "slug": "disclaimer", "status": "active", "canonId": "91173477-d91f-4024-bbaf-d4f93e3f82dc", "version": 1, "description": "Legal/cautionary text that occupies most of the body of its slide." }, "tool": null, "subkind": null, "framework": null }, "subkind": null, "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:39.981+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "56f9eae1-6e14-4212-ac3d-201b3eb8027b", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.03, "w": 0.4, "x": 0.5, "y": 0.75 }, "kind": "legend", "text": "No Response, Currently Using, Considering, Not Considering", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Legend", "slug": "legend", "status": "active", "canonId": "31361933-3d22-4c70-bbad-0801e9fffc0c", "version": 1, "description": "Color/symbol decoder placed adjacent to a chart or diagram." }, "tool": null, "subkind": null, "framework": null }, "subkind": null, "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:39.981+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "50304e51-050c-4984-9c28-f1fbb563d230", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": null, "kind": "metric", "text": "RPA adoption status", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Metric", "slug": "metric", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f923-73bf-8081-d0b1a8c5264d", "version": 1, "description": "Big-number or KPI value." }, "tool": { "name": "Quantification", "slug": "quantification", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd9e1-47ab-72ce-a079-aab1f5299e88", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Translating a claim into numbers, charts, or tables.", "familyLabel": null }, "subkind": null, "framework": null }, "subkind": "primary", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-04-24 13:46:06+00", "model": "or:google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "019dd951-dfa2-7185-b38a-570c9db7b89d", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.06, "w": 0.9, "x": 0.05, "y": 0.18 }, "kind": "paragraph", "text": "Data and Reporting Processes. The current processes where RPA are most frequently used are sending outputs and running ETL (Extract-Transform-Load) steps. Life Insurers are considering the use of RPA within more data and reporting processes than P&C insurers.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "5f2affc0-941d-4d07-959d-4bfc1930cea4", "version": 1, "description": "Single prose block in the body of a slide." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fb80-75af-aa5c-a7a4bfac2433", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "paragraph", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:39.981+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "a89982cb-dbd4-4696-a509-e9d28d0220fa", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.05, "w": 0.9, "x": 0.05, "y": 0.05 }, "kind": "title", "text": "Use of RPA within different functions in the insurer (continued)", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Title", "slug": "title", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f7dd-76d9-b848-b1f12bd85cf4", "version": 1, "description": "Slide title or headline." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Headline", "slug": "headline", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fae1-7463-9a7c-d60668eced0d", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "headline", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:39.981+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "2994b41c-5455-42c4-bf84-31e2a97413e0", "parentComponentId": null } ], "metrics": [], "tools": [ { "tool": { "name": "Annotation", "slug": "annotation", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b5b9-7668-bf0e-3af99823ec5c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Adding explanatory labels to highlight key data points", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9bed-77e0-bed0-10bedfef42cf", "evidence": "Bar segments carry status labels.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 7, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Chart Selection Guide", "slug": "chart-selection-guide", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b1a0-700b-ba17-0e16c4d5bcae", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Choosing the right chart type for your data and message", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9b98-73ca-8e69-835bc80bebfe", "evidence": "Stacked bar of adoption by data/reporting process.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 75, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 7, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Small Multiples", "slug": "small-multiples", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b32d-7586-b368-baa1dd388ed4", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Repeating similar charts for comparison across categories or time", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9bc2-77da-9160-d544be458366", "evidence": "Same template as p6 reused for next category.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 65, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 7, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "So What? Test", "slug": "so-what-test", "status": "active", "bestFor": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "canonId": "019dd956-acd2-76f8-b59a-9bf15a89f10a", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "fec04b06-b2f1-432b-a97b-916dc7563f64", "description": "The recursive editorial discipline of asking so-what of every slide, chart, and statement until the answer is an implication for the audience — that final answer becomes the slide's title; the chain becomes its body.", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9c18-74cf-8bb7-e10e1fa6d83a", "evidence": "Callout names where RPA is most used (sending outputs, ETL).", "pageRefs": null, "priority": "Core", "whenToUse": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 7, "whyItWorks": "Solves the two failure modes of analytical communication at once: stopping at description (analyst-confidence problem) and leaving insight stranded in the analyst's head (translation problem). The recursion is what guarantees the implication makes it into ink.", "antipattern": "Stopping at the first tighter description (still a fact, not an implication), regressing past the audience's decision space into philosophy, smuggling the so-what into speaker notes, or re-using an implication aimed at a previous audience.", "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": "Forces every analytical artefact to close the gap between fact and decision, so the reader holds the recommendation by reading titles alone rather than reconstructing the analyst's mental model from raw evidence." } ], "frameworks": [], "arcBeats": [ { "to": 13, "arc": { "name": "The Consultant's Gambit", "slug": "consultants-gambit", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Business cases, project proposals, strategic recommendations", "canonId": "019dd956-5e0a-73c8-b305-81c38c959e9c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "Situation & Context -> Problem & Complication -> Solution & Approach -> Evidence & Proof -> Impact & Next Steps", "description": null, "familyLabel": null }, "from": 4, "name": "Evidence & Proof", "beatId": "019de91d-9648-777a-a3e3-14bff9f462cc", "matchId": "019de91d-95c8-70e9-9817-4a0aa2bc0f9d", "beatType": null, "evidence": "Survey methodology + 9 chart slides quantifying RPA usage, governance, skills.", "position": 4, "isPrimaryArc": true, "parentBeatType": null, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 70 }, { "to": 13, "arc": { "name": "The Triple Take", "slug": "triple-take", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Data-driven presentations, research findings", "canonId": "019dd956-6221-73ad-bc12-378f8eb1f018", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "The Facts (What) -> The Implications (So What) -> The Action (Now What)", "description": null, "familyLabel": null }, "from": 4, "name": "The Facts (What)", "beatId": "019de91d-96c7-746d-b5c0-bae04f41cb6c", "matchId": "019de91d-969c-75eb-adf2-1804d7c9aa0c", "beatType": null, "evidence": "Methodology plus chart-heavy data section establishing what insurers are doing.", "position": 1, "isPrimaryArc": false, "parentBeatType": null, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 55 } ], "loops": [ { "to": 10, "from": 5, "loop": { "name": "02_pattern_hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "canonId": "019dd956-6695-771a-be2e-f1748ef041a4", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2420-77be-bc41-ded96d08cb21", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion", "familyLabel": null }, "matchId": "019de91d-974a-77f1-985f-dea127559a33", "evidence": "Six consecutive bar/stacked-bar slides each showing low current RPA usage across a different function category, all reinforcing the same pattern.", "position": 1, "objective": "Show RPA adoption is early-stage and fragmented across actuarial functions", "confidence": 78, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null } } ], "locked": true }, { "page": 8, "type": "analysis", "title": "The slide uses a stacked bar chart to visualize survey data regarding RPA adoption.", "function": "analyze_data", "rawType": "data_table", "block": null, "metadata": { "slideType": "data_table", "slideTypeCanon": { "name": "Data table", "slug": "data_table", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-0bbd-71b9-9918-417f904abbf8", "version": 1, "description": null }, "function": "analyze_data", "functionCanon": { "name": "Analyze data", "slug": "analyze_data", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-1590-7413-8c82-cc218cff40b4", "version": 1, "description": null }, "density": "dense", "densityScore": 65, "componentCount": 7, "textChars": 614, "nDataPoints": 21, "notes": "The slide uses a stacked bar chart to visualize survey data regarding RPA adoption.", "elementsJson": [ "headline_text", "paragraph", "bar_chart_stacked", "process_diagram" ], "confidence": 1, "extraction": { "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:40.17+00", "seconds": 2.746, "promptVersion": "v2-canon-conditioned" } }, "links": { "slide": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5/8", "deck": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5", "deckAnchor": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5#slide-8", "deckJson": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5.json" }, "components": [ { "bbox": null, "kind": "callout", "text": "The majority of respondents are currently using or considering the use of RPA in executing reconciliations, given the ability to gain scale by standardizing process steps.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Callout", "slug": "callout", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f8d3-761a-8953-7d37080de5e2", "version": 1, "description": "Highlighted callout box." }, "tool": { "name": "Visual emphasis", "slug": "visual-emphasis", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd9e1-474b-736b-a8eb-a794dd88241c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Drawing the eye to one element above the rest of the slide.", "familyLabel": null }, "subkind": null, "framework": null }, "subkind": null, "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-04-24 13:46:06+00", "model": "or:google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "019dd951-dfa2-7185-b38a-7f47ba045824", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.38, "w": 0.895, "x": 0.068, "y": 0.35 }, "kind": "chart", "text": "Stacked bar chart showing RPA adoption status for 7 finance processes", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Chart", "slug": "chart", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f9a0-76ef-adc6-0b859109d1f8", "version": 1, "description": "Quantitative chart." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Stacked bar chart (100%)", "slug": "bar-stacked-100pct", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-ff14-71b8-8d88-860f8d7da84b", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "bar-stacked-100pct", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:40.17+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "b0802513-4e74-498c-a02f-ef0548602d91", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.105, "w": 0.928, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.815 }, "kind": "diagram", "text": "Navigation breadcrumb showing 'RPA Uses by Case' as the active section", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Diagram", "slug": "diagram", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f9f0-734a-81de-15382ff28c65", "version": 1, "description": "Schematic or relational diagram." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Timeline", "slug": "timeline", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-03c5-73fc-84aa-4180cbf0f5cf", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "timeline", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:40.17+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "6abdc4a0-5885-45fc-b85a-92b3fb45eb6a", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.025, "w": 0.494, "x": 0.253, "y": 0.738 }, "kind": "legend", "text": "Currently Using, Considering, Not Considering", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Legend", "slug": "legend", "status": "active", "canonId": "31361933-3d22-4c70-bbad-0801e9fffc0c", "version": 1, "description": "Color/symbol decoder placed adjacent to a chart or diagram." }, "tool": null, "subkind": null, "framework": null }, "subkind": null, "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:40.17+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "5f701f1a-8f47-4423-aaf0-5b35b89b8c8e", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": null, "kind": "metric", "text": "RPA adoption status: 50%", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Metric", "slug": "metric", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f923-73bf-8081-d0b1a8c5264d", "version": 1, "description": "Big-number or KPI value." }, "tool": { "name": "Quantification", "slug": "quantification", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd9e1-47ab-72ce-a079-aab1f5299e88", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Translating a claim into numbers, charts, or tables.", "familyLabel": null }, "subkind": null, "framework": null }, "subkind": "primary", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-04-24 13:46:06+00", "model": "or:google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "019dd951-dfa2-7185-b38a-81b9a7feb0c8", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.038, "w": 0.928, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.254 }, "kind": "paragraph", "text": "The majority of respondents are currently using or considering the use of RPA in executing reconciliations, given the ability to gain scale by standardizing process steps.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "5f2affc0-941d-4d07-959d-4bfc1930cea4", "version": 1, "description": "Single prose block in the body of a slide." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fb80-75af-aa5c-a7a4bfac2433", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "paragraph", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:40.17+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "c60ae301-8caf-4270-8310-fb0f11f2e3e9", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.038, "w": 0.964, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.056 }, "kind": "title", "text": "Use of RPA within different functions in the insurer (continued)", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Title", "slug": "title", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f7dd-76d9-b848-b1f12bd85cf4", "version": 1, "description": "Slide title or headline." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Headline", "slug": "headline", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fae1-7463-9a7c-d60668eced0d", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "headline", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:40.17+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "a3a37a55-2a11-442c-9ead-d0f791d0edc3", "parentComponentId": null } ], "metrics": [], "tools": [ { "tool": { "name": "Chart Selection Guide", "slug": "chart-selection-guide", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b1a0-700b-ba17-0e16c4d5bcae", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Choosing the right chart type for your data and message", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9c42-768b-9995-864b71008538", "evidence": "Stacked bar of finance/accounting processes.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 75, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 8, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Small Multiples", "slug": "small-multiples", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b32d-7586-b368-baa1dd388ed4", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Repeating similar charts for comparison across categories or time", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9c6d-7072-a240-36c5c177600b", "evidence": "Continues p6-7 chart pattern.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 65, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 8, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "So What? Test", "slug": "so-what-test", "status": "active", "bestFor": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "canonId": "019dd956-acd2-76f8-b59a-9bf15a89f10a", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "fec04b06-b2f1-432b-a97b-916dc7563f64", "description": "The recursive editorial discipline of asking so-what of every slide, chart, and statement until the answer is an implication for the audience — that final answer becomes the slide's title; the chain becomes its body.", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9c98-77aa-bd43-24c55392c06f", "evidence": "Callout flags reconciliations as top RPA target.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": "Core", "whenToUse": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 8, "whyItWorks": "Solves the two failure modes of analytical communication at once: stopping at description (analyst-confidence problem) and leaving insight stranded in the analyst's head (translation problem). The recursion is what guarantees the implication makes it into ink.", "antipattern": "Stopping at the first tighter description (still a fact, not an implication), regressing past the audience's decision space into philosophy, smuggling the so-what into speaker notes, or re-using an implication aimed at a previous audience.", "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": "Forces every analytical artefact to close the gap between fact and decision, so the reader holds the recommendation by reading titles alone rather than reconstructing the analyst's mental model from raw evidence." } ], "frameworks": [], "arcBeats": [ { "to": 13, "arc": { "name": "The Consultant's Gambit", "slug": "consultants-gambit", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Business cases, project proposals, strategic recommendations", "canonId": "019dd956-5e0a-73c8-b305-81c38c959e9c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "Situation & Context -> Problem & Complication -> Solution & Approach -> Evidence & Proof -> Impact & Next Steps", "description": null, "familyLabel": null }, "from": 4, "name": "Evidence & Proof", "beatId": "019de91d-9648-777a-a3e3-14bff9f462cc", "matchId": "019de91d-95c8-70e9-9817-4a0aa2bc0f9d", "beatType": null, "evidence": "Survey methodology + 9 chart slides quantifying RPA usage, governance, skills.", "position": 4, "isPrimaryArc": true, "parentBeatType": null, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 70 }, { "to": 13, "arc": { "name": "The Triple Take", "slug": "triple-take", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Data-driven presentations, research findings", "canonId": "019dd956-6221-73ad-bc12-378f8eb1f018", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "The Facts (What) -> The Implications (So What) -> The Action (Now What)", "description": null, "familyLabel": null }, "from": 4, "name": "The Facts (What)", "beatId": "019de91d-96c7-746d-b5c0-bae04f41cb6c", "matchId": "019de91d-969c-75eb-adf2-1804d7c9aa0c", "beatType": null, "evidence": "Methodology plus chart-heavy data section establishing what insurers are doing.", "position": 1, "isPrimaryArc": false, "parentBeatType": null, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 55 } ], "loops": [ { "to": 10, "from": 5, "loop": { "name": "02_pattern_hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "canonId": "019dd956-6695-771a-be2e-f1748ef041a4", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2420-77be-bc41-ded96d08cb21", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion", "familyLabel": null }, "matchId": "019de91d-974a-77f1-985f-dea127559a33", "evidence": "Six consecutive bar/stacked-bar slides each showing low current RPA usage across a different function category, all reinforcing the same pattern.", "position": 1, "objective": "Show RPA adoption is early-stage and fragmented across actuarial functions", "confidence": 78, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null } } ], "locked": true }, { "page": 9, "type": "analysis", "title": "The slide uses a process-based categorization for RPA adoption in insurance.", "function": "analyze_data", "rawType": "data_table", "block": null, "metadata": { "slideType": "data_table", "slideTypeCanon": { "name": "Data table", "slug": "data_table", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-0bbd-71b9-9918-417f904abbf8", "version": 1, "description": null }, "function": "analyze_data", "functionCanon": { "name": "Analyze data", "slug": "analyze_data", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-1590-7413-8c82-cc218cff40b4", "version": 1, "description": null }, "density": "dense", "densityScore": 66, "componentCount": 7, "textChars": 674, "nDataPoints": 21, "notes": "The slide uses a process-based categorization for RPA adoption in insurance.", "elementsJson": [ "headline_text", "bar_chart_stacked", "process_diagram" ], "confidence": 1, "extraction": { "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:43.103+00", "seconds": 5.493, "promptVersion": "v2-canon-conditioned" } }, "links": { "slide": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5/9", "deck": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5", "deckAnchor": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5#slide-9", "deckJson": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5.json" }, "components": [ { "bbox": null, "kind": "callout", "text": "No responding P&C insurer is currently using RPA in any of the claims or underwriting processes cited below, and the majority are not considering its use at this time.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Callout", "slug": "callout", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f8d3-761a-8953-7d37080de5e2", "version": 1, "description": "Highlighted callout box." }, "tool": { "name": "Visual emphasis", "slug": "visual-emphasis", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd9e1-474b-736b-a8eb-a794dd88241c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Drawing the eye to one element above the rest of the slide.", "familyLabel": null }, "subkind": null, "framework": null }, "subkind": null, "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-04-24 13:46:06+00", "model": "or:google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "019dd951-dfa2-7185-b38b-0cc0e6fc8d60", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.4, "w": 0.92, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.35 }, "kind": "chart", "text": "Stacked bar chart showing adoption status of RPA across 7 processes", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Chart", "slug": "chart", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f9a0-76ef-adc6-0b859109d1f8", "version": 1, "description": "Quantitative chart." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Stacked bar chart (100%)", "slug": "bar-stacked-100pct", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-ff14-71b8-8d88-860f8d7da84b", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "bar-stacked-100pct", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:43.103+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "d5b15a53-2035-4456-b30a-4ffd6ddf6e93", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.08, "w": 0.92, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.815 }, "kind": "diagram", "text": "Navigation bar showing current section: RPA Uses by Case", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Diagram", "slug": "diagram", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f9f0-734a-81de-15382ff28c65", "version": 1, "description": "Schematic or relational diagram." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Timeline", "slug": "timeline", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-03c5-73fc-84aa-4180cbf0f5cf", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "timeline", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:43.103+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "691cf0fd-3b12-4046-b373-d968a9c9f732", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.03, "w": 0.3, "x": 0.48, "y": 0.74 }, "kind": "legend", "text": "Currently Using | Considering | Not Considering", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Legend", "slug": "legend", "status": "active", "canonId": "31361933-3d22-4c70-bbad-0801e9fffc0c", "version": 1, "description": "Color/symbol decoder placed adjacent to a chart or diagram." }, "tool": null, "subkind": null, "framework": null }, "subkind": null, "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:43.103+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "f7814edc-a32d-47e6-a401-4235aa65bb1a", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": null, "kind": "metric", "text": "RPA adoption status: 88%", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Metric", "slug": "metric", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f923-73bf-8081-d0b1a8c5264d", "version": 1, "description": "Big-number or KPI value." }, "tool": { "name": "Quantification", "slug": "quantification", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd9e1-47ab-72ce-a079-aab1f5299e88", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Translating a claim into numbers, charts, or tables.", "familyLabel": null }, "subkind": null, "framework": null }, "subkind": "primary", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-04-24 13:46:06+00", "model": "or:google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "019dd951-dfa2-7185-b38b-11867bcdc553", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.06, "w": 0.92, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.25 }, "kind": "paragraph", "text": "No responding P&C insurer is currently using RPA in any of the claims or underwriting processes cited below, and the majority are not considering its use at this time. Life insurers are more readily considering the use of RPA within these processes.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "5f2affc0-941d-4d07-959d-4bfc1930cea4", "version": 1, "description": "Single prose block in the body of a slide." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fb80-75af-aa5c-a7a4bfac2433", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "paragraph", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:43.103+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "83ec4cf2-abc4-43d7-8080-b635588dfd6a", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.04, "w": 0.65, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.056 }, "kind": "title", "text": "Use of RPA within different functions in the insurer (continued)", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Title", "slug": "title", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f7dd-76d9-b848-b1f12bd85cf4", "version": 1, "description": "Slide title or headline." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Headline", "slug": "headline", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fae1-7463-9a7c-d60668eced0d", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "headline", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:43.103+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "502e7f1a-1a5b-4590-8d4b-ae5346be22b8", "parentComponentId": null } ], "metrics": [], "tools": [ { "tool": { "name": "Chart Selection Guide", "slug": "chart-selection-guide", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b1a0-700b-ba17-0e16c4d5bcae", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Choosing the right chart type for your data and message", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9cc3-70b9-a556-5f6b649d118c", "evidence": "Stacked bar across claims/underwriting processes.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 75, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 9, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Small Multiples", "slug": "small-multiples", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b32d-7586-b368-baa1dd388ed4", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Repeating similar charts for comparison across categories or time", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9cee-7303-9719-cfe16774e49e", "evidence": "Same chart template re-used.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 65, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 9, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "So What? Test", "slug": "so-what-test", "status": "active", "bestFor": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "canonId": "019dd956-acd2-76f8-b59a-9bf15a89f10a", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "fec04b06-b2f1-432b-a97b-916dc7563f64", "description": "The recursive editorial discipline of asking so-what of every slide, chart, and statement until the answer is an implication for the audience — that final answer becomes the slide's title; the chain becomes its body.", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9d19-71c6-96ce-c674f4289812", "evidence": "Callout: 'No P&C insurer is currently using RPA in any of...'", "pageRefs": null, "priority": "Core", "whenToUse": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 9, "whyItWorks": "Solves the two failure modes of analytical communication at once: stopping at description (analyst-confidence problem) and leaving insight stranded in the analyst's head (translation problem). The recursion is what guarantees the implication makes it into ink.", "antipattern": "Stopping at the first tighter description (still a fact, not an implication), regressing past the audience's decision space into philosophy, smuggling the so-what into speaker notes, or re-using an implication aimed at a previous audience.", "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": "Forces every analytical artefact to close the gap between fact and decision, so the reader holds the recommendation by reading titles alone rather than reconstructing the analyst's mental model from raw evidence." } ], "frameworks": [], "arcBeats": [ { "to": 13, "arc": { "name": "The Consultant's Gambit", "slug": "consultants-gambit", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Business cases, project proposals, strategic recommendations", "canonId": "019dd956-5e0a-73c8-b305-81c38c959e9c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "Situation & Context -> Problem & Complication -> Solution & Approach -> Evidence & Proof -> Impact & Next Steps", "description": null, "familyLabel": null }, "from": 4, "name": "Evidence & Proof", "beatId": "019de91d-9648-777a-a3e3-14bff9f462cc", "matchId": "019de91d-95c8-70e9-9817-4a0aa2bc0f9d", "beatType": null, "evidence": "Survey methodology + 9 chart slides quantifying RPA usage, governance, skills.", "position": 4, "isPrimaryArc": true, "parentBeatType": null, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 70 }, { "to": 13, "arc": { "name": "The Triple Take", "slug": "triple-take", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Data-driven presentations, research findings", "canonId": "019dd956-6221-73ad-bc12-378f8eb1f018", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "The Facts (What) -> The Implications (So What) -> The Action (Now What)", "description": null, "familyLabel": null }, "from": 4, "name": "The Facts (What)", "beatId": "019de91d-96c7-746d-b5c0-bae04f41cb6c", "matchId": "019de91d-969c-75eb-adf2-1804d7c9aa0c", "beatType": null, "evidence": "Methodology plus chart-heavy data section establishing what insurers are doing.", "position": 1, "isPrimaryArc": false, "parentBeatType": null, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 55 } ], "loops": [ { "to": 10, "from": 5, "loop": { "name": "02_pattern_hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "canonId": "019dd956-6695-771a-be2e-f1748ef041a4", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2420-77be-bc41-ded96d08cb21", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion", "familyLabel": null }, "matchId": "019de91d-974a-77f1-985f-dea127559a33", "evidence": "Six consecutive bar/stacked-bar slides each showing low current RPA usage across a different function category, all reinforcing the same pattern.", "position": 1, "objective": "Show RPA adoption is early-stage and fragmented across actuarial functions", "confidence": 78, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null } } ], "locked": true }, { "page": 10, "type": "analysis", "title": "The slide uses a horizontal stacked bar chart to visualize survey data regarding RPA adoption.", "function": "analyze_data", "rawType": "data_table", "block": null, "metadata": { "slideType": "data_table", "slideTypeCanon": { "name": "Data table", "slug": "data_table", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-0bbd-71b9-9918-417f904abbf8", "version": 1, "description": null }, "function": "analyze_data", "functionCanon": { "name": "Analyze data", "slug": "analyze_data", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-1590-7413-8c82-cc218cff40b4", "version": 1, "description": null }, "density": "dense", "densityScore": 59, "componentCount": 6, "textChars": 696, "nDataPoints": 27, "notes": "The slide uses a horizontal stacked bar chart to visualize survey data regarding RPA adoption.", "elementsJson": [ "headline_text", "paragraph", "bar_chart_stacked", "process_diagram" ], "confidence": 1, "extraction": { "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:40.627+00", "seconds": 2.861, "promptVersion": "v2-canon-conditioned" } }, "links": { "slide": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5/10", "deck": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5", "deckAnchor": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5#slide-10", "deckJson": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5.json" }, "components": [ { "bbox": null, "kind": "callout", "text": "No P&C insurer is currently using RPA in any risk management process and the majority are not considering its use in any of the processes cited below.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Callout", "slug": "callout", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f8d3-761a-8953-7d37080de5e2", "version": 1, "description": "Highlighted callout box." }, "tool": { "name": "Visual emphasis", "slug": "visual-emphasis", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd9e1-474b-736b-a8eb-a794dd88241c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Drawing the eye to one element above the rest of the slide.", "familyLabel": null }, "subkind": null, "framework": null }, "subkind": null, "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-04-24 13:46:05+00", "model": "or:google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "019dd951-dfa2-7185-b389-d97d83fa55df", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.45, "w": 0.75, "x": 0.2, "y": 0.35 }, "kind": "chart", "text": "Stacked bar chart showing 'Currently Using', 'Considering', and 'Not Considering' for 9 risk management processes.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Chart", "slug": "chart", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f9a0-76ef-adc6-0b859109d1f8", "version": 1, "description": "Quantitative chart." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Stacked bar chart (100%)", "slug": "bar-stacked-100pct", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-ff14-71b8-8d88-860f8d7da84b", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "bar-stacked-100pct", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:40.627+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "f08dc1df-f24d-4cc8-9209-9aedc8c99a4f", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.1, "w": 0.95, "x": 0.03, "y": 0.82 }, "kind": "diagram", "text": "Navigation bar showing the current section as 'RPA Uses by Case'.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Diagram", "slug": "diagram", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f9f0-734a-81de-15382ff28c65", "version": 1, "description": "Schematic or relational diagram." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Timeline", "slug": "timeline", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-03c5-73fc-84aa-4180cbf0f5cf", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "timeline", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:40.627+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "9aa5aa3a-6b75-4084-8614-8ba5ddc48b55", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": null, "kind": "metric", "text": "RPA adoption status: 91%", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Metric", "slug": "metric", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f923-73bf-8081-d0b1a8c5264d", "version": 1, "description": "Big-number or KPI value." }, "tool": { "name": "Quantification", "slug": "quantification", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd9e1-47ab-72ce-a079-aab1f5299e88", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Translating a claim into numbers, charts, or tables.", "familyLabel": null }, "subkind": null, "framework": null }, "subkind": "primary", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-04-24 13:46:05+00", "model": "or:google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "019dd951-dfa2-7185-b389-df75867d1514", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.08, "w": 0.9, "x": 0.03, "y": 0.18 }, "kind": "paragraph", "text": "Risk Management Processes. No P&C insurer is currently using RPA in any risk management process and the majority are not considering its use in any of the processes cited below. Asset liability analysis is the area where life insurers are most readily considering the use of RPA.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "5f2affc0-941d-4d07-959d-4bfc1930cea4", "version": 1, "description": "Single prose block in the body of a slide." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fb80-75af-aa5c-a7a4bfac2433", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "paragraph", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:40.627+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "02843992-bc16-4e80-a5ae-733bd81b6e92", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.05, "w": 0.9, "x": 0.03, "y": 0.05 }, "kind": "title", "text": "Use of RPA within different functions in the insurer (continued)", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Title", "slug": "title", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f7dd-76d9-b848-b1f12bd85cf4", "version": 1, "description": "Slide title or headline." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Headline", "slug": "headline", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fae1-7463-9a7c-d60668eced0d", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "headline", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:40.627+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "91963ed5-47bb-4d03-bb62-37fb0e0da83f", "parentComponentId": null } ], "metrics": [], "tools": [ { "tool": { "name": "Chart Selection Guide", "slug": "chart-selection-guide", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b1a0-700b-ba17-0e16c4d5bcae", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Choosing the right chart type for your data and message", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9d43-755a-bb8e-d5ef4d9a0016", "evidence": "Stacked bar across risk-management processes.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 75, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 10, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Small Multiples", "slug": "small-multiples", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b32d-7586-b368-baa1dd388ed4", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Repeating similar charts for comparison across categories or time", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9d6d-76c9-8c76-c9afb7a17564", "evidence": "Closes the p6-10 small-multiples sweep.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 65, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 10, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "So What? Test", "slug": "so-what-test", "status": "active", "bestFor": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "canonId": "019dd956-acd2-76f8-b59a-9bf15a89f10a", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "fec04b06-b2f1-432b-a97b-916dc7563f64", "description": "The recursive editorial discipline of asking so-what of every slide, chart, and statement until the answer is an implication for the audience — that final answer becomes the slide's title; the chain becomes its body.", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9d97-71ad-b3c2-8ae25d39b8e7", "evidence": "Callout: '91% / no P&C insurer is currently using RPA in risk'.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": "Core", "whenToUse": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 10, "whyItWorks": "Solves the two failure modes of analytical communication at once: stopping at description (analyst-confidence problem) and leaving insight stranded in the analyst's head (translation problem). The recursion is what guarantees the implication makes it into ink.", "antipattern": "Stopping at the first tighter description (still a fact, not an implication), regressing past the audience's decision space into philosophy, smuggling the so-what into speaker notes, or re-using an implication aimed at a previous audience.", "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": "Forces every analytical artefact to close the gap between fact and decision, so the reader holds the recommendation by reading titles alone rather than reconstructing the analyst's mental model from raw evidence." } ], "frameworks": [], "arcBeats": [ { "to": 13, "arc": { "name": "The Consultant's Gambit", "slug": "consultants-gambit", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Business cases, project proposals, strategic recommendations", "canonId": "019dd956-5e0a-73c8-b305-81c38c959e9c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "Situation & Context -> Problem & Complication -> Solution & Approach -> Evidence & Proof -> Impact & Next Steps", "description": null, "familyLabel": null }, "from": 4, "name": "Evidence & Proof", "beatId": "019de91d-9648-777a-a3e3-14bff9f462cc", "matchId": "019de91d-95c8-70e9-9817-4a0aa2bc0f9d", "beatType": null, "evidence": "Survey methodology + 9 chart slides quantifying RPA usage, governance, skills.", "position": 4, "isPrimaryArc": true, "parentBeatType": null, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 70 }, { "to": 13, "arc": { "name": "The Triple Take", "slug": "triple-take", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Data-driven presentations, research findings", "canonId": "019dd956-6221-73ad-bc12-378f8eb1f018", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "The Facts (What) -> The Implications (So What) -> The Action (Now What)", "description": null, "familyLabel": null }, "from": 4, "name": "The Facts (What)", "beatId": "019de91d-96c7-746d-b5c0-bae04f41cb6c", "matchId": "019de91d-969c-75eb-adf2-1804d7c9aa0c", "beatType": null, "evidence": "Methodology plus chart-heavy data section establishing what insurers are doing.", "position": 1, "isPrimaryArc": false, "parentBeatType": null, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 55 } ], "loops": [ { "to": 10, "from": 5, "loop": { "name": "02_pattern_hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "canonId": "019dd956-6695-771a-be2e-f1748ef041a4", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2420-77be-bc41-ded96d08cb21", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion", "familyLabel": null }, "matchId": "019de91d-974a-77f1-985f-dea127559a33", "evidence": "Six consecutive bar/stacked-bar slides each showing low current RPA usage across a different function category, all reinforcing the same pattern.", "position": 1, "objective": "Show RPA adoption is early-stage and fragmented across actuarial functions", "confidence": 78, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null } } ], "locked": true }, { "page": 11, "type": "analysis", "title": "Includes a navigation timeline at the bottom indicating the current section.", "function": "analyze_data", "rawType": "industry_trends", "block": null, "metadata": { "slideType": "industry_trends", "slideTypeCanon": { "name": "Industry trends", "slug": "industry_trends", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-0b1d-7705-a0e0-c663199cd1fa", "version": 1, "description": null }, "function": "analyze_data", "functionCanon": { "name": "Analyze data", "slug": "analyze_data", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-1590-7413-8c82-cc218cff40b4", "version": 1, "description": null }, "density": "dense", "densityScore": 69, "componentCount": 7, "textChars": 912, "nDataPoints": 5, "notes": "Includes a navigation timeline at the bottom indicating the current section.", "elementsJson": [ "headline_text", "paragraph", "donut_chart", "bar_chart_horizontal", "process_diagram" ], "confidence": 1, "extraction": { "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:43.896+00", "seconds": 6.052, "promptVersion": "v2-canon-conditioned" } }, "links": { "slide": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5/11", "deck": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5", "deckAnchor": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5#slide-11", "deckJson": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5.json" }, "components": [ { "bbox": null, "kind": "callout", "text": "Over 60% of survey respondents do not currently use outsourcing/offshoring solutions within the actuarial function.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Callout", "slug": "callout", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f8d3-761a-8953-7d37080de5e2", "version": 1, "description": "Highlighted callout box." }, "tool": { "name": "Visual emphasis", "slug": "visual-emphasis", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd9e1-474b-736b-a8eb-a794dd88241c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Drawing the eye to one element above the rest of the slide.", "familyLabel": null }, "subkind": null, "framework": null }, "subkind": null, "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-04-24 13:46:06+00", "model": "or:google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "019dd951-dfa2-7185-b38a-33681a5c5f66", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.45, "w": 0.48, "x": 0.48, "y": 0.33 }, "kind": "chart", "text": "How will the use of RPA impact outsourcing solutions within the Actuarial function?", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Chart", "slug": "chart", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f9a0-76ef-adc6-0b859109d1f8", "version": 1, "description": "Quantitative chart." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Horizontal bar chart", "slug": "bar-horizontal", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fec4-7221-986b-1cb5f5e84b1f", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "bar-horizontal", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:43.896+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "4bdf2bbb-3d6d-4039-9b6e-6d0b482861b6", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.45, "w": 0.4, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.33 }, "kind": "chart", "text": "How are organizations deploying outsourcing?", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Chart", "slug": "chart", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f9a0-76ef-adc6-0b859109d1f8", "version": 1, "description": "Quantitative chart." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Donut chart", "slug": "donut", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-0006-752c-9528-0fef476b8004", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "donut", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:43.896+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "1088bb9d-755f-4a8f-9032-92d2791f30c7", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.1, "w": 0.92, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.82 }, "kind": "diagram", "text": "Foreword, Key Takeaways, Survey Overview, RPA Uses by Insurers, RPA Uses by Case, Impact on Offshoring, Tools and Governance, Skills Assessment and Development, What's Next: IPA", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Diagram", "slug": "diagram", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f9f0-734a-81de-15382ff28c65", "version": 1, "description": "Schematic or relational diagram." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Timeline", "slug": "timeline", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-03c5-73fc-84aa-4180cbf0f5cf", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "timeline", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:43.896+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "d7428dfd-fbc1-47d9-bf82-452cfa19b727", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": null, "kind": "metric", "text": "utilization: 61%", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Metric", "slug": "metric", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f923-73bf-8081-d0b1a8c5264d", "version": 1, "description": "Big-number or KPI value." }, "tool": { "name": "Quantification", "slug": "quantification", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd9e1-47ab-72ce-a079-aab1f5299e88", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Translating a claim into numbers, charts, or tables.", "familyLabel": null }, "subkind": null, "framework": null }, "subkind": "primary", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-04-24 13:46:06+00", "model": "or:google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "019dd951-dfa2-7185-b38a-35d7e9430580", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.12, "w": 0.92, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.135 }, "kind": "paragraph", "text": "Over 60% of survey respondents do not currently use outsourcing/offshoring solutions within the actuarial function. Of the respondents who currently use outsourcing/offshoring, the majority do not expect that RPA will have an impact on the utilization of outsourcing/offshoring levels. However, a quarter of P&C respondents think that RPA will impact the use of outsourcing/offshoring, whereas no life insurers think this will be the case.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "5f2affc0-941d-4d07-959d-4bfc1930cea4", "version": 1, "description": "Single prose block in the body of a slide." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fb80-75af-aa5c-a7a4bfac2433", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "paragraph", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:43.896+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "bd5fdc69-fef1-48ec-8919-07deb050e9ca", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.05, "w": 0.45, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.056 }, "kind": "title", "text": "RPA’s Impact on outsourcing/offshoring", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Title", "slug": "title", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f7dd-76d9-b848-b1f12bd85cf4", "version": 1, "description": "Slide title or headline." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Headline", "slug": "headline", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fae1-7463-9a7c-d60668eced0d", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "headline", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:43.896+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "8b6e50f4-ee3e-462e-a431-3ed580f0c8cc", "parentComponentId": null } ], "metrics": [], "tools": [ { "tool": { "name": "MECE Principle", "slug": "mece-principle", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-7c60-71a8-8758-c79d914489c9", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive - ensuring complete, non-overlapping structure", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Block", "categorySlug": "block" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "block", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9dc2-758f-a774-189d92249e98", "evidence": "First of three distinct enabling-topic slides covering offshoring/governance/skills.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": "Core", "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 60, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 11, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Annotation", "slug": "annotation", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b5b9-7668-bf0e-3af99823ec5c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Adding explanatory labels to highlight key data points", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9e16-7364-bbc9-ba0b293ca748", "evidence": "Percentages labelled directly on chart.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 11, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Chart Selection Guide", "slug": "chart-selection-guide", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b1a0-700b-ba17-0e16c4d5bcae", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Choosing the right chart type for your data and message", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9dec-77da-9add-4b2626d7523f", "evidence": "Donut + horizontal bar combination for current vs. future view.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 75, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 11, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "So What? Test", "slug": "so-what-test", "status": "active", "bestFor": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "canonId": "019dd956-acd2-76f8-b59a-9bf15a89f10a", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "fec04b06-b2f1-432b-a97b-916dc7563f64", "description": "The recursive editorial discipline of asking so-what of every slide, chart, and statement until the answer is an implication for the audience — that final answer becomes the slide's title; the chain becomes its body.", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9e41-71da-aaf5-7001f2236ecc", "evidence": "Callout states the >60% no-outsourcing finding.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": "Core", "whenToUse": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 11, "whyItWorks": "Solves the two failure modes of analytical communication at once: stopping at description (analyst-confidence problem) and leaving insight stranded in the analyst's head (translation problem). The recursion is what guarantees the implication makes it into ink.", "antipattern": "Stopping at the first tighter description (still a fact, not an implication), regressing past the audience's decision space into philosophy, smuggling the so-what into speaker notes, or re-using an implication aimed at a previous audience.", "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": "Forces every analytical artefact to close the gap between fact and decision, so the reader holds the recommendation by reading titles alone rather than reconstructing the analyst's mental model from raw evidence." } ], "frameworks": [], "arcBeats": [ { "to": 13, "arc": { "name": "The Consultant's Gambit", "slug": "consultants-gambit", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Business cases, project proposals, strategic recommendations", "canonId": "019dd956-5e0a-73c8-b305-81c38c959e9c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "Situation & Context -> Problem & Complication -> Solution & Approach -> Evidence & Proof -> Impact & Next Steps", "description": null, "familyLabel": null }, "from": 4, "name": "Evidence & Proof", "beatId": "019de91d-9648-777a-a3e3-14bff9f462cc", "matchId": "019de91d-95c8-70e9-9817-4a0aa2bc0f9d", "beatType": null, "evidence": "Survey methodology + 9 chart slides quantifying RPA usage, governance, skills.", "position": 4, "isPrimaryArc": true, "parentBeatType": null, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 70 }, { "to": 13, "arc": { "name": "The Triple Take", "slug": "triple-take", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Data-driven presentations, research findings", "canonId": "019dd956-6221-73ad-bc12-378f8eb1f018", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "The Facts (What) -> The Implications (So What) -> The Action (Now What)", "description": null, "familyLabel": null }, "from": 4, "name": "The Facts (What)", "beatId": "019de91d-96c7-746d-b5c0-bae04f41cb6c", "matchId": "019de91d-969c-75eb-adf2-1804d7c9aa0c", "beatType": null, "evidence": "Methodology plus chart-heavy data section establishing what insurers are doing.", "position": 1, "isPrimaryArc": false, "parentBeatType": null, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 55 } ], "loops": [ { "to": 13, "from": 11, "loop": { "name": "40_mece_breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "canonId": "019dd956-763c-765e-8b68-6ee3ae1ef184", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2420-77be-bc41-ded96d08cb21", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories", "familyLabel": null }, "matchId": "019de91d-9773-7040-b9a4-4026232b48b2", "evidence": "Three back-to-back slides covering mutually-distinct enabling dimensions (offshoring impact, tools/governance, skills) that together complete the survey picture.", "position": 2, "objective": "Round out the adoption picture with three distinct enabling topics: offshoring, governance, skills", "confidence": 65, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null } } ], "locked": true }, { "page": 12, "type": "analysis", "title": "Includes a timeline navigation bar at the bottom.", "function": "analyze_data", "rawType": "kpi_dashboard", "block": null, "metadata": { "slideType": "kpi_dashboard", "slideTypeCanon": { "name": "KPI dashboard", "slug": "kpi_dashboard", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-0be5-7295-af4d-b850fe7b7e65", "version": 1, "description": null }, "function": "analyze_data", "functionCanon": { "name": "Analyze data", "slug": "analyze_data", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-1590-7413-8c82-cc218cff40b4", "version": 1, "description": null }, "density": "overcrowded", "densityScore": 76, "componentCount": 8, "textChars": 818, "nDataPoints": 11, "notes": "Includes a timeline navigation bar at the bottom.", "elementsJson": [ "bar_chart_horizontal", "icon_grid", "donut_chart", "process_diagram" ], "confidence": 1, "extraction": { "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:40.689+00", "seconds": 2.841, "promptVersion": "v2-canon-conditioned" } }, "links": { "slide": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5/12", "deck": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5", "deckAnchor": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5#slide-12", "deckJson": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5.json" }, "components": [ { "bbox": null, "kind": "callout", "text": "RPA tends to be more centrally managed in Life insurers than P&C insurers, with life insurers displaying a higher likelihood of maintaining a comprehensive governance framework through a dedicated RPA center of excellence manages RPA.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Callout", "slug": "callout", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f8d3-761a-8953-7d37080de5e2", "version": 1, "description": "Highlighted callout box." }, "tool": { "name": "Visual emphasis", "slug": "visual-emphasis", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd9e1-474b-736b-a8eb-a794dd88241c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Drawing the eye to one element above the rest of the slide.", "familyLabel": null }, "subkind": null, "framework": null }, "subkind": null, "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-04-24 13:46:06+00", "model": "or:google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "019dd951-dfa2-7185-b389-f73db90f57f4", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.157, "w": 0.486, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.644 }, "kind": "chart", "text": "Which tool is being used?", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Chart", "slug": "chart", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f9a0-76ef-adc6-0b859109d1f8", "version": 1, "description": "Quantitative chart." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Grouped bar chart", "slug": "bar-grouped", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-ff3b-751e-a8ff-f21ff11097b1", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "bar-grouped", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:40.689+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "7d0475e7-1af8-4880-a13b-847e7199f3c1", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.215, "w": 0.928, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.289 }, "kind": "chart", "text": "How are organizations governing RPA?", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Chart", "slug": "chart", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f9a0-76ef-adc6-0b859109d1f8", "version": 1, "description": "Quantitative chart." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Horizontal bar chart", "slug": "bar-horizontal", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fec4-7221-986b-1cb5f5e84b1f", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "bar-horizontal", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:40.689+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "63f1559e-7913-4eb2-85b7-32792b56fcbf", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.2, "w": 0.3, "x": 0.514, "y": 0.55 }, "kind": "chart", "text": "Which internal parties manage RPA?", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Chart", "slug": "chart", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f9a0-76ef-adc6-0b859109d1f8", "version": 1, "description": "Quantitative chart." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Donut chart", "slug": "donut", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-0006-752c-9528-0fef476b8004", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "donut", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:40.689+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "3f1d9f4e-0aa2-439c-bdea-b7feeb75447a", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": null, "kind": "metric", "text": "Governance framework adoption: 28%", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Metric", "slug": "metric", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f923-73bf-8081-d0b1a8c5264d", "version": 1, "description": "Big-number or KPI value." }, "tool": { "name": "Quantification", "slug": "quantification", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd9e1-47ab-72ce-a079-aab1f5299e88", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Translating a claim into numbers, charts, or tables.", "familyLabel": null }, "subkind": null, "framework": null }, "subkind": "primary", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-04-24 13:46:06+00", "model": "or:google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "019dd951-dfa2-7185-b389-fa64d28f837c", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.08, "w": 0.928, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.815 }, "kind": "other", "text": "Timeline navigation bar", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Other", "slug": "other", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fa90-743c-8bf6-20d1fbe82b6d", "version": 1, "description": "Fallback when no canonical kind applies." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Unclassified", "slug": "unclassified", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-05ca-77db-81fb-db7d4234bbc0", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "unclassified", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:40.689+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "c6cf5510-4e7e-4b4f-af76-7ede7940d623", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.088, "w": 0.928, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.139 }, "kind": "paragraph", "text": "RPA tends to be more centrally managed in Life insurers than P&C insurers, with life insurers displaying a higher likelihood of maintaining a comprehensive governance framework through a dedicated RPA center of excellence manages RPA. Only half of our respondents have a governance framework in place. There are a variety of RPA tools currently being used in RPA implementations with no clear market leaders.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "5f2affc0-941d-4d07-959d-4bfc1930cea4", "version": 1, "description": "Single prose block in the body of a slide." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fb80-75af-aa5c-a7a4bfac2433", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "paragraph", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:40.689+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "6aaefd04-1591-4ef8-a0a5-c1257e3196cb", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.046, "w": 0.433, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.056 }, "kind": "title", "text": "RPA Tools and governance", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Title", "slug": "title", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f7dd-76d9-b848-b1f12bd85cf4", "version": 1, "description": "Slide title or headline." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Headline", "slug": "headline", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fae1-7463-9a7c-d60668eced0d", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "headline", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:40.689+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "21e537a0-61a8-4789-b3ec-98bfc744cc6c", "parentComponentId": null } ], "metrics": [], "tools": [ { "tool": { "name": "Cognitive Load", "slug": "cognitive-load", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-94f5-73dd-8446-ab3f7941bee7", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Total mental effort required to process information - minimize unnecessary complexity", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Block", "categorySlug": "block" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "block", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9f14-762f-8d88-985d5e0e867d", "evidence": "Slide flagged overcrowded — three distinct visual systems compete on one page.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 50, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 12, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Annotation", "slug": "annotation", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b5b9-7668-bf0e-3af99823ec5c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Adding explanatory labels to highlight key data points", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9eea-75b1-8a58-b4420ed258e0", "evidence": "All bars and donut wedges carry numeric labels.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 12, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Chart Selection Guide", "slug": "chart-selection-guide", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b1a0-700b-ba17-0e16c4d5bcae", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Choosing the right chart type for your data and message", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9e6b-77fb-a5d5-b72e610a294d", "evidence": "Combines bar chart, icon/percent grid, and donut on one dashboard.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 12, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Color Strategy", "slug": "color-strategy", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b202-77cf-8a6e-f445b08c0fd3", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Using color for emphasis, categories, sentiment, and hierarchy", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9e96-70f8-a047-360d8ef91449", "evidence": "Tool-share cards differ by colour to distinguish vendors.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 12, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Visual Hierarchy", "slug": "visual-hierarchy", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b2ca-706b-937f-e52441086fd7", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Order of perception through Size > Color > Position > Weight > Space", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9ec0-76af-b78f-60e4101deb6f", "evidence": "Large vendor-share percentages anchor lower-left grid.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 65, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 12, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null } ], "frameworks": [], "arcBeats": [ { "to": 13, "arc": { "name": "The Consultant's Gambit", "slug": "consultants-gambit", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Business cases, project proposals, strategic recommendations", "canonId": "019dd956-5e0a-73c8-b305-81c38c959e9c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "Situation & Context -> Problem & Complication -> Solution & Approach -> Evidence & Proof -> Impact & Next Steps", "description": null, "familyLabel": null }, "from": 4, "name": "Evidence & Proof", "beatId": "019de91d-9648-777a-a3e3-14bff9f462cc", "matchId": "019de91d-95c8-70e9-9817-4a0aa2bc0f9d", "beatType": null, "evidence": "Survey methodology + 9 chart slides quantifying RPA usage, governance, skills.", "position": 4, "isPrimaryArc": true, "parentBeatType": null, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 70 }, { "to": 13, "arc": { "name": "The Triple Take", "slug": "triple-take", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Data-driven presentations, research findings", "canonId": "019dd956-6221-73ad-bc12-378f8eb1f018", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "The Facts (What) -> The Implications (So What) -> The Action (Now What)", "description": null, "familyLabel": null }, "from": 4, "name": "The Facts (What)", "beatId": "019de91d-96c7-746d-b5c0-bae04f41cb6c", "matchId": "019de91d-969c-75eb-adf2-1804d7c9aa0c", "beatType": null, "evidence": "Methodology plus chart-heavy data section establishing what insurers are doing.", "position": 1, "isPrimaryArc": false, "parentBeatType": null, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 55 } ], "loops": [ { "to": 13, "from": 11, "loop": { "name": "40_mece_breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "canonId": "019dd956-763c-765e-8b68-6ee3ae1ef184", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2420-77be-bc41-ded96d08cb21", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories", "familyLabel": null }, "matchId": "019de91d-9773-7040-b9a4-4026232b48b2", "evidence": "Three back-to-back slides covering mutually-distinct enabling dimensions (offshoring impact, tools/governance, skills) that together complete the survey picture.", "position": 2, "objective": "Round out the adoption picture with three distinct enabling topics: offshoring, governance, skills", "confidence": 65, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null } } ], "locked": true }, { "page": 13, "type": "analysis", "title": "Includes a navigation breadcrumb at the bottom indicating the current section is 'Skills Assessment and Development'.", "function": "summarize", "rawType": "kpi_dashboard", "block": null, "metadata": { "slideType": "kpi_dashboard", "slideTypeCanon": { "name": "KPI dashboard", "slug": "kpi_dashboard", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-0be5-7295-af4d-b850fe7b7e65", "version": 1, "description": null }, "function": "summarize", "functionCanon": { "name": "Summarize", "slug": "summarize", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-1541-704f-b86f-bf7b75056373", "version": 1, "description": null }, "density": "overcrowded", "densityScore": 75, "componentCount": 8, "textChars": 750, "nDataPoints": 13, "notes": "Includes a navigation breadcrumb at the bottom indicating the current section is 'Skills Assessment and Development'.", "elementsJson": [ "headline_text", "paragraph", "donut_chart", "bar_chart_horizontal", "process_diagram" ], "confidence": 1, "extraction": { "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:41.015+00", "seconds": 3.046, "promptVersion": "v2-canon-conditioned" } }, "links": { "slide": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5/13", "deck": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5", "deckAnchor": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5#slide-13", "deckJson": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5.json" }, "components": [ { "bbox": null, "kind": "callout", "text": "Nearly 80% of survey respondents are either not currently using RPA within the actuarial team or are in education mode in terms of their skills.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Callout", "slug": "callout", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f8d3-761a-8953-7d37080de5e2", "version": 1, "description": "Highlighted callout box." }, "tool": { "name": "Visual emphasis", "slug": "visual-emphasis", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd9e1-474b-736b-a8eb-a794dd88241c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Drawing the eye to one element above the rest of the slide.", "familyLabel": null }, "subkind": null, "framework": null }, "subkind": null, "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-04-24 13:46:06+00", "model": "or:google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "019dd951-dfa2-7185-b38a-c7459d700f9b", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.25, "w": 0.48, "x": 0.48, "y": 0.54 }, "kind": "chart", "text": "Top risks and/or challenges of adoption of RPA", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Chart", "slug": "chart", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f9a0-76ef-adc6-0b859109d1f8", "version": 1, "description": "Quantitative chart." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Horizontal bar chart", "slug": "bar-horizontal", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fec4-7221-986b-1cb5f5e84b1f", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "bar-horizontal", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:41.015+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "78f1daba-f90b-4942-8f67-3c41594e2e55", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.22, "w": 0.48, "x": 0.48, "y": 0.29 }, "kind": "chart", "text": "Top areas for improvement", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Chart", "slug": "chart", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f9a0-76ef-adc6-0b859109d1f8", "version": 1, "description": "Quantitative chart." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Horizontal bar chart", "slug": "bar-horizontal", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fec4-7221-986b-1cb5f5e84b1f", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "bar-horizontal", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:41.015+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "c26d9ceb-8e43-4d5b-80c0-2cc4311a8d4c", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.45, "w": 0.35, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.306 }, "kind": "chart", "text": "Current skill level within Actuarial team", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Chart", "slug": "chart", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f9a0-76ef-adc6-0b859109d1f8", "version": 1, "description": "Quantitative chart." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Donut chart", "slug": "donut", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-0006-752c-9528-0fef476b8004", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "donut", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:41.015+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "ce568ebf-7599-4e77-a25d-1c1da54d14c4", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.08, "w": 0.928, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.82 }, "kind": "diagram", "text": "Navigation breadcrumb", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Diagram", "slug": "diagram", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f9f0-734a-81de-15382ff28c65", "version": 1, "description": "Schematic or relational diagram." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Timeline", "slug": "timeline", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-03c5-73fc-84aa-4180cbf0f5cf", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "timeline", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:41.015+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "d562676c-a053-47ec-a23c-f56ff7a09360", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": null, "kind": "metric", "text": "RPA skill level: 79%", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Metric", "slug": "metric", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f923-73bf-8081-d0b1a8c5264d", "version": 1, "description": "Big-number or KPI value." }, "tool": { "name": "Quantification", "slug": "quantification", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd9e1-47ab-72ce-a079-aab1f5299e88", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Translating a claim into numbers, charts, or tables.", "familyLabel": null }, "subkind": null, "framework": null }, "subkind": "primary", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-04-24 13:46:06+00", "model": "or:google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "019dd951-dfa2-7185-b38a-caf14b3f8a40", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.083, "w": 0.928, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.181 }, "kind": "paragraph", "text": "Nearly 80% of survey respondents are either not currently using RPA within the actuarial team or are in education mode in terms of their skills, with the primary area of focus for improvement of skills being in the implementation of RPA. Life and P&C insurers see their top challenges in trying to apply RPA techniques resulting from technical complexity of underlying processes and a lack of stability of existing processes.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "5f2affc0-941d-4d07-959d-4bfc1930cea4", "version": 1, "description": "Single prose block in the body of a slide." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fb80-75af-aa5c-a7a4bfac2433", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "paragraph", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:41.015+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "bdea96e1-7038-4930-92d9-962fafca65e2", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.056, "w": 0.475, "x": 0.036, "y": 0.056 }, "kind": "title", "text": "Skill and development of RPA", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Title", "slug": "title", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f7dd-76d9-b848-b1f12bd85cf4", "version": 1, "description": "Slide title or headline." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Headline", "slug": "headline", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fae1-7463-9a7c-d60668eced0d", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "headline", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:41.015+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "a7ca9f75-4a55-4693-a8e8-6ab771dd3ca1", "parentComponentId": null } ], "metrics": [], "tools": [ { "tool": { "name": "Annotation", "slug": "annotation", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b5b9-7668-bf0e-3af99823ec5c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Adding explanatory labels to highlight key data points", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9f69-77bc-bf1a-9b2e73e9a005", "evidence": "All chart values labelled.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 13, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Chart Selection Guide", "slug": "chart-selection-guide", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b1a0-700b-ba17-0e16c4d5bcae", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Choosing the right chart type for your data and message", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9f3f-72b9-856f-13d559bb3bb4", "evidence": "Donut + two horizontal bars to size skill gap and adoption blockers.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 75, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 13, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "So What? Test", "slug": "so-what-test", "status": "active", "bestFor": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "canonId": "019dd956-acd2-76f8-b59a-9bf15a89f10a", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "fec04b06-b2f1-432b-a97b-916dc7563f64", "description": "The recursive editorial discipline of asking so-what of every slide, chart, and statement until the answer is an implication for the audience — that final answer becomes the slide's title; the chain becomes its body.", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9f94-7288-b564-ef0d90dea21e", "evidence": "Callout: 'Nearly 80% are not using RPA or are in education mode'.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": "Core", "whenToUse": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "confidence": 75, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 13, "whyItWorks": "Solves the two failure modes of analytical communication at once: stopping at description (analyst-confidence problem) and leaving insight stranded in the analyst's head (translation problem). The recursion is what guarantees the implication makes it into ink.", "antipattern": "Stopping at the first tighter description (still a fact, not an implication), regressing past the audience's decision space into philosophy, smuggling the so-what into speaker notes, or re-using an implication aimed at a previous audience.", "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": "Forces every analytical artefact to close the gap between fact and decision, so the reader holds the recommendation by reading titles alone rather than reconstructing the analyst's mental model from raw evidence." } ], "frameworks": [], "arcBeats": [ { "to": 13, "arc": { "name": "The Consultant's Gambit", "slug": "consultants-gambit", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Business cases, project proposals, strategic recommendations", "canonId": "019dd956-5e0a-73c8-b305-81c38c959e9c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "Situation & Context -> Problem & Complication -> Solution & Approach -> Evidence & Proof -> Impact & Next Steps", "description": null, "familyLabel": null }, "from": 4, "name": "Evidence & Proof", "beatId": "019de91d-9648-777a-a3e3-14bff9f462cc", "matchId": "019de91d-95c8-70e9-9817-4a0aa2bc0f9d", "beatType": null, "evidence": "Survey methodology + 9 chart slides quantifying RPA usage, governance, skills.", "position": 4, "isPrimaryArc": true, "parentBeatType": null, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 70 }, { "to": 13, "arc": { "name": "The Triple Take", "slug": "triple-take", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Data-driven presentations, research findings", "canonId": "019dd956-6221-73ad-bc12-378f8eb1f018", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "The Facts (What) -> The Implications (So What) -> The Action (Now What)", "description": null, "familyLabel": null }, "from": 4, "name": "The Facts (What)", "beatId": "019de91d-96c7-746d-b5c0-bae04f41cb6c", "matchId": "019de91d-969c-75eb-adf2-1804d7c9aa0c", "beatType": null, "evidence": "Methodology plus chart-heavy data section establishing what insurers are doing.", "position": 1, "isPrimaryArc": false, "parentBeatType": null, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 55 } ], "loops": [ { "to": 13, "from": 11, "loop": { "name": "40_mece_breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "canonId": "019dd956-763c-765e-8b68-6ee3ae1ef184", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2420-77be-bc41-ded96d08cb21", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories", "familyLabel": null }, "matchId": "019de91d-9773-7040-b9a4-4026232b48b2", "evidence": "Three back-to-back slides covering mutually-distinct enabling dimensions (offshoring impact, tools/governance, skills) that together complete the survey picture.", "position": 2, "objective": "Round out the adoption picture with three distinct enabling topics: offshoring, governance, skills", "confidence": 65, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null } } ], "locked": true }, { "page": 14, "type": "analysis", "title": "Includes a navigation timeline at the bottom indicating the current section is 'What's Next: IPA'.", "function": "summarize", "rawType": "industry_trends", "block": null, "metadata": { "slideType": "industry_trends", "slideTypeCanon": { "name": "Industry trends", "slug": "industry_trends", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-0b1d-7705-a0e0-c663199cd1fa", "version": 1, "description": null }, "function": "summarize", "functionCanon": { "name": "Summarize", "slug": "summarize", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-1541-704f-b86f-bf7b75056373", "version": 1, "description": null }, "density": "dense", "densityScore": 61, "componentCount": 6, "textChars": 977, "nDataPoints": 4, "notes": "Includes a navigation timeline at the bottom indicating the current section is 'What's Next: IPA'.", "elementsJson": [ "headline_text", "paragraph", "bar_chart_horizontal", "process_diagram" ], "confidence": 1, "extraction": { "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:41.978+00", "seconds": 3.776, "promptVersion": "v2-canon-conditioned" } }, "links": { "slide": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5/14", "deck": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5", "deckAnchor": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5#slide-14", "deckJson": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5.json" }, "components": [ { "bbox": null, "kind": "callout", "text": "The majority of respondents have not yet started considering the adoption of IPA within their actuarial function.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Callout", "slug": "callout", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f8d3-761a-8953-7d37080de5e2", "version": 1, "description": "Highlighted callout box." }, "tool": { "name": "Visual emphasis", "slug": "visual-emphasis", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd9e1-474b-736b-a8eb-a794dd88241c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Drawing the eye to one element above the rest of the slide.", "familyLabel": null }, "subkind": null, "framework": null }, "subkind": null, "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-04-24 13:46:06+00", "model": "or:google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "019dd951-dfa2-7185-b38b-3e717f31d769", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.35, "w": 0.9, "x": 0.05, "y": 0.45 }, "kind": "chart", "text": "Survey results on IPA adoption status", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Chart", "slug": "chart", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f9a0-76ef-adc6-0b859109d1f8", "version": 1, "description": "Quantitative chart." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Horizontal bar chart", "slug": "bar-horizontal", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fec4-7221-986b-1cb5f5e84b1f", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "bar-horizontal", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:41.978+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "cb979169-b6ac-4afd-8384-45bcaaa4645e", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.1, "w": 0.9, "x": 0.05, "y": 0.82 }, "kind": "diagram", "text": "Navigation timeline", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Diagram", "slug": "diagram", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f9f0-734a-81de-15382ff28c65", "version": 1, "description": "Schematic or relational diagram." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Timeline", "slug": "timeline", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-03c5-73fc-84aa-4180cbf0f5cf", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "timeline", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:41.978+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "4ca13902-0496-48e1-9307-46e510bff233", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": null, "kind": "metric", "text": "Adoption status: 80%", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Metric", "slug": "metric", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f923-73bf-8081-d0b1a8c5264d", "version": 1, "description": "Big-number or KPI value." }, "tool": { "name": "Quantification", "slug": "quantification", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd9e1-47ab-72ce-a079-aab1f5299e88", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Translating a claim into numbers, charts, or tables.", "familyLabel": null }, "subkind": null, "framework": null }, "subkind": "primary", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-04-24 13:46:06+00", "model": "or:google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "019dd951-dfa2-7185-b38b-415cd09f3702", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.25, "w": 0.9, "x": 0.05, "y": 0.15 }, "kind": "paragraph", "text": "Intelligent Process Automation (IPA) incorporates cognitive intelligence to execute tasks and update rules based on “learned” trends, requiring minimal human oversight. The majority of respondents have not yet started considering the adoption of IPA within their actuarial function. We expect to see increased exploration (and ultimately adoption) of IPA in the next few years, particularly in areas such as experience analysis, trend analysis, and data quality remediation. IPA has the potential to significantly enhance our traditional application of actuarial judgment in these cases, perhaps uncovering new insights and complex data interactions. Where is your Actuarial function in the adoption of IPA (Intelligent Process Automation)?", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "5f2affc0-941d-4d07-959d-4bfc1930cea4", "version": 1, "description": "Single prose block in the body of a slide." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Paragraph", "slug": "paragraph", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fb80-75af-aa5c-a7a4bfac2433", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "paragraph", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:41.978+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "fa5aed79-2590-4d97-a3f7-f220c084c77f", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.05, "w": 0.5, "x": 0.05, "y": 0.05 }, "kind": "title", "text": "Looking Forward – Intelligent Process Automation", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Title", "slug": "title", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f7dd-76d9-b848-b1f12bd85cf4", "version": 1, "description": "Slide title or headline." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Headline", "slug": "headline", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fae1-7463-9a7c-d60668eced0d", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "headline", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:41.978+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "0f380adb-6968-4eff-bd33-6373ae3c25a8", "parentComponentId": null } ], "metrics": [], "tools": [ { "tool": { "name": "Annotation", "slug": "annotation", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b5b9-7668-bf0e-3af99823ec5c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Adding explanatory labels to highlight key data points", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9fe9-705f-b62b-45cb3aed9329", "evidence": "Bars labelled 80% / 16% / 2% / 2% directly.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 75, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 14, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "Chart Selection Guide", "slug": "chart-selection-guide", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-b1a0-700b-ba17-0e16c4d5bcae", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Choosing the right chart type for your data and message", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Designer", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Designer" ], "matchId": "019de91d-9fbe-7599-b9dc-f6946705f9d4", "evidence": "Single horizontal bar chart sized for the four IPA stages.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 75, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 14, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null }, { "tool": { "name": "So What? Test", "slug": "so-what-test", "status": "active", "bestFor": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "canonId": "019dd956-acd2-76f8-b59a-9bf15a89f10a", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "fec04b06-b2f1-432b-a97b-916dc7563f64", "description": "The recursive editorial discipline of asking so-what of every slide, chart, and statement until the answer is an implication for the audience — that final answer becomes the slide's title; the chain becomes its body.", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Architect", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Architect" ], "matchId": "019de91d-a012-70bf-97aa-5d1933b2c5af", "evidence": "Body text states 'majority have not yet started considering...'", "pageRefs": null, "priority": "Core", "whenToUse": "On every slide carrying a chart, number, list, or finding intended to inform a decision; whenever a draft title is descriptive rather than directive; whenever the deck will circulate without its author.", "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 14, "whyItWorks": "Solves the two failure modes of analytical communication at once: stopping at description (analyst-confidence problem) and leaving insight stranded in the analyst's head (translation problem). The recursion is what guarantees the implication makes it into ink.", "antipattern": "Stopping at the first tighter description (still a fact, not an implication), regressing past the audience's decision space into philosophy, smuggling the so-what into speaker notes, or re-using an implication aimed at a previous audience.", "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": "Forces every analytical artefact to close the gap between fact and decision, so the reader holds the recommendation by reading titles alone rather than reconstructing the analyst's mental model from raw evidence." } ], "frameworks": [ { "matchId": "019de91d-a092-71d9-b922-a359d03cdd49", "evidence": "Four IPA stages from 'not exploring' to 'completed deployment' form a maturity ladder.", "framework": null, "confidence": 65, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 14, "frameworkName": "Maturity model" } ], "arcBeats": [ { "to": 15, "arc": { "name": "The Consultant's Gambit", "slug": "consultants-gambit", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Business cases, project proposals, strategic recommendations", "canonId": "019dd956-5e0a-73c8-b305-81c38c959e9c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "Situation & Context -> Problem & Complication -> Solution & Approach -> Evidence & Proof -> Impact & Next Steps", "description": null, "familyLabel": null }, "from": 14, "name": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatId": "019de91d-9673-76fd-b87c-d70bb799af71", "matchId": "019de91d-95c8-70e9-9817-4a0aa2bc0f9d", "beatType": null, "evidence": "Looking-forward IPA framing on p14 followed by thank-you / contacts on p15.", "position": 5, "isPrimaryArc": true, "parentBeatType": null, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 70 }, { "to": 14, "arc": { "name": "The Triple Take", "slug": "triple-take", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Data-driven presentations, research findings", "canonId": "019dd956-6221-73ad-bc12-378f8eb1f018", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "The Facts (What) -> The Implications (So What) -> The Action (Now What)", "description": null, "familyLabel": null }, "from": 14, "name": "The Action (Now What)", "beatId": "019de91d-9720-769f-9db2-0b3f4b0bf021", "matchId": "019de91d-969c-75eb-adf2-1804d7c9aa0c", "beatType": null, "evidence": "Looking Forward – IPA invites future exploration and adoption.", "position": 3, "isPrimaryArc": false, "parentBeatType": null, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 55 } ], "loops": [ { "to": 14, "from": 14, "loop": { "name": "24_time_machine", "slug": "24-time-machine", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Vision casting, long-term strategy, investment pitches", "canonId": "019dd956-6f7f-70b2-b087-a16fe20515a7", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2420-77be-bc41-ded96d08cb21", "structure": "Fast Forward to Success -> What Made It Possible -> Back to Today's Decision", "description": "Transport the audience to a future state where your solution has already succeeded", "familyLabel": null }, "matchId": "019de91d-979d-739c-a322-b6420b014391", "evidence": "Looking-forward IPA slide projects future state and frames the next adoption wave; only one slide so loop is borderline.", "position": 3, "objective": "Pivot from today's RPA reality to tomorrow's IPA opportunity", "confidence": 50, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null } } ], "locked": true }, { "page": 15, "type": "appendix", "function": "other", "rawType": "appendix", "block": null, "metadata": { "slideType": "appendix", "slideTypeCanon": { "name": "Appendix", "slug": "appendix", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-0762-71f8-b564-89ab863301cc", "version": 1, "description": null }, "function": "other", "functionCanon": { "name": "Other (fallback)", "slug": "other", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52d-15e1-75bc-99dc-07732380e2ce", "version": 1, "description": null }, "density": "balanced", "densityScore": 38, "componentCount": 4, "textChars": 750, "nDataPoints": 0, "notes": null, "elementsJson": [ "headline_text", "other" ], "confidence": 1, "extraction": { "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:41.283+00", "seconds": 3.04, "promptVersion": "v2-canon-conditioned" } }, "links": { "slide": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5/15", "deck": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5", "deckAnchor": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5#slide-15", "deckJson": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5.json" }, "components": [ { "bbox": { "h": 0.15, "w": 0.93, "x": 0.035, "y": 0.76 }, "kind": "disclaimer", "text": "© 2019 PwC. All rights reserved. PwC refers to the US member firm or one of its subsidiaries or affiliates, and may sometimes refer to the PwC network. Each member firm is a separate legal entity. Please see www.pwc.com/structure for further details.", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Disclaimer", "slug": "disclaimer", "status": "active", "canonId": "91173477-d91f-4024-bbaf-d4f93e3f82dc", "version": 1, "description": "Legal/cautionary text that occupies most of the body of its slide." }, "tool": null, "subkind": null, "framework": null }, "subkind": null, "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:41.283+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "520be217-514c-487a-ace5-d90f03290ef2", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.5, "w": 0.3, "x": 0.675, "y": 0.175 }, "kind": "image", "text": "Group of people illustration", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Image", "slug": "image", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f978-701f-a720-51d029d769e7", "version": 1, "description": "Photo, illustration, screenshot or icon." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Illustration", "slug": "illustration", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fe76-7772-a5ac-c0b7294d7615", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "illustration", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:41.283+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "d0aaa9bb-2b22-46ea-aa99-28e4b3f6217f", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.5, "w": 0.6, "x": 0.035, "y": 0.2 }, "kind": "list", "text": "Timothy Landick, Partner, +1 267 207 5266, timothy.j.landick@pwc.com; David Honour, Partner, +1 718 290 3490, david.honour@pwc.com; Steve O'Hearn, Partner, +49 89 5790 6995, stephen.t.ohearn@pwc.com; Dorothy Woodrum, Director, +1 646 248 3959, dorothy.a.woodrum@pwc.com; Stephen Bochanski, Partner, +1 610 633 5332, steve.bochanski@pwc.com; Graham Hall, Senior Manager, +1 646 617 2453, graham.hall@pwc.com; Sisi Chen, Director, +1 804 319 0662, sisi.chen@pwc.com", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "List", "slug": "list", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f94b-779b-a53b-fd4904a5f4d2", "version": 1, "description": "Bullet or numbered list." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Bullet list", "slug": "bullet", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fc98-7169-a083-5cab805076ca", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "bullet", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:41.283+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "c3cf0a96-cc4e-4076-92f2-d8a88f4afdf9", "parentComponentId": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.15, "w": 0.3, "x": 0.035, "y": 0.06 }, "kind": "title", "text": "Thank you", "attrs": null, "canon": { "kind": { "name": "Title", "slug": "title", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-f7dd-76d9-b848-b1f12bd85cf4", "version": 1, "description": "Slide title or headline." }, "tool": null, "subkind": { "name": "Headline", "slug": "headline", "status": "active", "canonId": "019de52c-fae1-7463-9a7c-d60668eced0d", "version": 1, "description": null }, "framework": null }, "subkind": "headline", "groupRole": null, "confidence": null, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 19:11:41.283+00", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview-20260303", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "componentId": "1eeda32a-4fe9-43ac-b549-30391887282a", "parentComponentId": null } ], "metrics": [], "tools": [ { "tool": { "name": "Closing Techniques", "slug": "closing-techniques", "status": "active", "bestFor": null, "canonId": "019dd956-af13-774b-a4fd-7db0a3a88d51", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": null, "description": "Strong endings: Callback, challenge, vision, clear CTA, memorable line", "familyLabel": null, "categoryName": "Slide", "categorySlug": "slide" }, "agent": "Storyteller", "layer": "slide", "agents": [ "Storyteller" ], "matchId": "019de91d-a03c-7315-9fec-b326d4824bf9", "evidence": "Standard PwC sign-off with named partner contacts.", "pageRefs": null, "priority": null, "whenToUse": null, "confidence": 70, "extraction": { "at": "2026-05-02 14:35:23.215382+00", "model": "claude-cli", "runId": null, "seconds": null, "promptVersion": null }, "pageNumber": 15, "whyItWorks": null, "antipattern": null, "cardinality": null, "narrativePurpose": null } ], "frameworks": [], "arcBeats": [ { "to": 15, "arc": { "name": "The Consultant's Gambit", "slug": "consultants-gambit", "status": "active", "bestFor": "Business cases, project proposals, strategic recommendations", "canonId": "019dd956-5e0a-73c8-b305-81c38c959e9c", "version": 1, "bodyDocId": "019df22a-2356-73eb-8061-d8c81dc0aa49", "structure": "Situation & Context -> Problem & Complication -> Solution & Approach -> Evidence & Proof -> Impact & Next Steps", "description": null, "familyLabel": null }, "from": 14, "name": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatId": "019de91d-9673-76fd-b87c-d70bb799af71", "matchId": "019de91d-95c8-70e9-9817-4a0aa2bc0f9d", "beatType": null, "evidence": "Looking-forward IPA framing on p14 followed by thank-you / contacts on p15.", "position": 5, "isPrimaryArc": true, "parentBeatType": null, "alignedBlockIds": null, "matchConfidence": 70 } ], "loops": [], "locked": true } ], "arcBeats": [ { "from": 1, "to": 2, "label": "Situation & Context", "description": "Cover + foreword establish insurance-automation backdrop and the actuarial focus." }, { "from": 3, "to": 3, "label": "Problem & Complication", "description": "Key takeaways naming early-stage adoption, governance gaps, skill gaps, complexity." }, { "from": 4, "to": 13, "label": "Evidence & Proof", "description": "Survey methodology + 9 chart slides quantifying RPA usage, governance, skills." }, { "from": 14, "to": 15, "label": "Impact & Next Steps", "description": "Looking-forward IPA framing on p14 followed by thank-you / contacts on p15." } ], "loops": [ { "from": 5, "to": 10, "label": "Pattern Hunter", "description": "Show RPA adoption is early-stage and fragmented across actuarial functions" }, { "from": 11, "to": 13, "label": "Mece Breakdown", "description": "Round out the adoption picture with three distinct enabling topics: offshoring, governance, skills" }, { "from": 14, "to": 14, "label": "Time Machine", "description": "Pivot from today's RPA reality to tomorrow's IPA opportunity" } ] }